Knowledge (XXG)

:Miscellany for deletion/Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all uses of "ignore all rules" - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

70: 63: 167:
It's not a "user essay", it's a mainspace essay. However, I see now that this was ill-considered on my part, and I've attempted to improve the essay instead. Motion to delete is
180: 160: 143: 122: 104: 82: 57: 109:
I probably wouldn't have nominated it for deletion if the essay itself had been easier to follow. I thought there was one good point therein, namely "
88:
Looks like a deliberate play on words to me. And last time I recall, use of a light-hearted title in itself was not a criterion for deletion.
17: 193: 36: 192:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
171:(though as short as it is, it seems like it should either be expanded or merged with something else.) 176: 118: 98: 78: 156: 113:". Perhaps the page could be rewritten around that, if such an essay does not already exist. 172: 114: 93: 74: 152: 151:- it's a user essay, however brief it may be. I see no reason to delete it. -- 139: 53: 135: 49: 73:, the title makes no sense. How does one ignore the use of a rule? 186:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
92:, unless you can find a more reasonable rationale for deletion. 111:
The vast majority of times, rules should not be ignored
64:
Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all uses of "ignore all rules"
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 196:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion 7: 24: 44:The result of the discussion was 1: 181:07:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 161:06:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 144:05:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 123:05:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 105:04:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 83:03:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 58:15:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 213: 189:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 46:withdrawn by nominator 134:- it's an essay. -- 101: 204: 191: 99: 34: 212: 211: 207: 206: 205: 203: 202: 201: 200: 194:deletion review 187: 69:As pointed out 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 210: 208: 199: 198: 183: 164: 163: 146: 128: 127: 126: 125: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 209: 197: 195: 190: 184: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 165: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 145: 141: 137: 133: 130: 129: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 106: 103: 102: 95: 91: 87: 86: 85: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71:some time ago 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 188: 185: 168: 148: 131: 110: 97: 89: 68: 45: 43: 31: 28: 169:withdrawn 173:PSWG1920 115:PSWG1920 94:Grutness 75:PSWG1920 153:Eastlaw 16:< 177:talk 157:talk 149:Keep 140:talk 132:Keep 119:talk 100:wha? 90:Keep 79:talk 54:talk 96:... 179:) 159:) 142:) 121:) 81:) 56:) 48:-- 175:( 155:( 138:( 136:B 117:( 77:( 52:( 50:B

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
deletion review
B
talk
15:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all uses of "ignore all rules"
some time ago
PSWG1920
talk
03:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Grutness
wha?
04:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
PSWG1920
talk
05:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
B
talk
05:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Eastlaw
talk
06:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
PSWG1920
talk
07:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.