154:
is USA-centric. I've tried to rewrite sections that were overtly USA-centric, but I suspect it needs more work. In particular, I'm worried about the
Overview section, which might be perceived as tracing a history only through American cinema. Finally, I'd also like feedback on whether the article is clear, concise, and stays on-topic. I've tried to limit the amount of academic terms, jargon, and polysyllabic verbiage, but some did manage to sneak in, near the end of the article.
153:
I've listed this article for peer review because I've basically rewritten it. The original was an example farm and mess of original research. I haven't gotten much feedback on it, and I'd like to see if people like the direction that I've taken the article. Also, I have concerns that the article
76:
126:
180:
122:
69:
107:
162:
99:
62:
50:
158:
17:
44:
166:
115:
174:
92:
141:
134:
103:
70:
8:
150:This peer review discussion has been closed.
77:
63:
32:
35:
7:
24:
1:
197:
167:16:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
181:June 2013 peer reviews
18:Knowledge:Peer review
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
188:
159:NinjaRobotPirate
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:
187:
186:
185:
171:
170:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
194:
192:
184:
183:
173:
172:
152:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
193:
182:
179:
178:
176:
169:
168:
164:
160:
155:
151:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
156:
149:
148:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
104:visual edit
28:Cult film
175:Category
157:Thanks,
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
136:Watch
16:<
163:talk
123:edit
100:edit
177::
165:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
161:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.