Knowledge

:Peer review/Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

200:
I think the first sentence should emphasize that this is part of an ongoing conflict rather than something of major significance on its own. As I see it, the ongoing situation, that started in 2012, is primary with the time line punctuated by regime changes without there being a "start" of something
153:
I've listed this article for peer review because I was thinking of nominating it for GA status as it is very thorough on the events that went on during the nearly year of the stage of the conflict this represents. It is now over. Also there is a dearth of Afria-related GA articles. It would be nice
215:
I don't understand the following: "the writ of the state has apparently been effected with a prevalence of "insecurity" as a result of the proliferation of armed groups". I think the technical term for such writing is gobbledygook. "writ of state"? "apparently"?, "prevalence of
126: 122: 107: 99: 115: 219:"fighters from Chad and Darfur, Sudan"? I request editors working on this page please review it carefully for grammar before requesting outside review. I'm stopping now. Please notify me when you have cleaned it up. 92: 193:
What is the topic and when did it start and stop? The first sentence says equivocally, "started essentially on 13 April 2013", and the second sentence says it's part of an ongoing conflict started in 2012.
185:
verb tense is used in much of the article. This is incorrect for an encyclopedia relating past events. Instead of "has been" or "has caused", use "was" or "caused", respectively. Remember, Knowledge is
235: 170: 197:
Pairing "essentially" with a specific day is confusing, but I think the lead sentence needs a complete revision that will eliminate that construction as a matter of course.
209:
I think the neutrality of the last sentence of the intro could be improved by replacing "cleansed" with "segregated" or another term that doesn't connote malice.
44: 76: 249: 69: 204:
I also think the first sentence should state the period of time the topic covers since the Djotodia regime has ended.
62: 50: 17: 230: 187: 166: 182: 155: 225: 243: 162: 154:
to see, from another perspective, how this matches up with GA criteria at
28:
Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration
141: 134: 103: 201:
new at each point other than the start of each regime.
70: 8: 150:This peer review discussion has been closed. 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 24: 212:In the Militarisation section: 1: 236:19:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 171:16:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 266: 250:February 2014 peer reviews 176:Comments by Jojalozzo 18:Knowledge:Peer review 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 257: 233: 228: 216:\"insecurity\""? 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 265: 264: 260: 259: 258: 256: 255: 254: 240: 239: 231: 226: 183:present perfect 178: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 263: 261: 253: 252: 242: 241: 223: 222: 221: 220: 217: 210: 207: 206: 205: 202: 198: 191: 177: 174: 152: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 262: 251: 248: 247: 245: 238: 237: 234: 229: 218: 214: 213: 211: 208: 203: 199: 196: 195: 192: 189: 184: 180: 179: 175: 173: 172: 168: 164: 159: 157: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 224: 160: 149: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 104:visual edit 188:WP:NOTNEWS 244:Category 161:Thanks, 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 163:Lihaas 156:WP:GA? 232:lozzo 136:Watch 16:< 227:Joja 181:The 167:talk 123:edit 100:edit 246:: 169:) 158:. 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 190:. 165:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
WP:GA?
Lihaas
talk
16:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
present perfect
WP:NOTNEWS
Joja
lozzo
19:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Category
February 2014 peer reviews

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.