43:
I would also like to find out if people think the writing style of the article is clear, sufficient, and comprehensive enough (without being too burdensome to read) for the average reader. Other changes are also welcome that will improve the article. I was wondering if this article could now be
44:
considered to be above Start class on the assessment scale. I would like to see it become at least B class. Could someone also please consilidate repeated source references when appropriate?
47:
I'm also concerned that this page is being vandalized way too much. Perhaps this page would be much better in quality if it was protected somehow so that only registered users could edit.
40:
I think it would provide a good basis for a general look at amateur wrestling. I would most be interested in seeing whether there are any redundancies, spelling, or grammatical errors.
76:
21:
94:
61:
68:
17:
84:
57:
31:
80:
53:
72:
75:
style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
71:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
37:I've listed this article for peer review because…
8:
67:A script has been used to generate a semi-
7:
28:
1:
62:23:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
95:02:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
111:
18:Knowledge:Peer review
91:
32:Amateur wrestling
22:Amateur wrestling
102:
89:
110:
109:
105:
104:
103:
101:
100:
99:
88:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
108:
106:
98:
97:
85:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
107:
96:
93:
92:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
48:
45:
41:
38:
33:
30:
23:
19:
83:
52:
49:
46:
42:
39:
36:
87:<: -->
81:Ruhrfisch
69:automated
54:Wikiman86
50:Thanks,
20: |
86:: -->
73:house
16:<
77:here
58:talk
79:.
60:)
90:°
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.