218:
I personally wouldn't say so. Usually I see inactive WikiProject banner templates left alone on the talk pages where they were placed, presumably because it's a lot of work to clean them up, but I think it's actually a benefit because it means that people can see there was once a WikiProject for this
52:. I’m just sort of IAR closing this because the nominator seems to have informally withdrawn and there’s no delete votes or really any strong argument to delete (it’s not stillborn, it’s not broken or incomprehensible, so what’s the big deal?)
141:
I have struck part of my comment because I've just seen there was quite a lot of activity from 2006-2008, but nothing in the last decade. The question remains about what to do with long-term inactive projects like this. — Martin
219:
and find it again, which may lead them to want to revive it. Even if no one does so, however, retaining the template and the associated pages doesn't hurt anything, so I can't see a good logic for deleting it in any case.
97:
93:
85:
89:
168:. Especially considering that it was active for a time, I see no reason not to do as such here. If anything, it can be marked defunct and otherwise left alone.
80:
72:
248:
Talk page clutter is one reason. The fact that someone set something up 15 years ago, should not mean that we have to retain it forever. — Martin
347:
330:
318:
293:
260:
243:
213:
192:
154:
135:
66:
198:
17:
286:
236:
185:
266:
270:
220:
169:
366:
40:
164:: Inactive WikiProject pages are generally not deleted solely due to lack of recent activity, and often retained for
120:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
362:
36:
62:
327:
314:
326:
per above. We are not saving hard drive space by deleting. "Talk page clutter" is not a problem. —
165:
54:
361:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
342:
310:
255:
208:
149:
130:
338:
251:
204:
145:
126:
357:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
197:
Would it be reasonable to delete the project banner template (
335:
Fair enough. I am happy to withdraw this nomination — Martin
309:: Was active. Tag inactive. Archive. Don’t delete history.
105:
101:
115:
Inactive WikiProject on niche topic, set up in 2006
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
369:). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:) and retain the actual project pages? — Martin
8:
81:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
73:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
123:I am nominating for deletion — Martin
199:Template:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
7:
48:The result of the discussion was:
24:
267:Template:WikiProject banner shell
1:
117:and never gained any traction
348:18:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
331:21:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
319:22:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
294:16:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
261:16:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
244:12:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
214:12:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
193:11:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
155:11:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
136:10:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
67:06:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
386:
278:(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)
228:(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)
177:(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)
359:Please do not modify it.
119:. Per the suggestion in
32:Please do not modify it.
166:historical interest
55:(non-admin closure)
346:
290:
279:
274:
265:Well, that's why
259:
240:
229:
224:
212:
189:
178:
173:
153:
134:
57:
377:
336:
284:
277:
272:
249:
234:
227:
222:
202:
183:
176:
171:
143:
124:
110:
109:
53:
34:
385:
384:
380:
379:
378:
376:
375:
374:
373:
367:deletion review
83:
79:
76:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
383:
381:
372:
371:
353:
352:
351:
350:
321:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
287:inquire within
237:inquire within
186:inquire within
158:
157:
113:
112:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
382:
370:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
349:
344:
340:
334:
333:
332:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
295:
292:
291:
288:
281:
280:
275:
268:
264:
263:
262:
257:
253:
247:
246:
245:
242:
241:
238:
231:
230:
225:
217:
216:
215:
210:
206:
200:
196:
195:
194:
191:
190:
187:
180:
179:
174:
167:
163:
160:
159:
156:
151:
147:
140:
139:
138:
137:
132:
128:
122:
121:WP:INACTIVEWP
118:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
358:
356:
323:
306:
283:
282:
276:
271:
233:
232:
226:
221:
182:
181:
175:
170:
161:
116:
114:
49:
47:
31:
28:
59:Dronebogus
363:talk page
328:Alalch E.
311:SmokeyJoe
37:talk page
365:or in a
269:exists.
39:or in a
94:history
273:silvia
223:silvia
172:silvia
102:watch
98:links
16:<
343:talk
339:MSGJ
324:Keep
315:talk
307:Keep
256:talk
252:MSGJ
209:talk
205:MSGJ
162:Keep
150:talk
146:MSGJ
131:talk
127:MSGJ
106:logs
90:talk
86:edit
63:talk
50:keep
341:·
317:)
254:·
207:·
148:·
129:·
104:|
100:|
96:|
92:|
88:|
65:)
345:)
337:(
313:(
289:)
285:(
258:)
250:(
239:)
235:(
211:)
203:(
188:)
184:(
152:)
144:(
133:)
125:(
111:
108:)
84:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.