Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/September 11 attacks/1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

257:"At that point, Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were in a period of transition, having just relocated back to Afghanistan from Sudan. The 1998 African Embassy bombings and Bin Laden's 1998 fatwā marked a turning point, with bin Laden intent on attacking the United States" in section "Planning of the attacks". But the 1st and last sentences should stay. -- 128:
issues too. For instance al-Qaeda, bin Laden, Taliban and Pakistan are linked too many times. There are also links to states or cities like Indonesia, Malaysia or Hamburg which I think are not relevant to the
229:"According to Jerrold Post, a professor of psychology at George Washington University and former CIA officer, the hijackers were well-educated, mature adults, whose belief systems were fully formed" -- 132:
The "Long term effect" section doesn't seem comprehensive - in particular I would expect to see a subsection about the consequences on government policies all around the world regarding terrorism.
147:
in "International response". It seems they've been put there for decoration only. Also I would have expected to see at least one picture of Osama bin Laden in the section about him.
69: 65: 50: 42: 17: 316: 294: 280: 266: 252: 238: 224: 210: 187: 160: 109: 90: 307:
Given the work needed to bring this article back to GA status and the lack of interest in doing so, I have delisted it.
285:
It's time for the article's nominator/defender to check the rest of the articles for excessive and irrelevant text. --
58: 139: 117:
There are a few issues with this article and I'm wondering if it should still be listed as a good article:
215:
No need to name Felicia Dunn-Jones or Leon Heyward, it's enough that longer-term effects killed 2 more. --
141: 105: 312: 156: 198: 35: 125: 290: 276: 262: 248: 234: 220: 206: 183: 308: 175: 152: 330: 201:
is just basic aerodynamics, nothing about the struggle for the doomed plane on 9/11. --
324: 138:
The pictures seem a bit random - for instance it's not clear why these two pictures
286: 272: 258: 244: 230: 216: 202: 179: 144: 174:
consequences on government policies all around the world regarding terrorism, per
151:
So overall it's not a bad article but there are quite a few issues in my opinion.
135:
The "FBI investigation" section seems to short (only two sentences).
243:
Section "al-Qaeda and blowback" about the origins of al-Qaeda. --
271:
In facts it's easier to identify the parts that are relevant. --
85: 77: 46: 121:There are several dead links among the references. 8: 143:are in the "Economic aftermath" section or 7: 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 24: 86:Watch article reassessment page 1: 347: 317:22:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 295:14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 281:14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 267:14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 253:14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 239:14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 225:13:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 211:13:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 194:Excessive, not relevant: 188:13:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 110:23:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 161:21:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 28:September 11 attacks 91:Most recent review 338: 197:The wikilink to 112: 88: 82: 73: 54: 346: 345: 341: 340: 339: 337: 336: 335: 321: 320: 305: 168: 95: 84: 63: 40: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 344: 342: 334: 333: 323: 322: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 283: 269: 255: 241: 227: 213: 192: 191: 190: 167: 164: 149: 148: 136: 133: 130: 122: 115: 114: 113: 93: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 343: 332: 329: 328: 326: 319: 318: 314: 310: 302: 296: 292: 288: 284: 282: 278: 274: 270: 268: 264: 260: 256: 254: 250: 246: 242: 240: 236: 232: 228: 226: 222: 218: 214: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172: 170: 169: 165: 163: 162: 158: 154: 146: 142: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 123: 120: 119: 118: 111: 108: 107: 103:- see below. 102: 98: 94: 92: 87: 81: 80: 76: 71: 67: 62: 61: 57: 52: 48: 44: 39: 38: 33: 32: 29: 26: 19: 306: 150: 116: 106:Geometry guy 104: 100: 96: 78: 74: 60:Article talk 59: 55: 36: 27: 126:overlinking 47:visual edit 171:Missing: 325:Category 303:Delisted 166:Coverage 145:this one 129:article. 101:Delisted 309:Laurent 287:Philcha 273:Philcha 259:Philcha 245:Philcha 231:Philcha 217:Philcha 203:Philcha 180:Philcha 176:Laurent 153:Laurent 70:history 51:history 37:Article 331:GAR/48 97:Result 124:Some 79:Watch 16:< 313:talk 291:talk 277:talk 263:talk 249:talk 235:talk 221:talk 207:talk 199:roll 184:talk 178:. -- 157:talk 66:edit 43:edit 327:: 315:) 293:) 279:) 265:) 251:) 237:) 223:) 209:) 186:) 159:) 99:: 89:• 83:• 68:| 49:| 45:| 311:( 289:( 275:( 261:( 247:( 233:( 219:( 205:( 182:( 155:( 75:· 72:) 64:( 56:· 53:) 41:(

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
September 11 attacks
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch article reassessment page
Most recent review
Geometry guy
23:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
overlinking


this one
Laurent
talk
21:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Laurent
Philcha
talk
13:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
roll
Philcha
talk
13:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Philcha

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.