384:
280:
the "application" is only a formality, and the organization then lists the person on its membership roll as soon as the check clears the bank. Often there is a regular membership renewal fee as well. Many of these organizations are genuinely notable, but that does not make all of their members notable and no person can be considered to have achieved notability simply by having paid a membership fee to one. Organizations regularly need money, and selling memberships is a virtually free way for them to get it, but a notability claim such membership on its own does not make.
17:
259:
highly obscure) category of some kind. A certificate is offered in exchange, and often a trophy is available (for an additional fee). These arrangements exist for visual arts and creative writing, among other areas. An aspiring artist can have one of his early painting attempts honored with the "Foo
Barkeley Memorial–Silver Award for Figurative Painting", which he can add to his CV–or use to support his claim to being notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article.
463:
whether or not one person or another was paid to spend the time to create it, and has nothing to do with paying a third party to make you look notable when you are not. Only the latter is considered officially deviant or underhanded. Do not cite this essay in order to respond to a discussion that is happening on
Knowledge (XXG) regarding paid editing, and do not use it as leverage against people who have been paid to edit, as it has no bearing on these issues.
291:(personal, financial, political, or otherwise) in that Subject, then the evidence which is produced does not meet the "independent" clause of Knowledge (XXG)'s source requirements for establishing a claim of notability and should be discounted when evaluating it. If you have to pay someone to make you or your work look notable, you and/ or your work probably are not.
191:
to write about it and even for that review to be included within an article, for the purposes of establishing a
Knowledge (XXG) notability claim such writing is not considered independent of the subject. "Independent" means not only "produced by someone other than the subject", but also "produced independent of the subject's resources or influence".
442:/General Notability guidelines for their other activities in leading organizations/companies, writing, art, philanthropy, or other activities, then she or he can have her own Knowledge (XXG) article. And yes, you can even post cool-looking photos of him/her wearing a Formula 1 racing suit or sailing in her yacht on his/her off-hours : )
32:
113:
182:
a claim of notability, through the deliberate deceitful inclusion of what are in fact non-existent sources of information. If a source cannot be verified as real, it should be discounted for the purpose of assessing notability. If a source can be identified as false or contrived, it should be removed.
266:
When a person has an award, one can examine whether the organization giving the award is seen as reputable, and whether the organization is independent of the recipient, whether there were other candidates for the award, and so on. A person may have a huge trophy naming them "Most
Brilliant Genius in
206:
to print it, but then he cannot find an independent reviewer to read his work and publish a review. He decides to invest in a paid reviewer, and gives a company several hundred dollars to write up a review. Months later his review comes out. It is a rave review of his "excellent" work. He pays a
190:
Another unacceptable way of generating sources for an article on a given subject is by paying someone else to write on the subject and then having that person publish their material as a seemingly independent source. While it is perfectly fine for someone to pay someone else to review their work and
318:
If a book originally published through a vanity press eventually goes on to become so popular that it gets picked up by a regular publishing house and goes on to become genuinely notable, this would of course represent an exception. It would be highly irregular, but is certainly within the realm of
279:
While there are exceptions, paid memberships in many organizations are not evidence of notability. There are countless organizations that claim a highly exclusive and prestigious clientele whom a person may apply to join by completing an application and submitting an application fee. In many cases
181:
for full details). It was subsequently banned, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, by the
Knowledge (XXG) community for unethical editing, and many of its articles were identified and marked for deletion. This is an example of one way in which it is not acceptable to establish
163:
Obviously, very wealthy people and organizations are likely to be notable. As such, they will certainly warrant their own articles, even if the only notable thing about them is how much money they have. However, not all people or organizations with money are notable— the vast majority, in fact, are
310:
should be considered evidence of notability, either for the publication or its author. Legitimate publishers do not charge authors to publish their works— they review those works, evaluate them for their marketability and cultural significance, and then decide to invest (or not) in the process of
258:
Another way that people create dubious notability is by paying to be the recipient of a usually non-notable and non-competitive award. A number of organizations exist which will gladly accept a $ 100 payment in exchange for recognizing you as being the best entrant for that year in a given (often
263:
review: a financial transaction between the subject and the award winner, with the subject paying the "award" company, means the two are not independent. If the award itself is not notable, the claim of having received such an award probably shouldn't be considered evidence of notability either.
462:
But so long as a proper conflict-of-interest disclosure has been made by the relevant editor, there are no rules forbidding anyone from paying someone else to write an article about them and publish it on
Knowledge (XXG). The notability of that article's subject exists entirely independently of
262:
These fake "awards" do not provide information about the identity or qualification of the judges or of the criteria used to select the winners. Such "awards" should be carefully scrutinized before being considered valid evidence of notability for the same reasons as the aforementioned paid book
399:
condo can also do cool stuff in their leisure hours. Get a helicopter ride up to a mountain peak to ski from the top. Go on a tall ships tour and get doused in sea water as the ship crashes through waves. Pay to take a
Formula 1 racecar out for a spin at a motor speedway. Get $ 1,000-per-table
2965:
412:
photographers may snap photos of this individual doing these high-priced hobbies and leisure activities and these pictures may appear in magazines and gossip websites. But just because this wealthy person looks super cool in these photos, it does not, alone, make her/him notable.
1005:
176:
came into existence with the specific goal of helping companies and individuals get into
Knowledge (XXG) by charging them a fee and falsely generating electronic "sources" to support the notability claims of Knowledge (XXG) articles it then wrote on its clients (see
2166:
323:
seen the light of day via vanity publishing has no value for claiming notability. Knowledge (XXG) maintains a list of vanity publishing organizations which editors should review when in doubt about the nature of a book. Among these are the following:
1570:
211:
is synergistically excellent and plots a strategic pathway to synergy". He then sits down and writes his
Knowledge (XXG) article (yes, despite the conflict of interest) and offers these two reviews of his book as evidence of his notability.
1035:
2852:
2301:
2732:
1904:
2261:
227:
organization without the man having paid for it (and whether that review was positive or negative), then a notability claim might be viable... For the book, anyway. But the financial transaction means that the review is
2070:
1665:
164:
not. But the desire to achieve notoriety on
Knowledge (XXG) may give some individuals the incentive to attempt to produce, if possible, what appears like real-world evidence of notability. Below are some examples.
3105:
458:
about you! Paid editing is a contentious matter on Knowledge (XXG), and there are a number of essays that discuss various editor opinions and thoughts on what paid editing means and how it affects Knowledge (XXG).
1372:
151:
sources. However, the specifics of those criteria are sometimes vague— what counts as "reliable"? What counts as "verifiable"? This essay addresses in part the question, "What counts as 'independent'?" Briefly,
3045:
2792:
2413:
1050:
3115:
2857:
717:
3381:
3376:
2667:
127:
Knowledge (XXG) has a well-established list of criteria for the creation and inclusion of articles. Among these are that the subject of the article must be notable as demonstrated through the presence of
3170:
1470:
3155:
2905:
1445:
1500:
1197:
3175:
2582:
1768:
1222:
1145:
727:
1347:
777:
767:
2622:
2602:
1565:
1535:
847:
194:
Here is an example: a person wants to have a Knowledge (XXG) article written about him, as he thinks it will help to promote his business. He has not done anything notable and nor is his
1859:
1585:
862:
802:
935:
3320:
1267:
450:
This essay describes the problems and conflicts of interest that occur when a person tries to pay another person or entity to give that person a false semblance of notability. This is
2627:
2707:
2662:
2572:
2522:
1788:
1515:
1490:
3429:
3215:
1505:
1140:
1125:
837:
283:
Though a source such as those described above may be used to augment an article on a subject whose notability has already been established on other terms, if Person- or Entity-A
2542:
1105:
2697:
2612:
1728:
1580:
1485:
1100:
1060:
915:
3325:
2418:
2331:
1929:
1670:
1495:
1420:
1155:
1130:
1055:
667:
626:
2306:
2251:
2236:
479:
121:
In a deletion discussion, a claim of notability requires that sources provided as evidence of notability be independent of their subject, including financial independence.
2752:
2702:
2557:
1849:
1187:
1070:
950:
1989:
1367:
3285:
1914:
1660:
1397:
1322:
892:
1969:
3180:
2832:
2677:
2597:
2266:
2015:
1944:
1798:
1095:
3225:
2782:
1480:
1357:
1247:
1150:
1135:
298:, if all one has to do to become a member of this organization is send a bank draft for $ 99, then being a member of this organization does not confer notability.
1362:
737:
2767:
2737:
2547:
2296:
2291:
1828:
1277:
1232:
1162:
3305:
1984:
315:
to publish his or her book, this is another example of violating the independence clause and may not be used to support a notability claim for anyone involved.
3463:
3080:
1525:
900:
614:
3165:
882:
3035:
2910:
930:
2797:
2512:
1909:
1595:
1377:
1207:
1120:
722:
1655:
872:
3386:
2647:
2361:
1974:
1894:
1410:
1312:
1242:
1030:
3275:
2847:
2030:
587:
2527:
1964:
1710:
1202:
742:
383:
232:, even thought the subject did not write it himself and even though the publisher of the review is a seemingly legitimate book-reviewing organization.
2326:
2271:
2241:
712:
2995:
2915:
1778:
3310:
3280:
3070:
3050:
2607:
2276:
2231:
2226:
2035:
1919:
1823:
1560:
1272:
1217:
1172:
1110:
1080:
985:
975:
747:
3090:
2592:
1192:
877:
3245:
3120:
2970:
2692:
2388:
2196:
2075:
1924:
1520:
1342:
1292:
832:
364:(there are at least three companies called Tate Publishing; the others include a reputable art publisher and a defunct software book publisher)
3260:
3200:
3125:
2617:
2587:
2507:
2336:
1307:
1297:
1262:
1075:
980:
702:
3300:
3270:
3135:
3110:
2990:
2762:
2221:
2130:
2090:
1994:
1650:
1635:
1510:
1115:
965:
920:
852:
812:
662:
202:. He writes the book, but all of the reputable publishers he takes it to turn it down as "not publishable quality". Undeterred, he pays a
51:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3412:
3240:
3220:
3145:
3140:
2712:
2201:
1844:
1753:
1615:
1550:
1460:
1450:
1425:
1387:
1382:
1317:
1085:
1045:
990:
52:
1698:
2316:
1979:
1808:
3434:
2837:
2125:
2110:
2025:
1600:
945:
692:
687:
3230:
3040:
3010:
2975:
2802:
2281:
2191:
2105:
1748:
1718:
1590:
772:
867:
424:
Avoid: "He owns a Formula 1 racing car and drives it around on his own private motor speedway. Strong keep for this article in AfD.
3396:
3265:
3095:
2822:
2722:
2532:
2408:
2321:
2286:
2211:
2181:
2045:
1879:
1869:
1818:
1645:
1630:
1555:
1327:
1177:
1020:
807:
752:
677:
607:
2311:
2206:
2171:
1000:
361:
3371:
3185:
3100:
2862:
2807:
2727:
2682:
2637:
2632:
2517:
2351:
2146:
1854:
1675:
1455:
1430:
1337:
1332:
1212:
842:
757:
672:
3366:
2562:
2246:
328:
3422:
3195:
3075:
2955:
2930:
2757:
2393:
2356:
2346:
1949:
1889:
1743:
1040:
1015:
970:
822:
797:
787:
762:
178:
3315:
3130:
3015:
2940:
2827:
2747:
2717:
2567:
2186:
2156:
2120:
2010:
1874:
1793:
1575:
1440:
1405:
1252:
1010:
960:
955:
682:
240:
Another example of an attempt to purchase notability is through paying to have one's name published as part of a list in a
1738:
925:
3417:
3005:
3000:
2960:
2945:
2935:
2812:
2657:
2065:
2055:
1954:
1763:
1625:
910:
782:
3391:
3348:
3160:
3025:
2925:
2885:
2842:
2787:
2777:
2772:
2742:
2577:
2552:
2537:
2492:
2378:
2100:
2040:
1773:
1610:
1545:
1540:
1530:
1282:
905:
657:
639:
600:
582:
3065:
3020:
2383:
2256:
2216:
2020:
1758:
1287:
732:
521:
223:
to make him look notable when in fact he (so far) is not. If his work had been reviewed by a legitimate and truly
3295:
3235:
3210:
3150:
3060:
3055:
2642:
2459:
2161:
2151:
1939:
1934:
1352:
1025:
995:
827:
3255:
3205:
2985:
2980:
2950:
2439:
2403:
2398:
2095:
1899:
1733:
1257:
1090:
1065:
940:
16:
3250:
2817:
2672:
2085:
2080:
1864:
1783:
1640:
1302:
707:
333:
3190:
2652:
2449:
2373:
1237:
1182:
1167:
697:
44:
3290:
2900:
2469:
2444:
2423:
1803:
1435:
1227:
792:
145:
56:
2464:
2454:
2368:
2341:
1605:
857:
287:
Person- or Entity-B to generate evidence of notability of Subject-X, and if Person- or Entity-A has an
66:
501:
338:
2920:
1884:
1723:
1620:
817:
215:
Other than the fact that the reviews of a book should only be used to establish the notability of a
2060:
2050:
1959:
623:
133:
40:
409:
1813:
311:
publication themselves, with the authors usually receiving royalties on the sales. If a person
157:
247:
3085:
3030:
2176:
2115:
1415:
565:
387:
Just because your hobby is sailing your yacht, this activity alone does not make you notable.
148:
534:
439:
141:
129:
417:
Avoid: "She owns a 35 meter yacht. Strong keep for this article in this AfD discussion.
401:
195:
137:
3457:
2966:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
367:
271:
they hired to promote their career, then this is not a notability-conferring award.
59:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
307:
203:
246:
book. While there are certain exceptions, virtually all of these are considered
351:
242:
405:
392:
343:
268:
2167:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
207:
second company to do the same thing, and gets a similarly positive result "
432:
But if a person is really wealthy and does exciting, expensive hobbies,
154:
notability is not something which can be purchased through a third party
592:
372:
173:
160:
is not independent, and Knowledge (XXG) article space is not for sale.
1571:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
2853:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
396:
382:
198:
notable, but he has an idea for a book about business strategies:
15:
1036:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
3346:
2883:
2490:
1696:
637:
596:
107:
26:
2733:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1905:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1373:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
379:
Being able to do cool looking stuff because you are wealthy
2262:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2071:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1666:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1006:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
718:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
3106:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3116:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
267:
the Universe"...but if the trophy was given out by the
95:
88:
81:
74:
2668:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2302:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
2414:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1051:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
2858:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
250:and should not be cited as evidence of notability.
3405:
3359:
2432:
2139:
2003:
1837:
1709:
1469:
1396:
891:
650:
454:separate from issues surrounding paying someone to
3377:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3156:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
778:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
549:The Contester: Poetry.com Struggles for Legitimacy
1348:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
640:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
588:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
296:Organization of Really, Really Brilliant Geniuses
1501:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1446:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1198:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
522:Bad Art - A verse-case scenario (Boston Phoenix)
495:
493:
491:
489:
487:
3176:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2906:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2583:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1223:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
728:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
2603:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1769:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1536:Counting and sorting are not original research
3430:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3046:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
1566:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
848:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
608:
480:Paying for Prestige - the Cost of Recognition
294:Just because Foo Barkeley is a member of the
8:
3096:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1860:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1586:How to save an article proposed for deletion
863:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
838:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
803:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
404:in the velvet-roped-off VIP area of a fancy
2628:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
3356:
3343:
3321:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2893:
2880:
2708:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2663:News coverage does not decrease notability
2573:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2523:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2500:
2487:
1706:
1693:
1516:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1491:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
647:
634:
615:
601:
593:
535:"POD Superstar or Vanity Press Deception?"
319:possibility. Otherwise, a book which has
3216:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1506:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1126:Identifying and using independent sources
3382:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2543:Big events make key participants notable
1990:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1368:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1106:Formatting bilateral relations templates
275:Paying for membership in an organization
53:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3464:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
2793:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2698:Notability is not a level playing field
2613:How the presumption of notability works
1729:Contributing to complicated discussions
1581:How the presumption of notability works
1101:Formatting bilateral relations articles
916:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
559:
557:
472:
391:Anyone who is wealthy enough to have a
219:, the main problem is that the man has
3326:You should not write meaningless lists
2623:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1930:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1671:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1496:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1061:Don't hope the house will build itself
668:All Five Pillars are equally important
2753:One sentence does not an article make
2703:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2419:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2332:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1850:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1789:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1421:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1363:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1188:Minors and persons judged incompetent
951:An unfinished house is a real problem
936:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
738:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
7:
3306:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3286:Things that should not be surprising
2981:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2307:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2252:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2237:Don't call people by their real name
1985:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
1915:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1323:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
446:This essay is not about paid editing
3181:No one cares about your garage band
3166:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
2833:What is and is not routine coverage
2678:No one cares about your garage band
2598:Existence does not prove notability
2016:Assume the assumption of good faith
1945:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1799:Relationships with academic editors
1661:Why was the page I created deleted?
1656:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1096:Featured articles may have problems
883:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
533:Ron Pramschufer (2 November 2004).
358:The International Library of Poetry
3226:Please do not murder the newcomers
2783:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2267:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1481:Adjectives in your recommendations
1358:What an article should not include
1248:The problem with elegant variation
1056:Don't get hung up on minor details
873:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
179:Wiki-PR editing of Knowledge (XXG)
57:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
3276:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
2848:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2548:Businesses with a single location
1829:You have a right to remain silent
1278:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1233:Potential, not just current state
1163:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
362:Tate Publishing & Enterprises
2297:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2292:Don't ignore community consensus
1526:Confusing arguments mean nothing
111:
30:
24:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2798:Sources must be out-of-universe
2513:All high schools can be notable
1910:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1596:Identifying blatant advertising
1378:The world will not end tomorrow
1208:Not everything needs a template
1121:How to write a featured article
723:Editors will sometimes be wrong
583:Knowledge (XXG):Run-of-the-mill
537:. Publishers Newswire/Neotrope.
500:Span, Paula (23 January 2005).
456:write a Knowledge (XXG) article
329:American Biographical Institute
302:Paying to have a book published
168:Paying for non-existent sources
20:Notability cannot be purchased.
3387:Avoid writing redundant essays
3036:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2911:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2738:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2688:Notability cannot be purchased
2648:Masking the lack of notability
1411:Copyediting reception sections
1313:Temporary versions of articles
1243:Principle of Some Astonishment
1031:Creating controversial content
931:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
878:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
438:she or he otherwise meets the
230:not independent of the subject
1:
3413:About policies and guidelines
2528:Articles with a single source
2152:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
1975:Two wrongs don't make a right
1965:The rules of polite discourse
1895:It's not the end of the world
1203:Not everything needs a navbox
1071:Don't "teach the controversy"
743:Here to build an encyclopedia
306:No publication produced by a
236:Paying to be in a "who's who"
3301:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
2996:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2916:Alternatives to edit warring
1779:Maintaining a friendly space
551:. Poets and Writers Magazine
3281:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3071:Editing under the influence
2608:Google searches and numbers
2327:Don't template the regulars
2242:Don't call the kettle black
2036:Be excellent to one another
1920:Revert notification opt-out
1824:We are all Wikipedians here
1273:Put a little effort into it
1218:Obtain peer review comments
1173:Introduction to structurism
1111:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1081:Editors are not mindreaders
986:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
976:Beef up that first revision
748:Leave it to the experienced
713:Don't search for objections
3480:
3311:Why not create an account?
3246:Requirements for adminship
3121:How to vandalize correctly
3091:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3051:Don't delete the main page
2971:Avoid using preview button
2693:Notability comparison test
2277:Don't fight fire with fire
2272:Don't eat the troll's food
2232:Don't call a spade a spade
2227:Don't bludgeon the process
2076:Encourage full discussions
1925:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1561:Don't attack the nominator
1521:But there must be sources!
1343:Try not to leave it a stub
1293:Source your plot summaries
564:D. T. Max (16 July 2000).
64:
3355:
3342:
3261:Sarcasm is really helpful
3201:Notability is not eternal
3126:How to win a citation war
2896:
2892:
2879:
2588:Every snowflake is unique
2508:Advanced source searching
2503:
2499:
2486:
2389:No, you can't have a pony
2337:Do not insult the vandals
2197:Don't be high-maintenance
1754:Encouraging the newcomers
1705:
1692:
1298:Specialized-style fallacy
1263:Pruning article revisions
1091:Endorsements (commercial)
1076:Editing on mobile devices
981:Blind men and an elephant
956:Articles have a half-life
703:Dissent is not disloyalty
673:Avoid vague introductions
646:
633:
235:
172:In 2010 a company called
3271:The Night Before Wikimas
3136:Ignore every single rule
3111:How to get away with UPE
2991:Before they were notable
2763:Overreliance upon Google
2558:Common sourcing mistakes
2131:Settle the process first
2091:Imagine others complexly
1995:Writing for the opponent
1970:There is no common sense
1651:Unopposed AFD discussion
1636:Relisting can be abusive
1511:Avoid repeated arguments
1116:Give an article a chance
966:Avoid mission statements
926:Advanced text formatting
921:Advanced article editing
868:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
853:The rules are principles
813:Product, process, policy
663:Articles must be written
209:Strategy through Synergy
200:Strategy through Synergy
119:This page in a nutshell:
3406:Policies and guidelines
3241:Requests for medication
3221:Please bite the newbies
3146:Mess with the templates
2713:Notability means impact
2247:Don't call things cruft
2222:Don't be the Fun Police
2031:Avoid the word "vandal"
1980:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
1845:A thank you never hurts
1616:Liar liar pants on fire
1551:Deletion is not cleanup
1461:Writing better articles
1451:Write the article first
1426:Gender-neutral language
1398:Writing article content
1388:Writing better articles
1383:Write the article first
1318:Tertiary-source fallacy
1086:Encourage the newcomers
1046:Dictionaries as sources
991:Build content to endure
3435:Policy writing is hard
3141:Is that even an essay?
2838:What notability is not
2593:Existence ≠Notability
2202:Don't be inconsiderate
2126:Read before commenting
2111:Mind your own business
2026:Avoid personal remarks
1601:Identifying test edits
946:A navbox on every page
901:100K featured articles
698:Concede lost arguments
693:Competence is required
624:Knowledge (XXG) essays
388:
254:Paying to get an award
21:
3231:Pledge of Tranquility
2976:Avoid using wikilinks
2803:Subjective importance
2317:Don't spite your face
2106:Keep it down to earth
1870:Beware of the tigers!
1809:Too long; didn't read
1749:Edit at your own pace
1719:Accepting other users
1486:AfD is not a war zone
833:There is no seniority
773:Neutrality of sources
504:. The Washington Post
386:
55:, as it has not been
19:
3397:Quote your own essay
3266:Sausages for tasting
3041:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3011:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2823:Vanispamcruftisement
2723:Notability sub-pages
2533:Avoid template creep
2493:Essays on notability
2409:There are no oracles
2192:Don't be a WikiBigot
2046:Call a spade a spade
1819:Unblock perspectives
1646:The Heymann Standard
1631:Overzealous deletion
1591:I just don't like it
1328:There is no deadline
1193:"Murder of" articles
1021:Common-style fallacy
893:Article construction
808:Process is important
753:Levels of competence
678:Be a reliable source
566:"No More Rejections"
339:Famous Poets Society
3186:No one really cares
3101:Go ahead, vandalize
2863:Two prongs of merit
2808:Third-party sources
2728:Notabilitymandering
2683:No one really cares
2638:Inherent notability
2633:Independent sources
2518:Alternative outlets
2352:Nationalist editing
2322:Don't take the bait
2287:Don't help too much
2212:Don't be prejudiced
2182:Don't be an ostrich
2147:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1880:Deletion as revenge
1855:Advice for hotheads
1676:No Encyclopedic Use
1556:Does deletion help?
1456:Writing about women
1338:The deadline is now
1333:There is a deadline
1213:Nothing is in stone
843:Tendentious editing
758:Levels of consensus
334:Dorrance Publishing
248:vanity publications
186:Paying for a review
3196:No sorcery threats
3076:Embrace Stop Signs
2956:Assume good wraith
2931:Anti-Wikipedianism
2768:Perennial websites
2758:Other stuff exists
2394:Passive aggression
2357:No angry mastodons
2347:Hate is disruptive
2207:Don't be obnoxious
2172:Don't be a fanatic
1950:Most ideas are bad
1890:Forgive and forget
1699:Essays on civility
1308:Run an edit-a-thon
1041:Deprecated sources
1016:Citation underkill
1001:Chesterton's fence
971:Be neutral in form
823:Reasonability rule
788:Oversimplification
763:Most ideas are bad
389:
221:paid a third party
22:
3451:
3450:
3447:
3446:
3443:
3442:
3338:
3337:
3334:
3333:
3316:Yes legal threats
3131:Ignore all essays
3016:Complete bollocks
2941:Asshole John rule
2875:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2828:What BLP1E is not
2748:One hundred words
2718:Notability points
2482:
2481:
2478:
2477:
2282:Don't give a fuck
2157:Civil POV pushing
2121:Mutual withdrawal
2011:Assume good faith
1875:Civility warnings
1794:Please say please
1744:Editors' pronouns
1688:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1576:Follow the leader
1441:Use our own words
1406:Avoid thread mode
1253:Pro and con lists
1011:Citation overkill
961:Autosizing images
683:Civil POV pushing
568:. New York Times.
419:Own yacht=notable
125:
124:
106:
105:
3471:
3392:Finding an essay
3357:
3344:
3006:Butterfly effect
3001:Boston Tea Party
2961:Assume stupidity
2946:Assume bad faith
2936:Articlecountitis
2894:
2881:
2813:Trivial mentions
2658:Minimum coverage
2501:
2488:
2187:Don't be ashamed
2066:Discussing cruft
2056:Deny recognition
1955:Nothing is clear
1764:Expect no thanks
1707:
1694:
1626:Nothing is clear
1473:deleting content
1156:Tertiary sources
911:Acronym overkill
783:The one question
648:
635:
628:
617:
610:
603:
594:
570:
569:
561:
552:
545:
539:
538:
530:
524:
519:
513:
512:
510:
509:
497:
482:
477:
348:Ivy House Books
313:pays a publisher
115:
114:
108:
98:
91:
84:
77:
34:
33:
27:
3479:
3478:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3439:
3401:
3372:Value of essays
3351:
3330:
3161:Legal vandalism
3026:Counting juntas
2926:Anti-Wikipedian
2888:
2886:Humorous essays
2867:
2843:What to include
2788:Run-of-the-mill
2778:Read the source
2743:Offline sources
2538:Bare notability
2495:
2474:
2428:
2379:No Confederates
2177:Don't be a jerk
2135:
2101:Keep it concise
2041:Beyond civility
1999:
1833:
1774:How to be civil
1739:Don't retaliate
1701:
1680:
1611:Keep it concise
1546:Delete the junk
1541:Delete or merge
1531:Content removal
1465:
1431:Myth vs fiction
1392:
1283:Robotic editing
1146:Science sources
1141:Primary sources
1131:History sources
906:Abandoned stubs
887:
658:Article content
642:
629:
621:
579:
574:
573:
563:
562:
555:
546:
542:
532:
531:
527:
520:
516:
507:
505:
499:
498:
485:
478:
474:
469:
448:
381:
304:
277:
256:
238:
188:
170:
112:
102:
101:
94:
87:
80:
73:
69:
61:
60:
31:
25:
12:
11:
5:
3477:
3475:
3467:
3466:
3456:
3455:
3449:
3448:
3445:
3444:
3441:
3440:
3438:
3437:
3432:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3420:
3409:
3407:
3403:
3402:
3400:
3399:
3394:
3389:
3384:
3379:
3374:
3369:
3363:
3361:
3353:
3352:
3347:
3340:
3339:
3336:
3335:
3332:
3331:
3329:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3288:
3283:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3258:
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3198:
3193:
3188:
3183:
3178:
3173:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3066:Editsummarisis
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3021:Counting forks
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2897:
2890:
2889:
2884:
2877:
2876:
2873:
2872:
2869:
2868:
2866:
2865:
2860:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2840:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2725:
2720:
2715:
2710:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2600:
2595:
2590:
2585:
2580:
2578:Don't cite GNG
2575:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2555:
2553:But it's true!
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2520:
2515:
2510:
2504:
2497:
2496:
2491:
2484:
2483:
2480:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2473:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2450:WikiHarassment
2447:
2442:
2436:
2434:
2430:
2429:
2427:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2401:
2396:
2391:
2386:
2384:No queerphobia
2381:
2376:
2371:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2339:
2334:
2329:
2324:
2319:
2314:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2143:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2134:
2133:
2128:
2123:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2078:
2073:
2068:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2048:
2043:
2038:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2021:Assume no clue
2018:
2013:
2007:
2005:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1997:
1992:
1987:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1841:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1832:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1759:Enjoy yourself
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1715:
1713:
1703:
1702:
1697:
1690:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1682:
1681:
1679:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1483:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1464:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1402:
1400:
1394:
1393:
1391:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1288:Sham consensus
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
897:
895:
889:
888:
886:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
745:
740:
735:
733:Explanationism
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
700:
695:
690:
685:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
654:
652:
644:
643:
638:
631:
630:
622:
620:
619:
612:
605:
597:
591:
590:
585:
578:
575:
572:
571:
553:
547:Margo Stever,
540:
525:
514:
502:"Making Books"
483:
471:
470:
468:
465:
447:
444:
430:
429:
422:
402:bottle service
380:
377:
376:
375:
370:
365:
359:
349:
346:
341:
336:
331:
303:
300:
276:
273:
269:publicity firm
255:
252:
237:
234:
196:small business
187:
184:
169:
166:
123:
122:
116:
104:
103:
100:
99:
92:
85:
78:
70:
65:
62:
50:
49:
37:
35:
23:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3476:
3465:
3462:
3461:
3459:
3436:
3433:
3431:
3428:
3424:
3421:
3419:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3411:
3410:
3408:
3404:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3373:
3370:
3368:
3365:
3364:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3345:
3341:
3327:
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3297:
3296:Watchlistitis
3294:
3292:
3291:The WikiBible
3289:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3257:
3254:
3252:
3249:
3247:
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3236:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3211:Play the game
3209:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3187:
3184:
3182:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3164:
3162:
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3151:My local pond
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3061:Edits Per Day
3059:
3057:
3056:Editcountitis
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2898:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2882:
2878:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2856:
2854:
2851:
2849:
2846:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2831:
2829:
2826:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2736:
2734:
2731:
2729:
2726:
2724:
2721:
2719:
2716:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2643:Insignificant
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2506:
2505:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2489:
2485:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2460:WikiLawyering
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2437:
2435:
2433:WikiRelations
2431:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2405:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2395:
2392:
2390:
2387:
2385:
2382:
2380:
2377:
2375:
2372:
2370:
2367:
2363:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2320:
2318:
2315:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2257:Don't cry COI
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2217:Don't be rude
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2162:Cyberbullying
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2144:
2142:
2138:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2082:
2079:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2062:
2059:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2008:
2006:
2002:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1940:The last word
1938:
1936:
1935:The grey zone
1933:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1840:
1836:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1478:
1476:
1474:
1468:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1399:
1395:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1353:Walled garden
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1178:Mine a source
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1026:Concept cloud
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
996:Cherrypicking
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
898:
896:
894:
890:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
856:
854:
851:
849:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
828:Systemic bias
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
699:
696:
694:
691:
689:
686:
684:
681:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
655:
653:
649:
645:
641:
636:
632:
625:
618:
613:
611:
606:
604:
599:
598:
595:
589:
586:
584:
581:
580:
576:
567:
560:
558:
554:
550:
544:
541:
536:
529:
526:
523:
518:
515:
503:
496:
494:
492:
490:
488:
484:
481:
476:
473:
466:
464:
460:
457:
453:
445:
443:
441:
437:
436:
427:
423:
420:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
398:
394:
385:
378:
374:
371:
369:
368:Vantage Press
366:
363:
360:
357:
353:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
330:
327:
326:
325:
322:
316:
314:
309:
301:
299:
297:
292:
290:
286:
281:
274:
272:
270:
264:
260:
253:
251:
249:
245:
244:
233:
231:
226:
222:
218:
213:
210:
205:
201:
197:
192:
185:
183:
180:
175:
167:
165:
161:
159:
158:paid advocacy
155:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
120:
117:
110:
109:
97:
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
75:WP:NOTFORSALE
72:
71:
68:
63:
58:
54:
48:
46:
42:
36:
29:
28:
18:
3360:About essays
3349:About essays
3256:Rouge editor
3206:Oops Defense
2986:Barnstaritis
2951:Assume faith
2773:Pokémon test
2687:
2618:High Schools
2440:WikiBullying
2404:Superhatting
2399:POV railroad
2096:Just drop it
1900:Nobody cares
1734:Divisiveness
1258:Printability
1151:Style guides
941:Amnesia test
798:Paraphrasing
548:
543:
528:
517:
506:. Retrieved
475:
461:
455:
451:
449:
434:
433:
431:
426:Own Formula1
425:
418:
390:
355:
320:
317:
312:
308:vanity press
305:
295:
293:
288:
284:
282:
278:
265:
261:
257:
241:
239:
229:
224:
220:
216:
214:
208:
204:vanity press
199:
193:
189:
171:
162:
153:
126:
118:
38:
3367:Essay guide
3251:Rouge admin
2818:Video links
2673:No big loss
2362:just madmen
2312:Don't shout
2086:How to lose
2081:Get over it
1865:Be the glue
1784:Negotiation
1641:Relist bias
1471:Removing or
1303:Stub Makers
1136:Law sources
1066:Don't panic
395:loft and a
225:independent
142:independent
96:WP:PURCHASE
39:This is an
3423:Guidelines
3191:No, really
3171:LTTAUTMAOK
2653:Make stubs
2374:No racists
2116:Say "MOBY"
1838:Philosophy
1711:The basics
1268:Publicists
1238:Presentism
1183:Merge Test
1168:Inaccuracy
651:Philosophy
508:2013-08-22
467:References
352:Poetry.com
138:verifiable
45:notability
2901:Adminitis
2470:WikiPeace
2445:WikiCrime
2424:UPPERCASE
1804:Thank you
1436:Proseline
1228:Permastub
793:Paradoxes
708:Don't lie
406:nightclub
393:Manhattan
344:iUniverse
321:only ever
243:who's who
149:secondary
146:published
67:Shortcuts
3458:Category
3418:Policies
2568:Coatrack
2465:WikiLove
2455:WikiHate
2369:No Nazis
2342:Griefing
1606:Immunity
858:Trifecta
688:Cohesion
577:See also
452:entirely
289:interest
134:reliable
130:multiple
3081:Emerson
2921:ANI flu
1885:Failure
1724:Apology
1621:Nothing
818:Purpose
410:Tabloid
373:Xlibris
174:Wiki-PR
82:WP:NBUY
2563:Clones
2140:Don'ts
2061:Desist
2051:Candor
1960:Reader
440:WP:GNG
89:WP:BUY
1814:Truce
397:Tokyo
41:essay
3086:Fart
3031:Crap
1416:Coup
768:Need
285:pays
217:book
2004:Dos
627:(?)
435:and
356:aka
43:on
3460::
556:^
486:^
408:.
354:,
156:—
144:,
140:,
136:,
132:,
616:e
609:t
602:v
511:.
428:"
421:"
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
