239:.) This version of the draft was created in one single edit as the first edit of a brand new account, including a (copyrighted) photo uploaded by another new account to Commons. As I said on the draft creator's user talk page: s/he might deny being a paid editor, but their actions are indistinguishable from those of a paid editor. I would prefer to see this deleted to throw a spannner in that paid outfit's work rather than because of the subject, hence a weak delete – but it is not irrelevant that there is no way this draft could become a mainspace article now since there it is very evident that the person is not (yet) notable. --
131:
This problematic draft is promotional in tone, and relies on sources by a single author which are also suspiciously promotional. Accounts associated with this draft have been banned for suspicious edits. At least one account associated with this account has engaged in lobbying-type behaviour to have
230:
well, it has been resubmitted in a way I would call tendentious. The person who created the first version of the draft in July (when it was speedy deleted as spam) has been globally locked for cross wiki spamming, after promoting this individual with several different accounts.
258:
I would prefer to see discovered UPE product preserved for the record, to help track and study these promotional misuses of
Knowledge. Deletion serves to hide their mistakes, clearing the slate for them to try again. I made a proposal for this at
260:
282:- It has already been declined, which is sufficient action on the page at this time. If more issues arise, e.g. clearer tendentious resubission, it can be revisited here if desired.
94:
90:
132:
this draft accepted. A removal (but preserving the talk page) would save a great deal of potentially wasted editor / reviewer time.
17:
82:
246:
293:
203:. This draft has not even been AfC-REJECTED. Has it been tendentiously resubmitted? Does it violate something at
327:
362:
155:
40:
345:
318:
301:
272:
253:
216:
194:
176:
159:
141:
122:
63:
236:
190:
137:
86:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
358:
36:
185:
I had originally nominated this via AfC - you get an error message saying that it has to go via MfD. --
314:
151:
58:
232:
77:
69:
268:
212:
172:
200:
249:
186:
133:
357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
310:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
150:- It needs declining, and it has been declined. It doesn't need deletion at this time.
235:
leading to a CU block there for the draft creator and two other accounts, followed by a
341:
264:
208:
168:
118:
204:
207:. If not, just DECLINE/REJECT, and leave it for G13, or unexpected improvement. --
241:
285:
337:
114:
353:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
261:
Knowledge:Quarantine promotional
Undeclared Paid Editor product
330:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
102:
98:
167:. This is an AfC review issue, not an MfD matter. --
336:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
365:). No further edits should be made to this page.
309:- It has been declined. It belongs where it is.
8:
112:(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.)
7:
48:The result of the discussion was:
233:CheckUser investigation at Commons
24:
18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
273:06:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
254:06:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
217:07:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
195:07:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
177:23:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
160:15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
142:08:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
64:08:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
346:21:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
319:15:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
302:10:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
123:21:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
385:
355:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
237:global lock at MetaWiki
199:You should ask at
348:
300:
252:
125:
376:
335:
333:
331:
296:
290:
283:
245:
113:
110:
107:
106:
61:
56:
34:
384:
383:
379:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
369:
363:deletion review
349:
326:
324:
299:
294:
286:
152:Robert McClenon
111:
80:
76:
73:
59:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
382:
380:
371:
368:
367:
334:
323:
322:
321:
304:
292:
277:
276:
275:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
180:
179:
162:
129:
128:
127:
126:
78:Draft:BrazyXay
72:
70:Draft:BrazyXay
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
381:
372:
366:
364:
360:
356:
351:
350:
347:
343:
339:
332:
329:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
297:
291:
289:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
251:
248:
247:contributions
244:
243:
238:
234:
229:
226:
225:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
124:
120:
116:
109:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
370:
354:
352:
325:
306:
287:
279:
240:
227:
187:Salimfadhley
164:
147:
134:Salimfadhley
130:
49:
47:
31:
28:
228:Weak delete
55:‑Scottywong
311:Lightburst
359:talk page
307:Weak Keep
265:SmokeyJoe
209:SmokeyJoe
169:SmokeyJoe
148:Weak Keep
37:talk page
361:or in a
328:Relisted
39:or in a
242:bonadea
91:history
205:WP:NOT
201:WT:AfC
288:Godsy
263:. --
165:Close
99:watch
95:links
60:| ||
16:<
342:talk
338:Izno
315:talk
295:CONT
280:Keep
269:talk
250:talk
213:talk
191:talk
173:talk
156:talk
138:talk
119:talk
115:Izno
103:logs
87:talk
83:edit
50:keep
344:)
317:)
284:—
271:)
215:)
193:)
175:)
158:)
140:)
121:)
101:|
97:|
93:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
340:(
313:(
298:)
267:(
231:(
211:(
189:(
171:(
154:(
136:(
117:(
105:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.