Knowledge

:Peer review/Dennis Elwell (astrologer)/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

154:
would like a review of my major edit (although it has been added to by others in minor fashion since) and the article as it stands now, regarding all aspects, particularly sources. I understand this subject might not quite fit under this particular review section, but it is difficult for me to know where astrology does fit. Thanks,
153:
I've listed this article for peer review because… although not a long article it has been extensively added to by editors since the beginning of June. Through a request for intercession I eventually major copyedited and restructured the whole article to alleviate some contention that surrounded it. I
175:
makes clear, "is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work...". The same page states that articles for PR "must be free of major cleanup banners". I would suggest that you give attention to the lead, which ought to be a summary of the whole article rather than an
176:
introduction to Elwell. You should also develop the text so that the article becomes less a series of lists. You need to format your online references more consistently; each such reference needs minimally a title, publisher and retrieval date. There is a disambiguation link on
126: 122: 107: 99: 76: 203: 115: 69: 189: 163: 44: 92: 62: 50: 185: 17: 159: 181: 197: 155: 172: 171:: The article is insufficiently developed to warrant a full peer review which, as 177: 141: 134: 103: 70: 8: 150:This peer review discussion has been closed. 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 24: 1: 220: 28:Dennis Elwell (astrologer) 190:23:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 164:17:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 204:July 2011 peer reviews 18:Knowledge:Peer review 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 211: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 219: 218: 214: 213: 212: 210: 209: 208: 194: 193: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 217: 215: 207: 206: 196: 195: 152: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 216: 205: 202: 201: 199: 192: 191: 187: 183: 179: 174: 170: 166: 165: 161: 157: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 182:Brianboulton 168: 167: 149: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 104:visual edit 198:Category 156:Acabashi 169:Comment 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 178:Kilroy 173:WP:PR 136:Watch 16:< 186:talk 160:talk 123:edit 100:edit 200:: 188:) 180:. 162:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 184:( 158:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Dennis Elwell (astrologer)
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Acabashi
talk
17:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:PR
Kilroy
Brianboulton
talk
23:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Category
July 2011 peer reviews

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.