Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/UBS/1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

212: 195:, can you please take care of it? (When I was checking, I saw that you'd notified one of them about an FAR; GARs should get the same attention.) While it's much less likely that the original GA nominator and reviewer are still around, they should also be notified if they are still editing. Thank you for taking care of this. 190:
I've just checked, and there's no sign that the relevant WikiProjects were notified about this GAR at the time the nomination was made; such notifications are part of the GAR process. I don't think this can be properly closed before they have been notified and given a chance to bring the article back
121:
Concern that the article includes unsourced content and downplays the controversies that the organization has been involved in, see the talk page for details. (
17: 165:. Since this is a community GAR it needs to be closed by an uninvolved editor, but so far there is no support for keeping it as a GA. ( 147:
This article needs serious updating. See its talk page for the details. Besides it was not properly promoted GA in the first place..
224: 170: 126: 69: 65: 152: 50: 200: 162: 148: 109: 42: 235: 204: 181: 156: 137: 113: 220: 196: 166: 122: 105: 252: 246: 90: 229: 192: 175: 131: 58: 35: 85: 77: 46: 143:Comment by Swiss romulus moved from the other GAR: 8: 7: 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 24: 210: 86:Watch article reassessment page 1: 103:Fails NPOV and verifiability 269: 138:15:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 236:03:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 205:03:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 182:00:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 157:20:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 114:18:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC) 91:Most recent review 260: 232: 218: 214: 213: 191:up to GA level. 178: 134: 104: 88: 82: 73: 54: 268: 267: 263: 262: 261: 259: 258: 257: 243: 242: 230: 211: 209: 176: 132: 95: 84: 63: 40: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 266: 264: 256: 255: 245: 244: 241: 240: 239: 238: 187: 186: 185: 184: 142: 119: 118: 117: 93: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 265: 254: 251: 250: 248: 237: 234: 233: 226: 222: 217: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 189: 188: 183: 180: 179: 172: 168: 164: 163:Swiss romulus 160: 159: 158: 154: 150: 149:Swiss romulus 146: 145: 144: 140: 139: 136: 135: 128: 124: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 94: 92: 87: 81: 80: 76: 71: 67: 62: 61: 57: 52: 48: 44: 39: 38: 33: 32: 29: 26: 19: 228: 215: 174: 141: 130: 120: 100: 96: 78: 74: 60:Article talk 59: 55: 36: 27: 197:BlueMoonset 47:visual edit 161:I agree, 247:Category 70:history 51:history 37:Article 253:GAR/67 231:buidhe 193:buidhe 177:buidhe 133:buidhe 101:Delist 97:Result 106:Femke 79:Watch 16:< 216:Done 201:talk 153:talk 110:talk 99:: - 66:edit 43:edit 28:UBS 249:: 227:) 223:· 203:) 173:) 169:· 155:) 129:) 125:· 112:) 89:• 83:• 68:| 49:| 45:| 225:c 221:t 219:( 199:( 171:c 167:t 151:( 127:c 123:t 116:. 108:( 75:· 72:) 64:( 56:· 53:) 41:(

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
UBS
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch article reassessment page
Most recent review
Femke
talk
18:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
t
c
buidhe
15:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Swiss romulus
talk
20:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Swiss romulus
t
c
buidhe
00:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
buidhe
BlueMoonset
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.