475:
441:
401:
231:
182:
590:
are quite spacious even after contextual image usage. Whereas here we don't have space. As to being an article or a list i couldn't find any previous discussions related to awards. There have been similar discussions somewhere for List-of-episodes with no definite conclusion. But still majority of
541:
On the first look not bad, but after reading one section I believe it needs a good copyedit. One issue is that you are using repetitions, for example in "Awards not given" (where you use "given" in each sentence and even in the head). In some places the prose is awkward. Check whether it meets
203:
It also has to be trimmed. The
Dadasaheb Phalke award is mentioned thrice in different paragraphs, while it could be made into a single sentence. Adding to that, the sentence "Deool became third Marathi film to win the honour after Shyamchi Aai (1953) and Shwaas (2003)" is heavily
573:
Agree! Will work on copyediting and rephrasing. However, as Vivvt and i have worked on this article from quite a good time our minds (at least mine) are not able to find any phrasing issues. Will still try, but it would be nice if you all could give more examples. Regarding
153:
I've listed this article for peer review because it has got potential to become a FL. If reviews goes well, I wish to push this article for WP:FLC. I would appreciate if senior editors can review the article accordingly, considering its goal.
591:
such pages are under lists. I could not find any year-wise award related page under "article". Even if the content has more prose, the basic page is a list of awards. But if consensus is different i am okay with categorizing it that way. §§
259:"Entries of dubbed/revised/copied versions of a film before January 17, 2012." and "For feature and non-feature films sections, films made in any Indian language the Central Board of Film Certification." - The
126:
122:
107:
587:
76:
99:
521:. But this year, it was not published for some reason. Again, till now, they have never published the suitable entries/considerations for the awards. -
557:
306:
265:
210:
304:
I'm not really sure if it would find a place in the references, but now that it has been proved to be verifiable, there should not be any issue.
171:
Isn't the lead supposed to be restricted to four paragraphs? It looks like it needs to be condensed quite a bit before presentation.
617:
69:
115:
600:
564:
552:
529:
509:
490:
456:
416:
393:
382:
355:
319:
299:
278:
246:
223:
197:
165:
313:
272:
217:
44:
546:. Also it is more an article than a list as it has more prose than list, but I am not quite sure either. Regards.--
62:
596:
92:
50:
578:; image accompanied with the text is good. But adding images besides the tables would congest it. Articles like
547:
291:
listed under
External links: Official websites. Do you want me to put it as a part of references as well? -
17:
592:
583:
579:
518:
559:
504:
388:
360:
by award category (prefer): Dadasaheb Phalke, Feature films, non-feature films, best writing
350:
205:
431:
Enajori.com incident is not part of selection. Separate into "controversy" or something
611:
260:
575:
543:
499:
Awards not given: is it known if entries were suited for each of the categories?
288:
522:
483:
449:
409:
387:
Section is too long. Split into different 4 sections by award category IMO. --
375:
325:
292:
239:
190:
158:
517:
DFF publishes list of entries submitted for the awards like done earlier for
141:
134:
103:
465:
Why is /- needed after all prize money amounts? Remove
341:I not a specialist of FL, but some observations:
263:does not seem to verify these. Or am I wrong?
70:
8:
588:Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play
150:This peer review discussion has been closed.
77:
63:
32:
35:
7:
305:
264:
209:
374:Can you elaborate more on this? -
24:
473:
439:
399:
229:
180:
524:
485:
451:
411:
377:
327:
311:
307:
294:
270:
266:
241:
215:
211:
192:
160:
1:
634:
289:Regulations for submission
601:09:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
530:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
510:17:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
491:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
457:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
417:13:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
394:17:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
383:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
356:17:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
320:11:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
300:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
279:16:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
247:13:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
224:11:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
198:03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
166:17:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
28:59th National Film Awards
565:16:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
287:It is mentioned in the
618:July 2012 peer reviews
349:is too long. Split --
18:Knowledge:Peer review
584:57th Filmfare Awards
238:. My bad earlier. -
580:82nd Academy Awards
324:Thats Good then. -
200:
308:Secret of success
267:Secret of success
212:Secret of success
178:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
625:
550:
527:
526:
507:
488:
487:
481:
477:
476:
454:
453:
447:
443:
442:
414:
413:
407:
403:
402:
391:
380:
379:
353:
330:
329:
318:
317:
309:
297:
296:
277:
276:
268:
244:
243:
237:
233:
232:
222:
221:
213:
195:
194:
188:
184:
183:
163:
162:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
633:
632:
628:
627:
626:
624:
623:
622:
608:
607:
593:AnimeshKulkarni
562:
555:
548:
523:
505:
484:
474:
472:
450:
440:
438:
410:
400:
398:
389:
376:
363:jury and awards
351:
326:
293:
240:
230:
228:
191:
181:
179:
159:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
631:
629:
621:
620:
610:
609:
606:
605:
604:
603:
568:
567:
560:
553:
535:
534:
533:
532:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
493:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
459:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
282:
281:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
173:
172:
152:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
630:
619:
616:
615:
613:
602:
598:
594:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
563:
558:
556:
551:
545:
540:
537:
536:
531:
528:
520:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
508:
498:
497:
492:
489:
480:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
463:
458:
455:
446:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
429:
418:
415:
406:
397:
396:
395:
392:
386:
385:
384:
381:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
362:
359:
358:
357:
354:
348:
344:
343:
342:
331:
323:
322:
321:
315:
310:
303:
302:
301:
298:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
274:
269:
262:
258:
257:
248:
245:
236:
227:
226:
225:
219:
214:
207:
202:
201:
199:
196:
187:
177:
176:
175:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
164:
155:
151:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
538:
502:
478:
444:
404:
346:
340:
261:given source
234:
185:
156:
149:
148:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
506:Redtigerxyz
390:Redtigerxyz
352:Redtigerxyz
104:visual edit
157:Thanks, -
612:Category
539:Comments
519:56th NFA
206:WP:UNDUE
347:section
345:Awards
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
208:here.
576:WP:IG
544:WP:IG
525:Vivvt
486:Vivvt
452:Vivvt
412:Vivvt
378:Vivvt
328:Vivvt
295:Vivvt
242:Vivvt
193:Vivvt
161:Vivvt
136:Watch
16:<
597:talk
479:Done
445:Done
405:Done
314:talk
273:talk
235:Done
218:talk
186:Done
123:edit
100:edit
599:)
549:GoP
614::
586:,
582:,
503:--
482:-
448:-
408:-
189:-
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
595:(
561:N
554:T
316:)
312:(
275:)
271:(
220:)
216:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.