41:
and Latin
American history, and needs to be brought up to good standards. I would like feedback on possible room for expansion (questions which are unclear to a third-party audience), dealing with RS (it relies heavily on one author, for example) and potential stylistic issues. Basically:
44:
if you're not
Brazilian, and you're reading this article, what would you be interested in reading about in this moment in history and how do you think the article can better help you understand it?
21:
65:
54:
77:
31:
37:
I've listed this article for peer review because the article deals with an important (and controversial) event in the
61:
17:
73:
51:
69:
38:
8:
7:
28:
22:1964 Brazilian coup d'état
78:00:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
55:21:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
94:
32:1964 Brazilian coup d'état
64:peer review suggestions
18:Knowledge:Peer review
30:
85:
93:
92:
88:
87:
86:
84:
83:
82:
76:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
91:
89:
81:
80:
72:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
90:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
58:
57:
56:
53:
49:
46:
45:
40:
33:
23:
19:
50:
47:
43:
36:
60:Please see
68:. Thanks,
52:Dali-Llama
62:automated
48:Thanks,
39:Cold War
20: |
16:<
66:here
70:APR
74:t
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.