442:
The longer a PR stays open, the less likely it is to get comments. Also, it has been difficult for some PRs to get feedback, especially ones that are to go to FAC or are as long as this article. I am also aware of the fact that this PR should have closed when it was nominated for GAN a couple months
292:
had been incorrectly closed due to a misinterpretation of the inactive discussion rules. An inactive discussion, is one in which a review has begun and received some feedback and the subsequent discourse has become inactive. It is not a review with no feedback. There is a separate set of rules
514:
If I can get em. I'm not that active during my busy season, so I might as well sit on this. I checked out a bunch of books on the subject from the
Chicago Public Library and have now renewed them for the 15th and final time (due August 27). Still hoping for feedback while I still have all the
447:. If you want to keep this open, I suggest that you post a request on the Wikiprojects attached to this article to see if anyone would like to leave feedback. Bringing it to FAC might also generate feedback on how to improve the article, even if it is unsuccessful.
169:
the review mentioned both "unattributed opinion" and "uncited text" as well as MOS concerns. Please point out any remaining problems from either of those two reviews and help me address them. I believe I have addressed the image issues.
162:
166:
395:
I know the article is long and detailed, but that probably means there is a lot to improve. I'd rather wait another 7 months than go to FAC. Ping me in another 7 months if it still has not been reviewed.-
152:
21:
130:
289:
126:
80:
111:
610:
CPL let me turn in the books I used during the 2023 update and check them back out starting a new 15 cycle renewal countdown. So I have the books.-
103:
652:
620:
525:
471:
405:
373:
307:
266:
229:
183:
246:
200:
73:
662:
54:
637:
604:
585:
542:
509:
488:
456:
422:
390:
357:
324:
283:
119:
657:
576:
66:
48:
17:
598:
I'll take a look at the article and the past FACs and try and start giving feedback in the next week or two.
616:
521:
467:
401:
369:
303:
262:
225:
179:
566:
96:
628:
533:
479:
413:
381:
315:
274:
237:
191:
632:
537:
483:
417:
385:
319:
278:
241:
195:
611:
556:
516:
495:
462:
437:
396:
364:
344:
This has been open for quite a long time without comment. Can this be closed and nominated to
339:
298:
257:
220:
174:
624:
529:
475:
409:
377:
311:
297:
has a noticeboard for reviews that have had no feedback for a long time (well over a month).-
270:
233:
187:
599:
560:
253:
444:
345:
211:
505:
452:
353:
294:
216:
207:
646:
161:
I've listed this article for peer review because it was recommended at the failed
501:
448:
349:
163:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive2
500:
This has been open since
October. Are you still looking for comments?
167:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1
461:
I am in the busy season for my work. A FAC is a big commitment.-
555:
This nomination is approaching 11 months since it was opened.
145:
138:
107:
293:regarding limits for articles hoping for feedback.
290:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Review closure policy
74:
8:
81:
67:
36:
348:, or are you still looking for feedback?
205:P.S. Be advised that I intend to pursue
363:I'd prefer feedback. No hurry for FAC.-
39:
7:
563:, what's the status of this review?
28:
586:03:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
247:09:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
201:07:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
638:05:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
605:20:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
543:03:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
510:17:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
679:
653:October 2023 peer reviews
601:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
325:20:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
284:17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
165:. When it was demoted at
30:
22:Campbell's Soup Cans
489:23:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
457:18:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
445:the instructions, step 4
423:02:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
391:02:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
358:01:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
594:Comments by David Fuchs
663:Current peer reviews
154:Previous peer review
32:Campbell's Soup Cans
219:for this article.--
658:Arts peer reviews
636:
584:
541:
487:
421:
389:
323:
288:Please note that
282:
245:
199:
146:Watch peer review
91:
90:
670:
614:
602:
581:
574:
573:
571:
569:TechnoSquirrel69
519:
499:
465:
441:
399:
367:
343:
333:Query from Z1720
301:
260:
254:User:TheWikiToby
223:
177:
143:
134:
115:
83:
76:
69:
51:
37:
678:
677:
673:
672:
671:
669:
668:
667:
643:
642:
600:
596:
577:
567:
564:
493:
435:
337:
335:
252:I am reverting
149:
124:
101:
95:
87:
55:Manual of Style
47:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
676:
674:
666:
665:
660:
655:
645:
644:
641:
640:
595:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
428:
427:
426:
425:
334:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
159:
158:
157:
150:
148:
94:
89:
88:
86:
85:
78:
71:
63:
60:
59:
58:
57:
52:
42:
41:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
675:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
650:
648:
639:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
613:
609:
608:
607:
606:
603:
593:
587:
582:
580:
572:
570:
562:
558:
554:
544:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
518:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
497:
492:
491:
490:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
464:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
439:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
424:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
394:
393:
392:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
366:
362:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
341:
332:
326:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
296:
291:
287:
286:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
222:
218:
214:
213:
209:
203:
202:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
176:
171:
168:
164:
156:
155:
151:
147:
142:
141:
137:
132:
128:
123:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
100:
99:
93:
92:
84:
79:
77:
72:
70:
65:
64:
62:
61:
56:
53:
50:
49:Copying check
46:
45:
44:
43:
38:
33:
23:
19:
612:TonyTheTiger
597:
578:
568:
557:TonyTheTiger
517:TonyTheTiger
496:TonyTheTiger
463:TonyTheTiger
438:TonyTheTiger
397:TonyTheTiger
365:TonyTheTiger
340:TonyTheTiger
336:
299:TonyTheTiger
258:TonyTheTiger
256:'s closure.-
221:TonyTheTiger
206:
204:
175:TonyTheTiger
172:
160:
153:
139:
135:
121:Article talk
120:
116:
97:
31:
561:David Fuchs
108:visual edit
647:Categories
629:WP:CHICAGO
534:WP:CHICAGO
480:WP:CHICAGO
414:WP:CHICAGO
382:WP:CHICAGO
316:WP:CHICAGO
275:WP:CHICAGO
238:WP:CHICAGO
192:WP:CHICAGO
633:WP:WAWARD
538:WP:WAWARD
515:sources.-
484:WP:WAWARD
443:ago, per
418:WP:WAWARD
386:WP:WAWARD
320:WP:WAWARD
279:WP:WAWARD
242:WP:WAWARD
196:WP:WAWARD
173:Thanks,
20: |
625:WP:FOUR
530:WP:FOUR
476:WP:FOUR
410:WP:FOUR
378:WP:FOUR
312:WP:FOUR
271:WP:FOUR
234:WP:FOUR
188:WP:FOUR
131:history
112:history
98:Article
40:Toolbox
346:WP:FAC
212:WP:DYK
502:Z1720
449:Z1720
350:Z1720
295:WP:PR
217:WP:FA
208:WP:GA
140:Watch
16:<
579:sigh
559:and
506:talk
453:talk
354:talk
215:and
127:edit
104:edit
649::
631:/
627:/
623:/
619:/
536:/
532:/
528:/
524:/
508:)
482:/
478:/
474:/
470:/
455:)
416:/
412:/
408:/
404:/
384:/
380:/
376:/
372:/
356:)
318:/
314:/
310:/
306:/
277:/
273:/
269:/
265:/
240:/
236:/
232:/
228:/
210:,
194:/
190:/
186:/
182:/
144:•
129:|
110:|
106:|
635:)
621:C
617:T
615:(
583:)
575:(
565:—
540:)
526:C
522:T
520:(
504:(
498::
494:@
486:)
472:C
468:T
466:(
451:(
440::
436:@
420:)
406:C
402:T
400:(
388:)
374:C
370:T
368:(
352:(
342::
338:@
322:)
308:C
304:T
302:(
281:)
267:C
263:T
261:(
244:)
230:C
226:T
224:(
198:)
184:C
180:T
178:(
136:·
133:)
125:(
117:·
114:)
102:(
82:e
75:t
68:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.