274:
102:
237:
from the 19th or early 20th century. Such illustrations are generally useless in providing any valid encyclopedic information. Often they are also esthetically unoriginal and technically mediocre. Since they, too, typically carry heavy ideological overtones, reflecting the idealized, heroicized or romanticized way a historical figure or event was seen in a later age, such depictions may not merely be useless for
Knowledge (XXG) but actually harmful, as they inject a covert POV perspective into an article.
225:
117:, i.e. artistic depictions of a person that purport to provide an individualized, authentic representation of that person's unique looks, based either directly or indirectly on a witness's first-hand experience of their physical appearance, are obviously the best choice for illustrating history and biography articles about that person. Unfortunately, for individuals from most pre-modern cultures, such portraits are unavailable.
204:
126:
176:
138:
realistic sense of what the person actually looked like – they were never intended to do that. Nevertheless, such items are generally acceptable as illustrations in
Knowledge (XXG) articles, insofar as they were produced within the subject's own cultural sphere and can provide a sense of the subject's historical context and how they were seen and imagined by contemporaries.
93:
most cases such imaginary depictions have no encyclopedic information value, as they cannot convey any actual information to the reader about the subject. This essay argues that the use of non-contemporary imaginary depictions of people or events, outside certain special circumstances where they can be justified, should generally be avoided on
Knowledge (XXG).
156:
266:
24:
78:
166:
Conventionalized, imaginary depictions of religious figures, for example in
Christian hagiographic art, can be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) even if they come from a much later cultural context, since in these cases the history of the religious veneration of the figure in question is just as much part
146:
The same is generally true for paintings and other depictions of historical events, such as battles, political meetings and the like. Even if they do not impart a realistic or authentic idea of what the event looked like, they are generally unproblematic as long as they come from a historical context
236:
Knowledge (XXG) articles generally should not contain imaginary depictions created in later periods if they cannot be contextualized through sourced critical coverage because they lack independent notability in themselves. This is particularly true for items such as public-domain print illustrations
92:
Many articles on historical persons or events cannot be illustrated with authentic material, as no contemporary portraits or other depictions of the subject exist. Knowledge (XXG) editors have often resorted to the use of imaginary depictions from later periods, often by modern artists. However, in
240:
The same is true for copyrighted artwork by present-day artists offered to
Knowledge (XXG) under a free license or even produced by Wikipedians themselves. While Knowledge (XXG) normally values and appreciates user-created or other free modern artwork, editors should be reluctant to resort to such
194:
Another case where an imaginary depiction will generally be suitable in an article is if it is a well-known, high-quality artwork that is independently notable as such. While such an artwork may tell us little about the historical person directly, it will typically be an easily justifiable part of
137:
While most historical cultures didn't produce actual portraits, many did produce other kinds of depictions of individual persons, such as depictions of rulers on ancient coins, miniatures in medieval bookpainting etc. In many cases, these are so heavily stylized that they can't serve to provide a
215:
Similarly, an imaginary depiction can be a valuable addition to an article if it is a notable example of how some later era saw the figure in question, as for instance when a medieval ruler is represented in a famous 19th-century painting or statue. As such depictions will often carry some heavy
290:
Avoid using images just because other sites use them. Sometimes a historical personality becomes associated with some low-quality, unauthentic depiction on the
Internet simply because people on websites and web forums keep copying it from one place to another for lack of anything
286:
Avoid images with unclear provenance. Many alleged historical depictions float around on the internet without proper source documentation. Even if you know they are old enough to be free of copyright, if you don't know where they ultimately are from, they are useless for an
216:
ideological baggage (e.g. expression of nationalist hero worship etc.), they should never be used in articles without being contextualized through well-sourced textual coverage of how and why they were created.
327:
In a few cases, imaginary portraiture has been contentious in
Knowledge (XXG) for special cultural and ideological reasons other than those discussed here, most notoriously in the case of depictions of
300:
Images which are used to illustrate later opinions about a person should be carefully placed in the discussion about those views, lest anyone think the image is an accurate image of the person.
253:
rules of
Knowledge (XXG), unless they are artistically notable works that are the subject of sourced encyclopedic coverage in themselves. Otherwise they invariably fall foul of the
355:
195:
the coverage of the article, often in a "legacy" section or similar. The inclusion of such an image should normally be accompanied with sourced text that contextualizes it.
294:
Always add an informative caption to any non-photographic image explaining the provenance and nature of the depiction (this also applies to infoboxes)
232:
from a late 19th-century
Russian picture book. Non-notable fictional portraits like this usually have no legitimate encyclopedic function whatsoever.
257:: if one artist could create an imaginary depiction of the subject in question, then anybody else, including you and me, could do the same.
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
162:, painting by El Greco. Could be used to document the history of religious veneration, even though as a portrait it is entirely fictional.
40:
350:
86:
Before using an imaginary or fictitious image of a historical person or event, consider whether it really has any encyclopedic value.
130:
310:
Always be sure the image improves the encyclopedic content of any article - do not merely use images as fillers or eye-candy.
332:. These special cases are outside the scope of this essay, although some of its arguments might also be applicable to them.
109:
by Hans Holbein the Younger. Authentic portraits are ideal, but none exist for the vast majority of historic personalities.
345:
269:
This should never be captioned simply as "Lothair I". Always add its provenance: "Lothair I (contemporary bookpainting)"
380:
361:
241:
depictions given the absence of any concrete encyclopedic information value and the danger of covert POV overtones.
249:
Non-free copyrighted depictions of older personalities or events by modern artists are usually excluded under the
277:
Ahmed, 16th-century ruler of Mauretania. Hundreds of websites have falsely labelled this picture as 8th-century
211:. Useful to illustrate 19th-century ideological views of Arminius, but tells us nothing about Arminius himself.
273:
101:
44:
56:
307:
images. If no authentic and useful depiction of a person exists, it is better to leave the box empty.
106:
190:. Famous artworks featuring fictional portrayals can be a useful illustration if explained properly.
32:
229:
133:. Useful as a historical document, even if it tells us nothing about what he really looked like.
297:"Portrait" as a term should be reserved for images intended to accurately depict a real person.
147:
close to it and impart an authentic idea how the event was interpreted by its contemporaries.
254:
159:
250:
278:
224:
203:
125:
374:
175:
47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
179:
329:
208:
114:
155:
183:
265:
272:
264:
223:
202:
174:
167:
of the topic of the article as their actual historical existence.
154:
124:
100:
72:
18:
64:
281:, without ever bothering to find out where it's from.
356:
User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Historical portraits
367:(related guideline on the German Knowledge (XXG))
121:Contemporary stylized depictions of individuals
8:
199:Artwork illustrating later views of a person
358:(longer, original version of this essay)
41:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
320:
151:Conventionalized traditional depictions
351:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Images
142:Near-contemporary depictions of events
362:de:Knowledge (XXG):Historische Bilder
7:
45:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
346:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
131:Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor
76:
22:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
171:Independently notable artworks
1:
113:Where they exist, authentic
397:
245:Non-free modern depictions
220:Modern illustrators' works
54:
255:replaceability criterion
84:This page in a nutshell:
228:Imaginary depiction of
207:19th-century statue of
381:Knowledge (XXG) essays
282:
270:
261:General Dos and Don'ts
233:
212:
191:
163:
134:
129:Medieval miniature of
110:
276:
268:
227:
206:
178:
158:
128:
104:
43:, as it has not been
219:
107:Erasmus of Rotterdam
97:Authentic portraits
283:
271:
234:
230:Vladimir the Great
213:
192:
164:
135:
111:
303:Infoboxes do not
90:
89:
53:
52:
388:
366:
333:
325:
260:
251:non-free content
188:School of Athens
160:Paul the Apostle
80:
79:
73:
67:
26:
25:
19:
396:
395:
391:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
371:
370:
364:
342:
337:
336:
326:
322:
317:
279:Tariq ibn Ziyad
263:
247:
222:
201:
182:as depicted in
173:
153:
144:
123:
99:
77:
71:
70:
63:
59:
49:
48:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
394:
392:
384:
383:
373:
372:
369:
368:
359:
353:
348:
341:
338:
335:
334:
319:
318:
316:
313:
312:
311:
308:
301:
298:
295:
292:
288:
262:
259:
246:
243:
221:
218:
200:
197:
172:
169:
152:
149:
143:
140:
122:
119:
98:
95:
88:
87:
81:
69:
68:
60:
55:
51:
50:
38:
37:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
393:
382:
379:
378:
376:
363:
360:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:
339:
331:
324:
321:
314:
309:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
289:
287:encyclopedia.
285:
284:
280:
275:
267:
258:
256:
252:
244:
242:
238:
231:
226:
217:
210:
205:
198:
196:
189:
185:
181:
177:
170:
168:
161:
157:
150:
148:
141:
139:
132:
127:
120:
118:
116:
108:
103:
96:
94:
85:
82:
75:
74:
66:
62:
61:
58:
46:
42:
36:
34:
28:
21:
20:
323:
304:
248:
239:
235:
214:
193:
187:
165:
145:
136:
112:
105:Portrait of
91:
83:
30:
365:(in German)
65:WP:PORTRAIT
31:This is an
180:Pythagoras
115:portraits
375:Category
340:See also
330:Mohammed
209:Arminius
57:Shortcut
291:better.
184:Raphael
315:Notes
33:essay
305:need
186:'s
377::
35:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
