803:, I think that we can cut the number of pages down somewhat, by removing unfunny content and consolidating/merging pages, although this MFD is not a good way to effect that. The only funny stuff in there, in my opinion, includes the sections "Vivephilia", "From Sandwich", "From Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Islamophilia", "Knowledge (XXG):Write like this we should", "Being Vandalized", "Flamer's bible", "From: Bumblesnap Chess", "From "Popcorn trick"", and "From Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Chewbacca Defense". 9 out of 79 sections is not that much. Let's keep the focus on finding funny stuff, and not just stupid stuff. Now, an argument that "BJAODN encourages creation of nonsense" is a bad one.
280:
but we have many tens of pages with many hundreds of k of useless and unusable junk - too much ever to read. Third, the existence of these pages actively encourages people to create content aimed at being BJAODNed, which is a terrible outcome. Fourth, anything that ends up with a faux "Featured
Nonsense" process (best of BJAODN, which incidentally includes probably the only ones that are actually funny) shows that somebody has seriously lost the plot, because we seem to be actively working on collecting and improving explicitly non-encyclopaedic content. This insanity really needs to stop. One BJAODN page, maybe a couple of "best-of" archives.
968:. This is a terrible way to propose a cleanup, which is essentially what you are doing. Nominating a single random page out of many is pointless. What in the world would be the point of combining or merging these pages? The only thing such an action would do is waste time and get everyone in a frenzy, which would probably result in an even bigger mfd for the main BJAODN page and endless wheel wars. Honestly, leave well enough alone. If you truly want to get rid of BJAODN, the best way to do so would be using a GFDL-related argument, as the edit history of everything on BJAODN has not been preserved... (*wonders why I said that*) ---
1268:.Ā :) Seriously, it's important for our collective sanity to show a sense of humor, and BJAODN is the oldest example of this, long before there were ever Rouge Admins or Articles for Wheelation. Honestly, I don't think BJAODN encourages trolling, and if it does, it's only a very small fraction of the trolling that goes on. I've forwarded a few items from New Page Patrol to BJAODN, and I want the opportunity to continue in the future. Long live BJAODN!
1154:(where all the funny stuff, and some non-funny stuff, ends up), and increase barriers to BJAODN'ing things somewhat, as a lot of what's BJAODN'd just isn't funny. As for history-merging all the pages: why is this a worse option than simple deletion? (Unless there's a copyright concern involved; I notice that much of BJAODN violates the GFDL because author information hasn't been maintained.) Or one other option that hasn't been mentioned here:
1725:
48:. This has been an interesting and lively debate, and mostly good natured too! Thank you to all participants. A number of people have objected to the format of the listing, and others have highlighted that we may have no choice in removing the archives due to the requirements of the GFDL. Furthermore, since the nomination was made, a better community-led cleanup and refactoring has been proposed at
1421:. This is a hall of fame to vandals and food for trolls. How on earth does this help us make an encyclopedia, I say delete all such pages. They are too hard to keep free of libel and obscene material. One persons haha is another persons offense. Knowledge (XXG) is not a joke book. I would like point out to the many people who stated
1844:, I could live with kingboyk's proposal to let interested parties salvage and source what they want from the archives, although I hardly see the point in it. This really would amount to a colosal waste of somebody's time to sift through the archives, but if somebody places so little value on their time, then go for it. ā
435:
BJAODN has been up for deletion at least five times I know of, and has been kept every time, while consensus can change, it's clear from repeated attempts that BJAODN has a permenant place in
Knowledge (XXG) culture. While BJAODN could use a good pruning, that is essentially a content dispute, not a
951:
Make sure you folks look at
Consumed Crustacean's comment down a ways: all of these BJAODN pages are pure GFDL-related copyright violations. So, if we are to keep them, they'll need to be significantly pruned and have the histories copied and pasted somewhere -- which will require lots of admin time
941:
the "special collections" deleted and replaced by a rolling BJAODN page and a handful of best of's. That's just my opinion. However, if you think you can deliver consensus to delete the 60 archives but keep the special collections and create a much smaller more dynamic BJAODN it's a compromise that
375:
I'd be willing to do that if a few folks would help with tagging, maybe 10 or 20 each. The problem I foresee though is the usual problem with bundled debates, people wanting to delete some and keep others. Perhaps if people who think this should be a bundled debate could comment that way rather than
279:
for a number of reasons. First, most of these are not actually funny. Really. Very few of them raise so much as a smile form me, and I like to laugh. Second, what part of the mission of building an encyclopaedia does this serve? One page of BJAODN with ruthless pruning , fine, all very amusing,
992:
Why? There's no such rule, and of course folks who frequent BJAODN will want the whole shebang kept. You're not going to get a speedy keep either as this is a good faith nomination with several other people advocating deletion. However, we might start again and tag all the pages this time (still to
611:
Unfair. I advocated deletion of this, and I am responsible for numerous things in project space which are kept because a few of us find them funny. The problem here is not BJAODN, it's BJAODN archives 2 - 60 and up. One page, with some really funny stuff, fantastic. A hundred pages of vandalism
1314:
of best picks, and add a page where new bits could be proposed and eventually moved to collection - with encouragement to weed the "lamest of the jokes deleted for a good reasonā¢" out before they get permanently enshrined. Rolling model = good. However, MfD is not really the place to get processes
204:
Again, my reason for wanting to keep this is so that the issue can be reviewed differently. This issue needs an
Esperanza-type approach, and nominating the whole project doesn't necessarily mean the whole project will be deleted (you could easily propose there that only subpages be deleted, and to
689:
I'm curious: if all 60+ of the BJAODN pages are so imporant, why are you afraid that this particular nomination will be overlooked? I mean, if every page is absolutely necessary, wouldn't everyone who wants to add their opinion to this discussion notice it even if it is on one random BJAODN page?
186:
As I said, the central page can stay. One page. If this MFD fails, I move on. If it passes, I'll get all of them nominated using this as a precedent. I did consider nominating them all straight off the bat, but was advised against it - 80 pages is a lot to nominate in one go, and some folks don't
458:
said above, we might need a laugh but not 60+ pages of laughs. (Not that much of it is very funny anyway). I'm even willing to compromise by deleting in a move/delete/restore cycle so that all edits are retained, but in the article history of the central BJAODN page, just not spread out over 5-7
788:
because this is not the way to change such a significant custom. Personally, I find these pages reminders of trivial a sense of humor can get, (but of course if we started deleting individual ones on that basis there would be nothing left) so after suitable discussion I will !vote to delete the
77:
links to some 60 numbered BJAODN archives, and another 2 dozen or so "special collections". This is utterly absurd. First of all, we should be discouraging the creation of joke articles and nonsense whereas this meticulous cataloguing of it seems to me to be encouraging it. Your edits might get
1309:
Great strategy, really great, so far the most sensible strategy to get anything deleted, really... In all seriousness, I think the best solution would be to mark the unfettered BJAODN historical (and keep whatever the crap we have in the current collections), and for the future, only have a
912:, rather than stuff than can merely be accessed with obscure diffs. In fact, most pages of BJAODN can be filled up with lists of diffs, although this might make browsing it a less pleasant experience. And I assume that we're only talking about the sixty-something archives,
1240:- I don't think that all of us are on the same page here. If you all want BJAODN to be reconstructed, start a motion to do so on the talk page. MFD isn't the place to do it. The people voting keep are under the impression that BJAODN will be completely destroyed.
365:
I think closing this nomination and renominating the whole thing will serve to gain a better consensus on the issue. While I appreciate kingboyk's boldness in "testing the waters," I think this needs to be tackled with all the pages in question nominated.
1442:
1406:
1150:, but the arguments there don't seem to apply in the special case of BJAODN because it has no requirement to be notable and is full of false information by design. Perhaps the best option would be to remove all the non-funny information to leave just
838:
In my opinion, humorous articles on wikipedia, including BJAODN, have been not well organized. One solution to this problem is to establish a new WikiProject to evaluate the inclusion and organize all humor-related wikipedia pages on projectspace.
469:
52:. I've listened to all these suggestions and have decided the best way forward would be to withdraw this nomination and go with the community led proposal. Please direct any further discussion to AN or to the cleanup page when it's created. --
78:
deleted but you'll get a spot in BJAODN for ever and a day! Secondly, it's exactly this kind of activity which presents
Knowledge (XXG) as a frivolous social networking site, not an encyclopedia. I'm not a party pooper; I advocate having
828:
I agree that smerging the content would be appropriate. I would like to, however, solicit responses to this question: How can we decide what to keep and what not to keep in the proecess of smerging in order to keep the most users happy?
1146:, second choice to history-merge all the pages together. Yes, I agree that most of this isn't funny, but I don't really disagree with removing information in this context; the 'it doesn't do any harm' argument's been (rightly) added to
99:
for deletion. One other alternative is to merge all of these pages into one using move/delete/restore; anybody who truly wants to see all 80 or so pages can then trawl through the history. My recommendation, however, is to
482:
357:
1280:. I like it, it's like a version of Esperanza that actually works to remove stress. Why on earth would someone nominate ONLY archive 26 anyway? For those saying it's not funny, then remove the unfunny entries. --
453:
for deletion. I'm nominating one of it's many child/offshoot pages, with the intent of nominating all child pages if this passes. BJAODN is a
Knowledge (XXG) institution that is safe as far as I am concerned. As
256:" of the nominator, as he brings up some very valid points. However, BJAODN is central to Knowledge (XXG)'s culture. When users get a little too uptight over issues, they can just go there and get a good laugh.
191:
should this be kept? I've stated my rationale why it shouldn't be kept, so please help me out - how does it help
Knowledge (XXG) to have these pages? Is this what Jimbo had in mind when he started the project?
942:
I would be silly not to acceptĀ :) Do you think consensus can be achieved for that and if so how? Are we again talking about nominating all 60 archives for deletion or do you have another process in mind? --
1539:
Copying content from mainspace to projectspace does not constitute copyvio, as it is just content trans-namespace within wikipedia. Also we should not delete a longstanding page on wikipedia community.
1008:
I don't want structural changes, I want to delete 59 pages of (mainly) complete crap. Just to be absolutely clear here. And speedy keep is an invalid !vote after so many deletes have been registered.
1390:
BJAODN serves absolutely no purpose in building an encyclopedia. Some of it is funny, some of it is not. But guess what? Being "funny" still serves no purpose. Although the MfD might not result in a
1252:
It looks like the issue has been decided, but I'll speak up anyhow. If ever there was a declaration of war on one of
Knowledge (XXG)'s oldest and fondest traditions, this is it. We'll replace
861:
How about this: we announce that, after a month (or maybe two), we will delete all current archives. However, during that time period, it can be funneled by anyone into, say, five (at most ten)
1665:
I think you have misunderstood me, I never said I would support keeping all 60 pages on BJAODN. In fact I think cleanup is very necessary. I was only rebutting the claim that BJAODN should be
1848:
1830:
1817:
1772:
1763:
1740:
1682:
1673:
1660:
1647:
1626:
1590:
1581:
1572:
1553:
1544:
1534:
1521:
1482:
1433:
1385:
1373:
1361:
1346:
1330:
1289:
1272:
1244:
1232:
1194:
1127:
1081:
1057:
1048:
1021:
997:
987:
972:
956:
946:
928:
890:
881:
856:
843:
833:
823:
795:
776:
756:
747:
724:
694:
684:
654:
625:
602:
588:
571:
539:
513:
489:
476:
463:
440:
419:
389:
380:
370:
351:
342:
326:
317:
305:
293:
269:
260:
229:
216:
196:
181:
150:
137:
108:
56:
548:
499:
These pages are in the main not remotely funny; they are simply collections of vandalism. Maybe at most we should have a nomination page where people can nominate things to go on a single
908:
That's just about what I had in mind. We may have to stricter about what we accept, although I don't want to see any edit warring about it! The most important thing is that we archive
1700:
Move all the content that's actually funny elsewhere, determine its source (for legal reasons), and history-merge everything else together in case someone wants to salvage it later
123:
1425:
but did not make a policy based argument, this is not a vote and "votes" without policy based argument will not be given much weight if any when it comes time to judge consensus.
1354:. No deletion discussion is needed for pruning. Make one good page, turn the other pages into redirects, and then you haven't done a "deletion" at all, so MFD is irrelevant.
1162:
and let them sort the mess out. (I think this is unsatisfactory for both wikis, as well as complicating the legal situation further, but I'm mentioning it for consideration.) --
980:. If you want structural changes ("cleanup") of BJAODN, you should start on the talk page, not here. MfD should only consider this if discussion there won't (or didn't) work.
89:
This is a test nomination of a randomly selected page; if it succeeds I will nominate all of the other pages except for a central archive page, and also nominate the template
205:
keep the central page, similar to the decentralization of
Esperanza - only this wouldn't be tagged as historical). Perhaps I should have just used "close" and not "keep". --
167:
62:
313:- way too much, not a little unencyclopedic, and not amusing. I have no problem with one, maybe two pages of "rolling" BJAODNs, but this is really excessive.
521:. As has been said before, these pages are just collections of (mostly lame) vandalism. Keeping them all around is a total waste of time and space. I think
1381:. WP:ILIKEIT isn't enough reason to keep here; it violates the basic premises of the project. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not a joke collection. --
703:
A very small portion people will read this archive while this debate is going on; but someone might want to go through all the BJAODN and see all of them
1398:, and BJAODN are a young, hot, nubile virgin making out with her boyfriend in a car parked in a field and about to go to third base for the first time.
886:
One current page and say 5 best ofs? I, personally, could live with that. Is that what you have in mind? How would we seek consensus for the action? --
848:
That would be one of the first times I'm aware of a WikiProject being created solely to deal with pages not at all related to the actual encyclopedia.
49:
406:
That's a lot of work if there is clear consensus to keep. I'd say stick with the "live" one, which is most likely to be seen, and see what happens.
1752:. Why do people continue to think that everything deemed serious (like Knowledge (XXG)) should be totally void of any humor? Grow a funny bone. --
1652:
This is an encyclopedia. How many times does that point have to be made? We're saying you can keep a handful of BJAODN pages. How many times does
1208:, which is indeed a reasonably short list that has new items added and old items removed. Unlike BJAODN, LAME is actually funny most of the time.
522:
852:. I agree with you, however, that something does need to be done. Any ideas on how to define objective criteria on what stays and what goes? --
804:
1577:
Oops I didn't notice that subtle technicality. But a remedy would be prune it and keep the best one, find the author and add their names.
1517:
is a dictionary). The funny pages should not be deleted based on NOT because the jurisdiction of NOT in projectspace is not clearcut yet.
17:
1369:
and boldly remove the unfunny ones. Probably doesn't need to be reduced to one page, but something in single figures should be enough. --
637:
If you want to nominate this for deletion, and use it as a precedent, then put it on the main BJAODN page, so everyone can notice.
485:. I found no evidence that the main page has ever been linked to an mfd. I too am curious: where are the deletion discussions? --
1812:
122:, maybe speedily (as a "test"). This isn't the way this issue should be addressed - it should have been brought up on BJAODN's
1621:
1567:
1477:
1326:
1190:
360:. I found no evidence that the main page has ever been linked to an mfd. I am curious: where are the deletion discussions?
1717:
1549:
Oh yes it does, unless the author names were copied too! Knowledge (XXG) doesn't own the copyrights, the author does. --
1173:
720:
680:
650:
1863:
36:
1151:
1099:
527:"NONE OF THE RECENTLY ADDED CRAP IS FUNNY AT ALL. IN THE FUTURE, PLEASE CHOOSE SOMETHING FUNNY TO ADD TO THIS FILE."
1669:
deleted. Sorry if I've confused anyone. I do support deleting unnecessary, unfunny and redundant pages in BJAODN.
1140:(this remains broadly my opinion, but I'm clarifying it by adding a new one at the bottom and striking this one)
905:
865:
archives. This is just cleanup. I am strongly against getting it all on one page, since that page is going to be
334:
this was discussed so many times before... And whatever relieves the stress of editors is good for encyclopedia.
1467:. And, many of these are GFDL violations, not giving proper attribution to the original creator. That's a plain
1822:
Lol. Nothing like reading an entire debate before contributing is there? Just see one line above, comment from
1616:
1562:
1472:
1706:
that grew up about this MfD. My opinion above still broadly stands; this comment is to clarify what I mean. --
1605:
Personal essays on topics relating to
Knowledge (XXG) are welcome in your user namespace or on the Meta-wiki.
1862:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
535:
473:
386:
367:
348:
222:
221:
Thanks for clearing that up. If consensus shows people want an umbrella nom, I will oblige as per below and
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
1631:
If some kind of interpretation of NOT mandates the deletion of funny pages, I must invoke the doctrine of
187:
like big blanket nominations, so I was advised to test the waters first. Anyway, never mind the process -
503:
which would only contain the very best, but pointless to have these collections with so much rubbish in.
1076:
1043:
984:
771:
742:
711:
671:
641:
1514:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below.
1269:
1241:
925:
878:
820:
257:
93:
71:
1807:
1802:
210:
175:
131:
1261:
807:, and most entries into BJAODN do not have BJAODN inclusion as the goal. I will vote an extremely
450:
1209:
531:
170:
itself so the whole project could be discussed. Plus, what if this nomination doesn't succeed? --
1640:
1639:
and helps Wikipedians to explore and edit Knowledge (XXG) with more fun. To policies, sometimes
1636:
564:
1758:
1382:
1322:
1186:
506:
1783:
1749:
1558:
1506:
1205:
1147:
552:
166:
of BJAODN, why nominate only this page? It would have been more appropriate to just nominate
86:
BJAODN page, which is filled on a rolling basis. New additions to the page must replace old.
1724:
1714:
1358:
1285:
1170:
1067:
1034:
981:
768:
739:
716:
676:
646:
376:"keep" or "delete" and if there's plenty of movement for doing it that way, sure. Thanks. --
1632:
1608:
1607:". there are similar exceptions and such made elsewhere on WP:NOT; BJOADN isn't mentioned.
1527:
1510:
1502:
1498:
1490:
1460:
1418:
1414:
1265:
1111:
849:
560:
556:
253:
1823:
1769:
1679:
1656:
point have to be made? If your wikistress is that bad go do something else for a while! --
1587:
1531:
953:
917:
870:
853:
830:
812:
753:
691:
599:
585:
486:
437:
1841:
1703:
1497:
categorically apply to projectspace, only for the mainspace. I can give many examples of
1253:
1845:
1787:
1736:
455:
302:
266:
207:
172:
128:
1257:
1179:
Note: We can't transwiki to Uncyclopedia because they have an incompatible licence. --
470:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
1840:
While I prefer to just delete the whole lot of them, after reading the discussion at
1827:
1657:
1550:
1427:
1122:
1116:
1054:
1016:
1010:
994:
943:
887:
620:
614:
460:
414:
408:
377:
323:
314:
288:
282:
226:
193:
162:
MFD should be speedily kept - if you want to consider deleting or doing something to
147:
105:
53:
1753:
1317:
1181:
1159:
969:
504:
1439:
1403:
63:
Knowledge (XXG):Close Encounters of the Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense Kind
1711:
1707:
1395:
1355:
1281:
1167:
1163:
789:
entire group of pages as unencyclopedic. But not here, with this little notice.
708:
668:
638:
1768:
Um, no? There is not nearly enough majority either way to snowball this mfd. --
1670:
1644:
1578:
1541:
1518:
1370:
1033:. If one goes, they all go. If they all go, what's left of Knowledge (XXG)? ā
840:
568:
1110:
pages of - for the most part - crap. And if this does not get deleted I will
1735:
if it's deemed to be inappropriate content for Knowledge (XXG) itself. --///
1340:
335:
142:
Sorry? Why isn't this in the scope of MFD? Also, would you care to explain
791:
1797:
1338:- BJAODN is like a little brother to me. A freakish little brother. --
1299:
Just close and discuss this in BJAODN talk or some other, better venue
584:
pages with an equal number of images. It is irrelevant to this mfd. --
1063:
225:. There's no right or wrong answer here so whatever people want... --
126:, or possibly on the Village Pump. This isn't in the scope of MFD. --
1505:(all wikipedia essays are original research, including my own essay
952:
to get the histories from deleted pages for such a silly project. --
551:
which kept funny entries. There are purposes why pages like BJAODN,
301:/Review/do something with it. That many pages is just over the top!
1586:
Feel free to go ahead...60+ pages are just waiting for your TLC. --
1792:
146:
this should be kept, i.e. how does it benefit Knowledge (XXG)? --
1856:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1643:
does make exceptions through the principle established in IAR.
547:
Knowledge (XXG) can contain some humor and fun stuff. We have
1635:(albeit reluctantly). Funny pages in project space relieve
1315:
changed; this should probably be discussed elsewhere... --
1678:
No one is saying that all of BJAODN should be deleted..
1303:"This is a test nomination of a randomly selected page".
612:
preserved for posterity? Less obviously desirable.
168:
Knowledge (XXG):Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1402:everything that isn't funny whatsoever. Mahalo. --
1102:, and it will still have BJAODN, just one page of
50:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard#BJAODN
1530:categorically as blatant copyright violations. --
1501:policies that do not apply on projectspace, like
1394:, the whole thing needs to be pruned like we are
667:, but I hope it will be irrelevant for this MFD.
322:Delete, then make a new BAJODN to put this in. ā
158:Perhaps it is in MFD's scope, then. If anything,
1866:). No further edits should be made to this page.
916:the special collections or April Fools content.
8:
481:Interesting, I just went through the entire
385:I'd do 20 if we got one or two more people.
356:Interesting, I just went through the entire
752:Would you clarify? Which part of above? --
869:. Very long. Very, very, long. Too long.
767:I meant as per the keep arguments above.
850:Seems like we might be getting off track
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
811:if the whole collection is nominated.
120:Close and renominate the whole project
223:User_talk:Picaroon9288#The_BJAODN_MFD
7:
937:would prefer to see all 60 archives
805:Correlation does not imply causation
501:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
250:I misread the intentions of the nom.
525:of this BJAODN page says it best:
468:Where were the previous attempts?
24:
1723:
1731:. Why not? Perhaps it could be
1702:as I've proposed in the thread
1615:should not contain dicdefs. --
1526:But they should be deleted per
347:Where was it discussed before?
1152:Knowledge (XXG):Best of BJAODN
1100:Category:Knowledge (XXG) humor
44:The result of the debate was
1:
563:are established, to relieve
1112:get the Spider-Man suit out
252:- I'm not questioning the "
1883:
1849:21:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1831:20:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1818:19:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1773:18:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1764:18:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1741:20:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1683:18:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1674:18:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1661:17:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1648:17:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1627:17:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1591:17:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1582:17:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1573:17:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1554:17:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1545:17:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1535:16:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1522:16:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1483:16:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1443:16:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1434:16:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1407:16:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1386:16:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1374:16:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1362:16:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1347:10:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1331:08:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1290:07:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1273:01:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1245:01:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1233:16:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
1195:08:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1128:23:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
1082:20:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
1062:A dry, crusty one with no
1058:14:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
1049:14:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
1022:14:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
998:14:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
988:14:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
973:05:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
957:16:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
947:20:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
929:20:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
891:19:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
882:19:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
857:04:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
844:04:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
834:04:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
824:03:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
796:03:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
777:10:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
757:02:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
748:02:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
725:13:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
695:02:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
685:00:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
655:00:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
626:14:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
603:00:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
589:00:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
572:23:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
540:23:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
514:22:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
490:23:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
477:22:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
464:22:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
441:22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
420:23:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
390:22:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
381:22:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
371:22:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
352:22:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
343:22:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
327:22:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
318:22:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
306:22:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
294:22:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
270:22:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
265:But 60+ Pages of laughs??
261:22:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
230:23:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
217:22:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
197:22:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
182:22:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
151:22:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
138:21:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
109:21:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
57:22:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1611:specifically states that
1859:Please do not modify it.
1838:Delete all the archives.
1515:Knowledge (XXG):Glossary
1204:. This should work like
32:Please do not modify it.
1098:No, it will still have
1710:18:29, 23 March 2007 (
1166:14:54, 22 March 2007 (
1780:Keep and speedy close
1746:Keep and speedy close
1307:RANDOMLY SELECTED????
736:Strong Keep and Close
472:doesn't exist (yet).
436:matter for deletion.
663:Also, my opinion is
46:Nomination withdrawn
1617:Consumed Crustacean
1563:Consumed Crustacean
1473:Consumed Crustacean
1469:copyright violation
1266:we already did that
1053:An encyclopedia? --
1438:You hope...Ā ;-) --
1260:before we replace
1114:, see if I don't.
1106:BJAODN instead of
1762:
1625:
1571:
1481:
1432:
1288:
1126:
1020:
723:
706:
683:
653:
624:
418:
292:
251:
1874:
1861:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1756:
1727:
1619:
1565:
1475:
1471:right there. --
1426:
1343:
1284:
1229:
1227:
1225:
1223:
1221:
1120:
1079:
1074:
1046:
1041:
1014:
923:
920:
910:deleted nonsense
876:
873:
818:
815:
774:
745:
719:
714:
704:
679:
674:
649:
644:
618:
510:
412:
340:
286:
249:
213:
178:
134:
98:
92:
76:
70:
34:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1864:deletion review
1857:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1430:
1341:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1213:
1211:
1077:
1068:
1044:
1035:
993:be decided). --
921:
918:
874:
871:
816:
813:
772:
743:
712:
672:
642:
511:
508:
459:dozen pages. --
336:
211:
176:
132:
96:
90:
74:
68:
66:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1880:
1878:
1869:
1868:
1852:
1851:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1743:
1721:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1556:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1428:
1409:
1388:
1376:
1364:
1349:
1333:
1292:
1275:
1247:
1235:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
975:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
798:
782:
781:
780:
779:
762:
761:
760:
759:
738:as per above.
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
698:
697:
687:
658:
657:
635:Speedy Refile.
631:
630:
629:
628:
606:
605:
598:party pooper.
593:
592:
591:
580:redirect, not
549:this precedent
542:
516:
507:
494:
493:
492:
479:
466:
456:User:Reedy Boy
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
363:
362:
361:
354:
329:
320:
308:
296:
274:
273:
272:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1879:
1867:
1865:
1860:
1854:
1853:
1850:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1836:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1733:moved to Meta
1730:
1726:
1722:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1684:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1313:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1083:
1080:
1075:
1073:
1072:
1066:, perhapsā¦ ā
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
999:
996:
991:
990:
989:
986:
983:
979:
976:
974:
971:
967:
964:
958:
955:
950:
949:
948:
945:
940:
936:
932:
931:
930:
926:
924:
915:
911:
907:
904:
892:
889:
885:
884:
883:
879:
877:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
855:
851:
847:
846:
845:
842:
837:
836:
835:
832:
827:
826:
825:
821:
819:
810:
806:
802:
799:
797:
794:
793:
787:
784:
783:
778:
775:
770:
766:
765:
764:
763:
758:
755:
751:
750:
749:
746:
741:
737:
734:
733:
726:
722:
718:
715:
710:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
693:
688:
686:
682:
678:
675:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:
659:
656:
652:
648:
645:
640:
636:
633:
632:
627:
622:
617:
616:
610:
609:
608:
607:
604:
601:
597:
594:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
541:
538:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
512:
505:
502:
498:
495:
491:
488:
484:
483:Whatlinkshere
480:
478:
475:
471:
467:
465:
462:
457:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
439:
434:
431:
430:
421:
416:
411:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
391:
388:
384:
383:
382:
379:
374:
373:
372:
369:
364:
359:
358:Whatlinkshere
355:
353:
350:
346:
345:
344:
341:
339:
333:
330:
328:
325:
321:
319:
316:
312:
309:
307:
304:
300:
297:
295:
290:
285:
284:
278:
275:
271:
268:
264:
263:
262:
259:
255:
248:
247:
243:
231:
228:
224:
220:
219:
218:
215:
214:
209:
203:
200:
199:
198:
195:
190:
185:
184:
183:
180:
179:
174:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
153:
152:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
136:
135:
130:
125:
121:
118:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
103:
95:
87:
85:
81:
73:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1858:
1855:
1842:WP:AN#BJAODN
1837:
1779:
1745:
1732:
1728:
1704:WP:AN#BJAODN
1699:
1666:
1653:
1612:
1604:
1494:
1487:
1468:
1464:
1456:
1450:
1449:
1422:
1411:
1399:
1391:
1378:
1366:
1351:
1339:
1335:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1277:
1264:! Oh wait,
1249:
1237:
1210:
1201:
1180:
1160:Uncyclopedia
1155:
1142:
1141:
1115:
1107:
1103:
1070:
1069:
1037:
1036:
1030:
1009:
977:
965:
938:
934:
913:
909:
866:
862:
808:
800:
790:
785:
735:
664:
634:
613:
595:
581:
577:
544:
530:
529:
526:
518:
500:
496:
446:
432:
407:
337:
331:
310:
298:
281:
276:
245:
244:
206:
201:
188:
171:
163:
159:
155:
143:
127:
119:
115:
114:
101:
88:
83:
79:
67:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1609:WP:NOT#DICT
1511:WP:NOT#DICT
1396:Leatherface
1064:lubrication
1031:Strong Keep
982:Gavia immer
978:Speedy Keep
966:Speedy keep
809:strong keep
769:mrholybrain
740:mrholybrain
545:Strong Keep
523:one section
449:nominating
433:strong keep
1824:Iamunknown
1770:Iamunknown
1680:Iamunknown
1667:completely
1637:Wikistress
1588:Iamunknown
1532:Iamunknown
1528:WP:CSD#G12
1457:relist all
1312:collection
1270:YechielMan
954:Iamunknown
935:personally
854:Iamunknown
831:Iamunknown
754:Iamunknown
692:Iamunknown
586:Iamunknown
565:wikistress
487:Iamunknown
438:Wintermut3
1846:DougĀ Bell
1737:Jrothwell
1503:WP:NOT#OR
1352:Avoid MFD
1262:WP:BJAODN
1156:transwiki
705:(like me)
576:That was
451:WP:BJAODN
303:Reedy Boy
267:Reedy Boy
124:talk page
1828:kingboyk
1658:kingboyk
1641:WP:SENSE
1613:articles
1551:kingboyk
1238:Comment!
1055:kingboyk
995:kingboyk
944:kingboyk
888:kingboyk
863:numbered
721:contribs
681:contribs
651:contribs
532:Warpstar
474:Picaroon
461:kingboyk
387:Picaroon
378:kingboyk
368:Picaroon
349:Picaroon
315:Moreschi
227:kingboyk
194:kingboyk
148:kingboyk
106:kingboyk
84:only one
54:kingboyk
1784:WP:SNOW
1754:Edokter
1750:WP:SNOW
1559:WP:GFDL
1507:WP:RDAL
1488:Comment
1383:Rory096
1318:wwwwolf
1206:WP:LAME
1182:wwwwolf
1148:WP:AADD
1071:$ PŠÆING
1038:$ PŠÆING
970:RockMFR
801:Comment
773:'s talk
744:'s talk
553:WP:NOTO
202:Comment
156:Comment
1708:ais523
1633:WP:IAR
1509:) and
1499:WP:NOT
1491:WP:NOT
1465:policy
1461:WP:NOT
1453:Delete
1451:Strong
1419:WP:NOT
1415:WP:ENC
1412:Delete
1400:Delete
1392:delete
1379:Delete
1359:(talk)
1356:Friday
1327:growls
1305:Um...
1282:tjstrf
1202:Delete
1191:growls
1164:ais523
985:(talk)
561:WP:DOF
559:, and
557:WP:TOE
519:Delete
497:Delete
311:Delete
299:Delete
277:Delete
102:delete
94:Bjaodn
72:Bjaodn
1789:ĶĩÅĪ²Č³
1671:Wooyi
1645:Wooyi
1579:Wooyi
1542:Wooyi
1519:Wooyi
1493:does
1440:Ali'i
1404:Ali'i
1371:Tango
1323:barks
1254:WP:OR
1250:Keep.
1212:: -->
1187:barks
1123:Help!
1108:sixty
1104:funny
1078:rĪ±gŃ
1045:rĪ±gŃ
1017:Help!
922:notes
919:Grace
875:notes
872:Grace
841:Wooyi
817:notes
814:Grace
621:Help!
600:Derex
569:Wooyi
536:Rider
415:Help!
338:Grue
324:Steel
289:Help!
254:faith
212:desat
177:desat
133:desat
16:<
1826:. --
1809:ŤÄÆɱƩ
1786:. --
1782:per
1759:Talk
1748:per
1739:///
1729:Keep
1654:that
1622:talk
1568:talk
1478:talk
1429:InBC
1423:Keep
1367:Keep
1342:AAA!
1336:Keep
1295:Keep
1286:talk
1278:Keep
1258:WP:V
1256:and
1228:<
1143:Keep
867:long
786:keep
665:keep
596:Keep
509:Phil
445:I'm
332:Keep
246:KEEP
208:Core
173:Core
160:this
129:Core
116:Keep
82:and
1561:--
1495:not
1463:is
1297:or
1242:PTO
1158:to
1117:Guy
1011:Guy
939:and
914:not
792:DGG
717:g92
677:g92
647:g92
615:Guy
582:60+
578:one
447:not
409:Guy
283:Guy
258:PTO
189:why
164:all
144:why
80:one
1459:.
1455:/
1417:,
1329:)
1301:.
1193:)
1176:)
933:I
927:Ā§
880:Ā§
829:--
822:Ā§
709:Ab
707:.
690:--
669:Ab
639:Ab
567:.
555:,
192:--
104:.
97:}}
91:{{
75:}}
69:{{
1814:Ć
1804:ā„
1799:ā„
1794:ā„
1761:)
1757:(
1720:)
1718:C
1715:T
1712:U
1624:)
1620:(
1603:"
1570:)
1566:(
1513:(
1480:)
1476:(
1325:/
1321:(
1226:t
1224:n
1222:a
1220:i
1218:d
1216:a
1214:R
1189:/
1185:(
1174:C
1171:T
1168:U
1125:)
1121:(
1019:)
1015:(
906:ā
713:e
673:e
643:e
623:)
619:(
417:)
413:(
291:)
287:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.