287:. There's no one major problem; rather, there are numerous low-level issues. The lead isn't terrible but could be better developed so that it provides a more complete encapsulation of the article. The prose is often cluncky and some paragraphs are stubby. The article also contains a small number of {{fact}} tags.
158:
section is starting to read like a trivia section, which indicates that there may be more edits that were made between now and when it was last reviewed that have gone unchecked. It has been almost a year since the last time it was formally reviewed, and the
160:
69:
17:
65:
163:
seems to address only general problems instead of article-specific problems. I think that a reassessment would benefit this article. —
50:
42:
251:. The article is not well written. It focuses too much on trivia and doesn't really explain the game adequately at all. --
109:
Consensus appears to be to delist, the article has had little work done to it, for example the lead is still sparse.
184:, the lead is also not up to par. It is far too short for an article of this size and doesn't adequately summarize.
256:
296:
278:
260:
243:
224:
199:
172:
149:
134:
117:
104:
209:
Lead, as noted above, is not long enough (needs information on reception, et al.) and should not have citations.
212:
Gameplay doesn't adequately introduce readers to the game, and is too focused on minutae (i.e., easter eggs.)
274:
292:
252:
239:
130:
192:
58:
145:
269:
288:
219:
311:
168:
215:
Citations, in addition to those already marked, should be added for some dubious claims.
235:
126:
305:
185:
155:
35:
141:
125:
I've nominated this article to GAR because there are three "citation needed" tags.
111:
98:
164:
154:
I think that there is still reason for it to need reassessment. The
140:
That's not a good reason for GAR. Take it to the talk page. --
85:
77:
46:
218:"All Bonds" section suffers from undue weight.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Good article reassessment
234:- the article needs many things to fix.
7:
24:
86:Watch article reassessment page
1:
297:04:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
279:23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
268:per above. Failure to meet
261:21:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
118:16:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
105:16:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
328:
244:21:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
225:00:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
221:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
200:04:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
173:22:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
150:18:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
135:21:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
272:is particularly clear.
319:
253:Malleus Fatuorum
222:
197:
190:
161:last peer review
114:
101:
96:
88:
82:
73:
54:
327:
326:
322:
321:
320:
318:
317:
316:
302:
301:
220:
193:
186:
112:
99:
91:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
325:
323:
315:
314:
304:
303:
300:
299:
283:I lean toward
281:
263:
246:
229:
228:
227:
216:
213:
210:
202:
178:
177:
176:
175:
123:
122:
121:
120:
89:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
324:
313:
310:
309:
307:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
280:
277:
276:
271:
267:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
223:
217:
214:
211:
208:
207:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
191:
189:
183:
180:
179:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
152:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
119:
116:
115:
108:
107:
106:
103:
102:
94:
90:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
28:GoldenEye 007
26:
19:
284:
275:Geometry guy
273:
265:
248:
231:
204:
194:
187:
181:
124:
110:
97:
92:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
289:Majoreditor
156:easter eggs
47:visual edit
236:David Pro
127:David Pro
306:Category
205:Comments
95:: Delist
270:WP:LEAD
182:Comment
142:haha169
70:history
51:history
37:Article
312:GAR/39
285:delist
266:Delist
249:Delist
232:Delist
113:naerii
100:naerii
93:Result
188:Nikki
165:OranL
79:Watch
16:<
293:talk
257:talk
240:talk
169:talk
146:talk
131:talk
66:edit
43:edit
195:311
308::
295:)
259:)
242:)
171:)
148:)
133:)
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
291:(
255:(
238:(
167:(
144:(
129:(
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.