35:
95:
1005:
Consensus may also be that while a certain journal is notable on its own, it is best to cover the material in another article (for example, on the publisher's article). This is a matter of editorial judgment, and the essay takes no stance on whether it is best for a journal to have its own article,
468:
Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". While the notability of a journal is often correlated to the quality or importance of its scholarship, they are not synonymous. High quality research can be published in low-circulation journals, just as poor research may be published in
911:
For journals in humanities, the existing citation indices and Google
Scholar often provide inadequate and incomplete information. In these cases, one can also look at how frequently the journal is held in various academic libraries when evaluating whether C2 is satisfied. This information is often
477:
that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller journals also can be notable if they can be considered to be influential in their field. Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economics, history, literature, science, or education.
1128:
Knowledge (XXG) editors have been known to reject nominations for deletion that have been inadequately researched. Research should include attempts to find sources that might demonstrate notability, and/or information that would demonstrate notability in another manner. See
991:
Many journals are non-notable by themselves, but are published by notable organizations. While a journal may not be worthy of having its own article, it can be helpful to include some information about the journal in the publisher's article. For instance the
551:, then it is not notable even though other journals in its field are commonly notable. Likewise a journal published by a notable organization does not necessarily mean that the journal is itself notable. Likewise, just because the journal is indexed in a
670:
be an appropriate topic for coverage in
Knowledge (XXG) because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject. Independent, third-party sources must exist for every topic that receives its own article on Knowledge (XXG) (see
675:: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it."). For the routine, uncontroversial details of a journal, official institutional and professional sources are accepted.
950:
C3 may be satisfied for both current and defunct journals. Journals that have been the focus of historical analysis can be covered under this criterion. An example of a journal that would qualify by C3 alone would be
1027:) simply because there is not a lot to say about individual sections. On the other hand, some such sections become very prominent in their own way, and can be covered in a separate article (for example, the
939:
Journal age is not a consideration here. While there is a correlation between age and notability, simply having published academic works for a long period of time is not considered sufficient to satisfy
481:
Even if editors personally believe a journal is "important" or "inherently notable", journals are only accepted as notable if they have attracted notice in reliable sources. The fact that a journal
1002:, and while the society is notable on its own, this journal is not. But since the journal is an important part of the society's activity, the article on the society should mention the journal.
1109:
855:) as an expert source in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media or blogs, is not unexpected for academic journals and so falls short of this mark.
1156:
981:
485:
is by itself not enough to support notability. Hundreds if not thousand of publications can exist in each field, many of them short-lived, while others amount to nothing more than
421:
257:
905:
is a useful metric, although can be hard to reliably obtain for the above reason, and again needs to be compared against what constitute high h-index in the journal's field.
303:
894:
308:
804:
428:, but are not necessarily so. Journals could be known for being historically influential in an area of research now considered obsolete, or even in influential in a
901:. The comprehensiveness of the coverage varies by field, geography, language, and thus the threshold for constitute "frequently cited" varies by field. A journal's
214:
1188:
238:
385:. For the sake of simplicity, all such publications will be referred as 'journals' in this essay, unless otherwise noted. Non-scholarly publications, such as
455:, this will be often be sufficient to create a stub on a particular journal. However, this does not exempt the journal from meeting notability requirements.
334:
1057:
If no criteria can be met for either a standalone article or inclusion in a more general article, then there are two deletion procedures to be considered:
1039:
1151:
1097:
1021:). Although such sections may be listed individually in some databases, it can be preferable to cover them together in one single article (for example,
559:, aim for being comprehensive, and will index almost everything they can, regardless of impact or significance. It is not the job of Knowledge (XXG) to
1062:
474:
482:
394:
747:
Journal size is not a consideration here. Simply having published a large number of academic works is not considered sufficient to satisfy
54:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
570:
that contain information about non-notable journals. However, such lists are still subject to
Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies, such as
55:
994:
207:
1081:
797:
556:
250:
627:
or other notability criteria. The merits of an article on the journal will depend largely on the extent to which the material is
765:
508:
486:
327:
632:
612:
544:
417:
269:
264:
226:
824:
245:
231:
221:
777:
1146:
1074:
298:
1104:
that the article is being considered for deletion. If using the AfD process, you can also tag the deletion discussion with
616:
276:
145:
130:
115:
293:
320:
999:
890:
751:. The reverse is also true, a journal having published only a few articles is not necessarily disqualified by this.
720:
Journals dedicated to legitimate scholarship will often meet at least one of C1, C2, or C3. However, simply being
628:
470:
448:
1045:
1023:
524:
928:. Data on library holdings need to be interpreted in the light of what can be expected for the specific subject.
882:
819:
1080:
For cases where you are unsure about deletion or believe others might object, nominate the article for the
968:
624:
536:
433:
409:
352:
197:
190:
183:
111:
47:
862:
773:
769:
552:
501:
666:
It is possible for a journal to qualify for a stand-alone article according to this standard and yet not
168:
59:
587:
69:
1073:
at the top of the article. This allows the article to be deleted after 7 days if nobody objects (see
886:
164:
1101:
711:
523:
In the sense that a journal has been published, it may have been noted by various entities like the
944:. The reverse is also true, a recently established journal is not necessarily disqualified by this.
917:
371:
1130:
560:
152:
43:
1028:
851:
548:
364:
114:; that is significant, interesting, or unusual enough to be worthy of notice, as established by
531:, who assign and compile information about serial publications. For the purposes of this essay,
348:
156:
849:
may be satisfied, for example, if the journal is frequently quoted in conventional media (e.g.
1015:
1088:
When nominating an article for deletion (via either the PROD or AfD processes), please place
567:
540:
379:
368:
356:
107:
1066:
707:
575:
444:
375:
1037:
Supplement series are also best covered in their associated journal's article, hence why
722:
452:
425:
17:
619:, it qualifies for a stand-alone article. If a journal meets none of these criteria, it
1092:
at the top of its talk page, as well as any other relevant
Wikiproject templates (e.g.
878:
870:
866:
793:
761:
386:
728:
672:
650:: The journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area.
571:
139:
124:
1182:
921:
832:
814:
691:
578:, and editorial decisions to exclude non-notable journals from such lists can apply.
515:
in independent scholarly publications, news media, books, theses, and other sources.
429:
432:. It is possible for a journal not to be notable under this guidance but still meet
62:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
958:
757:
The most typical way of satisfying C1 is to show that the journal is included in
953:
360:
469:
widely read journals. Major journals are likely to have more readily available
390:
489:
scams. A journal can be considered notable if it can be demonstrated to have
828:
566:
These general rules-of-thumb do not prohibit the creation or maintenance of
160:
1173:
861:
The only reasonably accurate way of finding citations to journals are via
497:
in its field. This is usually verified through the journal's inclusion in
424:, etc. Journals found to be notable under these criteria are likely to be
528:
382:
1006:
or if it is best to cover the journal as a section of another article.
925:
902:
807:
in the broader community for this being a suitable notability criteria.
623:
still qualify for a stand-alone article, if it meets the conditions of
967:
It should be noted that journals that pass C3 will almost always pass
898:
874:
781:
823:
usually qualifies (except for journals indexed in the non-selective
1084:
process (or AfD), where its merits will be discussed for 7 days.
1069:
especially), but are uncontroversial deletion candidates, place
416:
from the other subject-specific notability guidelines, such as
1110:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Deletion sorting/Academic journals
89:
29:
1168:
662:: The journal is historically important in its subject area.
656:: The journal is frequently cited by other reliable sources.
543:. If the journal has received no or very little notice from
1157:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Academic Journals/Writing guide
982:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Academic Journals/Writing guide
694:
and marginal or fringe theories will often not meet any of
535:
means having attracted significant notice in the spirit of
1014:
Some journals are published in sections (for example, the
913:
555:
does not ensure notability. Several databases, like the
148:, we should probably not have a dedicated article on it.
835:
serves as proof the journal has been indexed by Scopus.
595:
77:
449:
may be used as sources for uncontroversial information
133:, we should probably have a dedicated article on it.
895:International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
151:Articles on non-notable academic journals may be
706:. However, they may still be notable under the
561:needlessly duplicate content in these databases
447:. Most journals nowadays have home pages which
610:of the following criteria, as demonstrated by
406:known for its publishing of scholarly research
1152:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Academic Journals
328:
8:
1096:for an economics journal). This will notify
1040:The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
957:, for the historical role it played in the
800:are not sufficient to establish notability.
439:Note that this page provides guidance, not
1100:(as well other relevant Wikiprojects) via
541:No journal is exempt from this requirement
335:
321:
179:
1106:{{subst:delsort|Academic journals|~~~~}}
916:, but other sources can be found on the
493:in the media, or demonstrated to have a
56:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1189:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
1121:
1071:{{subst:PROD|concern=REASON TO DELETE}}
285:
196:
189:
182:
378:) devoted to reporting the results of
451:. If the journal can be considered a
7:
1108:, which will list the discussion at
995:Nepali Mathematical Sciences Report
404:thus refers to a publication being
1061:For articles that do not meet the
998:is one of the publications of the
881:, or field-specific services like
60:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
1147:Knowledge (XXG):Scholarly journal
1090:{{WikiProject Academic Journals}}
1075:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion
987:Dealing with non-notable journals
813:For the purpose of C1, having an
798:Directory of Open Access Journals
557:Directory of Open Access Journals
509:indexing and abstracting services
869:, such as general services like
772:. Examples of such services are
726:doesn't necessarily imply being
690:Journals dedicated to promoting
487:predatory open access publishing
93:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
825:Emerging Sources Citation Index
778:Social Sciences Citation Index
1:
1098:WikiProject Academic Journals
673:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
511:, or by being the subject of
1063:criteria for speedy deletion
792:) indices and services like
636:
351:provides guidance about the
191:General notability guideline
309:Why was my article deleted?
258:Organizations and companies
198:Subject-specific guidelines
1205:
1169:Web of Science master list
1000:Nepal Mathematical Society
979:
585:
67:
1094:{{WikiProject Economics}}
1046:The Astrophysical Journal
1024:Nuclear Physics A & B
922:Karlsruhe Virtual Catalog
827:). Analogously, having a
525:ISSN International Centre
445:exceptions may well exist
389:and professional society
159:(usually to their parent
18:Knowledge (XXG):NJournals
883:Astrophysics Data System
820:Journal Citation Reports
643:applying this guidance.
304:Common deletion outcomes
101:This page in a nutshell:
941:
863:bibliographic databases
846:
770:bibliographic databases
748:
703:
699:
695:
519:No inherited notability
502:bibliographic databases
430:pseudo-scientific field
393:are instead covered by
136:If an academic journal
121:If an academic journal
926:Zeitschriftendatenbank
774:Science Citation Index
714:, or other guidelines.
553:bibliographic database
513:significant commentary
464:No inherent notability
361:conference proceedings
1082:Articles for deletion
412:. These criteria are
58:, as it has not been
1053:Failing all criteria
784:. Being included in
576:no original research
491:significant coverage
215:Astronomical objects
803:Note that there is
732:. The criterion is
708:Knowledge (XXG):GNG
635:. However, see the
633:third-party sources
604:If a journal meets
545:independent sources
436:for other reasons.
372:serial publications
270:Sports and athletes
239:Geographic features
110:are required to be
1030:Journal of Physics
1019:series of journals
891:Chemical Abstracts
852:The New York Times
736:, not reliability.
549:academic community
495:significant impact
365:monographic series
1174:Scopus title list
766:indexing services
473:information from
408:in the spirit of
357:academic journals
345:
344:
299:Guide to deletion
294:Notability essays
178:
177:
108:academic journals
88:
87:
16:(Redirected from
1196:
1134:
1126:
1107:
1095:
1091:
1072:
933:Criterion 3 (C3)
867:citation indices
840:Criterion 2 (C2)
762:citation indices
741:Criterion 1 (C1)
617:reliable sources
598:
475:reliable sources
459:Basic notability
426:reliable sources
337:
330:
323:
180:
167:), depending on
163:, or affiliated
146:reliable sources
131:reliable sources
116:reliable sources
97:
96:
90:
80:
37:
36:
30:
21:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1179:
1178:
1165:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1105:
1093:
1089:
1070:
1055:
1012:
989:
984:
978:
684:General remarks
681:
602:
601:
594:
590:
584:
521:
466:
461:
453:reliable source
402:notable journal
387:trade magazines
376:grey literature
341:
281:
174:
142:to be impactful
127:to be impactful
94:
84:
83:
76:
72:
64:
63:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1202:
1200:
1192:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1171:
1164:
1163:External links
1161:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1120:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1086:
1085:
1078:
1054:
1051:
1043:is covered in
1011:
1010:Journal series
1008:
988:
985:
977:
976:Best practices
974:
973:
972:
962:
945:
934:
930:
929:
906:
879:Google Scholar
871:Web of Science
856:
841:
837:
836:
808:
801:
794:Google Scholar
752:
742:
738:
737:
715:
692:pseudo-science
685:
680:
677:
664:
663:
657:
651:
639:section below
600:
599:
596:WP:JOURNALCRIT
591:
586:
583:
580:
520:
517:
465:
462:
460:
457:
343:
342:
340:
339:
332:
325:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
306:
301:
296:
288:
287:
283:
282:
280:
279:
273:
272:
267:
261:
260:
254:
253:
248:
242:
241:
235:
234:
229:
224:
218:
217:
211:
210:
204:
201:
200:
194:
193:
187:
186:
176:
175:
173:
172:
149:
134:
119:
103:
98:
86:
85:
82:
81:
73:
68:
65:
53:
52:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1201:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1132:
1125:
1122:
1115:
1113:
1111:
1103:
1099:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1052:
1050:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1020:
1018:
1009:
1007:
1003:
1001:
997:
996:
986:
983:
975:
970:
966:
963:
960:
956:
955:
949:
946:
943:
938:
935:
932:
931:
927:
923:
920:page, at the
919:
915:
912:available in
910:
907:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
857:
854:
853:
848:
845:
842:
839:
838:
834:
833:SJR indicator
830:
826:
822:
821:
816:
815:impact factor
812:
809:
806:
802:
799:
795:
791:
790:non-selective
787:
786:comprehensive
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
756:
753:
750:
746:
743:
740:
739:
735:
731:
730:
725:
724:
719:
716:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:
683:
682:
678:
676:
674:
669:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
645:
644:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:WP:Notability
622:
618:
615:
614:
609:
608:
597:
593:
592:
589:
581:
579:
577:
573:
572:verifiability
569:
568:list articles
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
518:
516:
514:
510:
507:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
479:
476:
472:
463:
458:
456:
454:
450:
446:
442:
437:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
373:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
338:
333:
331:
326:
324:
319:
318:
316:
315:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
284:
278:
275:
274:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
259:
256:
255:
252:
249:
247:
244:
243:
240:
237:
236:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
220:
219:
216:
213:
212:
209:
206:
205:
203:
202:
199:
195:
192:
188:
185:
181:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
143:
141:
135:
132:
128:
126:
120:
117:
113:
109:
106:Articles on
105:
104:
102:
99:
92:
91:
79:
75:
74:
71:
66:
61:
57:
51:
49:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
1124:
1087:
1056:
1044:
1038:
1036:
1029:
1022:
1016:
1013:
1004:
993:
990:
964:
959:Sokal affair
952:
947:
936:
924:, or at the
918:book sources
908:
858:
850:
843:
818:
817:assigned by
810:
805:no consensus
789:
785:
758:
754:
744:
733:
727:
721:
717:
687:
667:
665:
659:
653:
647:
640:
620:
611:
606:
605:
603:
565:
547:or from the
532:
522:
512:
505:
498:
494:
490:
480:
467:
440:
438:
413:
405:
401:
399:
367:, and other
346:
140:demonstrated
137:
125:demonstrated
122:
100:
78:WP:NJOURNALS
41:
1077:, or PROD).
954:Social Text
660:Criterion 3
654:Criterion 2
648:Criterion 1
613:independent
414:independent
391:newsletters
374:(including
277:Web content
42:This is an
1102:WP:AALERTS
980:See also:
887:MathSciNet
712:WP:NFRINGE
629:verifiable
471:verifiable
353:notability
184:Notability
138:cannot be
48:notability
1131:WP:BEFORE
1067:WP:CSD#A7
971:directly.
829:CiteScore
759:selective
506:selective
499:selective
380:scholarly
369:scholarly
208:Academics
169:consensus
161:publisher
1183:Category
1141:See also
914:Worldcat
796:and the
723:reliable
668:actually
631:through
588:Shortcut
582:Criteria
529:WorldCat
383:research
286:See also
70:Shortcut
903:h-index
729:notable
679:Remarks
637:remarks
533:notable
422:WP:NORG
418:WP:NBIO
395:WP:NMAG
251:Numbers
165:society
153:deleted
123:can be
112:notable
1032:series
1017:Trends
969:WP:GNG
899:PubMed
897:, and
877:, and
875:Scopus
788:(i.e.
782:Scopus
780:, and
768:, and
734:impact
641:before
537:WP:GNG
483:exists
434:WP:GNG
410:WP:GNG
265:People
227:Events
157:merged
1116:Notes
441:rules
349:essay
347:This
246:Music
232:Films
222:Books
44:essay
965:3.c)
948:3.b)
937:3.a)
909:2.c)
865:and
859:2.b)
844:2.a)
811:1.c)
755:1.b)
745:1.a)
718:G.b)
688:G.a)
574:and
527:and
504:and
144:via
129:via
1034:).
831:or
702:or
621:may
607:any
355:of
155:or
46:on
1185::
1112:.
1049:.
942:C3
893:,
889:,
885:,
873:,
847:C2
776:,
764:,
749:C1
710:,
704:C3
700:C2
698:,
696:C1
563:.
539:.
443:;
420:,
400:A
397:.
363:,
359:,
1133:.
1065:(
961:.
336:e
329:t
322:v
171:.
118:.
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.