Knowledge

:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Viruses - Knowledge

Source 📝

175:. The purpose of portals is to "help readers and/or editors navigate their way through Knowledge topic areas through pages similar to the Main Page. In essence, portals are useful entry-points to Knowledge content." But apart from displaying the same abstracts of five articles in rotation and listing a few categories, this page is a dead end. Portals need to be regularly maintained, updated and show what a busy site Knowledge is. I can't see the point of setting one up and then abandoning it a few weeks later. 52:- portals are stupid, but if people want to make and use them, there's no harm in letting them do so. Which isn't an argument for keeping the portal, but does mean that an argument for deleting the portal must be made (and given the headcount, made effectively). "Maybe not viable?" is not a strong argument for deletion - I don't see any reason to believe that, so I can give it strong weight (a cursory examination suggests it's as good as any other portal). Too broad to be viable doesn't stand up to the "But 262:. Portals are not for WikiProjects, but for readers to serve as a portal of entry to the topic. I don't think the group of viruses is too diverse for a portal, there are featured portals on much broader topics (eg Science, Biology). I have some experience with portals, and would be willing to do some work to broaden and improve this one, on behalf of the WikiProject. 281:
or merge. The subject is important, and others must have put a lot of work into it. I don't understand the efficiency of portals, but some appear to value it. I think portals should be cross wiki (to link to wikinews, wikisource, wikipedia and wikiversity together, and be transcluded from a central
56:
does fine!" retort. "Not currently being maintained" isn't an argument I can give much weight either - Knowledge is a work in progress, to be sure, but we're working towards a goal where further maintenance isn't necessary, if this portal got there first - good for it! Without a good argument for
216:
is invalid. I'm not big on the portal space as a whole, but this one seems a clear-cut case of someone building a portal just because it's cool, then abandoning it. If no one wants to support it, then it should be deleted.
229:
The whole point of portals is to clump editors together so as to stimulate collaboration. The more portals there are, the more diluted the pool of editors gets. This is a long-inactive skeleton.
136:
a WikiProject is not a Portal, or vice versa. They serve completely different functions. As for "diversity", every broad topic portal would need to be deleted under that rationale. --
153:
I know it doesn't look much, but I believe it could have potential in the future. It's been there for a long time, It's not doing any harm by being there. --
171:
Yes it has been there for a relatively long time (two years) but with no activity since its inception. "Doing no harm" is an argument that should be
118:. I don't think a Portal for viruses is viable; they are too diverse. The page has only ten edits, most of which where made in 2011, two years ago. 243:
No, that is the point of WikiProjects. Portals are not for editors to collaborate on articles, they are for readers to access the articles. --
97: 244: 190: 137: 93: 286: 17: 85: 115: 327: 268: 40: 308: 291: 273: 252: 238: 224: 198: 184: 162: 145: 127: 66: 248: 194: 141: 114:
This is not going anywhere and does not contain anything that is not covered by the, albeit, semi-dormant
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
323: 234: 36: 263: 180: 158: 123: 89: 283: 230: 213: 172: 322:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
189:
Then you'd need to delete most portals, since most of them are not that active either. --
176: 154: 119: 61: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
304: 80: 72: 53: 57:
deletion, and with a headcount strongly favouring keep, that's where this must go.
58: 300: 299:- clearly a net asset to our readers for information and navigation. 316:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105: 101: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 330:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 282:point) to be a real gateway to information. 7: 231:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) 48:The result of the discussion was 24: 18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion 1: 116:Knowledge:WikiProject Viruses 309:03:06, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 292:08:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 274:14:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 253:08:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC) 239:14:48, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 225:22:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 199:01:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 185:19:48, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 163:19:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 146:06:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 128:23:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 67:06:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 350: 319:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 212:. As mentioned above 272: 341: 321: 289: 266: 222: 220:Ten Pound Hammer 110: 109: 64: 34: 349: 348: 344: 343: 342: 340: 339: 338: 334: 328:deletion review 317: 287: 264:Espresso Addict 218: 83: 79: 76: 62: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 347: 345: 336: 333: 332: 312: 311: 294: 276: 257: 256: 255: 227: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 166: 165: 148: 112: 111: 81:Portal:Viruses 75: 73:Portal:Viruses 70: 54:Portal:Science 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 346: 337: 331: 329: 325: 320: 314: 313: 310: 306: 302: 298: 295: 293: 290: 285: 280: 277: 275: 270: 265: 261: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245:65.92.180.137 242: 241: 240: 236: 232: 228: 226: 221: 215: 211: 208: 207: 200: 196: 192: 191:65.92.180.137 188: 187: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 168: 167: 164: 160: 156: 152: 149: 147: 143: 139: 138:70.24.246.233 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 125: 121: 117: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 82: 78: 77: 74: 71: 69: 68: 65: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 335: 318: 315: 296: 278: 259: 219: 209: 150: 133: 113: 49: 47: 31: 28: 177:Graham Colm 120:Graham Colm 155:Thomas888b 324:talk page 284:Sidelight 214:WP:NOHARM 37:talk page 326:or in a 39:or in a 173:avoided 94:history 210:Delete 159:Say Hi 102:watch 98:links 16:< 305:talk 301:Moxy 297:Keep 279:Keep 269:talk 260:Keep 249:talk 235:talk 195:talk 181:talk 151:Keep 142:talk 134:Keep 124:talk 106:logs 90:talk 86:edit 59:Wily 50:Keep 223:• 307:) 288:12 251:) 237:) 197:) 183:) 161:) 144:) 126:) 104:| 100:| 96:| 92:| 88:| 303:( 271:) 267:( 247:( 233:( 193:( 179:( 157:( 140:( 122:( 108:) 84:( 63:D

Index

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Portal:Science
Wily
D
06:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Portal:Viruses
Portal:Viruses
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Knowledge:WikiProject Viruses
Graham Colm
talk
23:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
70.24.246.233
talk
06:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Thomas888b
Say Hi
19:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
avoided
Graham Colm
talk
19:48, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
65.92.180.137

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.