246:
3. Districts govern some, but not all inhabited localities. Both Adygea's cities are not in jurisdiction of any district, and it is theoretically possible that any other inhabited locality (urban or rural) may be subordinated directly to the
Republic. The grouping is thus in accordance with the
223:
I don't actually care for the table designs under the "List of administrative and municipal divisions" heading. They are too big for the information that they display, and there is too much white space. Consider sizing them down - for example, there is a huge column that displays one number.
257:
5. The design of those table, unfortunately, is another source of frustraction. I will happily re-design them if anyone has ideas as to what exactly will work for them. Could you, please, clarify, which cells you believe would benefit from
166:
4. The reason why identations were used instead of different level headings was because there are too many nested sections. When headings are used, the font of the deepest ones is almost smaller than the font used in the body
219:
The subheadings under "Rural localities" need to be visually distinct, not just indented - it is hard to discern if the hierarchy is just visual to separate listings or if they are intended to be smaller subsections of Rural
48:
A peer review is requested because the list was so significantly expanded and reworked that it would be wrong to just replace old contents with a new draft without subjecting it to public scrutiny first.
254:
4. I think we had tried every possible formatting there is, and identation so far worked the best. If you have suggestions as to exactly what else can be tried, you are very welcome to voice them here.
216:
The
Administrative division structure" is not really a logical hierarchy. You say that the district governs the inhabited localities, but they are given the same hierarchical level as the district.
213:
The new
History section needs some attention paid to its visual chunking - it looks bad on the page. Too many small paragraphs. It would look better grouped into larger sections for readability.
132:
The summary table of units of administrative division is great. Just move it to the right (just add align=right next to class="db-d2lraXRhYmxl") so that there is no huge empty space on the right.
21:
243:
2. I am planning to expand the
History section a bit more. However, I am not sure how to bundle the smaller chunks into larger ones, as they are grouped by time periods.
138:
I really don't like ==Rural localities== Source: . You should put that after sentences taken from that source (it's ok tuo cite the same source 50 times :)
57:
31:
53:
42:
270:
237:
195:
154:
101:
210:
The new infobox is WAY better. It is a much neater table that displays the information in a more concise and useful fashion.
144:
There is no need to bold things like "municipal urban okrug of the city of Maykop" or "municipal urban settlements"
135:
I really don't like all those intendations. I think different size headings are just fine and do job well enough.
17:
233:
160:
1. I am not sure what else could be included in the lead, and, in my opinion, its length is just right.
170:
5. We tried to cite the same source multiple times. The output, in my view, is almost unreadable (
229:
228:
Overall great work and I would still support it for
Featured List status after the rework. --
141:
Sources: 1897–2002: 2007: should be incorporated with the table (extra row at the bottom)
266:
191:
114:
97:
38:
37:
This is a somewhat unusual request for a peer review, because it deals with an already
151:
147:^ a b 2002 Russian census should have more details: where the date got published?
262:
187:
93:
73:
a new large section on administrative division structure has been added;
180:
7. Why not? They emphasize the most important concept in each passage.
88:
content of district composition sections has been expanded.
76:"municipal division structure" section has been re-written;
85:
layout of district composition sections has been changed;
117:, with pieces irrelevant to this peer review edited out:
171:
224:
Consider using shading for better visual presentation.
251:). Perhaps a clarification of some sort is in order?
206:
Hello and great job on this article. Some feedback:
249:
163:
3. The summary table is now right-aligned. Better?
174:shows how it looks like). Any other opinions?
263:Ă‹zhiki (Igels HĂ©rissonovich ĂŹzhakoff-Amursky)
188:Ă‹zhiki (Igels HĂ©rissonovich ĂŹzhakoff-Amursky)
94:Ă‹zhiki (Igels HĂ©rissonovich ĂŹzhakoff-Amursky)
8:
183:8. That was an oversight. It is now fixed.
79:additional references have been provided;
32:Administrative divisions of Adygea/update
261:Thanks much for your valuable feedback!—
92:Any feedback will be much appreciated!—
45:), which was featured fairly recently.
122:I have few suggestions/observations:
67:prose has been significantly reworded;
7:
113:The following is a cross-post from
43:administrative divisions of Adygea
28:
22:Administrative divisions of Adygea
52:The main differences between the
126:Lead is crying to be longer ;)
1:
64:infobox has been re-designed;
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
287:
271:17:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
238:16:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
202:Feedback from Mus Musculus
196:17:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
102:19:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
155:00:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
177:6. Implemented. Better?
115:User talk:Ezhiki#Adygea
107:Feedback from Renata3
82:the map was adjusted;
70:layout was changed;
278:
286:
285:
281:
280:
279:
277:
276:
275:
204:
129:Nice new map :)
109:
58:updated version
54:current version
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
284:
282:
274:
273:
259:
255:
252:
244:
226:
225:
221:
217:
214:
211:
203:
200:
199:
198:
184:
181:
178:
175:
168:
164:
161:
149:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
120:
119:
108:
105:
90:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
283:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
250:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
208:
207:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
172:this revision
169:
165:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
153:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
124:
123:
118:
116:
111:
110:
106:
104:
103:
99:
95:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
66:
63:
62:
61:
59:
55:
50:
46:
44:
40:
39:featured list
33:
30:
23:
19:
248:
230:Mus Musculus
227:
205:
150:
121:
112:
91:
51:
47:
36:
220:localities.
258:shading?
247:source (
56:and the
20: |
152:Renata
167:text.
60:are:
16:<
234:talk
269:);
267:yo?
265:• (
194:);
192:yo?
190:• (
100:);
98:yo?
96:• (
236:)
232:(
186:—
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.