154:
216:
Some references are shortened footnotes (e.g. ref 11 - NCSTAR 1–6, p lxxi; ref 12 - NCSTAR 1–6, p lxvii–lxix). Others are repeating entire bibliographical information and should be shortened footnotes (e.g. refs 19, 20, 21 - all cite
Starossek, Uwe (2009). Progressive Collapse of Structures. Thomas
171:
I've listed this article for peer review because we are interested in advancing the article through the
Featured Article Candidate process and need external feedback to determine what we need to do to make the article better. We have been at an impasse for some time as to how technical we need to
217:
Telford
Publishing but with different page numbers). Even with shortened footnotes, these are not consistent. Compare refs 65-68, which include links to Eagar & Musso 2001, with refs 11-12, which don't include any links.
172:
make the article as well as to whether we are staying well focused on the matter and not diverging away from what should be the main effort. Otherwise the article is relatively stable, well referenced and comprehensive.
237:- this is an inconsistent list style because you have noun, noun, and verb phrase. Better phrasing would be "round-the-clock operations and many contractors and subcontractors, and cost hundreds of millions of dollars."
209:
The references need to be formatted consistently. For instance, some New York Times references have urls, some don't, and one ref doesn't even have an article title. Same with NIST and other references.
194:
As a long-time follower of this page, I would like to see this at FAC someday. However, I think this needs some improvements first, and that maybe this should first go through GAN. For instance:
126:
122:
258:
I also see "WTC #" and "# WTC" (where # is the number) being used to refer to the WTC towers. This should be standardized, even in places where the numbers and "WTC" are spelled out.
107:
213:
Sometimes, the author format is also mixed up. Some refs have "first name last name" authors and some refs have "last name, first name" authors. The latter is recommended nowadays.
99:
243:- not cited in the body, and the second clause is not too relevant, since we can just say "and construction of other structures is still ongoing" or something like that.
235:
The cleanup of the World Trade Center site involved round-the-clock operations, many contractors and subcontractors, and cost hundreds of millions of dollars.
76:
264:
These are my initial comments, and I hope to leave more later. If I find any minor issues, I'll fix them myself, but these are things to keep in mind.
115:
199:
241:
As of July 2019, five new buildings had been erected on the site; the last one, Two World Trade Center, is scheduled for completion in 2022.
206:
are quality articles - FA and GA respectively. There are other unsourced sentences and paragraphs that need referencing in other sections.
92:
348:
328:
307:
290:
273:
184:
222:
In regards to prose, there are some things about coverage and wording that need to be improved. Just in the lead, for example:
69:
44:
363:
198:
The construction and
September 11, 2001 sections have several unsourced paragraphs, but these can be easily fixed since
298:, I will be able to dedicate a large portion of time in about a week, but wanted you to know this is on my plate.--
62:
50:
225:
The first two paragraphs of the lead could probably be combined since they are about the attacks themselves.
17:
324:
269:
203:
255:: I see "stories" and "storeys". I suggest the former since this is an American topic mostly.
252:
281:
All excellent insights and I will start addressing them. Greatly appreciate the feedback.--
344:
320:
303:
295:
286:
265:
180:
357:
161:
340:
314:
299:
282:
176:
319:
No problem. I look forward to providing some more detailed feedback.
148:
339:
Still in process of addressing so lets not close this down.--
248:
Spelling and abbreviations may need to be standardized.
229:
The scale of the destruction initially puzzled engineers
141:
134:
103:
231:- "puzzled" could be replaced with a better word.
70:
8:
77:
63:
32:
35:
240:
234:
228:
200:Construction of the World Trade Center
7:
28:Collapse of the World Trade Center
24:
152:
1:
329:22:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
308:21:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
291:16:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
274:19:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
185:16:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
164:discussion has been closed.
380:
349:15:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
190:Comments from Epicgenius
364:May 2020 peer reviews
18:Knowledge:Peer review
204:September 11 attacks
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
371:
318:
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
379:
378:
374:
373:
372:
370:
369:
368:
354:
353:
312:
192:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
377:
375:
367:
366:
356:
355:
352:
351:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
293:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
251:For instance,
246:
245:
244:
238:
232:
226:
220:
219:
218:
214:
207:
191:
188:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
376:
365:
362:
361:
359:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
330:
326:
322:
316:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
257:
254:
250:
249:
247:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
221:
215:
212:
211:
208:
205:
201:
197:
196:
195:
189:
187:
186:
182:
178:
175:Thank you! --
173:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
263:
193:
174:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
162:peer review
104:visual edit
321:epicgenius
296:Epicgenius
266:epicgenius
253:WP:ENGVAR
358:Category
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
341:MONGO
315:MONGO
300:MONGO
283:MONGO
177:MONGO
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
345:talk
325:talk
304:talk
287:talk
270:talk
202:and
181:talk
123:edit
100:edit
360::
347:)
327:)
306:)
289:)
272:)
183:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
343:(
323:(
317::
313:@
302:(
285:(
268:(
179:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.