Knowledge (XXG)

:Notability (restaurants) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

21: 127:
Local newspaper reviews do not serve to convey notability to restaurants. Since these reviews strive to provide complete and exhaustive coverage of the area they serve, their reviews will cover the notable and non-notable alike. Coverage must at least reach the regional level before being treated as
136:
Inclusion of a restaurant in a restaurant guide generally does not confer notability. The vast majority of restaurant guides attempt to be inclusive rather than exclusive. If a notable restaurant guide determines that a restaurant is notable enough to be top-ranked on its list, then certainly other
108:
A specific restaurant may be notable for events which occurred at that restaurant, but only if the restaurant itself or staff of the restaurant played a specific role in the notability. However, in most cases the event which occurred at the restaurant keeps the notability to itself. An example of
145:
Simply put, the size of the restaurant chain is the most important factor in the notability of the restaurant chain. While other issues, such as the popularity and impact on popular culture have an impact, generally a restaurant chain becomes notable if there are enough individual locations that
77:, in no way to replace its purpose, in regard to restaurants. It is also not intended to replace, supplant, or otherwise alter the standard notability requirements. 39: 158: 43: 28: 146:
knowledge of the chain's existence is very widespread. Note that very notable chains do not necessarily exist in multiple countries.
38:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
80:
The reason this extension of the notability requirements is necessary is that there is a constant inflow of pages for
110: 35: 52: 113:
was shot to death, for which the event and the person are notable, but the specific saloon is not.
128:
a source of notability, and even then multiple reputable sources should support this notability.
117: 74: 152: 137:
reputable sources will discuss this restaurant and provide proof of notability.
124:, which received fame through the actions of others (in song and television). 81: 121: 97: 89: 93: 85: 15: 100:/etc. that do not have, or have a very tenuous, notability. 116:
An example of a restaurant having its own notability is
60: 8: 73:This guideline is intended to extend 7: 14: 159:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals 141:Notability of a restaurant chain 19: 1: 175: 104:Notability of a restaurant 50: 109:this is the saloon where 42:or initiate a thread at 111:Caleb Claiborne Herbert 132:Restaurant guides 71: 70: 166: 118:Tom's Restaurant 63: 44:the village pump 23: 22: 16: 174: 173: 169: 168: 167: 165: 164: 163: 149: 148: 143: 134: 106: 67: 66: 59: 55: 47: 20: 12: 11: 5: 172: 170: 162: 161: 151: 150: 142: 139: 133: 130: 105: 102: 69: 68: 65: 64: 56: 51: 48: 34: 33: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 171: 160: 157: 156: 154: 147: 140: 138: 131: 129: 125: 123: 119: 114: 112: 103: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 78: 76: 62: 58: 57: 54: 49: 45: 41: 40:the talk page 37: 32: 30: 25: 18: 17: 144: 135: 126: 115: 107: 79: 72: 26: 82:restaurants 98:cafeterias 27:This is a 122:Manhattan 36:Consensus 31:proposal. 153:Category 53:Shortcut 90:saloons 75:WP:CORP 61:WP:REST 29:failed 94:delis 86:pubs 120:in 155:: 96:/ 92:/ 88:/ 84:/ 46:.

Index

failed
Consensus
the talk page
the village pump
Shortcut
WP:REST
WP:CORP
restaurants
pubs
saloons
delis
cafeterias
Caleb Claiborne Herbert
Tom's Restaurant
Manhattan
Category
Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.