466:. Articles about periodicals that are not yet published are strongly discouraged and such articles are only accepted under criteria other than those provided in this guideline, typically because the anticipation of the periodical is notable in its own right. In such cases there should still be multiple independent sources providing strong evidence that the periodical will be published, which sources include the title of the periodical and an approximate date of first publication.
523:
periodicals are incompatible in the academic bailiwick. Again, common sense should prevail. In that case, notability should rely on whether it is published by an academic press, how widely the periodical is cited by other academic publications, papers, or in the media, how influential the periodical is considered to be in its specialty area, or adjunct disciplines, and whether it is taught or required reading in a number of reputable educational institutions.
500:, are from the modern era. Nevertheless, the notability of periodicals published much earlier may occasionally be disputed and the criteria proposed above intended primarily for modern periodicals may not be as suitable. We suggest instead a more common sense approach which considers whether the periodical has been widely cited or written about, whether issues or content have been recently reprinted (note that a flurry of mentions in one context
35:
109:
442:
and other similar publications. While there are some fanzines which would meet the criteria for inclusion (either the ones listed here, or other notability criteria), most are not going to be notable. By the same token, it should always weigh against an article's inclusion if the publisher or other
350:
code, are circulated in libraries or other reference sources, and (usually or often) appear in paper. A few periodicals may be notable despite lacking these, and in such rare cases good reasons should be evidenced. Regularly updated and reissued reference books (dictionaries, encyclopedias, style
358:
It is possible for a periodical not to meet the criteria of this suggested guideline but to meet another subject's notability guidelines. Conversely, if a periodical is notable under this suggested guideline, its possible failure to meet other subject's notability guideline is not important.
647:
A periodical that is considered reliable enough to be used regularly as a reliable source by a large number of other works (especially scholarly and other academic works) is considered notable enough to have an article, just the same as an academic who is highly regarded and widely cited is
522:
through very different processes than do periodicals intended for the general public. They are often highly specialized, have small printing runs, and may only be available in specialized libraries and bookstores. For these reasons, the bulk of standards delineated previously for mainstream
420:
It is possible for a periodical to be notable according to this standard and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in
Knowledge (XXG) because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject. Every topic on Knowledge (XXG) must be one for which sources exist; see
351:
guides, legal guides, etc.), and regular publications that are not "works" of the publishing body, are not covered under this suggested guideline. Publications and periodicals falling outside these criteria need to be assessed by reference to other guidelines or the
469:
Additionally, periodicals which have only been published for a short time generally do not meet the threshold for inclusion. Exceptions should be rare and accompanied by multiple independent sources showing notability for such a new publication.
345:
is a recognized published work that appears in a new edition on a regular schedule. This suggested guideline covers the kinds of periodicals that are formally published, that is they (usually after 1974) have an
661:
Publication by a prominent academic press should be accorded far more weight than the analogous benchmark defined for publication of mainstream periodical by well known commercial publishers, by virtue of the
687:
A periodical's subject may be so specialized, such as in the esoteric math or physics spheres, that only a few hundred (or less) people in the world are situated to understand and comment on the material.
678:. Note that because a large portion of (en.)Knowledge (XXG) articles are written by English speaking people from English speaking nations, this list currently has an English speaking bias.
224:
270:
275:
338:, and similar periodic publications. This is not an official policy or an official guideline of Knowledge (XXG); it is rather an essay that proposes a guideline.
496:
From a pragmatic standpoint, the vast majority of periodicals upon which articles are written which invite a notability judgment call and which find their way to
181:
406:
703:
205:
301:
532:
513:
463:
347:
54:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
55:
174:
497:
444:
217:
294:
236:
231:
193:
542:
537:
383:
or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the periodical will depend largely on the extent to which it is
212:
198:
188:
265:
370:
243:
671:
405:
The periodical is or was the proceedings of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a
260:
287:
452:
138:
This essay specifies criteria for judging the notability of a periodical through reliable sources showing its impact.
448:
422:
384:
591:
380:
319:
164:
157:
150:
47:
323:
59:
120:
Articles about periodicals (magazines, newspapers, academic journals, and similar) are required to meet
504:), the fame that the periodical enjoyed in the past and its place in the history of such publications.
479:
69:
519:
416:
The periodical has had regular and significant usage as a citation in academic or scholarly works.
43:
399:
The periodical has made significant impact in its field or other area, such as higher education.
649:
587:
675:
373:
which write significant commentary about the periodical in relation to the specific criteria
335:
501:
315:
566:
402:
The periodical has received a notable award or honor at a national or international level.
125:
17:
616:
562:
352:
121:
697:
410:
612:
62:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
375:, it is likely to be notable. If a periodical meets none of these conditions, it
667:
342:
670:
process that must be passed before publication is allowed to go forward. See
331:
327:
439:
443:
interested party is the creator of the
Knowledge (XXG) article. See
518:
Academic journals serve a very different function and come to be
367:
If a periodical meets any one of the following conditions, as
103:
29:
487:
131:
Many periodicals are notably influential without being
91:
84:
77:
379:still be notable, if it meets the conditions of
341:For the purposes of this suggested guideline, a
314:This essay reflects one view of the community's
124:by citing significant commentary in independent
533:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academic journals)
514:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academic journals)
295:
8:
666:-commercial nature of such presses, and the
302:
288:
146:
56:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
704:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
640:
554:
252:
163:
156:
149:
459:Not yet or newly published periodicals
464:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
7:
445:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
543:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (books)
538:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (media)
60:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
107:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
502:is not by itself good evidence
393:before applying this guideline
1:
449:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
423:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
474:Non-contemporary periodicals
407:National Academy of Sciences
158:General notability guideline
353:general notability criteria
276:Why was my article deleted?
225:Organizations and companies
165:Subject-specific guidelines
720:
511:
477:
126:reliable secondary sources
67:
18:Knowledge (XXG):NMAGAZINE
271:Common deletion outcomes
115:This page in a nutshell:
648:considered notable per
592:Oxford University Press
455:for more information.
498:articles for deletion
135:of secondary sources.
58:, as it has not been
429:Other considerations
369:evidenced by citing
182:Astronomical objects
672:Academic publishing
613:"Define Periodical"
438:This would include
237:Sports and athletes
206:Geographic features
122:notability criteria
676:University presses
389:Notes and Examples
674:for several such
508:Academic journals
453:WP:NOTADVERTISING
336:academic journals
316:current consensus
312:
311:
266:Guide to deletion
261:Notability essays
145:
144:
102:
101:
16:(Redirected from
711:
688:
685:
679:
659:
653:
645:
628:
627:
625:
623:
609:
603:
602:
600:
598:
584:
578:
577:
575:
573:
559:
490:
434:Self-publication
371:reliable sources
304:
297:
290:
147:
111:
110:
104:
94:
87:
80:
37:
36:
30:
21:
719:
718:
714:
713:
712:
710:
709:
708:
694:
693:
692:
691:
686:
682:
660:
656:
646:
642:
637:
632:
631:
621:
619:
611:
610:
606:
596:
594:
586:
585:
581:
571:
569:
567:Merriam-Webster
561:
560:
556:
551:
529:
516:
510:
494:
493:
486:
482:
476:
461:
436:
431:
365:
308:
248:
141:
108:
98:
97:
90:
83:
76:
72:
64:
63:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
717:
715:
707:
706:
696:
695:
690:
689:
680:
654:
639:
638:
636:
633:
630:
629:
617:Dictionary.com
604:
579:
553:
552:
550:
547:
546:
545:
540:
535:
528:
525:
509:
506:
492:
491:
488:WP:DEFUNCTNEWS
483:
478:
475:
472:
460:
457:
435:
432:
430:
427:
418:
417:
414:
403:
400:
391:section below
364:
361:
310:
309:
307:
306:
299:
292:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
273:
268:
263:
255:
254:
250:
249:
247:
246:
240:
239:
234:
228:
227:
221:
220:
215:
209:
208:
202:
201:
196:
191:
185:
184:
178:
177:
171:
168:
167:
161:
160:
154:
153:
143:
142:
140:
139:
136:
129:
117:
112:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
81:
78:WP:NPERIODICAL
73:
68:
65:
53:
52:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
716:
705:
702:
701:
699:
684:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
658:
655:
651:
644:
641:
634:
618:
614:
608:
605:
593:
589:
583:
580:
568:
564:
558:
555:
548:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
530:
526:
524:
521:
515:
507:
505:
503:
499:
489:
485:
484:
481:
473:
471:
467:
465:
458:
456:
454:
450:
446:
441:
433:
428:
426:
424:
415:
412:
411:Royal Society
408:
404:
401:
398:
397:
396:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:WP:Notability
378:
374:
372:
362:
360:
356:
354:
349:
344:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
305:
300:
298:
293:
291:
286:
285:
283:
282:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
245:
242:
241:
238:
235:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
222:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
203:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
179:
176:
173:
172:
170:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
137:
134:
130:
127:
123:
119:
118:
116:
113:
106:
105:
93:
92:WP:NNEWSPAPER
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
74:
71:
66:
61:
57:
51:
49:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
683:
663:
657:
643:
620:. Retrieved
607:
595:. Retrieved
588:"Periodical"
582:
570:. Retrieved
563:"Periodical"
557:
517:
495:
468:
462:
437:
419:
392:
388:
376:
368:
366:
357:
340:
326:, including
313:
132:
114:
41:
668:peer review
512:Main page:
324:periodicals
244:Web content
133:the subject
42:This is an
549:References
387:. See the
385:verifiable
343:periodical
332:newspapers
320:notability
318:about the
151:Notability
48:notability
622:April 22,
597:April 22,
572:April 22,
520:published
355:instead.
328:magazines
175:Academics
70:Shortcuts
698:Category
527:See also
480:Shortcut
440:fanzines
363:Criteria
253:See also
650:WP:PROF
409:or the
218:Numbers
85:WP:NMAG
451:, and
232:People
194:Events
635:Notes
213:Music
199:Films
189:Books
44:essay
624:2010
599:2010
574:2010
348:ISSN
664:non
377:may
322:of
46:on
700::
615:.
590:.
565:.
447:,
425:.
413:).
395:.
334:,
330:,
652:.
626:.
601:.
576:.
303:e
296:t
289:v
128:.
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.