182:
The only thing I can see is the prose needs a tad bit of improvement. With the image thing, you simply need to look at the time period. There were minimal images at that time and most of them have likely been lost. As for the explanation of terms, I have no idea what you are talking about. This
140:
This article has problems in the sense that I don't think it's detailed enough but what you have described isn't exactly one of them. There aren't going to be many images for a storm that happened 80 years ago. And can you be more specific on "explanations of terms". If anything, jargon is more
121:. While it does address the main points of the cyclone in a concise way, I don't believe there are really enough images or explanations of terms to justify a good article rating. Also, the "Impact" section doesn't seem to be organized well enough to merit this status.
69:
141:
explained here than in most hurricane GA articles. The order of presentation in the impact is not how I'd do it if I was writing the article but regardless that's an easy fix.
65:
50:
42:
211:
Thank you for your feedback. Does anybody know how to close the discussion? Also, thanks for educating me about good article reassessment.
273:
248:
237:
224:
191:
174:
150:
134:
110:
58:
17:
148:
118:
35:
169:
269:
220:
130:
106:
145:
202:
164:
261:
232:
212:
122:
98:
198:
142:
288:
265:
216:
126:
102:
160:
282:
255:
241:
206:
184:
183:
article isn't overly technical in its explanation of the system.
117:
It looks like the article is possibly slightly below the
85:
77:
46:
159:
No clear issues and images are optional, according to
8:
7:
238:Knowledge:Good_article_reassessment
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
24:
240:has instructions on closing it.
86:Watch article reassessment page
28:1939 California tropical storm
1:
260:Thanks. Closed successfully.
274:03:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
249:02:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
225:02:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
192:00:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
175:18:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
151:05:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
135:04:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
111:02:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
305:
119:level of a good article
89:• GAN review not found
296:
264:(If you want to
259:
246:
236:
215:(If you want to
210:
189:
172:
167:
157:Oppose and close
125:(If you want to
101:(If you want to
97:
88:
82:
73:
54:
304:
303:
299:
298:
297:
295:
294:
293:
279:
278:
253:
242:
230:
203:Nova Crystallis
196:
185:
170:
166:Nova Crystallis
165:
92:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
302:
300:
292:
291:
281:
280:
277:
276:
251:
180:Oppose + Close
154:
153:
115:
114:
113:
90:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
301:
290:
287:
286:
284:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:Hdjensofjfnen
257:
252:
250:
247:
245:
239:
234:
233:Hdjensofjfnen
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:Hdjensofjfnen
208:
204:
200:
194:
193:
190:
188:
181:
177:
176:
173:
168:
162:
158:
152:
149:
147:
144:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:Hdjensofjfnen
120:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:Hdjensofjfnen
95:
91:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
243:
195:
186:
179:
178:
156:
155:
116:
93:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
199:Yellow Evan
47:visual edit
283:Category
270:go ahead
266:trout me
256:Figfires
244:Figfires
221:go ahead
217:trout me
207:Figfires
187:Figfires
131:go ahead
127:trout me
107:go ahead
103:trout me
96:: Closed
205:, and
161:WP:GACR
70:history
51:history
37:Article
289:GAR/63
171:(Talk)
94:Result
79:Watch
16:<
66:edit
43:edit
272:!)
223:!)
133:!)
109:!)
285::
268:,
219:,
201:,
163:.
129:,
105:,
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
258::
254:@
235::
231:@
209::
197:@
146:E
143:Y
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.