321:
well. An editor with no interest in a subject may hardly know its substance and may little know how to search for information about it. The passionate editor may therefore be better able to edit accurately, while the disinterested editor may be unable to recognize errors or omissions or to judge the quality of sources. On the other hand, the disinterested editor may be able to report all sides because they don't care who wins while the committed editor may propagandize for one side and against all others. Both kinds of editors can do a great job and both can do a miserable job. We don't care about personal passion. What we care about is accuracy in reporting what sources say.
249:. At best, the professor seems to have hinted at too many to be statistically likely and it may never have happened. The professor compiled a database of reports of alleged abductees but systematically excluded some considered as lacking credibility. Despite the professor's bias and my doubt about their judgment, what remains useful are the professor's criteria for exclusion. While I don't think the criteria were stringent enough, they are a start and could be reportable in Knowledge (XXG), not only in an article about claims of abduction from Earth, but also in an article on unlikely personal claims in any field.
376:
does not have to say the person was a criminal. The section about criminality does not have to say anything about art. That's because the article is taken as a whole when judging the article's neutrality. A section is judged the same way unless the section is obviously meant to be one-sided; in that case, the article as a whole will still be judged for neutrality. However, we do not include information about relatively minor crimes unrelated to the field in which the subject works, unless they have received very wide responsible coverage, or unless they are public figures.
266:.) But in most subject areas, scholars and journalists can do original research, such as interviewing people. Biographies are often good examples of sources acceptable for Knowledge (XXG) even though they contain original research. We're usually happy with original research that's in a source. Just edit the Knowledge (XXG) article so the resulting article does not present its own original research.
237:
to produce consistent results but not eliminate bias. Not only are people who are wrong but persistent in their beliefs biased; people who are persistently right are also biased. We just prefer the bias of those who are right over those who are wrong. As long as a
Knowledge (XXG) article neutrally reflects good sources, the sources cited being biased doesn't matter.
200:
field for a point of criticism, but otherwise probably does not belong in
Knowledge (XXG). For example, a grace-of-a-deity view does not belong in most descriptions of mathematical method or theory. But, as an editor, you may subscribe to any view you wish and you may decide what to edit and not to edit, as you wish, as long as articles retain NPOV.
131:
24:
116:
388:
Knowledge (XXG), write something neutral. We interpret advertising to include advocacy, no matter how meritorious the cause. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for that. Articles about advocacy organizations describe what they do, but not include advocacy for the cause, or general information about the field in which they work.
481:
Consider the problems (from their standpoints) of militaries, sports teams, and peace activists. They want only passionately committed people who believe in one side and, in the case of the military, are willing to risk dying for their cause. But they also must understand their enemies and opponents.
240:
Even a bad bias can be a bias we can live with. Handle with care. What matters is the article; the source is less important and it may be possible to reconcile a problematic bias with the need for neutrality, because a source with a bad bias may still have something useful. For example, a then-former
182:
Disciplines have inherent biases. For instance, perhaps some people argue that one plus one equals two because of the grace of a deity, and that absence of that grace could mean that arithmetic would fail. But mathematicians generally reject that. So the believers would find the field of math to have
320:
And caution is advised regardless of passion. The concern about cause-driven editing is fundamentally about accuracy. An editor deeply attached to one view of a subject may have become very knowledgeable about all sides, and even if all they know is the one view they may know its pros and cons quite
316:
may not edit in fields in which they have that conflict, or must edit only with extra care, and that includes an employee. It includes an editor who has had something published somewhere else who wishes to cite it in
Knowledge (XXG). The COI guideline lets those editors ask other editors to consider
199:
In most major fields, most people believe in the internal consistency of their agreed-upon premises and main body of knowledge. An outside critic may find an inconsistency or conclude it's all nonsense, and a source outside the field and criticizing it may be citable in the article about the general
236:
Many quite reliable sources have biases. Possibly, all do. A health book recommending herbal remedies likely is biased toward herbs for health. A health book recommending medicines or surgeries and opposing herbs likely is biased toward medicines or surgeries for health. The scientific method tends
216:
performed in a field, but waits for a secondary source to report it and then reports what the secondary source reports. But that is not because
Knowledge (XXG) objects to the field having original research. It's to make sure that Knowledge (XXG) reports what people familiar with that field consider
191:
in accordance with the mainstream of each field of study. We do so even if fundamental premises of a field of study are accepted on faith, even if questioning them is not allowed in the faith community, and even if no source found questions or scientifically proves any of the fundaments. You, as a
375:
Some sections do not have to be neutral. Examples include criticism sections and pro and con sections. If a biography describes a person as a criminal in one section and as an artist in another, neither section has to repeat the other section just for neutrality. The section about being an artist
300:
Human beings have biases. Probably most editors have biases that lead them to select which articles to work on and what to add or delete. Those personal biases are fine with us, as long as the result is an article that's neutral. However, editors who contribute from specific points of view must
257:
Sources often contain original research. Most times, we're fine with that. If sources stating original research were removed from
Knowledge (XXG), there'd hardly be any Knowledge (XXG) left. There are subject areas with so much conflicting secondary material available that citing them would make
359:
This is different from editors, sources, and fields, yet not entirely different, because edits can cause a point of view as long as the article it's in afterwards has no point of view as a result; but, on the other hand, an edit cannot create original research. If the edit is the creation of an
387:
When
Knowledge (XXG) objects to an advertisement, the objection is to that which advocates for one view and omits or distorts competing views. That, by definition, cannot be neutral. Neutrality is required, so advertising is forbidden. Don't write an ad, not for Knowledge (XXG). Instead, for
2861:
369:" This may well be an edit with a POV. But if the article presents a reasonable balance of views about bliss and about good people even after being edited, then it doesn't matter that the new sentence focuses on just one point of view. In this case, the article remains neutral.
901:
208:
An academic field is generally supposed to create new original research. When we report about this research using a secondary source's explanation of the research, that's not original research in a
Knowledge (XXG) article, and that's all that matters to Knowledge (XXG).
2062:
138:
Editors, sources, and academic disciplines or fields of study may have points of view (POV) and perform original research (OR). Even some edits can reflect a POV. If that was not permitted, probably most of
Knowledge (XXG) could not exist. Articles must have
364:. And if the edit is the creation of a section and if the section must be neutral (a criticism section and sometimes other sections do not have to be), then the edit creating the section must be neutral, even if the section is meant to be expanded later.
1466:
164:
is not permitted. It is not neutral. If you feel like writing an ad, what you should do instead is write neutral content based on sourcing. If you find this difficult, you can ask other editors on an existing article's talk page to help, or ask
482:
Winning, especially when it's close, requires understanding the other side. They don't have to agree. They have to understand. A Knowledge (XXG) editor can both be driven by a cause and understand the content being edited. That meets our needs.
350:
This is useful in an indirect way. Your doing original research may lead you to recognize ideas that direct you to sources you can cite. So your original research can't be reported in
Knowledge (XXG) but maybe something related can be. Do it.
931:
2748:
2197:
217:
as having been reasonably enough established by the original research. The secondary source serves as an intermediate filter. Knowledge (XXG), through that filter, still accepts that the field has produced original research.
2628:
1800:
2157:
1966:
1561:
3001:
1268:
2941:
2688:
2309:
946:
317:
an edit or a citation. But simply believing in a cause does not invoke the COI restrictions. A cause-driven editor may edit articles whether related to the cause or not. Caution is advised, but permission stands.
3011:
2753:
613:
3277:
3272:
2563:
3066:
1366:
3051:
2801:
1341:
1396:
1093:
3071:
2478:
1664:
1118:
1041:
623:
1243:
673:
663:
193:
2518:
2498:
1461:
1431:
743:
347:
Go ahead. Do original research. We don't care. As long as you don't put your original research into an article, we don't mind. And don't insert another editor's original research, either.
1755:
1481:
758:
831:
3216:
1163:
430:
2523:
2603:
2558:
2468:
2418:
1684:
1411:
1386:
3325:
3111:
1401:
1036:
1021:
733:
2438:
1001:
3369:
2593:
2508:
1624:
1476:
1381:
996:
956:
811:
3374:
3221:
2314:
2227:
1825:
1566:
1391:
1316:
1051:
1026:
951:
563:
522:
2202:
2147:
2132:
2648:
2598:
2453:
1745:
1083:
966:
846:
1885:
1263:
3181:
1810:
1556:
1293:
1218:
788:
1865:
3076:
2728:
2573:
2493:
2162:
1911:
1840:
1694:
991:
440:
124:
Editors, sources, and fields can have a point of view and original research, and even some edits can have a POV, as long as the article in
Knowledge (XXG) does not.
3121:
2678:
1376:
1253:
1143:
1046:
1031:
1258:
633:
2663:
2633:
2443:
2192:
2187:
1724:
1173:
1128:
1058:
3201:
1880:
379:
No way exists for an edit to state original research without the result being the article stating original research. So an edit cannot state original research.
3379:
2976:
1421:
796:
510:
3061:
778:
2931:
2806:
826:
2693:
2408:
1805:
1491:
1273:
1103:
1016:
618:
435:
1551:
768:
3282:
2583:
2543:
2257:
1870:
1790:
1306:
1208:
1138:
926:
412:
3171:
2743:
1926:
2423:
1860:
1606:
1098:
638:
183:
a vital theological misunderstanding and would conclude that math is biased in having a POV regarding a deity. Nonetheless, Knowledge (XXG) reports on
2222:
2167:
2137:
608:
422:
2891:
2811:
1674:
3206:
3176:
2966:
2946:
2503:
2172:
2127:
2122:
1931:
1815:
1719:
1456:
1168:
1113:
1068:
1006:
976:
881:
871:
643:
2986:
2488:
1088:
773:
3141:
3016:
2866:
2588:
2284:
2092:
1971:
1820:
1416:
1238:
1188:
728:
3156:
3096:
3021:
2513:
2483:
2403:
2232:
1203:
1193:
1158:
971:
876:
598:
417:
3196:
3166:
3031:
3006:
2886:
2658:
2117:
2026:
1986:
1890:
1546:
1531:
1406:
1011:
861:
816:
748:
708:
558:
161:
47:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3308:
3136:
3116:
3041:
3036:
2608:
2097:
1740:
1649:
1511:
1446:
1356:
1346:
1321:
1283:
1278:
1213:
981:
941:
886:
48:
1594:
2212:
1875:
1704:
367:
For example, an edit to an article on a religion might add this sentence: "According to ..., a good person can attain bliss.<ref: -->
3364:
3330:
2733:
2021:
2006:
1921:
1496:
841:
588:
583:
407:
3126:
2936:
2906:
2871:
2698:
2177:
2087:
2001:
1644:
1614:
1486:
668:
226:
166:
140:
36:
763:
3292:
3161:
2991:
2718:
2618:
2428:
2304:
2217:
2182:
2107:
2077:
1941:
1775:
1765:
1714:
1541:
1526:
1451:
1223:
1073:
916:
703:
648:
573:
503:
313:
259:
213:
155:
151:
144:
40:
2207:
2102:
2067:
896:
262:
before inclusion of research studies. (There are specially stringent and specific rules for topics involving human medicine--see
3267:
3081:
2996:
2758:
2703:
2623:
2578:
2533:
2528:
2413:
2247:
2042:
1750:
1571:
1351:
1326:
1233:
1228:
1108:
738:
653:
568:
297:
We don't much care who you are. So we don't care if you're neutral. We care about the article being neutral, but not about you.
3262:
2458:
2142:
3318:
3091:
2971:
2851:
2826:
2653:
2289:
2252:
2242:
1845:
1785:
1639:
936:
911:
866:
718:
693:
683:
658:
3211:
3026:
2911:
2836:
2723:
2643:
2613:
2463:
2082:
2052:
2016:
1906:
1770:
1689:
1471:
1336:
1301:
1148:
906:
856:
851:
578:
402:
306:
1634:
821:
3313:
2901:
2896:
2856:
2841:
2831:
2708:
2553:
1961:
1951:
1850:
1659:
1521:
806:
678:
372:
Units within articles, including leads and sections, can receive a nonneutral edit as long as neutrality is the result.
3359:
3287:
3244:
3056:
2921:
2821:
2781:
2738:
2683:
2673:
2668:
2638:
2473:
2448:
2433:
2388:
2274:
1996:
1936:
1669:
1506:
1441:
1436:
1426:
1178:
801:
553:
535:
496:
312:
There's a view that editors driven by causes may not edit in those causes. That is not true. There is a guideline that
2961:
2916:
2279:
2152:
2112:
1916:
1654:
1183:
628:
196:
if you believe the field of study has a bias that you are unable to counterbalance. Someone else can do the editing.
258:
articles too long, so Knowledge (XXG) may be more selective in those areas, requiring more evidence of scholarly or
134:
Having a strong POV is fine and you can report it from a source, but also other POVs may be reported from sourcing.
3191:
3131:
3106:
3046:
2956:
2951:
2538:
2355:
2057:
2047:
1835:
1830:
1248:
921:
891:
723:
3151:
3101:
2881:
2876:
2846:
2335:
2299:
2294:
1991:
1795:
1629:
1153:
986:
961:
836:
360:
article, the article must be neutral, so an edit creating an article must be neutral, even if the article is a
3146:
2713:
2568:
1981:
1976:
1760:
1679:
1536:
1198:
603:
3086:
2548:
2345:
2269:
1133:
1078:
1063:
593:
3186:
2796:
2365:
2340:
2319:
1699:
1331:
1123:
688:
52:
246:
2360:
2350:
2264:
2237:
1501:
753:
330:
280:
62:
2816:
1780:
1619:
1516:
713:
472:
This is one editor's personal opinion. Scholarship in the future may lead to different conclusions.
1956:
1946:
1855:
519:
32:
242:
1709:
263:
245:
apparently believed that numerous people credibly reported having been abducted from Earth by
2981:
2926:
2072:
2011:
1311:
361:
460:
302:
459:
The original editor of this essay read a book by the professor on this subject, who was
3353:
2862:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
55:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
147:(NOR) but that does not restrict any editors, sources, or fields, or some edits.
184:
154:(COI) are discouraged, an editor with a COI may sometimes still edit, after
2063:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
188:
488:
130:
1467:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
2749:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
129:
932:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
3242:
2779:
2386:
1592:
533:
492:
110:
18:
2629:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1801:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1269:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
2158:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
1967:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1562:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
902:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
614:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
431:
Knowledge (XXG):For publicists publicizing a client's work
3002:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3012:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
338:
288:
98:
91:
84:
77:
70:
2564:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2198:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
2310:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
947:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
305:
to ensure their contributions are not interpreted as
169:
to create an article on a topic you feel is missing.
2754:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
3301:
3255:
2328:
2035:
1899:
1733:
1605:
1365:
1292:
787:
546:
441:
Knowledge (XXG):Ye shall know them by their sources
3273:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3052:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
674:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1244:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
536:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
426:(the phrase doesn't mean what you think it means)
1397:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1342:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1094:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3072:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2802:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2479:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1119:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
624:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
436:Knowledge (XXG):These are not original research
3370:Knowledge (XXG) essays about original research
2499:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1665:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1432:Counting and sorting are not original research
413:Knowledge (XXG):Creating controversial content
212:There is a caveat. Generally, Knowledge (XXG)
3375:Knowledge (XXG) essays about reliable sources
3326:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
2942:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
1462:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
744:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
504:
8:
2992:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1756:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1482:How to save an article proposed for deletion
759:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
734:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
699:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
2524:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
423:Knowledge (XXG):Don't teach the controversy
3252:
3239:
3217:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2789:
2776:
2604:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2559:News coverage does not decrease notability
2469:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2419:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2396:
2383:
1602:
1589:
1412:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1387:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
543:
530:
511:
497:
489:
3112:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1402:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1022:Identifying and using independent sources
418:Knowledge (XXG):Describing points of view
3278:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2439:Big events make key participants notable
1886:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1264:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1002:Formatting bilateral relations templates
49:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3380:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
2689:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2594:Notability is not a level playing field
2509:How the presumption of notability works
1625:Contributing to complicated discussions
1477:How the presumption of notability works
997:Formatting bilateral relations articles
812:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
452:
3222:You should not write meaningless lists
2519:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1826:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1567:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1392:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
957:Don't hope the house will build itself
564:All Five Pillars are equally important
408:Knowledge (XXG):Controversial articles
2649:One sentence does not an article make
2599:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2315:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2228:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1746:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1685:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1317:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1259:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1084:Minors and persons judged incompetent
847:An unfinished house is a real problem
832:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
634:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
227:Knowledge (XXG):Neutrality of sources
167:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation
7:
3202:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3182:Things that should not be surprising
2877:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2203:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2148:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2133:Don't call people by their real name
1881:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
1811:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1219:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
3077:No one cares about your garage band
3062:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
2729:What is and is not routine coverage
2574:No one cares about your garage band
2494:Existence does not prove notability
1912:Assume the assumption of good faith
1841:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1695:Relationships with academic editors
1557:Why was the page I created deleted?
1552:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
992:Featured articles may have problems
779:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
3122:Please do not murder the newcomers
2679:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2163:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1377:Adjectives in your recommendations
1254:What an article should not include
1144:The problem with elegant variation
952:Don't get hung up on minor details
769:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
314:editors with conflicts of interest
53:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
3172:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
2744:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2444:Businesses with a single location
1725:You have a right to remain silent
1174:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1129:Potential, not just current state
1059:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
403:Knowledge (XXG):Civil POV pushing
214:does not report original research
2193:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2188:Don't ignore community consensus
1422:Confusing arguments mean nothing
301:maintain rigorous commitment to
114:
22:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2694:Sources must be out-of-universe
2409:All high schools can be notable
1806:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1492:Identifying blatant advertising
1274:The world will not end tomorrow
1104:Not everything needs a template
1017:How to write a featured article
619:Editors will sometimes be wrong
3283:Avoid writing redundant essays
2932:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2807:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2634:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2584:Notability cannot be purchased
2544:Masking the lack of notability
1307:Copyediting reception sections
1209:Temporary versions of articles
1139:Principle of Some Astonishment
927:Creating controversial content
827:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
774:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1:
3365:Knowledge (XXG) how-to essays
3309:About policies and guidelines
2424:Articles with a single source
2048:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
1871:Two wrongs don't make a right
1861:The rules of polite discourse
1791:It's not the end of the world
1099:Not everything needs a navbox
967:Don't "teach the controversy"
639:Here to build an encyclopedia
204:Fields with original research
3197:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
2892:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2812:Alternatives to edit warring
1675:Maintaining a friendly space
192:Knowledge (XXG) editor, are
3177:The Five Pillars of Untruth
2967:Editing under the influence
2504:Google searches and numbers
2223:Don't template the regulars
2138:Don't call the kettle black
1932:Be excellent to one another
1816:Revert notification opt-out
1720:We are all Wikipedians here
1169:Put a little effort into it
1114:Obtain peer review comments
1069:Introduction to structurism
1007:Fruit of the poisonous tree
977:Editors are not mindreaders
882:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
872:Beef up that first revision
644:Leave it to the experienced
609:Don't search for objections
194:free not to edit an article
3396:
3207:Why not create an account?
3142:Requirements for adminship
3017:How to vandalize correctly
2987:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
2947:Don't delete the main page
2867:Avoid using preview button
2589:Notability comparison test
2173:Don't fight fire with fire
2168:Don't eat the troll's food
2128:Don't call a spade a spade
2123:Don't bludgeon the process
1972:Encourage full discussions
1821:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1457:Don't attack the nominator
1417:But there must be sources!
1239:Try not to leave it a stub
1189:Source your plot summaries
328:
278:
241:psychology professor from
224:
60:
3251:
3238:
3157:Sarcasm is really helpful
3097:Notability is not eternal
3022:How to win a citation war
2792:
2788:
2775:
2484:Every snowflake is unique
2404:Advanced source searching
2399:
2395:
2382:
2285:No, you can't have a pony
2233:Do not insult the vandals
2093:Don't be high-maintenance
1650:Encouraging the newcomers
1601:
1588:
1194:Specialized-style fallacy
1159:Pruning article revisions
987:Endorsements (commercial)
972:Editing on mobile devices
877:Blind men and an elephant
852:Articles have a half-life
599:Dissent is not disloyalty
569:Avoid vague introductions
542:
529:
3167:The Night Before Wikimas
3032:Ignore every single rule
3007:How to get away with UPE
2887:Before they were notable
2659:Overreliance upon Google
2454:Common sourcing mistakes
2027:Settle the process first
1987:Imagine others complexly
1891:Writing for the opponent
1866:There is no common sense
1547:Unopposed AFD discussion
1532:Relisting can be abusive
1407:Avoid repeated arguments
1012:Give an article a chance
862:Avoid mission statements
822:Advanced text formatting
817:Advanced article editing
764:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
749:The rules are principles
709:Product, process, policy
559:Articles must be written
122:This page in a nutshell:
3302:Policies and guidelines
3137:Requests for medication
3117:Please bite the newbies
3042:Mess with the templates
2609:Notability means impact
2143:Don't call things cruft
2118:Don't be the Fun Police
1927:Avoid the word "vandal"
1876:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
1741:A thank you never hurts
1512:Liar liar pants on fire
1447:Deletion is not cleanup
1357:Writing better articles
1347:Write the article first
1322:Gender-neutral language
1294:Writing article content
1284:Writing better articles
1279:Write the article first
1214:Tertiary-source fallacy
982:Encourage the newcomers
942:Dictionaries as sources
887:Build content to endure
303:policies and guidelines
141:a neutral point of view
35:on the policies on the
3360:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3331:Policy writing is hard
3037:Is that even an essay?
2734:What notability is not
2489:Existence ≠Notability
2098:Don't be inconsiderate
2022:Read before commenting
2007:Mind your own business
1922:Avoid personal remarks
1497:Identifying test edits
842:A navbox on every page
797:100K featured articles
594:Concede lost arguments
589:Competence is required
520:Knowledge (XXG) essays
156:declaring the conflict
135:
3127:Pledge of Tranquility
2872:Avoid using wikilinks
2699:Subjective importance
2213:Don't spite your face
2002:Keep it down to earth
1766:Beware of the tigers!
1705:Too long; didn't read
1645:Edit at your own pace
1615:Accepting other users
1382:AfD is not a war zone
729:There is no seniority
669:Neutrality of sources
152:conflicts of interest
133:
51:, as it has not been
37:neutral point of view
3293:Quote your own essay
3162:Sausages for tasting
2937:Don't-give-a-fuckism
2907:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2719:Vanispamcruftisement
2619:Notability sub-pages
2429:Avoid template creep
2389:Essays on notability
2305:There are no oracles
2088:Don't be a WikiBigot
1942:Call a spade a spade
1715:Unblock perspectives
1542:The Heymann Standard
1527:Overzealous deletion
1487:I just don't like it
1224:There is no deadline
1089:"Murder of" articles
917:Common-style fallacy
789:Article construction
704:Process is important
649:Levels of competence
574:Be a reliable source
447:Notes and references
368:Source.</ref: -->
260:scientific consensus
145:no original research
41:no original research
3082:No one really cares
2997:Go ahead, vandalize
2759:Two prongs of merit
2704:Third-party sources
2624:Notabilitymandering
2579:No one really cares
2534:Inherent notability
2529:Independent sources
2414:Alternative outlets
2248:Nationalist editing
2218:Don't take the bait
2183:Don't help too much
2108:Don't be prejudiced
2078:Don't be an ostrich
2043:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1776:Deletion as revenge
1751:Advice for hotheads
1572:No Encyclopedic Use
1452:Does deletion help?
1352:Writing about women
1234:The deadline is now
1229:There is a deadline
1109:Nothing is in stone
739:Tendentious editing
654:Levels of consensus
3092:No sorcery threats
2972:Embrace Stop Signs
2852:Assume good wraith
2827:Anti-Wikipedianism
2664:Perennial websites
2654:Other stuff exists
2290:Passive aggression
2253:No angry mastodons
2243:Hate is disruptive
2103:Don't be obnoxious
2068:Don't be a fanatic
1846:Most ideas are bad
1786:Forgive and forget
1595:Essays on civility
1204:Run an edit-a-thon
937:Deprecated sources
912:Citation underkill
897:Chesterton's fence
867:Be neutral in form
719:Reasonability rule
684:Oversimplification
659:Most ideas are bad
243:Harvard University
136:
3347:
3346:
3343:
3342:
3339:
3338:
3234:
3233:
3230:
3229:
3212:Yes legal threats
3027:Ignore all essays
2912:Complete bollocks
2837:Asshole John rule
2771:
2770:
2767:
2766:
2724:What BLP1E is not
2644:One hundred words
2614:Notability points
2378:
2377:
2374:
2373:
2178:Don't give a fuck
2053:Civil POV pushing
2017:Mutual withdrawal
1907:Assume good faith
1771:Civility warnings
1690:Please say please
1640:Editors' pronouns
1584:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1472:Follow the leader
1337:Use our own words
1302:Avoid thread mode
1149:Pro and con lists
907:Citation overkill
857:Autosizing images
579:Civil POV pushing
427:
307:civil POV-pushing
128:
127:
109:
108:
3387:
3288:Finding an essay
3253:
3240:
2902:Butterfly effect
2897:Boston Tea Party
2857:Assume stupidity
2842:Assume bad faith
2832:Articlecountitis
2790:
2777:
2709:Trivial mentions
2554:Minimum coverage
2397:
2384:
2083:Don't be ashamed
1962:Discussing cruft
1952:Deny recognition
1851:Nothing is clear
1660:Expect no thanks
1603:
1590:
1522:Nothing is clear
1369:deleting content
1052:Tertiary sources
807:Acronym overkill
679:The one question
544:
531:
524:
513:
506:
499:
490:
483:
479:
473:
470:
464:
457:
425:
341:
291:
118:
117:
111:
101:
94:
87:
80:
73:
26:
25:
19:
3395:
3394:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3335:
3297:
3268:Value of essays
3247:
3226:
3057:Legal vandalism
2922:Counting juntas
2822:Anti-Wikipedian
2784:
2782:Humorous essays
2763:
2739:What to include
2684:Run-of-the-mill
2674:Read the source
2639:Offline sources
2434:Bare notability
2391:
2370:
2324:
2275:No Confederates
2073:Don't be a jerk
2031:
1997:Keep it concise
1937:Beyond civility
1895:
1729:
1670:How to be civil
1635:Don't retaliate
1597:
1576:
1507:Keep it concise
1442:Delete the junk
1437:Delete or merge
1427:Content removal
1361:
1327:Myth vs fiction
1288:
1179:Robotic editing
1042:Science sources
1037:Primary sources
1027:History sources
802:Abandoned stubs
783:
554:Article content
538:
525:
517:
487:
486:
480:
476:
471:
467:
458:
454:
449:
399:
394:
385:
383:Advertising ban
357:
345:
344:
337:
333:
327:
295:
294:
287:
283:
277:
272:
255:
234:
229:
223:
206:
180:
175:
173:Fields of study
115:
105:
104:
97:
90:
83:
76:
69:
65:
57:
56:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3393:
3391:
3383:
3382:
3377:
3372:
3367:
3362:
3352:
3351:
3345:
3344:
3341:
3340:
3337:
3336:
3334:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3316:
3305:
3303:
3299:
3298:
3296:
3295:
3290:
3285:
3280:
3275:
3270:
3265:
3259:
3257:
3249:
3248:
3243:
3236:
3235:
3232:
3231:
3228:
3227:
3225:
3224:
3219:
3214:
3209:
3204:
3199:
3194:
3189:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3134:
3129:
3124:
3119:
3114:
3109:
3104:
3099:
3094:
3089:
3084:
3079:
3074:
3069:
3064:
3059:
3054:
3049:
3044:
3039:
3034:
3029:
3024:
3019:
3014:
3009:
3004:
2999:
2994:
2989:
2984:
2979:
2974:
2969:
2964:
2962:Editsummarisis
2959:
2954:
2949:
2944:
2939:
2934:
2929:
2924:
2919:
2917:Counting forks
2914:
2909:
2904:
2899:
2894:
2889:
2884:
2879:
2874:
2869:
2864:
2859:
2854:
2849:
2844:
2839:
2834:
2829:
2824:
2819:
2814:
2809:
2804:
2799:
2793:
2786:
2785:
2780:
2773:
2772:
2769:
2768:
2765:
2764:
2762:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2746:
2741:
2736:
2731:
2726:
2721:
2716:
2711:
2706:
2701:
2696:
2691:
2686:
2681:
2676:
2671:
2666:
2661:
2656:
2651:
2646:
2641:
2636:
2631:
2626:
2621:
2616:
2611:
2606:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2586:
2581:
2576:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2501:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2481:
2476:
2474:Don't cite GNG
2471:
2466:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2449:But it's true!
2446:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2400:
2393:
2392:
2387:
2380:
2379:
2376:
2375:
2372:
2371:
2369:
2368:
2363:
2358:
2353:
2348:
2346:WikiHarassment
2343:
2338:
2332:
2330:
2326:
2325:
2323:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2307:
2302:
2297:
2292:
2287:
2282:
2280:No queerphobia
2277:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2250:
2245:
2240:
2235:
2230:
2225:
2220:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2160:
2155:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2039:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1917:Assume no clue
1914:
1909:
1903:
1901:
1897:
1896:
1894:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1737:
1735:
1731:
1730:
1728:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1655:Enjoy yourself
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1611:
1609:
1599:
1598:
1593:
1586:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1577:
1575:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1373:
1371:
1368:
1363:
1362:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1334:
1329:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1298:
1296:
1290:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1184:Sham consensus
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1019:
1014:
1009:
1004:
999:
994:
989:
984:
979:
974:
969:
964:
959:
954:
949:
944:
939:
934:
929:
924:
919:
914:
909:
904:
899:
894:
889:
884:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
793:
791:
785:
784:
782:
781:
776:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
746:
741:
736:
731:
726:
721:
716:
711:
706:
701:
696:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
661:
656:
651:
646:
641:
636:
631:
629:Explanationism
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
581:
576:
571:
566:
561:
556:
550:
548:
540:
539:
534:
527:
526:
518:
516:
515:
508:
501:
493:
485:
484:
474:
465:
451:
450:
448:
445:
444:
443:
438:
433:
428:
420:
415:
410:
405:
398:
395:
393:
390:
384:
381:
356:
353:
343:
342:
334:
329:
326:
323:
293:
292:
284:
279:
276:
273:
271:
268:
254:
253:OR in a source
251:
233:
230:
222:
219:
205:
202:
179:
176:
174:
171:
126:
125:
119:
107:
106:
103:
102:
95:
88:
81:
74:
66:
61:
58:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3392:
3381:
3378:
3376:
3373:
3371:
3368:
3366:
3363:
3361:
3358:
3357:
3355:
3332:
3329:
3327:
3324:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3307:
3306:
3304:
3300:
3294:
3291:
3289:
3286:
3284:
3281:
3279:
3276:
3274:
3271:
3269:
3266:
3264:
3261:
3260:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3241:
3237:
3223:
3220:
3218:
3215:
3213:
3210:
3208:
3205:
3203:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3192:Watchlistitis
3190:
3188:
3187:The WikiBible
3185:
3183:
3180:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3143:
3140:
3138:
3135:
3133:
3132:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3130:
3128:
3125:
3123:
3120:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3108:
3107:Play the game
3105:
3103:
3100:
3098:
3095:
3093:
3090:
3088:
3085:
3083:
3080:
3078:
3075:
3073:
3070:
3068:
3065:
3063:
3060:
3058:
3055:
3053:
3050:
3048:
3047:My local pond
3045:
3043:
3040:
3038:
3035:
3033:
3030:
3028:
3025:
3023:
3020:
3018:
3015:
3013:
3010:
3008:
3005:
3003:
3000:
2998:
2995:
2993:
2990:
2988:
2985:
2983:
2980:
2978:
2975:
2973:
2970:
2968:
2965:
2963:
2960:
2958:
2957:Edits Per Day
2955:
2953:
2952:Editcountitis
2950:
2948:
2945:
2943:
2940:
2938:
2935:
2933:
2930:
2928:
2925:
2923:
2920:
2918:
2915:
2913:
2910:
2908:
2905:
2903:
2900:
2898:
2895:
2893:
2890:
2888:
2885:
2883:
2880:
2878:
2875:
2873:
2870:
2868:
2865:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2843:
2840:
2838:
2835:
2833:
2830:
2828:
2825:
2823:
2820:
2818:
2815:
2813:
2810:
2808:
2805:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2795:
2794:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2778:
2774:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2732:
2730:
2727:
2725:
2722:
2720:
2717:
2715:
2712:
2710:
2707:
2705:
2702:
2700:
2697:
2695:
2692:
2690:
2687:
2685:
2682:
2680:
2677:
2675:
2672:
2670:
2667:
2665:
2662:
2660:
2657:
2655:
2652:
2650:
2647:
2645:
2642:
2640:
2637:
2635:
2632:
2630:
2627:
2625:
2622:
2620:
2617:
2615:
2612:
2610:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2580:
2577:
2575:
2572:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2539:Insignificant
2537:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2500:
2497:
2495:
2492:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2482:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2472:
2470:
2467:
2465:
2462:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2450:
2447:
2445:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2405:
2402:
2401:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2385:
2381:
2367:
2364:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2356:WikiLawyering
2354:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2339:
2337:
2334:
2333:
2331:
2329:WikiRelations
2327:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2291:
2288:
2286:
2283:
2281:
2278:
2276:
2273:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2259:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2251:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2241:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2231:
2229:
2226:
2224:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2153:Don't cry COI
2151:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2134:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2113:Don't be rude
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2058:Cyberbullying
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2040:
2038:
2034:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1902:
1898:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1836:The last word
1834:
1832:
1831:The grey zone
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1738:
1736:
1732:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1591:
1587:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1372:
1370:
1364:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1297:
1295:
1291:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1249:Walled garden
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1074:Mine a source
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
998:
995:
993:
990:
988:
985:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
968:
965:
963:
960:
958:
955:
953:
950:
948:
945:
943:
940:
938:
935:
933:
930:
928:
925:
923:
922:Concept cloud
920:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
898:
895:
893:
892:Cherrypicking
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
794:
792:
790:
786:
780:
777:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
724:Systemic bias
722:
720:
717:
715:
712:
710:
707:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
532:
528:
521:
514:
509:
507:
502:
500:
495:
494:
491:
478:
475:
469:
466:
462:
456:
453:
446:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
400:
396:
391:
389:
382:
380:
377:
373:
370:
365:
363:
354:
352:
348:
340:
336:
335:
332:
325:OR by editors
324:
322:
318:
315:
310:
308:
304:
298:
290:
286:
285:
282:
274:
269:
267:
265:
261:
252:
250:
248:
244:
238:
231:
228:
220:
218:
215:
210:
203:
201:
197:
195:
190:
186:
177:
172:
170:
168:
163:
159:
157:
153:
148:
146:
142:
132:
123:
120:
113:
112:
100:
96:
93:
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
72:
68:
67:
64:
59:
54:
50:
44:
42:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
3256:About essays
3245:About essays
3152:Rouge editor
3102:Oops Defense
2882:Barnstaritis
2847:Assume faith
2669:Pokémon test
2514:High Schools
2336:WikiBullying
2300:Superhatting
2295:POV railroad
1992:Just drop it
1796:Nobody cares
1630:Divisiveness
1154:Printability
1047:Style guides
837:Amnesia test
698:
694:Paraphrasing
477:
468:
455:
386:
378:
374:
371:
366:
358:
349:
346:
319:
311:
299:
296:
289:WP:POVEDITOR
256:
247:space aliens
239:
235:
211:
207:
198:
181:
160:
149:
137:
121:
78:WP:POVSOURCE
71:WP:POVEDITOR
30:
3263:Essay guide
3147:Rouge admin
2714:Video links
2569:No big loss
2258:just madmen
2208:Don't shout
1982:How to lose
1977:Get over it
1761:Be the glue
1680:Negotiation
1537:Relist bias
1367:Removing or
1199:Stub Makers
1032:Law sources
962:Don't panic
162:Advertising
143:(NPOV) and
99:WP:ORSOURCE
92:WP:OREDITOR
31:This is an
3354:Categories
3319:Guidelines
3087:No, really
3067:LTTAUTMAOK
2549:Make stubs
2270:No racists
2012:Say "MOBY"
1734:Philosophy
1607:The basics
1164:Publicists
1134:Presentism
1079:Merge Test
1064:Inaccuracy
547:Philosophy
275:Editor POV
232:Source POV
225:See also:
85:WP:POVEDIT
2797:Adminitis
2366:WikiPeace
2341:WikiCrime
2320:UPPERCASE
1700:Thank you
1332:Proseline
1124:Permastub
689:Paradoxes
604:Don't lie
461:John Mack
178:Field POV
63:Shortcuts
3314:Policies
2464:Coatrack
2361:WikiLove
2351:WikiHate
2265:No Nazis
2238:Griefing
1502:Immunity
754:Trifecta
584:Cohesion
392:See also
331:Shortcut
281:Shortcut
264:WP:MEDRS
189:theology
2977:Emerson
2817:ANI flu
1781:Failure
1620:Apology
1517:Nothing
714:Purpose
270:Editors
221:Sources
187:and on
39:and on
2459:Clones
2036:Don'ts
1957:Desist
1947:Candor
1856:Reader
397:Essays
339:WP:EOR
150:While
1710:Truce
355:Edits
33:essay
2982:Fart
2927:Crap
1312:Coup
664:Need
362:stub
185:math
1900:Dos
523:(?)
3356::
309:.
158:.
512:e
505:t
498:v
463:.
43:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
