35:
98:
133:
to be sure. All too often, editors with a particularly strong interest in a topic would seek to promote the subject (if they happen to like him) with all sorts of side statements, or, conversely, to denigrate those whom they do not like. WP articles with extensive "This person was evil" sections are
116:. While this tends to ensure that all relevant content is included in the article, it can also lead to articles that are poorly structured, include disparate and irrelevant details, overweight one or more minority viewpoints, and degrade the overall quality of the article.
140:
If you find yourself adding to a section not because it is underweighted in an article, but just because you find it "important" – step back a little. Even add an edit you "disagree" with. Remember – articles are the
134:
often the result. (Sometimes the section is "This person's sex crimes", "This person's controversies" or "This person's hatred of some particular group" whether or not there is any basis in fact for the claims.)
112:
The collaborative nature of
Knowledge (XXG) encourages the rapid acquisition and integration of content from many different sources and viewpoints, properly
174:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
126:
and thus editing single sections, no matter how important they seem to an editor, frequently results in a very ill-weighted article.
106:
The impact of any individual contribution should be considered in regards to the tone and perspective of the article as a whole
169:
137:
Other areas where this syndrome is found are political, sociological, racial, and sexual articles, just to name a few.
55:
154:
65:
113:
43:
130:
163:
17:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
119:
Individual pieces of articles are what most editors seem to edit.
92:
29:
80:
73:
8:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
7:
175:Knowledge (XXG) essays about editing
124:an article is the sum of its parts
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
129:This has been a major problem in
96:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1:
131:biographies of living people
191:
63:
155:Knowledge (XXG):Coatrack
104:This page in a nutshell:
170:Knowledge (XXG) essays
54:, as it has not been
18:Knowledge (XXG):PIECE
110:
109:
91:
90:
16:(Redirected from
182:
145:of their parts!
100:
99:
93:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
190:
189:
185:
184:
183:
181:
180:
179:
160:
159:
151:
122:The problem is
97:
87:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
188:
186:
178:
177:
172:
162:
161:
158:
157:
150:
147:
108:
107:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
187:
176:
173:
171:
168:
167:
165:
156:
153:
152:
148:
146:
144:
138:
135:
132:
127:
125:
120:
117:
115:
105:
102:
95:
94:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
142:
139:
136:
128:
123:
121:
118:
111:
103:
74:WP:PIECEMEAL
41:
42:This is an
164:Categories
66:Shortcuts
149:See also
114:weighted
81:WP:PIECE
44:essay
143:sum
166::
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.