Knowledge

:Hazing - Knowledge

Source 📝

178: 24: 87: 101:
From time to time, notable people come to edit Knowledge, most often to edit articles related to themselves. As newbies, they invariably are unfamiliar with our policies and guidelines, our sourcing standards, and make many mistakes. Of course, this is our chance to put them in their place, right?
164:
Conflict of interest, notability and neutrality may all be genuine issues that very much need addressing, but please, let's be sensitive about how we go about it, and not abuse the relative advantage we have over notable people when they come here to edit. We should always
291:
Knowledge is a great leveler. Notable people are people, and usually interesting and talented people at that. The Knowledge experience will be much more interesting and pleasant for them
201:
and on the web, and post the available sources on the relevant talk page. Explain to the editor that these are the sources that should mainly be reflected in the article.
317: 245:
Remember that editing with a conflict of interest is not forbidden, only discouraged. The content of an edit is more important than the editor who made it.
347: 327: 312: 342: 285: 189:
Before nominating an article for deletion, make a good-faith effort to check notability against the notability criteria. Look for sources in
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
40: 295:
for us if we approach them in a spirit of camaraderie and help them find their feet here, rather than throwing the book at them.
322: 332: 277: 153: 367: 307: 264:. If it is not in line with the policy, remove it; if you are unsure, remove it and start a thread at the 169:, and be especially sensitive to the position of people whose lives are affected by our coverage of them. 185:
These are a few things you should consider doing, to make the process as easy and agreeable as possible:
204:
Explain why they can't just write the article from their personal knowledge, and that they have to cite
337: 44: 260:! If they complain about libellous or defamatory content, check if the sourcing and content match 54: 95:
When a notable person comes to Knowledge to edit, don't give them a hazing just because you can.
352: 298:
And that way, when they speak about Knowledge, they will have something nice to say about us.
251: 225: 146: 221: 32: 269: 265: 257: 232: 166: 114: 361: 273: 261: 239: 217: 157: 125: 121: 107: 47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 205: 194: 177: 136: 132: 276:
just because they have used a word like "libelous", but do make them aware of
222:
what sort of information self-published sources can be used for in Knowledge
198: 238:
Explain to them what they have to bear in mind when they edit with a
231:
Explain to them how important it is that articles be written from a
176: 288:
on their talk page, which outlines some of these basic points.
81: 18: 190: 142:"Stop using our project as a vehicle for self-promotion!" 69: 62: 284:
You might also consider dropping them a link to the
252:
how they can fix errors in articles about themselves
262:
Knowledge's policy on biographies of living persons
220:, such as their own website or blog, and explain 8: 318:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Help 348:Knowledge:Please do not bite the newcomers 216:Tell them that they may use a modicum of 313:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 328:Knowledge:Don't overlook legal threats 343:Knowledge:Notable person survival kit 7: 126:nominating your article for deletion 278:Knowledge's policy on legal threats 181:Please don't torture the celebrity. 45:thoroughly vetted by the community 41:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 14: 208:, such as a newspaper or a book. 85: 22: 323:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 1: 226:what they mustn't be used for 120:"You are not really all that 106:"Hey, you are editing with a 258:Don't overlook legal threats 286:Notable person survival kit 274:administrators' noticeboard 195:Google News Advanced Search 158:administrators' noticeboard 156:! I've reported you to the 384: 333:Knowledge:No legal threats 211:Show them how <ref: --> 52: 16:Essay on editing Knowledge 235:, and how they can do it. 93:This page in a nutshell: 308:Knowledge:Autobiography 270:Don't report the person 218:self-published sources 182: 124:at all, are you? I am 233:neutral point of view 180: 43:, as it has not been 338:Knowledge:Notability 250:Give them advice on 240:conflict of interest 167:be kind to newcomers 131:"Your edits are all 108:conflict of interest 154:made a legal threat 183: 353:Knowledge:SELFPUB 173:Good things to do 137:original research 99: 98: 80: 79: 375: 368:Knowledge essays 206:reliable sources 89: 88: 82: 72: 65: 26: 25: 19: 383: 382: 378: 377: 376: 374: 373: 372: 358: 357: 304: 266:BLP noticeboard 175: 152:"You have just 145:"You are using 86: 76: 75: 68: 61: 57: 49: 48: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 381: 379: 371: 370: 360: 359: 356: 355: 350: 345: 340: 335: 330: 325: 320: 315: 310: 303: 300: 282: 281: 255: 248: 247: 246: 236: 229: 214: 209: 202: 199:Google Scholar 174: 171: 162: 161: 150: 143: 140: 135:! Stop adding 129: 118: 111: 97: 96: 90: 78: 77: 74: 73: 66: 58: 53: 50: 38: 37: 29: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 380: 369: 366: 365: 363: 354: 351: 349: 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 321: 319: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 305: 301: 299: 296: 294: 289: 287: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 253: 249: 244: 243: 241: 237: 234: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212:</ref: --> 210: 207: 203: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 186: 179: 172: 170: 168: 159: 155: 151: 148: 144: 141: 138: 134: 130: 127: 123: 119: 117:our project!" 116: 112: 109: 105: 104: 103: 94: 91: 84: 83: 71: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 51: 46: 42: 36: 34: 28: 21: 20: 297: 292: 290: 283: 191:Google Books 184: 163: 100: 92: 30: 31:This is an 149:language!" 133:unsourced 70:WP:HAZING 55:Shortcuts 362:Category 302:See also 115:spamming 272:at the 147:peacock 122:notable 224:, and 213:works. 113:"Stop 63:WP:HAZ 33:essay 293:and 193:, 364:: 268:. 242:. 197:, 160:!" 139:!" 128:!" 110:!" 280:. 254:. 228:. 35:.

Index

essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:HAZ
WP:HAZING
conflict of interest
spamming
notable
nominating your article for deletion
unsourced
original research
peacock
made a legal threat
administrators' noticeboard
be kind to newcomers

Google Books
Google News Advanced Search
Google Scholar
reliable sources
self-published sources
what sort of information self-published sources can be used for in Knowledge
what they mustn't be used for
neutral point of view
conflict of interest
how they can fix errors in articles about themselves
Don't overlook legal threats
Knowledge's policy on biographies of living persons
BLP noticeboard

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.