304:, it was sourced mainly to wood-related trade journals, plus an archive collection and a local newspaper.That brings me back to this article. To be honest, I'm not sure that Haskelite is notable, either. Even if the article did not contain copyright violations, there are only two paragraphs about the type of wood itself (even in the
361:
Having seen a 1920 reference supporting "the largest plywood sheet ever produced", related GA articles saying different things, statements not supported by references and more I agree. There needs to be somewhere that we can table all concerns and tick things off when they are done and it seems to be
326:
My slightly longer term plan is a 4 way merge starting with the canoe and this one and then the two companies then all together but I am doing it bit by bit to try to avoid overwhelming the GAR and other processes. I think that you are probably right about the building being worthy of a standalone
299:
However, it seems that
Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation was the main or only manufacturer of Haskelite. Furthermore, the Haskell canoe could be easily merged, given that it's a minor product from the Haskell Manufacturing Company that was made out of Haskelite. The Haskell canoe article has a
233:
I mean, if you want to stubify the articles, RD1 the copyvio, redirect two of the titles to the third and write the article from there, sure, sounds great. This article's essence could be captured in no more than a paragraph or two, I would think, which means it would fit tidily in a company
195:
That took 30 seconds to identify, and there's no good reason to trust the policy compliance of other text in the article. To the contrary, if this is what we see in the easily checked sources, we might safely assume that the sources we can't easily access have been treated in the same way. A
129:
There is nothing in the article about anything post World War II and it gives no indication whether or not it is still being manufactured (although I suspect that it isn't). It also doesn't include information about what happened to the product when the
421:
Clearly nowhere near meeting the requirements for broad coverage. That, plus the copyvio, means this requires a total rewrite or even merge as suggested above. Regardless, clearly not fit for GA status.
142:
says that it is but this page is unclear about it. How did it relate and compete with other plywoods? There is only a single reference after 1965 which I suspect is part of the issue.
219:. This would give us a single longer page with more information and rewriting to deal with at least some of the copyvios as they were all largely written by the same editor.
312:
on copyright concerns alone. Nonetheless, it seems like the reader would be much better served if these four articles were merged into one, more comprehensive, page. –
170:
One of these ships has received a commercial license and is flying daily. More than 500 hours has been flown in the plane and it is proved to have superior performance.
341:
It's becoming more and more clear that we need a special process to deal with DC's creations. It's more than just a question of GA delisting -- everywhere I look it's
308:). The rest of the article is about the products made from this wood, which go into extreme (and arguably even excessive) detail. I think this article should be
300:
grand total of five sources (three from specialized trade journals and two from local newspapers), which don't really convince me of its notability. Even when
345:
for copyvio, nonnotability, misuse of sources, etc. Part of me feels bad for the guy but his defiant IDHT at ANI makes it hard to be sympathetic.
381:
17:
80:
180:
The fuselage of the plane was molded in 2 hours 35 minutes, about one-thirtieth of the time taken to construct an ordinary fuselage.
362:
outside the scope of the CCI work and the GAR. I would be happy to be involved but have no idea where I would start suggesting it.
76:
427:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
196:
ground-up rewrite is probably necessary simply to comply with our basic copyvio policies, regardless of any other issues.
61:
269:
212:
131:
239:
201:
287:
Haskell
Manufacturing Company, which formed a subsidiary called the Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation - although the
156:
The bulk of the final paragraph, from "One of these airplanes..." forward, is lightly-rephrased copyvio from the cited
288:
273:
216:
139:
135:
53:
176:
The fuselage was molded in 2 hours 35 minutes, which was 1⁄30 the time required to construct an ordinary fuselage.
166:
One of these airplanes received a commercial license to fly daily, and 500 hours of testing proved its worthiness.
423:
431:
407:
393:
371:
356:
336:
321:
261:
243:
235:
228:
205:
197:
151:
122:
317:
403:
389:
367:
332:
257:
224:
147:
117:
101:
211:
I have been wondering if the best approach is to propose a 3-way merge between this page, the
291:
may merit its own article if it has a history that's substantially separate from the company
454:
313:
284:. It appears that we have four articles about what may be, at most, two notable subjects:
399:
385:
363:
351:
328:
253:
220:
143:
69:
448:
342:
281:
249:
112:
346:
277:
46:
190:
It is without longitudinal or cross bracing and is very light.
305:
301:
96:
88:
57:
398:
Haskell canoe has been merged to the
Haskelite page.
268:I think this can actually be a 4-way merge between
252:into this one as a starting point for future work.
294:Haskelite, from which Haskell canoes are made
186:It was without longitudinal or cross bracing.
8:
134:was split up. Also, was it ever produced by
380:I have created a page for the building at
382:Haskell Manufacturing Company Building
306:version of the article that passed GAN
189:
185:
179:
175:
169:
165:
7:
35:The following discussion is closed.
270:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation
213:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation
132:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
24:
437:The discussion above is closed.
97:Watch article reassessment page
432:03:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
408:11:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
394:08:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
372:04:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
357:00:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
337:00:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
327:article as it is on the NHRP.
322:14:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
262:10:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
244:04:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
234:article's "Products" section.
229:02:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
206:21:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
152:04:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
274:Haskell Manufacturing Company
248:I have proposed a merge from
217:Haskell Manufacturing Company
140:Haskell Manufacturing Company
136:Haskell Manufacturing Company
384:as a stubish level article.
302:the canoe article passed GAN
123:22:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
471:
439:Please do not modify it.
37:Please do not modify it.
424:Trainsandotherthings
236:Indignant Flamingo
198:Indignant Flamingo
102:Most recent review
38:
36:
462:
289:Haskell building
111:
99:
93:
84:
65:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
445:
444:
443:
442:
158:Chicago Tribune
121:
106:
95:
74:
51:
45:
41:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
458:
457:
447:
446:
436:
435:
434:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
396:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
297:
296:
295:
292:
266:
265:
264:
193:
192:
182:
172:
127:
126:
125:
115:
104:
42:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
456:
453:
452:
450:
440:
433:
429:
425:
420:
417:
416:
409:
405:
401:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
373:
369:
365:
360:
359:
358:
355:
354:
350:
349:
344:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
293:
290:
286:
285:
283:
282:Haskell canoe
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:Haskell canoe
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
191:
187:
184:Our article:
183:
181:
177:
174:Our article:
173:
171:
167:
164:Our article:
163:
162:
161:
160:source. e.g.
159:
154:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
124:
120:
119:
114:
109:
105:
103:
98:
92:
91:
87:
82:
78:
73:
72:
68:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
44:
43:
40:
29:
26:
19:
438:
418:
352:
347:
309:
194:
157:
155:
128:
116:
107:
89:
85:
71:Article talk
70:
66:
47:
34:
27:
110:: Delisted.
58:visual edit
314:Epicgenius
400:Gusfriend
386:Gusfriend
364:Gusfriend
329:Gusfriend
278:Haskelite
254:Gusfriend
221:Gusfriend
144:Gusfriend
28:Haskelite
449:Category
310:delisted
215:and the
188:Source:
178:Source:
168:Source:
113:Hog Farm
81:history
62:history
48:Article
455:GAR/67
419:Delist
343:WP:TNT
280:, and
138:? The
108:Result
90:Watch
16:<
428:talk
404:talk
390:talk
368:talk
333:talk
318:talk
258:talk
240:talk
225:talk
202:talk
148:talk
118:Talk
77:edit
54:edit
353:Eng
451::
430:)
406:)
392:)
370:)
335:)
320:)
276:,
272:,
260:)
242:)
227:)
204:)
150:)
100:•
94:•
79:|
60:|
56:|
426:(
402:(
388:(
366:(
348:E
331:(
316:(
256:(
238:(
223:(
200:(
146:(
86:·
83:)
75:(
67:·
64:)
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.