553:. Accusing other editors of owning the article may appear aggressive, and could be perceived as a personal attack. Address the editor in a civil manner, with the same amount of respect you would expect. Often, editors accused of ownership may not even realize it, so it is important to assume good faith. Some editors may think they are protecting the article from vandalism, and may respond to any changes with hostility. Others may try to promote their own point of view, failing to recognize the importance of the
349:
header informing readers about the topic. Always avoid accusations, attacks, and speculations concerning the motivation of any editor. If the behaviour continues, the issue may require dispute resolution, but it is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation, etc. Editors of this type often welcome discussion, so a simple exchange of ideas will usually solve the problem of ownership.
529:, they have rights to edit other pages in your user space as well. Usually others will not edit your primary user page, other than to address significant concerns (rarely) or to do routine housekeeping, such as handling project-related tags, disambiguating links to pages that have been moved, removing the page from categories meant for articles, replacing non-free content by linking to it, or removing obvious vandalism or
45:
101:
482:. Editors are asked to take particular care when editing a featured article; it is considerate to discuss significant changes of text or images on the talk page first. Explaining civilly why sources and policies support a particular version of a featured article does not necessarily constitute ownership. The
707:
The subject of an article is not required to police it for policy violations or otherwise keep it updated, etc. Keep in mind that even though
Knowledge (XXG) often comes up high on Google searches, the subject may not yet have discovered the article or even if they have, they may not know how to edit
421:
Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit", but not all edits bring improvement. In many cases, a core group of editors will have worked to build the article up to its present state and will revert edits that they find detrimental in order, they believe, to preserve the quality of the
373:
The involvement of multiple editors, each defending the ownership of the other, can be highly complex. The simplest scenario usually consists of a dominant editor who is defended by other editors, reinforcing the former's ownership. This can be frustrating to both new and seasoned editors. As before,
315:
Being the primary or sole editor of an article does not constitute ownership, provided that contributions and input from fellow editors are not ignored or immediately disregarded. Editors familiar with the topic and in possession of relevant reliable sources may have watchlisted such articles and may
645:
Although the following statements, seen in isolation from any context or other statements, do not indicate ownership behavior or motivation, they may be part of a pattern that indicates ownership behavior. When they occur along with some form of dogged insistence and relentless pushing, without good
335:
While ownership behavior is often understood to involve the original creator of the article, it can also involve other editors who have conflicting interests in promoting or opposing the subject, hijacking the original article's direction and emphasis, changing the title to reflect such changes, or,
291:
with other contributors, why not take some time off from the editing process? Taking yourself out of the equation can cool things off considerably. Take a fresh look a week or two later. Or, if someone else is claiming "ownership" of a page, you can bring it up on the associated talk page, appeal to
628:
An editor comments on other editors' talk pages with the purpose of discouraging them from making additional contributions. The discussion can take many forms; it may be purely negative, consisting of threats and insults, often avoiding the topic of the article altogether. At the other extreme, the
299:
Even though editors can never "own" an article, it is important to respect the work and ideas of your fellow contributors. Therefore, be cautious when removing or rewriting large amounts of content, particularly if this content was written by one editor; it is more effective to try to work with the
624:
An editor reverts a good-faith change without providing an edit summary that refers to relevant
Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, reliable sources, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit. Repeating such no-reason reversions after being
364:
may be necessary, but at least you will be on record as having attempted to solve the problem directly with the editor. It is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation, etc. It may also be wise to allow them to withdraw
348:
to the article, so keep in mind that such editors may be experts in their field or have a genuine interest in maintaining the quality of the article and preserving accuracy. An editor who appears to assume ownership of an article should be approached on the article's talk page with a descriptive
266:
Some contributors feel possessive about material they have contributed to
Knowledge (XXG). A few editors will even defend such material against others. It is quite reasonable to take an interest in an article on a topic you care about—perhaps you are an expert, or perhaps it is just your hobby;
401:
on their part and regard their behavior as stewardship. Stewardship or shepherding of an article or group of related articles may be the result of a sincere personal interest in the subject matter or in a cause or organization related to it. The editor might also be an expert or otherwise very
605:
An editor disputes minor edits concerning layout, image use, and wording in a particular article frequently. The editor might claim, whether openly or implicitly, the right to review any changes before they can be added to the article. (This does not include the routine maintenance of article
109:
No one "owns" content (including articles or any page at
Knowledge (XXG)). If you create or edit an article, other editors can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so. In addition, you should not undo their edits without good reason. Disagreements should be
422:
encyclopedia. Such reversion does not indicate an "ownership" problem, if it is supported by an edit summary referring to
Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit.
316:
discuss or amend others' edits. This too does not equal ownership, provided it does not marginalise the valid opinions of others and is adequately justified. Often these editors can be approached and may offer assistance to those unfamiliar with the article.
629:
owner may patronize other editors, claiming that their ideas are interesting while also claiming that they lack the deep understanding of the subject necessary to edit the article (see the first two comments in the
Statements section just below).
522:. They are still part of Knowledge (XXG) and must serve its primary purposes; in particular, user talk pages make communication and collaboration among editors easier. These functions must not be hampered by ownership behavior.
429:
or accusations of ownership. In this way, the specifics of any change can be discussed with the editors who are familiar with the article, who are likewise expected to discuss the content civilly. All editors must follow
620:
An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's
926:
708:
it. Although subjects are allowed to make minor corrections and remove vandalism, they are normally discouraged from making substantial edits, so some subjects may prefer to stay away from editing them at all.
699:
The author of an article is not generally required to update an article for outdated information or changes in consensus as long as the content was accurate/according to consensus at the time of creation, see
1173:
766:
1088:
374:
address the topic and not the actions of the editors. If this fails, proceed to dispute resolution, but it is important to communicate on the talk page and attempt to resolve the dispute yourself
779:
1420:
541:
While it may be easy to identify ownership issues, it is far more difficult to resolve the conflict to the satisfaction of the editors involved. It is always helpful to remember to
919:
571:
If an editor consistently demonstrates behavior similar to that shown in the following examples in a certain article talk page, then they may have issues with page ownership.
1346:
704:. Keep in mind that not all authors are active or check their watchlist and even those that are/do will not necessarily check every edit or identify a problem with an edit.
284:
Similarly, by submitting your ideas (for article organization, categorization, style, standards, etc.) to
Knowledge (XXG), you allow others to challenge and develop them.
759:
1379:
723:
222:
1103:
752:
1579:
1374:
1113:
855:
1394:
1180:
1049:
403:
263:
say. No one whether a subject or an article creator has a responsibility to maintain an article or can normally be held responsible for its content.
475:
267:
however, if this watchfulness starts to become possessiveness, then you are overdoing it. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a
617:
An editor reverts justified article changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect a certain version, stable or not.
360:
by discussing the topic on the talk page. You may need to ignore attacks made in response to a query. If ownership persists after a discussion,
1645:
1477:
479:
1367:
268:
850:
425:
Where disagreement persists after such a reversion, the editor proposing the change should first take the matter to the talk page, without
1399:
776:
493:
53:
274:
Once you have posted it to
Knowledge (XXG), you cannot stop anyone from editing text you have written. As each edit page clearly states:
1389:
1384:
1404:
1341:
845:
407:
215:
1118:
1078:
936:
864:
840:
509:
1014:
566:
426:
176:
1609:
1430:
1108:
1083:
1029:
357:
293:
156:
111:
471:
1640:
1472:
1248:
1195:
1168:
1098:
1073:
465:
398:
309:
1650:
1594:
1044:
1039:
1009:
914:
870:
798:
127:
61:
1556:
208:
1362:
1243:
1163:
946:
941:
191:
136:
1425:
1331:
1286:
1238:
1233:
951:
909:
875:
660:"I'm an expert on the subject. If you have any suggestions, please put them in the talk page and I will review them."
478:, where they are checked for high-quality sources, a thorough survey of the relevant literature, and compliance with
166:
1319:
904:
835:
411:
19:"WP:OWN" redirects here. For the guideline about users' own talk pages and the removal of posts and comments, see
1314:
1034:
1024:
791:
288:
186:
161:
486:
1185:
657:"I created/wrote the majority of this article." (implying some kind of right or status exists because of that)
146:
251:
of a particular article (or any part of it). Even a subject of an article, be that a person or organization,
1551:
1618:
1484:
1123:
999:
931:
899:
860:
505:
171:
34:
966:
1489:
1190:
1093:
1004:
994:
718:
670:
515:
305:
196:
151:
669:"I can see nothing wrong with the article and there is no need to change anything at all." (misapplying
526:
1501:
1496:
989:
651:
575:
447:
415:
353:
301:
141:
115:
75:
65:
812:
33:
This page is about control over an article's text. For the ownership of copyright in an article, see
1336:
1326:
611:
20:
735:
646:
policy back up, and often including edit warring, they may be an expression of ownership behavior.
492:
template on the talk page will contain a link to the featured article candidacy and any subsequent
300:
editor than against them—even if you think they are acting as if they "own" the article. (See also
607:
431:
1140:
1561:
26:"WP:OOP" redirects here. For the humorous essay on the usage of "OOPS" to defend oneself, see
701:
554:
542:
27:
744:
474:) are open for editing like any other, they have gone through a community review process as
633:
550:
546:
530:
1541:
435:
361:
677:
402:
knowledgeable in the subject matter and able to provide credible insights for locating
352:
If you find that the editor continues to be hostile, makes personal attacks, or wages
1634:
1210:
406:. The editors in question are no less responsible for adhering to core policies like
1518:
344:
In many cases (but not all), single editors engaged in ownership conflicts are also
739:
279:
Work submitted to
Knowledge (XXG) can be edited, used, and redistributed by anyone.
118:. There is generally no responsibility on subjects or authors to maintain articles.
1546:
236:
324:
There are two common types of ownership conflicts between users: those involving
1263:
240:
387:
695:
Subjects and authors aren't responsible for updating content. Examples:
470:
336:
if unsuccessful, blanking or deleting the article as a form of revenge.
650:"Are you qualified to edit this article?" / "You only have X edits." (
663:"Please do not make any more changes without my/their/our approval."
518:
as they see fit. Nevertheless, they are not personal homepages, and
514:
Knowledge (XXG) offers wide latitude to users to manage their user
625:
asked for a rationale is a strong indicator of ownership behavior.
60:
It describes a widely accepted standard that all editors should
748:
247:, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the
95:
39:
386:"WP:STEWARDSHIP" redirects here. For the group of users, see
1449:
683:"You hadn't edited the article or talk page previously."
525:
While other users and bots will more commonly edit your
590:
583:
468:(identified by a bronze star in the upper-right corner
455:
83:
510:
Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines § User talk pages
365:
from the conversation and return when they are ready.
239:
pages and articles are edited collaboratively by the
1089:
Do not disrupt
Knowledge (XXG) to illustrate a point
394:
1526:
1514:
1457:
1447:
1413:
1355:
1295:
1271:
1261:
1218:
1208:
1148:
1138:
1058:
974:
964:
884:
820:
810:
738:– A discussion of authorship of Wiki pages on the
606:consistency, such as preservation of established
927:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
724:Knowledge (XXG):Don't revert without explanation
719:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus § Levels of consensus
276:
52:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
241:Wikipedian community of volunteer contributors
760:
666:"Please clear this with WikiProject Z first."
432:the official policy about discussing disputes
216:
8:
1515:
395:exhibits behaviour associated with ownership
378:escalating the conflict resolution process.
114:, starting with a discussion on the article
1421:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1523:
1454:
1307:
1268:
1215:
1145:
971:
817:
767:
753:
745:
223:
209:
123:
64:follow. Changes made to it should reflect
126:
7:
292:other contributors, or consider the
1580:List of all policies and guidelines
567:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
1619:Summaries of values and principles
1460:
1298:
1061:
887:
686:"You're vandalizing my hard work."
632:An editor reverts any edit with a
14:
310:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
1646:Knowledge (XXG) conduct policies
1529:
1274:
1221:
1151:
1104:Please do not bite the newcomers
977:
823:
469:
271:people make on Knowledge (XXG).
99:
43:
561:Examples of ownership behaviour
1:
1114:Responding to threats of harm
856:Biographies of living persons
480:the featured article criteria
1181:Criteria for speedy deletion
1050:Paid-contribution disclosure
259:what the article may or may
257:nor has any right to dictate
851:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
476:featured article candidates
414:with reliable sources, and
287:If you find yourself in an
1667:
573:
564:
537:Resolving ownership issues
506:Knowledge (XXG):User pages
503:
445:
385:
73:
35:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
32:
25:
18:
1574:
1310:
786:
520:are not owned by the user
382:Ownership and stewardship
369:Multiple-editor ownership
306:Knowledge (XXG):Etiquette
1641:Knowledge (XXG) policies
494:featured article reviews
302:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
107:This page in a nutshell:
16:Wikimedia project policy
1651:Knowledge (XXG) culture
1557:Licensing and copyright
777:policies and guidelines
408:neutrality of viewpoint
340:Single-editor ownership
282:
1552:Friendly space policy
1342:Broad-concept article
846:Neutral point of view
565:Further information:
1119:Talk page guidelines
1079:Conflict of interest
1020:Ownership of content
865:Copyright violations
841:No original research
775:Knowledge (XXG) key
636:in the edit summary.
346:primary contributors
328:and those involving
182:Ownership of content
1015:No personal attacks
937:Don't create hoaxes
177:No personal attacks
1610:List of guidelines
1431:Template namespace
1109:Courtesy vanishing
1084:Disruptive editing
1030:Dispute resolution
362:dispute resolution
358:disruptive editing
320:Types of ownership
294:dispute resolution
157:Dispute resolution
1628:
1627:
1570:
1569:
1510:
1509:
1473:Project namespace
1443:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1380:Dates and numbers
1347:Understandability
1257:
1256:
1204:
1203:
1196:Revision deletion
1169:Proposed deletion
1134:
1133:
1099:Gaming the system
1074:Assume good faith
960:
959:
547:assume good faith
466:featured articles
442:Featured articles
427:personal comments
399:assume good faith
393:Unless an editor
255:own the article,
233:
232:
122:
121:
94:
93:
1658:
1605:
1604:
1595:List of policies
1590:
1589:
1547:List of policies
1534:
1533:
1532:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1455:
1451:
1448:Project content
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1269:
1265:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1216:
1212:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1146:
1142:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1045:Child protection
1040:No legal threats
1010:Ignore all rules
982:
981:
980:
972:
968:
915:Reliable sources
892:
891:
890:
828:
827:
826:
818:
814:
799:Ignore all rules
781:
769:
762:
755:
746:
593:
586:
491:
485:
473:
458:
404:reliable sources
356:, try to ignore
330:multiple editors
225:
218:
211:
128:Conduct policies
124:
103:
102:
96:
86:
47:
46:
40:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1624:
1602:
1601:
1587:
1586:
1566:
1530:
1528:
1506:
1461:
1459:
1435:
1409:
1363:Manual of Style
1351:
1299:
1297:
1291:
1275:
1273:
1253:
1249:Page protection
1222:
1220:
1200:
1164:Deletion policy
1152:
1150:
1130:
1062:
1060:
1054:
978:
976:
956:
947:Patent nonsense
942:Fringe theories
888:
886:
880:
824:
822:
806:
782:
773:
736:AuthorshipModel
732:
715:
693:
643:
634:personal attack
612:citation styles
602:
597:
596:
591:WP:OWNBEHAVIOUR
589:
582:
578:
569:
563:
539:
512:
502:
489:
487:article history
483:
462:
461:
454:
450:
444:
397:, it's best to
391:
384:
371:
342:
322:
237:Knowledge (XXG)
229:
192:Username policy
112:calmly resolved
100:
90:
89:
82:
78:
70:
69:
44:
38:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1664:
1662:
1654:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1633:
1632:
1626:
1625:
1623:
1622:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1598:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1564:
1562:Privacy policy
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1538:
1536:
1521:
1512:
1511:
1508:
1507:
1505:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1469:
1467:
1452:
1445:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1426:Categorization
1423:
1417:
1415:
1414:Classification
1411:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1402:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1382:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1359:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1350:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1334:
1332:Disambiguation
1329:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1311:
1305:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1287:Editing policy
1283:
1281:
1266:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1252:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1234:Administrators
1230:
1228:
1213:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1166:
1160:
1158:
1143:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1070:
1068:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
986:
984:
969:
962:
961:
958:
957:
955:
954:
952:External links
949:
944:
939:
934:
929:
924:
923:
922:
912:
910:Citing sources
907:
902:
896:
894:
882:
881:
879:
878:
876:Article titles
873:
868:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
832:
830:
815:
808:
807:
805:
804:
803:
802:
787:
784:
783:
774:
772:
771:
764:
757:
749:
743:
742:
731:
730:External links
728:
727:
726:
721:
714:
711:
710:
709:
705:
692:
691:Responsibility
689:
688:
687:
684:
681:
678:peanut-gallery
674:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
642:
639:
638:
637:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
601:
598:
595:
594:
587:
584:WP:OWNBEHAVIOR
579:
574:
562:
559:
538:
535:
527:user talk page
501:
498:
460:
459:
451:
446:
443:
440:
383:
380:
377:
370:
367:
341:
338:
321:
318:
269:common mistake
231:
230:
228:
227:
220:
213:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
167:Editing policy
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
131:
130:
120:
119:
104:
92:
91:
88:
87:
79:
74:
71:
59:
58:
50:
48:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1663:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1636:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1611:
1606:
1599:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1539:
1537:
1535:
1525:
1522:
1513:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1468:
1466:
1456:
1453:
1446:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1375:Accessibility
1373:
1369:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1358:
1354:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1320:Summary style
1318:
1317:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1294:
1288:
1285:
1284:
1282:
1280:
1270:
1267:
1260:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1227:
1217:
1214:
1207:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1157:
1147:
1144:
1137:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1067:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
993:
991:
988:
987:
985:
983:
973:
970:
963:
953:
950:
948:
945:
943:
940:
938:
935:
933:
930:
928:
925:
921:
918:
917:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
905:Autobiography
903:
901:
898:
897:
895:
893:
883:
877:
874:
872:
869:
866:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
836:Verifiability
834:
833:
831:
829:
819:
816:
809:
801:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
788:
785:
778:
770:
765:
763:
758:
756:
751:
750:
747:
741:
740:CommunityWiki
737:
734:
733:
729:
725:
722:
720:
717:
716:
712:
706:
703:
698:
697:
696:
690:
685:
682:
679:
675:
672:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
653:
649:
648:
647:
640:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
613:
609:
604:
603:
599:
592:
588:
585:
581:
580:
577:
572:
568:
560:
558:
556:
552:
549:, and remain
548:
544:
536:
534:
532:
528:
523:
521:
517:
511:
507:
499:
497:
495:
488:
481:
477:
472:
467:
457:
453:
452:
449:
441:
439:
437:
433:
428:
423:
419:
417:
413:
412:verifiability
409:
405:
400:
396:
389:
388:meta:Stewards
381:
379:
375:
368:
366:
363:
359:
355:
350:
347:
339:
337:
333:
331:
327:
319:
317:
313:
311:
307:
303:
297:
295:
290:
285:
281:
280:
275:
272:
270:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
226:
221:
219:
214:
212:
207:
206:
204:
203:
198:
195:
193:
190:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
138:
137:Block evasion
135:
134:
133:
132:
129:
125:
117:
113:
108:
105:
98:
97:
85:
81:
80:
77:
72:
67:
63:
57:
55:
49:
42:
41:
36:
29:
22:
1617:
1608:
1600:
1593:
1585:
1578:
1542:Terms of Use
1527:
1478:WikiProjects
1458:
1395:Lead section
1315:Article size
1296:
1272:
1219:
1209:Enforcement
1149:
1059:
1035:Sockpuppetry
1025:Edit warring
1019:
975:
885:
821:
797:
792:Five pillars
790:
694:
671:WP:AINTBROKE
652:pulling rank
644:
570:
540:
533:violations.
524:
519:
513:
504:Main pages:
463:
436:edit warring
424:
420:
392:
372:
351:
345:
343:
334:
329:
325:
323:
314:
298:
286:
283:
278:
277:
273:
265:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
234:
187:Sockpuppetry
181:
162:Edit warring
106:
51:
1186:Attack page
1174:Biographies
147:Clean start
1635:Categories
1490:User boxes
1485:User pages
1124:Signatures
1000:Harassment
932:Plagiarism
900:Notability
641:Statements
555:neutrality
500:User pages
434:and avoid
326:one editor
172:Harassment
21:WP:OWNTALK
1497:Shortcuts
1191:Oversight
1139:Deletion
1094:Etiquette
1005:Vandalism
995:Consensus
871:Image use
861:Copyright
576:Shortcuts
543:stay calm
354:edit wars
296:process.
197:Vandalism
152:Consensus
116:talk page
66:consensus
1502:Subpages
1368:Contents
1337:Hatnotes
1262:Editing
1244:Blocking
990:Civility
965:Conduct
920:Medicine
811:Content
713:See also
680:editor."
621:version.
608:spelling
557:policy.
456:WP:FAOWN
448:Shortcut
416:civility
289:edit war
253:does not
142:Civility
76:Shortcut
62:normally
1400:Linking
1327:Be bold
1239:Banning
702:WP:MESS
600:Actions
28:WP:OOPS
1390:Layout
1385:Images
676:"Undo
464:While
376:before
308:, and
245:No one
84:WP:OWN
54:policy
1405:Lists
1356:Style
551:civil
516:space
249:owner
508:and
235:All
1519:(?)
1516:WMF
1450:(?)
1264:(?)
1211:(?)
1141:(?)
967:(?)
813:(?)
780:(?)
610:or
531:BLP
312:.)
261:not
1637::
1607::
1592::
614:.)
545:,
496:.
490:}}
484:{{
438:.
418:.
410:,
332:.
304:,
243:.
1603:G
1588:P
1531:P
1462:G
1300:G
1276:P
1223:P
1153:P
1063:G
979:P
889:G
867:)
863:(
825:P
768:e
761:t
754:v
673:)
654:)
390:.
224:e
217:t
210:v
68:.
56:.
37:.
30:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.