1252:
to alphabetize capital and lower case letters in separate alphabets on the page; for reasons I won't take time here to explain, that made some particularly large categories much easier to navigate. And something I read suggested that the system was designed that way. But then one day, all my beautiful
Category pages started interfiling capital and lower case entries. I inquired everywhere I could find. But some answers I got seemed to say that this thing that I saw as a neat and useful feature was regarded by others as a glitch that had finally been fixed.
1106:
509:
in a long page history. Linear search examines each revision in an interval but the tool limits the interval size to 50 revisions for performance reasons, and search for removal doesn't allow linear search at all. You could use linear to search 50 revisions at a time for addition of the text but it's harder to make separate searches and it's a way to circumvent a performance limit on the server making the searches.
115:. I want to know if this is okay cuz I don't want to get blocked. I just want a tutorial, can you tell me if I'm doing right or wrong, and if there's any other incidences were people who did canvassing get blocked, cuz I feel like I'm breaking a rule I don't know, I really want to be taught it, just so I can learn from my mistakes, cuz I don't want to be blocked.
651:
924:, I don't plan to elaborate. That said, copying an existing article is less serious because it is simply an attribution problem, and that is likely to go away, but I don't want anyone left with the impression that copyright issues in the sandbox can simply be ignored. Thanks for asking the question, I'm sorry the response was so dismissive.
1603:
not pay them to give reviews or vice versa. Not only that, they offer a paid service to resolve any issues you may think you have and with th company I am involved in, NovaTechfx there are no issues that the company do not and can not resolve. This is clearly a scamming site operating under the pretext of being affiliated to WiKipedia.
1251:
Now, this IS interesting! I'm not sure how relevant this is, but it hearkens back to my earliest days here, when I was doing massive edits as an IP user (YEARS ago). I was almost exclusively reorganizing
Category pages, mostly for lists of species within a genus. In those days, Category pages used
943:
seems to take a more lenient view, suggesting that such internal copy-pasting can be dealt with via nothing more dramatic that an edit summery added after the fact: "pages that contain unattributed text do not normally need to be deleted". And that applies even to stuff that isn't being deleted every
443:
as the source for Rajoub having an account at Bank Leumi. The content could have been added, then removed and the revisions could have been hidden (showing as a struck through date and time in the edit history). Finally, the information could have been added and removed, but not detected by the tool.
402:
It's called
Wikiblame because it is often used to find out which editor made a particular change. For the purpose you want, I would suggest using just the less-common words from the phrase you want to check and take the default options. Since you are looking for removal of those words, you do need to
1602:
Hi Folks, I have just researched what is being said about a company I am involved with. I came across a site named WiKifx and assumed it would be upfront and unbiased and connected to this site. However that was not my experience! They are a scamming company giving false reviews on companies that do
718:
That said, yes, IMDb does sound impressive; it did to me for a long time. But now I'm on IMDb, too. I had a secondary, but significant, recurring, speaking role in an independent movie. I play a one of a race of multi-colored, humanoid beings; I'm a member of a tribe that believes in going around
486:
Well, this can be quite a job, but it's still less than going through all edits. What I've done before: I go to the last edit on the first page. If the edit I want is already there, I go to the next page and check the last one there. When I finally get to one that DOESN'T show the edit I want to
155:
Personally, I don't have an issue with this - I find it to be better than pinging specific people who you know a certain viewpoint. Pinging people at random is a bit of a pain - usually people don't mind so much if you ping people who have already taken part of a discussion or a parallel discussion.
1646:
is a type of website with collaborative editing. The concept is older than
Knowledge and lots of unrelated websites have "wiki" in their name. I'm not sure WikiFX actually has a wiki but it's their chosen name and nothing the Wikimedia Foundation can do something about unless they claim or imply to
508:
Binary search doesn't examine all revisions. If it ever finds both a revision with and without the text then it tracks down the removal by repeatedly halving the possible interval. But if it never finds the text then it doesn't try every revision to see if it was added and removed quickly somewhere
1480:
It appears that the issue was actually with the wikidata entries. There was a bot that automatically added releases from GitHub to the wikidata page. The repositories were also specified on the wikidata page. However, even though each repository's platform was specified, the bot didn't add them to
169:
Hi folks. I was planning to create a help request. If your looking for "input", for intellectual discussion, for example on a talk page or an RFC, then pinging lots of folks is ok. But if your looking to ping lots of folk where you looking for "support" for a particular action, or for a particular
136:
Hi, pinging many people on a discussion goes against the "Spamming" rule of canvassing. This is seen as a way to get more people to vote/decide in said discussion, thus being favored to you since you were the one who mentioned them. It's made even worse if the people you pinged are not involved in
919:
Thanks for asking the question, I'm not on the same page as AndyTheGrump. As a regular at CopyPatrol, reports of issues requiring investigation show up involving the sandbox regularly. It is not uncommon that edits to that page include copyright violations. I am aware that the sandbox is cleared
881:
is cleared automatically. Nothing is going to stay there long. If someone copies a
Knowledge article there, so what? The warning on WP:BADSAND presumably refers to content copy-pasted from external sources. Unattributed copying of Knowledge content only becomes an issue if it is either in article
1710:
I am trying to develop a timeline (1920-1970) for events that could effect
Education (K-12) in the United States. So I need to identify WW1 and WW2 Korean War Viet Nam Wars but also innovations such as computers or digitization of education. So I would appreciate any assistance to get me in the
853:
I'm not really. However I do know that certain policies do still apply to the sandbox so I just wanted to know if it was something that was allowed or not. I don't exactly remember how I came across the page again (I removed it from my watchlist for a while and then I probably reverted something
380:
I posted here after using
Wikiblame but getting "0 versions found". I searched twice, at first ticking/checking "Look for removal of text (binary only)", "Ignore minor changes (experimental)" and "Force searching for wikitext" and then without "Ignore minor changes (experimental)". Should I have
896:
Ah alright sounds good. I'm not all that familiar with how copyright works regarding copying stuff from
Knowledge within Knowledge itself. I guess really the only harm would be the sandbox getting categorized into categories it doesn't belong to but most of the time as you said that's not a big
1134:
There is a Wiki page for the
English drum and bass record producer "dBridge". But in "Category:English_drum_and_bass_musicians" he appears as "DBridge". This causes my app to include two entries for the same person. I cannot find the source of "DBridge" to correct it. Where is it? Thanks!
487:
find, I go about half way up the page and look. If the edit is there, I go about half way down the bottom half of the page; if it isn't I go about half way up the top half. Keep subdividing, and at some point (to be decided by you) it becomes easier to start checking next or previous edits.
296:
I don't donate to you because you are not partial in your publishing. When posting something like "they shared false information" but don't post any proof of that, you lose credibility. See the notes under Kari Lake for reference. Garbage reporting. Get better and I'll support your cause.
663:
Hi there my name is
Richard Price a uk actor I do a lot of work on a uk show called Doctor Who I have a verified Twitter @richard_price2 and also on IMDb I have no clue when it comes to Knowledge as to how it works and wondered how you get a page on the site?
1090:, yet the latter three donāt show up as expandable sections on their own, the first section has to be expanded in order to view the others, which shouldnāt be the case. Iāll add that I am using the mobile version, it is not apparent on the desktop version.
109:, I've been pinging a lot of people on discussions just to get responses, and people have been saying that I've been canvassing, I read Knowledge's canvassing rules and it said nothing about pinging a lot of people, I have done this in a lot of discussions
719:
completely naked. As far as I know, the movie only ever appeared on Vimeo.com. It was there for a few years, and then just a short time ago, Vimeo yanked it and the site on which it appeared--presumably because I was running around naked too much.
1663:
That website does not make any claims that it is affiliated with Knowledge or the Wikimedia Foundation. Their logo is completely different and the appearance of the website is different. "Wiki" is not a trademark and anyone is free to use it.
794:
A lot of solid actors, whether legit, TV or film, work for a lifetime without ever becoming high-profile enough to merit an article in a global encyclopedia such as this one. (And yes, I too have an IMDb entry; big deal.)
1554:
1623:
944:
few hours, at maximum. If there is even a technical violation of copyright involved in the sandbox edit, it seems too minor to be worth bothering about, in my opinion. Nobody is going to court over such trivia.
697:, someone will eventually take note of your career and choose to write about you. That is how the vast majority of articles are created- trying to force the issue is not usually successful. Please read about
897:
issue. (really the only time I think it would be an issue would be if it gets placed in a category that tells the cleaner bot to ignore the page, and even then editors themselves can still undo that) ā
1779:
My comment above was uncalled for; I apologize. I myself have gone back to things I've written, and discovered to my horror that in a moment of brain short circuit, I wrote some blatant illiteracy.
208:
1712:
1291:
674:
421:
as the source for Rajoub having an account at Bank Leumi. Since the current text doesn't include the word leumi (or any other bank account) it must have been deleted, assuming it was once there.
1031:. This bug means that all sections of the page are grouped under the first section, and I can see no issue in the source code and no way of resolving it. Does anyone know how to fix this?
403:
use the "Look for removal of text (binary only)" option. If you still have no luck, please specify the article and the phrase whose removal you are trying to find so we can help further.
1682:
I don't think the term is technically copyrightable/trademarkable either since it's a general use term (I think it's why Google does not want you to say that you "googled something") ā
1445:
1427:
170:
political point your trying to make, for example at Afd or an RFC, then that would be canvassing. Your going around asking for help to push in a particular direction, is not cool.
765:
in which you are mentioned as part of the cast, it is probably only a matter of time until someone writes an article about you, especially if your contributions are mentioned in
1157:
Interesting question. I don't think it can be fixed. All articles start with a capital letter, but there is a trick that lets some display it as lower case, such as on
689:
We don't have pages, we have articles, typically written by independent editors unconnected with the subject in any way. If you meet the special Knowledge definition of
323:
Donating or withholding donations has no impact on article content, as donations are collected by the Wikimedia Foundation, that operates the computers Knowledge is on.
212:
139:
You said you are pinging people just to get responses, and this is why it's bad: because you're using it to get responses and not to start a thoughtful discussion.
1204:
to display dBridge on the article itself but it cannot be displayed in other places like categories and search results. It's the same for all 4000 articles using
472:
In scenario three you could check all 180 edits, except the hidden ones. Obviously if the information was never added or has been hidden, you would not find it.
1305:
I am afraid the answer is no. First, it is Knowledge's article about your company, not "a Knowledge page". Second, Knowledge's Terms of Service mandate that
532:
62:
41:
1442:, and that was fine at the time with only one stable release. However, more updates have been released since then, so the article now lists multiple dates.
227:
79:
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the
55:
51:
1050:, are you saying that the article doesn't have a table of contents? That's not a bug - TOCs don't show up until an article has at least four headings. (
1166:
47:
1463:
I don't know how to fix this, presumably by separating the releases into different sections. The original creator appears to be taking a Wikibreak.
596:- I added a load of wikilinks and now the blockquote template markup appears. Are the wikilinks the problem or have I done something else wrong?
1028:
1071:
1055:
740:
320:. If the sources are summarized accurately, but you disagree with what they say, you will need to take that up with the sources themselves.
298:
1413:
1438:, was created, there was only one stable release of the software listed on Wikidata. The template took release dates from Wikidata using
967:
1716:
1604:
1295:
940:
722:
Facetiousness aside, other people who answer are probably going to explain why IMDb is not considered a reliable source by Knowledge.
678:
981:
Does she have an article? If not then this won't happen unless a consensus is reached among editors to include her in the article. ā
1404:
There's a lot of red text saying that a parameter is wrong. Is this a problem with the wikidata formatting? How could I solve it?
593:
531:
Having read the background, I think the most likely explanation is that Knowledge never had such information and even if it did
1736:
1632:
1622:(I believe you want the first address there). Remember, scammers prey on those who are desperate for Knowledge articles and
141:
Also, it can be viewed as annoying. To avoid being seen as a canvassing rulebreaker, ping less people. I hope this helps. -
776:
process (explained at that link) but beware that writing acceptable articles is quite tough, particularly the need to meet
1339:. Using a company page may require recognizing the source as the company and not a third party. You must also say you are
785:
540:
408:
556:
I used (linear) Wikiblame to check all revisions of Jibril Rajoub (except the suppressed ones, of course), and none have
1290:
Hi, our company has a wikipedia page which we did not create. Can we update the page and correct inaccuracies directly?
854:
there for a valid reason and it got added back) but I wanted to make sure as copyright still applies to the sandbox per
618:
21:
1547:
1457:
1449:
1165:. But, the article actually does start with upper case, so thats what appears in the category. The same way that
1379:
It is highly preferred that COI editors not directly edit articles in most cases. They should make edit requests.
343:
Is it possible to discover when a word/phrase/sentence was deleted if key words don't appear in the Edit summary?
255:
1095:
1036:
1731:
1627:
1727:
1322:
1208:
1198:
1117:
1059:
781:
744:
536:
404:
363:
302:
971:
1608:
762:
612:
267:
251:
1468:
1367:
949:
887:
844:
199:
is happening because it is a fake, because the references are from three years ago for announcements for
1774:
1758:
1741:
1720:
1693:
1677:
1656:
1652:
1637:
1612:
1589:
1571:
1567:
1526:
1490:
1472:
1388:
1371:
1355:
1347:
1326:
1299:
1275:
1261:
1223:
1219:
1178:
1144:
1121:
1099:
1063:
1040:
1014:
992:
975:
953:
935:
908:
891:
873:
855:
848:
833:
807:
789:
748:
731:
710:
682:
640:
636:
626:
605:
601:
569:
544:
518:
514:
496:
481:
467:
453:
430:
412:
393:
375:
352:
332:
306:
285:
281:
259:
239:
216:
180:
164:
150:
146:
130:
1753:
1688:
1618:
We can't do anything here in this forum about scammers, unfortunately. You might want to contact the
1510:
1431:
1313:. Therefore, you are generally discouraged from editing the article directly and are asked to submit
1091:
1047:
1032:
987:
930:
903:
868:
828:
802:
670:
565:
223:
106:
1770:
1673:
1486:
1409:
1318:
1257:
1174:
1113:
772:. You are allowed to create a draft if you wish and can be bothered to learn how to do so: use the
769:
727:
492:
371:
273:
102:
I don't know if this is the right place to do this, just let me know if I'm doing something wrong.
80:
33:
17:
966:
She should be a famous person listed for the town of she is from in the state of Washington, USA.
551:
528:
503:
477:
459:
449:
436:
422:
399:
385:
359:
344:
1309:. Third, editing the article about a Company you are a staff member of triggers what we call a
1027:
Hello, thereās a bug Iāve found on a few pages which is present in the page Iāve just created,
1585:
1522:
1464:
1453:
1439:
1376:
1363:
1271:
1140:
1010:
945:
883:
859:
840:
235:
158:
1648:
1563:
1384:
1238:
1215:
1001:
She does have an article (as you could easily have verified). I've added her to the list at
777:
706:
690:
632:
597:
510:
463:
426:
389:
348:
328:
277:
173:
142:
126:
1747:
1683:
1435:
1397:
982:
925:
921:
898:
863:
823:
796:
698:
561:
207:
in development, and there is no way that Crunchyroll ever teams up with Cartoon Network.
1766:
1669:
1482:
1419:
1405:
1340:
1306:
1253:
1246:
1170:
736:
723:
488:
367:
317:
1105:
920:
automatically, but when I note a copyright violation, I typically perform an RD1. Per
1359:
1351:
1310:
1051:
1002:
878:
819:
773:
694:
473:
445:
440:
1581:
1534:
1518:
1336:
1314:
1267:
1230:
1185:
1152:
1136:
1006:
766:
231:
1481:
the releases entries. The issue was fixed after I added the platform to releases.
1214:, and others which don't use this specific template. What does "my app" refer to?
1074:, No, is it not an issue on the page for you? There are multiple sections, titled
316:
article are not being summarized accurately, please detail the specific errors on
1746:
Events that could "effect education"? Where did you get your doctorate, Paul? --
1505:
1380:
702:
324:
116:
1668:, for example, is a well-known website that is not affiliated with Knowledge.
758:
715:
I looked you up just now! You are indeed a Cyberman; I'm impressed (truly!).
611:
Looks like you forgot to close one of the wikilinks, which caused this. ā Ā ā
1665:
313:
70:
1423:
822:
without proper attribution. Could this be considered a copyvio or no? ā
1191:
1162:
1112:. One of the tables in the first named section wasn't closed properly.
439:, there are several possibilities. Someone could be incorrectly giving
272:
If you have JavaScript off then disable "Enable quick topic adding" at
1452:, which parses a date and calculates how long ago it was. The use of
1158:
1619:
1456:
returned multiple dates, as there were multiple stable releases, so
222:
I'm the culprit here. I restore the above editor's removal of the
1643:
1764:
Woke U, where thinking is regarded as an immoral waste of time!
418:
818:
Hello! I noticed that someone copied a Knowledge article into
1266:āmy appā is an iOS app I am writing based on Knowledge data.
882:
space, or is liable to remain in other spaces for some time.
230:. I was mislead by the pseudo-sources. My apologies! Cheers
1647:
be affiliated with Knowledge or the Wikimedia Foundation.
1576:
Dear PrimeHunter! Thank you so much ā once again! You're
292:
Donations/poor practice in reporting and or presentation.
667:
Can anyone help? Or does anyone write submissions etc?
1561:
1558:
1446:
Template:Latest stable software release/Material Design
1428:
Template:Latest stable software release/Material Design
1422:, I took a crack at it. It appears to be an issue with
113:
110:
757:
Hi Richard. Given how many articles Knowledge has on
778:
Knowledge's specialist definition of a notable actor
814:
Copying articles from Knowledge without attribution
250:New section links are broken with Javascript off.
1624:haven't considered the consequences of having one
1553:but the parameter also has to actually be coded.
1396:
444:I think the last scenario is the least likely.
1560:when changing the default. I have restored it.
1460:broke, not being able to parse multiple dates.
8:
74:Welcome to the Knowledge Help Desk Archives
699:how an article is not necessarily desirable
228:List of Cartoon Network Studios productions
1539:Some templates falsely claim to support a
668:
659:How do I get a Knowledge page as an actor?
274:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing
1513:is still rendered collapsed, even though
1167:Category:Mobile_phones_introduced_in_2007
594:Golden Jubilee of Queen Victoria#21 June
458:Is there any certain way of finding it?
45:
32:
1711:right direction. Dr Paul Hollandsworth
1690:
1620:Wikimedia Foundation's legal department
1543:parameter. The claim is made by adding
1341:paid by the company to edit the article
989:
905:
870:
830:
209:2600:4040:5BE1:3300:F9FC:D1F4:AE41:D7DE
61:
1713:2600:8805:3200:110:6D76:59D7:B14F:990C
1292:2001:8F8:1129:DD42:B710:93DC:6B34:B9DE
675:2A00:23C7:83A2:BD01:1063:7341:AFB:694E
419:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jibril_Rajoub
39:
1029:2023 British Touring Car Championship
533:WP:Knowledge is not a reliable source
7:
1307:Paid contributions must be disclosed
1348:highlighting your failures too much
631:Marvellous! Thank you most kindly.
1400:'s release dates are going haywire
1346:If there is an issue, for example
941:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge
28:
1358:instead. For the full policy see
1335:(not opinions) directly, using a
1331:(ec) Yes you can. You can update
1726:You're better off asking at the
1104:
839:Why are you policing a sandbox?
649:
1169:lists IPhone and not iPhone.
417:A few times someone has given
1:
592:I've made a bit of a mess of
384:Why is that the tool's name?
29:
1775:14:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
1759:03:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
1742:21:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1721:21:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1694:20:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1678:20:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1657:20:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1638:20:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1613:19:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1590:20:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1580:a great help. All the best,
1572:20:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1527:19:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1491:14:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
1473:21:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1414:19:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1389:22:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1372:18:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1327:18:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1300:18:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1276:04:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
1262:14:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
1224:20:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1179:17:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1145:17:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1122:17:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1100:17:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1064:17:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1041:17:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1015:16:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
993:16:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
976:15:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
954:00:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
936:23:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
909:15:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
892:15:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
874:15:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
849:15:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
834:15:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
808:00:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
790:22:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
749:16:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
732:15:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
711:15:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
683:15:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
641:15:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
627:14:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
606:14:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
570:01:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
545:21:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
519:21:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
497:19:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
482:19:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
468:18:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
454:18:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
431:15:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
413:12:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
394:12:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
381:searched in a different way?
376:12:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
353:11:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
333:12:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
307:11:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
286:14:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
260:08:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
240:04:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
217:04:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
181:12:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
165:11:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
151:11:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
131:03:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
107:Knowledge's canvassing rules
1458:Template:Start date and age
1450:Template:Start date and age
1798:
1506:Bertelsmann#External links
647:
739:explains it fairly well.
98:am I violating canvassing
201:We Bare Bears: The Movie
1730:, Dr. Hollandsworth. ā
763:The Power of the Doctor
195:There is no proof that
1511:corresponding template
1286:Editing a company page
1130:Capitalization problem
339:Searching page history
1706:Education (1920-1970)
1477:I managed to fix it.
1311:Conflict of interest
1190:RudolfRed is right.
105:I'm confused about
18:Knowledge:Help desk
1548:collapsible option
366:for this purpose.
312:If sources in the
268:Elephas X. Maximus
252:Elephas X. Maximus
203:in production and
143:š¾š¤š¤š”š¢šš£2917
1555:ŠŠ°ŃŠ¼Š¾Š½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŠ¹ ŠŠøŃ
1499:Expanded template
1454:Template:Wikidata
1440:Template:Wikidata
1076:Teams and drivers
770:secondary sources
685:
673:comment added by
87:
86:
81:current Help Desk
69:
68:
1789:
1756:
1750:
1739:
1635:
1552:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1516:
1426:. When the page
1352:inaccurate style
1250:
1242:
1234:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1197:
1189:
1156:
1108:
962:Susannah Scaroni
933:
928:
805:
799:
695:a notable person
653:
652:
588:Blockquote issue
555:
507:
271:
178:
176:
161:
137:the discussion.
122:
71:
30:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1754:
1748:
1737:
1728:reference desks
1708:
1692:
1691:BlazeĀ Wolf#6545
1633:
1600:
1550:
1544:
1540:
1532:
1515:|state=expanded
1514:
1501:
1436:Material Design
1402:
1398:Material Design
1337:reliable source
1288:
1244:
1236:
1228:
1211:
1209:lowercase title
1205:
1201:
1199:lowercase title
1195:
1183:
1150:
1132:
1092:DRYT.Motorsport
1048:DRYT.Motorsport
1033:DRYT.Motorsport
1025:
1023:Glitch on Pages
991:
990:BlazeĀ Wolf#6545
964:
931:
926:
907:
906:BlazeĀ Wolf#6545
872:
871:BlazeĀ Wolf#6545
832:
831:BlazeĀ Wolf#6545
816:
803:
797:
691:a notable actor
661:
656:
655:
650:
590:
560:within them. -
549:
501:
341:
294:
265:
248:
224:We Bear Bears 2
197:We Bare Bears 2
193:
191:We Bear Bears 2
174:
172:
159:
118:
100:
95:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1795:
1793:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1744:
1733:JƩskƩ Couriano
1707:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1640:
1629:JƩskƩ Couriano
1599:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1478:
1461:
1443:
1401:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1344:
1329:
1319:Victor Schmidt
1287:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1264:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1114:Victor Schmidt
1088:External links
1072:199.208.172.35
1067:
1066:
1056:199.208.172.35
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
996:
995:
963:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
856:WP:NOCOPYRIGHT
815:
812:
811:
810:
792:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
741:199.208.172.35
720:
716:
660:
657:
648:
646:
645:
644:
643:
589:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
547:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
382:
340:
337:
336:
335:
321:
318:Talk:Kari Lake
299:199.96.122.147
293:
290:
289:
288:
247:
244:
243:
242:
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
84:
76:
75:
67:
66:
60:
44:
37:
36:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1794:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1765:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1757:
1751:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1735:
1734:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1705:
1695:
1689:
1687:
1686:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1645:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1631:
1630:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1597:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1556:
1549:
1536:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1498:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1399:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1315:edit requests
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1285:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1248:
1240:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1210:
1200:
1193:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1129:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:Race calendar
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1022:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1003:Burns, Oregon
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
988:
986:
985:
980:
979:
978:
977:
973:
969:
968:70.57.201.221
961:
955:
951:
947:
942:
939:
938:
937:
934:
929:
923:
918:
910:
904:
902:
901:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
880:
879:Draft:Sandbox
877:
876:
875:
869:
867:
866:
861:
858:(which is on
857:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
835:
829:
827:
826:
821:
820:Draft:Sandbox
813:
809:
806:
800:
793:
791:
787:
783:
782:Mike Turnbull
779:
775:
771:
768:
764:
760:
756:
750:
746:
742:
738:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
714:
713:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:
684:
680:
676:
672:
665:
658:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
625:
622:
621:
616:
615:
610:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
595:
587:
571:
567:
563:
559:
553:
548:
546:
542:
538:
537:Mike Turnbull
534:
530:
526:
520:
516:
512:
505:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
442:
441:Jibril Rajoub
438:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
405:Mike Turnbull
401:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:We Baby Bears
202:
198:
190:
182:
179:
177:
168:
167:
166:
163:
162:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
124:
123:
121:
114:
111:
108:
103:
97:
92:
90:
82:
78:
77:
73:
72:
64:
57:
53:
49:
43:
38:
35:
31:
23:
19:
1767:UporzÄ
dnicki
1763:
1732:
1709:
1684:
1628:
1605:92.1.219.162
1601:
1577:
1504:
1503:How come at
1502:
1465:Sungodtemple
1403:
1377:Sungodtemple
1364:Sungodtemple
1356:edit request
1332:
1289:
1254:UporzÄ
dnicki
1133:
1109:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1026:
983:
965:
946:AndyTheGrump
899:
884:AndyTheGrump
864:
841:AndyTheGrump
824:
817:
761:, including
724:UporzÄ
dnicki
669:āĀ Preceding
666:
662:
623:
619:
613:
591:
557:
489:UporzÄ
dnicki
362:you can use
342:
295:
249:
226:addition to
204:
200:
196:
194:
171:
160:Lee Vilenski
157:
138:
119:
117:
104:
101:
88:
1749:Orange Mike
1649:PrimeHunter
1564:PrimeHunter
1557:removed it
1432:transcluded
1239:PrimeHunter
1216:PrimeHunter
927:S Philbrick
798:Orange Mike
633:Alansplodge
598:Alansplodge
511:PrimeHunter
368:ā robertsky
278:PrimeHunter
246:New section
175:scope_creep
1685:BlazeĀ Wolf
1354:, make an
1084:References
984:BlazeĀ Wolf
900:BlazeĀ Wolf
865:BlazeĀ Wolf
860:WP:BADSAND
825:BlazeĀ Wolf
759:Doctor Who
620:Part of me
562:R. S. Shaw
93:November 4
63:November 5
42:November 3
1670:Cullen328
1666:Wikileaks
1483:Aaron Liu
1420:Aaron Liu
1406:Aaron Liu
1317:instead.
1247:RudolfRed
1194:contains
1171:RudolfRed
364:Wikiblame
314:Kari Lake
46:<<
34:Help desk
1517:is set?
1424:Wikidata
922:WP:BEANS
767:reliable
671:unsigned
654:Resolved
614:Madeline
474:TSventon
446:TSventon
147:talkpage
52:November
22:Archives
20: |
1582:Hildeoc
1535:Hildeoc
1519:Hildeoc
1231:Vossron
1192:DBridge
1186:Vossron
1163:DBridge
1153:Vossron
1007:Maproom
737:WP:IMDB
232:Adakiko
83:pages.
1598:WiKifx
1578:always
1509:, the
1381:331dot
1360:WP:COI
1159:IPhone
1052:WP:TOC
932:(Talk)
774:WP:AFC
703:331dot
552:Mcljlm
529:Mcljlm
504:Mcljlm
460:Mcljlm
437:Mcljlm
423:Mcljlm
400:Mcljlm
386:Mcljlm
360:Mcljlm
345:Mcljlm
325:331dot
120:4me689
1738:v^_^v
1634:v^_^v
1541:state
1448:uses
1434:onto
1333:facts
1110:Fixed
558:leumi
65:: -->
59:: -->
58:: -->
40:<
16:<
1771:talk
1755:Talk
1717:talk
1674:talk
1653:talk
1644:wiki
1626:. ā
1609:talk
1586:talk
1568:talk
1523:talk
1487:talk
1469:talk
1410:talk
1385:talk
1368:talk
1323:talk
1296:talk
1272:talk
1258:talk
1220:talk
1175:talk
1161:and
1141:talk
1118:talk
1096:talk
1086:and
1060:talk
1037:talk
1011:talk
1005:.
972:talk
950:talk
888:talk
862:) ā
845:talk
804:Talk
786:talk
745:talk
728:talk
707:talk
679:talk
637:talk
617:āĀ ā
602:talk
566:talk
541:talk
515:talk
493:talk
478:talk
464:talk
450:talk
427:talk
409:talk
390:talk
372:talk
349:talk
329:talk
303:talk
282:talk
256:talk
236:talk
213:talk
127:talk
1350:or
1268:Ron
1137:Ron
693:or
56:Dec
48:Oct
1773:)
1752:|
1719:)
1676:)
1655:)
1642:A
1611:)
1588:)
1570:)
1551:}}
1545:{{
1525:)
1489:)
1471:)
1430:,
1412:)
1387:)
1370:)
1362:.
1325:)
1298:)
1274:)
1260:)
1243:,
1235:,
1222:)
1212:}}
1206:{{
1202:}}
1196:{{
1177:)
1143:)
1120:)
1098:)
1082:,
1078:,
1062:)
1054:)
1039:)
1013:)
974:)
952:)
890:)
847:)
801:|
795:--
788:)
780:!
747:)
730:)
709:)
701:.
681:)
639:)
604:)
568:)
543:)
535:.
517:)
495:)
480:)
466:)
452:)
429:)
411:)
392:)
374:)
351:)
331:)
305:)
284:)
276:.
258:)
238:)
215:)
149:)
129:)
112:,
54:|
50:|
1769:(
1715:(
1672:(
1651:(
1607:(
1584:(
1566:(
1537::
1533:@
1521:(
1485:(
1467:(
1408:(
1383:(
1366:(
1343:.
1321:(
1294:(
1270:(
1256:(
1249::
1245:@
1241::
1237:@
1233::
1229:@
1218:(
1188::
1184:@
1173:(
1155::
1151:@
1139:(
1116:(
1094:(
1070:@
1058:(
1046:@
1035:(
1009:(
970:(
948:(
886:(
843:(
784:(
743:(
726:(
705:(
677:(
635:(
624:;
600:(
564:(
554::
550:@
539:(
527:@
513:(
506::
502:@
491:(
476:(
462:(
448:(
435:@
425:(
407:(
398:@
388:(
370:(
358:@
347:(
327:(
301:(
280:(
270::
266:@
254:(
234:(
211:(
145:(
125:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.