308:
lead to the ban. If this page did not exist then the banning process would be much less transparent. As for the "none of anyone's business" claim, it certainly is our business to decide who is and is not allowed to edit our encyclopedia, and I don't see how this could possibly constitute harassment. Furthermore this information is not only of interest to admins, and even if it was there is no way to keep the page while making it invisible to non-admins.
307:
none of the nominator's concerns are valid. This page does serve a useful purpose beyond historical archiving, in that bans are enforced by removing any edits made by the banned editor. To do this it is helpful to have a page which tells you whether someone is banned and which lays out concerns which
218:
problems with the list to make it more accessible and to remove older records to subpages or collapsed sections. This nomination's contention that this is "none of anyone's business" is ridiculous. Even if we didn't have the list, the banning discussions and the talk pages of the banned users are
111:
72:
Unnecessary list. If it is useful for admins then perhaps this list could be only for admins to see. Publicly putting a scarlet letter on people being bad is not the way to go. It just invites nosy people to see why people are banned and it is really none of anyone's business.
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
219:
still available for anyone to see. Also, sorry to disappoint you but there is no secret namespace that only admins can see, so that option is off the table. And lastly, the mfd tag does not properly link to this discussion, please fix it.
106:
399:
I know I said 10 but I don't see the need to keep this going. I still disagree with this "naming and shaming" list here but if consensus is against me, then consensus is against me.
85:
by letting said nosy people gawk at all those bad people with their scarlet letters from past wikicrimes that they might not even remember. All this can do is reopen old wounds.
404:
295:
242:
90:
78:
408:
390:
373:
350:
333:
316:
299:
274:
260:
246:
228:
202:
168:
94:
60:
400:
291:
238:
86:
74:
17:
181:
no policy-based reason for deleting it. Considering that there are some that could be made, there's little reason to continue with this
358:
it aids in quickly implementing the policy regarding banned users, and making it admin access only would mostly defeat the point.--
66:
368:
426:
40:
182:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
422:
197:
163:
36:
386:
256:
224:
81:) 17:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Adding, since policy must be included, this could be considered a form of
364:
270:
186:
152:
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
382:
346:
252:
220:
112:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users/Banned by the
Arbitration Committee
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
360:
266:
329:
310:
54:
342:
290:
If 10 users vote keep before the first delete, I'll withdraw the nomination.
325:
137:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)
132:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (5th nomination)
127:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (4th nomination)
122:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (3rd nomination)
117:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (2nd nomination)
415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
177:
Even now, after changing the rationale a little, there is
107:
Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
429:). No further edits should be made to this page.
151:- no policy-based reason for deletion given.
8:
265:It was also not transcluded, now I did it.--
341:. This is a frivolous nomination. I'm #5.--
381:, per Gilderien; my thoughts exactly. --
104:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
98:
401:The most interesting man in the world
292:The most interesting man in the world
239:The most interesting man in the world
87:The most interesting man in the world
75:The most interesting man in the world
7:
214:One or two of us are working on the
67:Knowledge (XXG):List of banned users
48:The result of the discussion was
24:
102:All prior XfDs for this page:
1:
449:
324:per Hut 8.5. Well said. --
409:17:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
391:17:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
374:16:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
351:23:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
334:22:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
317:18:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
300:18:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
275:18:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
261:17:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
247:17:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
229:17:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
203:18:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
169:17:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
101:
95:18:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
61:18:22, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
237:The link works now.
199:(tell Luke off here)
165:(tell Luke off here)
50:Nomination withdrawn
369:List of good deeds
145:
144:
440:
420:
372:
371:
195:
192:
189:
161:
158:
155:
99:
34:
448:
447:
443:
442:
441:
439:
438:
437:
433:
427:deletion review
416:
363:
359:
193:
190:
187:
159:
156:
153:
149:Procedural keep
141:
70:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
446:
444:
435:
432:
431:
394:
393:
376:
353:
336:
319:
302:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
232:
231:
208:
207:
206:
205:
183:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
172:
171:
143:
142:
140:
139:
134:
129:
124:
119:
114:
109:
103:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
445:
436:
430:
428:
424:
419:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
370:
366:
362:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
313:
306:
303:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
285:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
210:
209:
204:
201:
200:
196:
184:
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:
162:
150:
147:
146:
138:
135:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
100:
97:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:WP:Harassment
80:
76:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
57:
52:, see below.
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
417:
414:
396:
395:
378:
355:
338:
321:
311:
309:
304:
287:
215:
211:
198:
185:nomination.
178:
164:
148:
71:
55:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
383:Yellow1996
253:Beeblebrox
221:Beeblebrox
423:talk page
361:Gilderien
267:Ymblanter
37:talk page
425:or in a
397:Withdraw
251:Thanks.
39:or in a
312:Hut 8.5
288:Comment
56:Hut 8.5
216:actual
343:Bbb23
179:still
16:<
405:talk
387:talk
379:Keep
365:Chat
356:Keep
347:talk
339:Keep
330:talk
322:Keep
305:Keep
296:talk
271:talk
257:talk
243:talk
225:talk
212:Keep
188:Luke
154:Luke
91:talk
79:talk
326:BDD
407:)
389:)
349:)
332:)
298:)
273:)
259:)
245:)
227:)
194:94
191:no
160:94
157:no
93:)
403:(
385:(
367:|
345:(
328:(
294:(
269:(
255:(
241:(
223:(
89:(
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.