643:. Knowledge (XXG) articles are generally written based on in-depth, independent, reliable sourcing with some subject-specific exceptions. The subject-specific notability guidelines generally include verifiable criteria about a topic which show that appropriate sourcing likely exists for that topic. Therefore, topics which pass an SNG are presumed to merit an article, though articles which pass an SNG or the GNG may still be deleted or merged into another article, especially if adequate sourcing or significant coverage cannot be found, or if the topic is not suitable for an encyclopedia.
1436:. Editors may decide that it is better for readers to present a narrow subject as part of a broader one. For example, editors normally prefer to merge information about translations of books into the larger subject of the original book, because in their editorial judgment, the merged article is more informative and more balanced for readers and reduces redundant information in the encyclopedia. (For ideas on how to deal with material that may be best handled by placing it in another article, see
932:, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.
67:
1219:
of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context (and doing so in no way disparages the importance of the topic). Editorial judgment goes into each decision about whether or not to create a separate page, but the decision should always be based upon specific considerations about how to make the topic understandable, and not merely upon personal
1029:
1018:
1000:
989:
971:
960:
125:
2069:
Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source.
1273:). Other times, when many similar notable topics exist, it is impractical to collect them into a single page, because the resulting article would be too unwieldy. In that case, a viable option is creating a new list or category for the broader topic and linking to the individual articles from it (as with
2068:
Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works.
1519:
are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic worth writing and publishing non-trivial works of their own that focus upon
1218:
When creating new content about a notable topic, editors should consider how best to help readers understand it. Often, understanding is best achieved by presenting the topic on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so; at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part
2139:
may be merged into a "list of minor characters in..."; articles on schools may be merged into articles on the towns or regions where schools are located; relatives of a famous person may be merged into the article on the person; articles on persons only notable for being associated with a certain
2058:
newspapers, books and e-books, magazines, television and radio documentaries, reports by government agencies, and academic journals. In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a
899:
The absence of sources or citations in a
Knowledge (XXG) article (as distinct from the non-existence of independent, published reliable sources in libraries, bookstores, and the internet) does not indicate that a subject is not notable. Notability requires only that suitable independent, reliable
1364:
Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the
English language Knowledge (XXG) should have a separate, stand-alone article on that subject. The primary purpose of these standards is to ensure that editors create articles that comply with major content policies.
2019:
constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as
2149:
Knowledge (XXG) editors have been known to reject nominations for deletion that have been inadequately researched. Research should include attempts to find sources which might demonstrate notability, and/or information which would demonstrate notability in another
1625:
Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed
2121:
Sometimes contacting the subject of a biography or the representative of a subject organization will yield independent source material. Of course we have to be careful to observe and evaluate independence. You might also see if there is an active
638:
In some topic areas, subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs) have been written to help clarify when a standalone article can or should be written. The currently accepted subject guidelines are listed in the box at the top of this page and at
658:, provide topic-related guidance when articles should not be created. SNGs can also provide examples of sources and types of coverage considered significant for the purposes of determining notability, such as the treatment of book reviews for our
1746:, and that all majority and significant-minority views published in reliable sources should be represented fairly and proportionately. Should any inconsistency arise between this guideline and the content policies, the policies take precedence.
908:
in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before
1080:, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, an article may be proposed for deletion months or even years after its creation, or recreated whenever new evidence supports its existence as a standalone article.
1429:, rather than representing only one author's point of view. This is also why multiple publications by the same person or organization are considered to be a single source for the purpose of complying with the "multiple" requirement.
1645:
There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists, although
582:, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do
1567:: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and
1863:
tag for articles which do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but are uncontroversial deletion candidates. This allows the article to be deleted after seven days if nobody objects. For more information, see
1531:
can be written. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they are not a measure of the attention a subject has received.
1264:
Sometimes, several related topics, each of them similarly notable, can be collected into a single page, where the relationships between them can be better appreciated than if they were each a separate page (as at
2337:
481:
creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates
1969:
1287:. On the other hand, an article may be a stub even though many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet. Such a short page is better expanded than merged into a larger page (see also the essays
1939:
1415:
2584:
2177:
854:
No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere
601:" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.
2499:
2190:
1133:
indicates what the economy was doing in the past, a topic is "notable" in
Knowledge (XXG) terms only if the outside world has already "taken notice of it". Once established, notability is not
1073:
Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.
2831:
1614:
685:
and do not establish new notability standards, lacking the weight of broad consensus of the general and subject-specific notability guidelines in various discussions (such as at
1871:
For cases where you are unsure about deletion, believe others might object, or another editor has already objected to a previous proposed deletion, nominate the article for the
1716:
663:
232:
1076:
While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a
2330:
1571:
is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The
Wikimedia project
1283:
Sometimes, when a subject is notable, but it is unlikely that there ever will be a lot to write about it, editors should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of creating a
2757:
1373:
of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be
1707:
There are numerous reasons for these requirements. Knowledge (XXG) is not and must not become the validating source for non-significant subjects, and it is not a forum for
1658:
often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.
729:
The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not the same as those applied to the content inside it. The notability guideline does not apply to the
2170:
681:
have provided additional guidance on notability of topics within their field. Editors are cautioned that these WikiProject notability guidance pages should be treated as
278:
283:
1933:
1311:
only if reliable sources confirm that principal photography for the film has commenced, as completion of the film is generally seen out to the end from this point on.
866:. Sources of evidence include recognized peer-reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally.
1689:, a Knowledge (XXG) article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable or more widely accepted than it is. Statements about the truth of a theory must be
1156:
If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual,
2790:
1754:
189:
2514:
2163:
1927:
671:
213:
1370:
1238:
Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page (
349:
depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.
1700:. If discussed in an article about a mainstream idea, a theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight, and
309:
2990:
1923:
3051:
1905:
1785:
Topics that do not meet this criterion are not retained as separate articles. Non-notable topics with closely related notable articles or lists are often
1315:
640:
632:
341:
sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Knowledge (XXG)'s concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid
74:
519:
is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
2785:
2524:
2266:
1137:. Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. However, sustained coverage is an indicator of notability, as described by
1120:
419:
2805:
2591:
2460:
1847:
1634:. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the
1615:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and navigation templates § Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates are not considered duplicative
1239:
149:
to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic may have its own article.
1303:). However, before creating such an article, make sure that the likelihood of the future event occurring is reasonably assured. For example, the
594:. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
1295:). Sometimes, when information about a future event is scarce, coverage may instead be better suited to a larger encompassing article (see also
1243:
2888:
1916:
1288:
1274:
1266:
2778:
1750:
360:
It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG); and
2261:
1651:
1647:
1322:
may provide information on how to make these editorial decisions in particular subject areas. When a standalone page is created, it can be
483:
415:
364:
138:
2810:
2187:
2800:
2795:
1369:
We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a
667:
182:
2078:
Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability. See also:
605:
If a topic does not meet these criteria but still has some verifiable facts, it might be useful to discuss it within another article.
371:
This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to
2815:
2752:
2256:
2096:
2092:
1872:
1712:
1620:
1426:
1400:
1077:
918:
914:
686:
403:
35:
1444:
Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the
851:, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability.
2529:
2489:
2430:
2347:
2275:
2251:
1959:
1708:
1638:
is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion,
1419:
577:
516:
411:
225:
925:
for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any.
302:
2425:
1909:
1694:
1559:
1396:
1335:
651:
464:
338:
244:
239:
201:
146:
3020:
2841:
2519:
2494:
2440:
1949:
1944:
659:
647:
646:
SNGs also serve additional and varying purposes depending on the topic. Some SNGs, for example the ones in the topic areas of
220:
206:
196:
31:
1247:
2883:
2659:
2606:
2579:
2509:
2484:
1865:
1792:
If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:
1704:
must be cited that affirm the relationship of the marginal idea to the mainstream idea in a serious and substantial manner.
1610:
1575:
may cover topics of present news coverage. In some cases, notability of a controversial entity (such as a book) could arise
910:
738:
273:
1432:
We require editors to use their judgment about how to organize subjects so that we have neither long, bloated articles nor
1299:). Other times, a future event may clearly be suitable for a standalone page before it happens (such as the next upcoming
3005:
2455:
2450:
2420:
2325:
2281:
2209:
2016:
1827:
1385:
758:
558:
478:
458:
334:
251:
82:
2967:
2773:
2654:
2574:
2357:
2352:
1668:
1334:
can be used to direct readers searching for such topics to the appropriate articles and sections within them (see also
1292:
1255:
1198:
268:
90:
1883:
not notable, then deletion is usually the most appropriate response, although other options may help the community to
814:, even very poor writing and referencing within a Knowledge (XXG) article will not decrease the subject's notability.
295:
2836:
2742:
2697:
2649:
2644:
2362:
2320:
2286:
1964:
1449:
1404:
1331:
905:
487:
137:—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are
1130:
2730:
2315:
2246:
2079:
1408:
1194:
848:
554:
407:
2725:
2445:
2435:
2202:
1686:
1516:
1319:
1202:
1150:
1146:
742:
587:
47:
533:
2596:
2123:
1823:
1224:
678:
2962:
1816:
1685:
in its particular field. Because
Knowledge (XXG) aims to summarize significant opinions with representation
3029:
2895:
2534:
2410:
2342:
2271:
1690:
1682:
655:
345:
of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not
2377:
1987:
2900:
2601:
2504:
2415:
2405:
1954:
1488:
1433:
1284:
1212:
929:
901:
562:
1977:
1388:
so that we can be confident that we're not passing along random gossip, perpetuating hoaxes, or posting
375:
or group two or more related topics into a single article. These guidelines only outline how suitable a
2912:
2907:
2400:
1884:
1768:
1655:
1592:
1541:
1470:
1347:
1327:
1258:, for example, may merit standalone pages but have undue weight on a page about the mainstream concept.
1231:, and so the amount of content and details should not be limited by concerns about space availability.
1228:
1169:
1091:
1049:
875:
823:
807:
778:
698:
614:
495:
431:
99:
86:
2223:
806:
and not of a
Knowledge (XXG) article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Knowledge (XXG),
1681:
is used in a broad sense to describe an idea that departs significantly from the prevailing views or
1630:
by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a
2747:
2737:
1839:
1564:
1374:
1323:
1296:
1220:
1206:
1138:
870:
Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article
372:
2136:
1842:
the article's verifiable content into a broader article providing context. Otherwise, if deleting:
1803:
1250:
as well as standalone biographies of every individual
President). One should particularly consider
541:
1888:
1739:
1425:
We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with
945:
922:
811:
754:
682:
591:
566:
396:
2551:
1568:
1631:
1437:
1389:
1378:
1157:
342:
2972:
1796:
Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject for advice on where to look for sources.
1711:. For writers and editors of Knowledge (XXG) articles to write about controversial ideas in a
1500:
1789:
into those pages, while non-notable topics without such merge targets are generally deleted.
1723:
1528:
1304:
2155:
2109:
1887:. As deletion of an article are often heavily contested, editors are advised to thoroughly
1735:
1727:
1639:
1453:
1445:
1308:
1251:
1142:
863:
855:
766:
750:
392:
2952:
1300:
810:
to the
Knowledge (XXG) content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the
2035:
2021:
1701:
1697:
142:
1492:
569:. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
1743:
1731:
1722:
The governing policies regarding fringe theories are the three core content policies:
1086:
Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time
330:
3045:
2621:
1857:
1677:
1640:
choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items
1504:
1496:
1448:. They do not, however, apply to pages whose primary purpose is navigation (e.g. all
1326:
from a broader page. Conversely, when notable topics are not given standalone pages,
17:
2929:
1936:, an essay on the difference between first-person, first-party, and primary sources.
326:
is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.
2040:
1121:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons § Subjects notable only for one event
749:
enough to be mentioned within the article or list) is governed by the principle of
537:
527:
2957:
1993:, two templates used to present an assessment of the sources present in an article
1715:, it is of vital importance that they simply restate what is said by independent
2674:
1652:
Knowledge (XXG):What
Knowledge (XXG) is not § Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory
1512:
353:
745:. Content coverage within a given article or list (i.e. whether something is
1521:
1487:
Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability.
662:
and the strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for
2140:
group or event may be merged into the main article on that group or event.
1826:
to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to
1246:, for example). Other times, standalone pages are well justified (as with
1158:
we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual
1996:
1875:
process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for seven days.
1621:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Lists § Adding individual items to a list
1572:
1524:, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.
917:
an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a
1583:
because the controversy was notable as an event—both need considering.
1749:
Fringe theories and related articles have been the subject of several
693:
Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles or lists
452:
to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received
1850:, one can use a criterion-specific deletion tag listed on that page.
1399:
so that we can write a fair and balanced article that complies with
847:
The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be
1940:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying and using primary and secondary sources
1508:
488:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
666:. Some SNGs have specialized functions: for example, the SNG for
1411:
for discussion of neutrality concerns of self-published sources.
2159:
1422:'s requirement that all articles be based on secondary sources.
936:
The current state of the article does not determine notability
631:
For a full list of subject-specific notability guidelines, see
1999:: Manual of Style on "Instructional and presumptuous language"
523:
119:
61:
1656:
recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes
2097:
Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view § Due and undue weight
1377:
into an article about a larger topic or relevant list. (See
2860:
1244:
Mitt Romney 2012 presidential campaign § International trip
1240:
Barack Obama 2012 presidential campaign § Other initiatives
172:
1908:, with subject specific essays and proposed guidelines at
1211:
For the guideline on red-linked articles in hatnotes, see
674:
operate according to principles that differ from the GNG.
540:, that "In high school, he was part of a jazz band called
1734:. Jointly these say that articles should not contain any
1434:
articles so narrow that they cannot be properly developed
85:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
2110:
Synthesis of published material that advances a position
741:, unless editors agree to use notability as part of the
30:"WP:N" and "WP:NOTE" redirect here. For other uses, see
1776:
1600:
1549:
1478:
1355:
1184:
1177:
1106:
1099:
1064:
1057:
890:
883:
838:
831:
793:
786:
720:
713:
706:
622:
553:" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow
503:
439:
107:
1970:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
1611:
Knowledge (XXG):Stand-alone lists § Selection criteria
761:. For additional information about list articles, see
515:" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that
1922:
For commentary and discussion of this guideline, see
1812:
If the article is about a specialized field, use the
399:). For Knowledge (XXG)'s policies regarding content,
53:
2500:
Do not disrupt
Knowledge (XXG) to illustrate a point
2080:
Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability § Questionable sources
1904:
for different aspects of notability can be found at
1889:
follow several recommended steps prior to nomination
2937:
2925:
2868:
2858:
2824:
2766:
2706:
2682:
2672:
2629:
2619:
2559:
2549:
2469:
2385:
2375:
2295:
2231:
2221:
1934:
Knowledge (XXG):Secondary does not mean independent
1527:Independent sources are also needed to guarantee a
904:; it does not require their immediate presence or
1763:Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
1755:Knowledge (XXG):Fringe theories/Arbitration cases
1141:. New organizations and future events might pass
393:commonly used as an inclusion criterion for lists
165:
2338:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
1928:Category:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
1134:
921:, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to
860:promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity
1924:Knowledge (XXG):Essays in a nutshell/Notability
1395:We require that all articles rely primarily on
73:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
1906:Category:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
1401:Knowledge (XXG)'s neutral point of view policy
1309:a standalone article for a new film be created
1236:Does other information provide needed context?
966:No or few suitable sources that could be cited
641:Category:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
633:Category:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
27:Article inclusion criteria for Knowledge (XXG)
2171:
2126:related to the topic, and ask for help there.
1838:after a good-faith search for them, consider
1024:Multiple suitable sources that could be cited
995:Multiple suitable sources that could be cited
773:Article content does not determine notability
303:
8:
2926:
733:of articles. It also does not apply to the
544:" is plainly a trivial mention of that band.
391:of an article or list, though notability is
2832:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1489:Knowledge (XXG) is not a promotional medium
536:'s statement, in a newspaper article about
81:Editors should generally follow it, though
2934:
2865:
2718:
2679:
2626:
2556:
2382:
2228:
2178:
2164:
2156:
1809:tag on the article to alert other editors.
1145:, but lack sufficient coverage to satisfy
310:
296:
154:
1965:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization § Defining
1917:Notability in the English Knowledge (XXG)
1414:We require the existence of at least one
1407:a product, service, or organization. See
1390:indiscriminate collections of information
1289:Knowledge (XXG):Every snowflake is unique
1262:Do related topics provide needed context?
1642:or those with Knowledge (XXG) articles.
934:
139:not outside the scope of Knowledge (XXG)
2008:
1719:of reasonable reliability and quality.
1579:because the entity itself was notable,
818:Notability requires verifiable evidence
530:is plainly non-trivial coverage of IBM.
329:Information on Knowledge (XXG) must be
260:
171:
164:
157:
1675:In Knowledge (XXG) parlance, the term
1648:non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations
1397:"third-party" or "independent sources"
1316:Subject-specific notability guidelines
762:
609:Subject-specific notability guidelines
3052:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
2093:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
1427:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
1275:Category:Restaurants in New York City
687:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
477:" means that significant coverage in
7:
1960:Knowledge (XXG):Relevance of content
1565:Knowledge (XXG) is not a news source
1420:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
1418:so that the article can comply with
1149:, and these must still also satisfy
2991:List of all policies and guidelines
1910:Category:Knowledge (XXG) notability
1560:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (events)
1336:Knowledge (XXG):Redirects are cheap
1117:Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Events
3030:Summaries of values and principles
2871:
2709:
2472:
2298:
1950:Knowledge (XXG):Search engine test
1945:Knowledge (XXG):Viability of lists
1879:For articles on subjects that are
1164:Whether to create standalone pages
862:, nor is the topic unsuitable for
565:works in all forms and media, and
89:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
1866:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion
1687:in proportion to their prominence
397:for listing out a school's alumni
2940:
2685:
2632:
2562:
2515:Please do not bite the newcomers
2388:
2234:
2135:For instance, articles on minor
2082:for handling of such situations.
1902:subject-specific guideline pages
1667:This section is an excerpt from
1403:and to ensure that articles are
1027:
1016:
1013:No or few suitable sources cited
998:
987:
969:
958:
955:No or few suitable sources cited
123:
65:
2137:characters in a work of fiction
1669:Knowledge (XXG):Fringe theories
1293:Knowledge (XXG):Run-of-the-mill
1281:What sourcing is available now?
1199:Knowledge (XXG):Content forking
1127:lagging indicator of notability
984:Multiple suitable sources cited
133:Knowledge (XXG) articles cover
2015:Moreover, not all coverage in
1342:Why we have these requirements
1248:President of the United States
802:Notability is a property of a
557:evaluation of notability, per
1:
2525:Responding to threats of harm
2267:Biographies of living persons
2036:"Tough love child of Kennedy"
1915:Knowledge (XXG)'s article on
1409:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
1195:Knowledge (XXG):Summary style
928:Knowledge (XXG) articles are
559:the reliable source guideline
486:, particularly the rule that
420:Biographies of living persons
363:It is not excluded under the
2592:Criteria for speedy deletion
2461:Paid-contribution disclosure
2034:Martin Walker (1992-01-06).
1885:preserve any useful material
1848:criteria for speedy deletion
1465:Self-promotion and publicity
1384:We require the existence of
1203:Knowledge (XXG):Article size
941:Current state of the article
426:General notability guideline
166:General notability guideline
141:. We consider evidence from
2262:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1736:novel analysis or synthesis
1446:general notability criteria
1116:
1044:Notability is not temporary
946:available in the real world
664:organizations and companies
522:The book-length history of
484:what Knowledge (XXG) is not
416:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
365:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
284:Why was my article deleted?
233:Organizations and companies
173:Subject-specific guidelines
3068:
1766:
1666:
1618:
1608:
1590:
1557:
1539:
1468:
1345:
1210:
1192:
1167:
1131:lagging economic indicator
1114:
1089:
1047:
873:
821:
776:
696:
630:
612:
599:Independent of the subject
493:
429:
97:
91:this guideline's talk page
42:
29:
2985:
2721:
2197:
1955:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism
1846:If the article meets our
1307:strongly recommends that
859:
1320:WikiProject advice pages
808:no amount of improvement
668:academics and professors
561:. Sources may encompass
356:to merit an article if:
343:indiscriminate inclusion
279:Common deletion outcomes
131:This page in a nutshell:
36:WP:NOTE (disambiguation)
2968:Licensing and copyright
2188:policies and guidelines
1834:If appropriate sources
1740:likely to be challenged
1297:Knowledge (XXG):CRYSTAL
1227:. Knowledge (XXG) is a
1207:Knowledge (XXG):Merging
902:exist in the real world
767:List selection criteria
743:list selection criteria
381:its own article or list
2059:comprehensive article.
812:source material exists
2963:Friendly space policy
2753:Broad-concept article
2257:Neutral point of view
1873:articles for deletion
1830:not available online.
1724:Neutral point of view
1654:. Lists that fulfill
1609:Further information:
1193:Further information:
1125:Knowledge (XXG) is a
660:literature guidelines
404:Neutral point of view
32:WP:N (disambiguation)
18:Knowledge (XXG):LISTN
2530:Talk page guidelines
2490:Conflict of interest
2431:Ownership of content
2276:Copyright violations
2252:No original research
2186:Knowledge (XXG) key
1900:An extensive set of
1822:tag with a specific
1728:No original research
1650:are touched upon in
1460:Common circumstances
1252:due and undue weight
1229:digital encyclopedia
1139:notability of events
517:no original research
513:Significant coverage
454:significant coverage
412:No original research
322:On Knowledge (XXG),
190:Astronomical objects
75:notability guideline
2426:No personal attacks
2348:Don't create hoaxes
2108:See in particular "
1078:deletion discussion
937:
919:deletion discussion
856:short-term interest
763:Notability of lists
672:geographic features
245:Sports and athletes
214:Geographic features
147:independent sources
3021:List of guidelines
2842:Template namespace
2520:Courtesy vanishing
2495:Disruptive editing
2441:Dispute resolution
2056:but not limited to
1569:tabloid journalism
1509:branding campaigns
1386:"reliable sources"
978:Likely not notable
935:
858:, nor a result of
592:written in English
3039:
3038:
2981:
2980:
2921:
2920:
2884:Project namespace
2854:
2853:
2850:
2849:
2791:Dates and numbers
2758:Understandability
2668:
2667:
2615:
2614:
2607:Revision deletion
2580:Proposed deletion
2545:
2544:
2510:Gaming the system
2485:Assume good faith
2371:
2370:
1751:arbitration cases
1717:secondary sources
1709:original research
1628:as a group or set
1587:Stand-alone lists
1501:product placement
1328:redirection pages
1269:Final Fantasy VII
1041:
1040:
930:not a final draft
739:stand-alone lists
579:secondary sources
320:
319:
274:Guide to deletion
269:Notability essays
153:
152:
118:
117:
16:(Redirected from
3059:
3016:
3015:
3006:List of policies
3001:
3000:
2958:List of policies
2945:
2944:
2943:
2935:
2931:
2928:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2866:
2862:
2859:Project content
2719:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2680:
2676:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2627:
2623:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2557:
2553:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2456:Child protection
2451:No legal threats
2421:Ignore all rules
2393:
2392:
2391:
2383:
2379:
2326:Reliable sources
2303:
2302:
2301:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2229:
2225:
2210:Ignore all rules
2192:
2180:
2173:
2166:
2157:
2151:
2147:
2141:
2133:
2127:
2119:
2113:
2106:
2100:
2095:, in particular
2089:
2083:
2076:
2070:
2066:
2060:
2052:
2046:
2045:
2031:
2025:
2022:reliable sources
2017:reliable sources
2013:
1992:
1986:
1982:
1976:
1862:
1856:
1828:reliable sources
1821:
1815:
1808:
1802:
1779:
1738:, that material
1702:reliable sources
1698:reliable sources
1683:mainstream views
1632:stand-alone list
1603:
1552:
1481:
1416:secondary source
1379:the advice below
1358:
1305:WikiProject Film
1187:
1180:
1109:
1102:
1067:
1060:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1005:
1002:
1001:
994:
991:
990:
976:
973:
972:
965:
962:
961:
938:
893:
886:
864:any other reason
841:
834:
796:
789:
759:content policies
723:
716:
709:
670:and the SNG for
625:
588:available online
542:Three Blind Mice
506:
479:reliable sources
459:reliable sources
442:
312:
305:
298:
155:
127:
126:
120:
110:
69:
68:
62:
56:
21:
3067:
3066:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3035:
3013:
3012:
2998:
2997:
2977:
2941:
2939:
2917:
2872:
2870:
2846:
2820:
2774:Manual of Style
2762:
2710:
2708:
2702:
2686:
2684:
2664:
2660:Page protection
2633:
2631:
2611:
2575:Deletion policy
2563:
2561:
2541:
2473:
2471:
2465:
2389:
2387:
2367:
2358:Patent nonsense
2353:Fringe theories
2299:
2297:
2291:
2235:
2233:
2217:
2193:
2184:
2154:
2148:
2144:
2134:
2130:
2120:
2116:
2107:
2103:
2090:
2086:
2077:
2073:
2067:
2063:
2053:
2049:
2033:
2032:
2028:
2014:
2010:
2006:
1990:
1984:
1980:
1974:
1897:
1860:
1854:
1836:cannot be found
1819:
1813:
1806:
1800:
1783:
1782:
1775:
1771:
1765:
1760:
1759:
1744:reliable source
1672:
1664:
1623:
1617:
1607:
1606:
1599:
1595:
1589:
1562:
1556:
1555:
1548:
1544:
1538:
1529:neutral article
1485:
1484:
1477:
1473:
1467:
1462:
1405:not advertising
1362:
1361:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1301:Summer Olympics
1256:Fringe theories
1216:
1209:
1191:
1190:
1183:
1176:
1172:
1166:
1151:WP:NOTPROMOTION
1147:WP:NOTNEWSPAPER
1123:
1113:
1112:
1105:
1098:
1094:
1088:
1071:
1070:
1065:WP:NOTTEMPORARY
1063:
1056:
1052:
1046:
1032:
1028:
1021:
1017:
1003:
999:
992:
988:
974:
970:
963:
959:
897:
896:
889:
882:
878:
872:
845:
844:
837:
830:
826:
820:
800:
799:
792:
785:
781:
775:
727:
726:
719:
712:
705:
701:
695:
636:
629:
628:
621:
617:
611:
567:in any language
510:
509:
502:
498:
446:
445:
438:
434:
428:
316:
256:
124:
114:
113:
106:
102:
94:
66:
60:
59:
52:
50:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3065:
3063:
3055:
3054:
3044:
3043:
3037:
3036:
3034:
3033:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3009:
2986:
2983:
2982:
2979:
2978:
2976:
2975:
2973:Privacy policy
2970:
2965:
2960:
2955:
2949:
2947:
2932:
2923:
2922:
2919:
2918:
2916:
2915:
2910:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2880:
2878:
2863:
2856:
2855:
2852:
2851:
2848:
2847:
2845:
2844:
2839:
2837:Categorization
2834:
2828:
2826:
2825:Classification
2822:
2821:
2819:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2770:
2768:
2764:
2763:
2761:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2743:Disambiguation
2740:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2722:
2716:
2704:
2703:
2701:
2700:
2698:Editing policy
2694:
2692:
2677:
2670:
2669:
2666:
2665:
2663:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2645:Administrators
2641:
2639:
2624:
2617:
2616:
2613:
2612:
2610:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2594:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2577:
2571:
2569:
2554:
2547:
2546:
2543:
2542:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2481:
2479:
2467:
2466:
2464:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2433:
2428:
2423:
2418:
2413:
2408:
2403:
2397:
2395:
2380:
2373:
2372:
2369:
2368:
2366:
2365:
2363:External links
2360:
2355:
2350:
2345:
2340:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2323:
2321:Citing sources
2318:
2313:
2307:
2305:
2293:
2292:
2290:
2289:
2287:Article titles
2284:
2279:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2243:
2241:
2226:
2219:
2218:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2198:
2195:
2194:
2185:
2183:
2182:
2175:
2168:
2160:
2153:
2152:
2142:
2128:
2114:
2101:
2084:
2071:
2061:
2047:
2026:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1994:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1931:
1920:
1913:
1896:
1893:
1877:
1876:
1869:
1851:
1832:
1831:
1817:expert-subject
1810:
1797:
1781:
1780:
1772:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1713:neutral manner
1673:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1637:
1629:
1605:
1604:
1596:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1554:
1553:
1545:
1540:
1537:
1534:
1513:advertisements
1505:press releases
1493:Self-promotion
1483:
1482:
1474:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1450:disambiguation
1442:
1441:
1430:
1423:
1412:
1393:
1382:
1360:
1359:
1351:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1332:disambiguation
1313:
1312:
1285:permanent stub
1278:
1259:
1189:
1188:
1181:
1173:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1128:
1111:
1110:
1103:
1095:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1053:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1036:Likely notable
1025:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1007:Likely notable
996:
985:
981:
980:
967:
956:
952:
951:
948:
942:
895:
894:
887:
879:
874:
871:
868:
843:
842:
835:
827:
822:
819:
816:
805:
798:
797:
790:
782:
777:
774:
771:
748:
725:
724:
717:
710:
702:
697:
694:
691:
627:
626:
618:
613:
610:
607:
603:
602:
595:
585:
570:
547:
546:
545:
531:
508:
507:
499:
494:
491:
468:
467:of the subject
461:
455:
451:
444:
443:
435:
430:
427:
424:
390:
386:
382:
378:
369:
368:
361:
348:
318:
317:
315:
314:
307:
300:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
281:
276:
271:
263:
262:
258:
257:
255:
254:
248:
247:
242:
236:
235:
229:
228:
223:
217:
216:
210:
209:
204:
199:
193:
192:
186:
185:
179:
176:
175:
169:
168:
162:
161:
151:
150:
135:notable topics
128:
116:
115:
112:
111:
103:
98:
95:
80:
79:
70:
58:
57:
51:
46:
43:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3064:
3053:
3050:
3049:
3047:
3032:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3022:
3017:
3010:
3008:
3007:
3002:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2988:
2987:
2984:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2966:
2964:
2961:
2959:
2956:
2954:
2951:
2950:
2948:
2946:
2936:
2933:
2924:
2914:
2911:
2909:
2906:
2902:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2894:
2890:
2887:
2886:
2885:
2882:
2881:
2879:
2877:
2867:
2864:
2857:
2843:
2840:
2838:
2835:
2833:
2830:
2829:
2827:
2823:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2786:Accessibility
2784:
2780:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2772:
2771:
2769:
2765:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2731:Summary style
2729:
2728:
2727:
2724:
2723:
2720:
2717:
2715:
2705:
2699:
2696:
2695:
2693:
2691:
2681:
2678:
2671:
2661:
2658:
2656:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2646:
2643:
2642:
2640:
2638:
2628:
2625:
2618:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2586:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2573:
2572:
2570:
2568:
2558:
2555:
2548:
2536:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2482:
2480:
2478:
2468:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2432:
2429:
2427:
2424:
2422:
2419:
2417:
2414:
2412:
2409:
2407:
2404:
2402:
2399:
2398:
2396:
2394:
2384:
2381:
2374:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2336:
2332:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2324:
2322:
2319:
2317:
2316:Autobiography
2314:
2312:
2309:
2308:
2306:
2304:
2294:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2247:Verifiability
2245:
2244:
2242:
2240:
2230:
2227:
2220:
2212:
2211:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2196:
2189:
2181:
2176:
2174:
2169:
2167:
2162:
2161:
2158:
2146:
2143:
2138:
2132:
2129:
2125:
2118:
2115:
2111:
2105:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2088:
2085:
2081:
2075:
2072:
2065:
2062:
2057:
2051:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2037:
2030:
2027:
2023:
2018:
2012:
2009:
2003:
1998:
1995:
1989:
1988:source assess
1979:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1898:
1894:
1892:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1874:
1870:
1867:
1859:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1841:
1837:
1829:
1825:
1818:
1811:
1805:
1798:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1762:
1758:
1756:
1752:
1747:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1732:Verifiability
1729:
1725:
1720:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1705:
1703:
1699:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1679:
1678:fringe theory
1670:
1662:Fringe topics
1661:
1659:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1643:
1641:
1635:
1633:
1627:
1622:
1616:
1612:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1594:
1586:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1525:
1523:
1518:
1517:paid material
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1497:autobiography
1494:
1490:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1464:
1459:
1457:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1341:
1339:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1270:
1267:Music of the
1263:
1260:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1214:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1178:WP:PAGEDECIDE
1175:
1174:
1171:
1163:
1161:
1159:
1154:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1100:WP:NSUSTAINED
1097:
1096:
1093:
1085:
1083:
1081:
1079:
1074:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1051:
1043:
1037:
1026:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1008:
997:
986:
983:
982:
979:
968:
957:
954:
953:
949:
947:
943:
940:
939:
933:
931:
926:
924:
920:
916:
912:
907:
903:
892:
888:
885:
881:
880:
877:
869:
867:
865:
861:
857:
852:
850:
840:
836:
833:
829:
828:
825:
817:
815:
813:
809:
803:
795:
791:
788:
784:
783:
780:
772:
770:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
746:
744:
740:
736:
732:
722:
721:WP:NOTEWORTHY
718:
715:
711:
708:
704:
703:
700:
692:
690:
688:
684:
680:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
644:
642:
634:
624:
620:
619:
616:
608:
606:
600:
596:
593:
589:
583:
581:
580:
575:
571:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
543:
539:
535:
534:Martin Walker
532:
529:
525:
521:
520:
518:
514:
505:
501:
500:
497:
492:
489:
485:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
466:
463:
460:
457:
453:
449:
441:
437:
436:
433:
425:
423:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:Verifiability
405:
402:
398:
395:(for example
394:
388:
384:
380:
376:
374:
366:
362:
359:
358:
357:
355:
350:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
325:
313:
308:
306:
301:
299:
294:
293:
291:
290:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
266:
265:
264:
259:
253:
250:
249:
246:
243:
241:
238:
237:
234:
231:
230:
227:
224:
222:
219:
218:
215:
212:
211:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
194:
191:
188:
187:
184:
181:
180:
178:
177:
174:
170:
167:
163:
160:
156:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
122:
121:
109:
105:
104:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
78:
76:
71:
64:
63:
55:
49:
45:
44:
41:
37:
33:
19:
3028:
3019:
3011:
3004:
2996:
2989:
2953:Terms of Use
2938:
2889:WikiProjects
2869:
2806:Lead section
2726:Article size
2707:
2683:
2630:
2620:Enforcement
2560:
2470:
2446:Sockpuppetry
2436:Edit warring
2386:
2310:
2296:
2232:
2208:
2203:Five pillars
2201:
2145:
2131:
2117:
2104:
2087:
2074:
2064:
2055:
2050:
2041:The Guardian
2039:
2029:
2011:
1978:assess table
1901:
1880:
1878:
1835:
1833:
1791:
1786:
1784:
1748:
1721:
1706:
1676:
1674:
1644:
1636:group or set
1624:
1563:
1526:
1486:
1443:
1363:
1314:
1280:
1268:
1261:
1235:
1217:
1213:WP:NOARTICLE
1155:
1129:. Just as a
1124:
1107:WP:SUSTAINED
1082:
1075:
1072:
1035:
1006:
977:
927:
923:find sources
898:
891:WP:NPOSSIBLE
853:
846:
801:
757:, and other
734:
730:
728:
714:WP:NLISTITEM
679:WikiProjects
676:
645:
637:
604:
598:
578:
576:" should be
573:
550:
538:Bill Clinton
528:Robert Sobel
512:
474:
447:
400:
370:
351:
328:
323:
321:
158:
134:
130:
72:
40:
2597:Attack page
2585:Biographies
2124:WikiProject
1824:WikiProject
1695:independent
1558:Main page:
1520:it—without
656:politicians
652:biographies
586:have to be
465:independent
448:A topic is
352:A topic is
347:necessarily
339:independent
252:Web content
2901:User boxes
2896:User pages
2535:Signatures
2411:Harassment
2343:Plagiarism
2311:Notability
2054:Including
1804:notability
1619:See also:
1454:some lists
1452:pages and
1371:definition
1115:See also:
915:nominating
849:verifiable
751:due weight
747:noteworthy
555:verifiable
387:limit the
331:verifiable
324:notability
159:Notability
83:exceptions
54:w.wiki/3qq
2908:Shortcuts
2602:Oversight
2550:Deletion
2505:Etiquette
2416:Vandalism
2406:Consensus
2282:Image use
2272:Copyright
1522:incentive
1185:WP:NOPAGE
1170:Shortcuts
1135:temporary
1092:Shortcuts
1050:Shortcuts
911:proposing
884:WP:NEXIST
876:Shortcuts
824:Shortcuts
779:Shortcuts
699:Shortcuts
563:published
504:WP:SIGCOV
462:that are
183:Academics
87:consensus
48:Short URL
3046:Category
2913:Subpages
2779:Contents
2748:Hatnotes
2673:Editing
2655:Blocking
2401:Civility
2376:Conduct
2331:Medicine
2222:Content
1997:MOS:NOTE
1895:See also
1853:Use the
1799:Place a
1777:WP:FAILN
1769:Shortcut
1742:needs a
1601:WP:NLIST
1593:Shortcut
1573:Wikinews
1542:Shortcut
1471:Shortcut
1438:WP:FAILN
1348:Shortcut
1324:spun off
1225:dislikes
1058:WP:NTEMP
944:Sources
906:citation
900:sources
794:WP:CONTN
735:contents
731:contents
615:Shortcut
551:Reliable
496:Shortcut
475:Presumed
450:presumed
432:Shortcut
354:presumed
335:reliable
333:; if no
261:See also
143:reliable
100:Shortcut
2811:Linking
2738:Be bold
2650:Banning
2150:manner.
1881:clearly
1840:merging
1550:WP:SBST
1479:WP:SPIP
1356:WP:WHYN
950:Result
839:WP:NRVE
804:subject
787:WP:ARTN
755:balance
574:Sources
389:content
383:. They
379:is for
367:policy.
226:Numbers
2801:Layout
2796:Images
1787:merged
1753:. See
1730:, and
1613:; and
1577:either
1536:Events
1515:, and
1375:merged
1271:series
1205:, and
1143:WP:GNG
1119:, and
832:WP:NRV
707:WP:NNC
683:essays
654:, and
623:WP:SNG
440:WP:GNG
418:, and
385:do not
240:People
202:Events
2816:Lists
2767:Style
2004:Notes
1693:upon
1691:based
1221:likes
677:Some
648:films
377:topic
373:merge
221:Music
207:Films
197:Books
2091:See
1983:and
1926:and
1858:prod
1330:and
1318:and
1291:and
1242:and
765:and
145:and
108:WP:N
34:and
2930:(?)
2927:WMF
2861:(?)
2675:(?)
2622:(?)
2552:(?)
2378:(?)
2224:(?)
2191:(?)
1456:).
1338:).
1223:or
913:or
737:of
689:).
590:or
584:not
526:by
524:IBM
456:in
401:see
3048::
3018::
3003::
2112:".
2038:.
1991:}}
1985:{{
1981:}}
1975:{{
1891:.
1861:}}
1855:{{
1820:}}
1814:{{
1807:}}
1801:{{
1757:.
1726:,
1581:or
1511:,
1507:,
1503:,
1499:,
1495:,
1491:.
1440:.)
1381:.)
1277:).
1254:.
1201:,
1197:,
1160:.
1153:.
769:.
753:,
650:,
469:.
422:.
414:,
410:,
406:,
337:,
3014:G
2999:P
2942:P
2873:G
2711:G
2687:P
2634:P
2564:P
2474:G
2390:P
2300:G
2278:)
2274:(
2236:P
2179:e
2172:t
2165:v
2099:.
2044:.
2024:.
1930:.
1919:.
1912:.
1868:.
1671:.
1392:.
1215:.
1033:Y
1022:Y
1004:Y
993:Y
975:N
964:N
635:.
597:"
572:"
549:"
511:"
490:.
473:"
311:e
304:t
297:v
93:.
77:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.