323:
a hoax as it claims to be a physical radio station licensed by the
Federal Communications Commission, and it clearly is not. Internet radio stations can have articles but if there's lots of SIGCOV to justify it, not by simply citing the website.
439:. An article on a nonexistent broadcast station has no chance of meeting the GNG by definition, and the vast, vast majority of internet stations are not notable at all. I can start an internet radio station and call it WSMM, but it takes
440:
136:
436:
273:
in the media to back up claims. You can't cite just the station's website and social media pages. Moreover, you can't write an article on something that you own. It's simple common sense.
52:. Found not to be a blatant hoax, just undemonstrated verifiability. There is an unreconciliable split between whether it should be deleted as hopeless or kept to die a natural death.
398:(after previously claiming the station signed on at 94.7 FM on January 1, 2022) we do not do articles on terrestrial radio stations that don't exist, internet radio notwithstanding.
305:, not the creator. I don't think it's a hoax as it does seem to exist online. It has no chance of being accepted in its present state, but we normally give drafts time to develop.
435:
This is a topic area where it takes one search of 30 seconds or less to learn what's a hoax and what isn't. This isn't even the first draft G3 for this very reason:
181:
is a reliable aggregate of information from the FCC's database systems. That it is not directly operated by the agency is immaterial to the issue at hand.
164:, this station has not yet been added to a broadcasting tower but is in the process of doing such. Second of all, that isn't a government website.
362:
As I highly stated and bolded in the article, it clearly states that it is not license by the FCC and is not publicly on radio currently.
251:
If y'all beleive I am fake, you are highly encouraged to delete it. I am not a hoax and I don't need to prove it to a private non-profit.
17:
109:
139:. This is a blatant hoax, no matter what the creator claims, and it should be deleted as unsuitable to become an encyclopedic article.
411:
337:
286:
240:
194:
105:
454:
150:
97:
74:
532:
40:
127:
This is a speedy declined by the creator. The article purports to describe a 94.7 FM radio station in
Atlanta, which
487:
211:
through reliable sources, the website used as a source for three of the four citations is very suspicious and
515:
491:
458:
417:
385:
371:
357:
343:
314:
310:
292:
260:
246:
200:
173:
154:
78:
499:
per Robert McClenon. Draft MFDs are not a duplicate of article AFDs, and we allow some latitude for this.--
405:
331:
280:
234:
188:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
528:
101:
36:
483:
450:
381:
367:
353:
256:
169:
146:
302:
92:
84:
270:
208:
430:
306:
128:
69:
509:
399:
325:
274:
228:
182:
482:. They are declined on account of notability and verifiability, and that is not the issue.
54:
220:
527:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
444:
395:
377:
363:
349:
252:
212:
165:
140:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
266:
474:. But this is not an article. This is a draft. Drafts are not deleted on account of
479:
475:
471:
64:
501:
443:
to learn that there is no station that currently broadcasts with that call sign.
265:
If the station is for real, that's all well and good. But articles need to have
376:
Licensed doesn't mean license with FCC, I just have a royalty license so far..
470:- The above arguments appear to be about whether an article satisfies
437:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Draft:KFBG-TV (2nd nomination)
132:
523:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
207:
The FCC records do not show this station exists, there is no
394:
a full two hours after this deletion request was posted by
391:
216:
117:
113:
178:
137:
no radio station with the call sign WWWJ at this time
135:on 94.9, so there couldn't be one.) There is also
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
535:). No further edits should be made to this page.
219:. Which, if it was the case, would be a massive
223:and he would have no business working on it.
8:
348:I never claimed to be licensed by the FCC.
227:the speedy deletion as a hoax per nom.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
7:
48:The result of the discussion was:
24:
217:is claiming to own the station
1:
301:The speedy was declined by
60:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
552:
215:, the author of the page,
492:18:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
459:03:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
418:00:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
386:00:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
372:00:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
358:00:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
344:00:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
315:23:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
293:21:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
261:19:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
247:17:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
201:18:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
174:17:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
160:As stated in the article
155:17:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
525:Please do not modify it.
516:14:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
79:23:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
390:Inasmuch as you made
319:That's the thing, it
271:significant coverage
55:(non-admin closure)
513:
57:
543:
507:
447:
434:
414:
408:
340:
334:
289:
283:
267:reliable sources
243:
237:
197:
191:
143:
122:
121:
53:
34:
551:
550:
546:
545:
544:
542:
541:
540:
539:
533:deletion review
484:Robert McClenon
445:
441:one easy search
428:
412:
406:
338:
332:
287:
281:
241:
235:
195:
189:
141:
131:. (Atlanta has
95:
91:
88:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
549:
547:
538:
537:
519:
518:
494:
464:
463:
462:
461:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
388:
303:user:Johnj1995
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
205:
204:
203:
129:does not exist
125:
124:
87:
82:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
548:
536:
534:
530:
526:
521:
520:
517:
514:
511:
504:
503:
498:
495:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:verifiability
477:
473:
472:verifiability
469:
466:
465:
460:
456:
452:
448:
442:
438:
432:
431:Pawnkingthree
427:
419:
415:
409:
403:
402:
397:
393:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
335:
329:
328:
322:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
307:Pawnkingthree
304:
300:
294:
290:
284:
278:
277:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
238:
232:
231:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
192:
186:
185:
180:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
138:
134:
130:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
93:Draft:WWWJ-FM
90:
89:
86:
85:Draft:WWWJ-FM
83:
81:
80:
76:
72:
71:
67:
66:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
524:
522:
506:
500:
496:
467:
401:Nathan Obral
400:
327:Nathan Obral
326:
320:
276:Nathan Obral
275:
230:Nathan Obral
229:
224:
184:Nathan Obral
183:
162:specifically
161:
126:
68:
63:
59:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
449:(she/her •
404:• he/him •
330:• he/him •
279:• he/him •
233:• he/him •
187:• he/him •
179:FCCData.org
145:(she/her •
476:notability
446:Sammi Brie
396:Sammi Brie
378:Rfmanradgh
364:Rfmanradgh
350:Rfmanradgh
253:Rfmanradgh
213:Rfmanradgh
166:Rfmanradgh
142:Sammi Brie
529:talk page
392:this edit
209:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
531:or in a
39:or in a
502:WaltCip
468:Comment
225:Support
106:history
221:WP:COI
114:watch
110:links
65:mello
16:<
510:talk
497:Keep
488:talk
382:talk
368:talk
354:talk
311:talk
269:and
257:talk
170:talk
133:WUBL
118:logs
102:talk
98:edit
478:or
70:hi!
490:)
457:)
453:•
416:•
410:•
384:)
370:)
356:)
342:•
336:•
321:IS
313:)
291:•
285:•
259:)
245:•
239:•
199:•
193:•
172:)
153:)
149:•
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
77:)
75:投稿
62:,
58:—
512:)
508:(
505:-
486:(
455:c
451:t
433::
429:@
413:c
407:t
380:(
366:(
352:(
339:c
333:t
309:(
288:c
282:t
255:(
242:c
236:t
196:c
190:t
168:(
151:c
147:t
123:
120:)
96:(
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.