Knowledge

:Peer review/Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

154: 201:
I have a question about the "biography" word choice in this part: (Cohen decided that rather than creating a traditional biography) I have more often seen the word associated with a book rather than a movie or a script. Would biographical film or biopic be more suitable here? I could be over-thinking
253:
For this part, (Bruce fights with British sailors harassing a young Chinese woman), should it be "fights" instead of "fights with"? I am just curious because when I initially read the sentence, I thought it mean he fought alongside (i.e. "with") with these sailors until reading the later half of the
478:"Richard Harrington of The Washington Post, gave a positive review, praising the film's pace" - perhaps we can remove "gave a positive review and instead state it as "Richard Harrington of The Washington Post praised the film's pace..." Since critical response already mentions reviews were positive. 372:
I've done some minor rewording to touch on this issue. Let me know if you think it needs more or if it should be done differently. I don't think it's worth mentioning minor inaccuracies in the lead, such as that plot elements were condensed, as it's my understanding that's quite common in
268:
I think this poses a bit of an issue, as her name in the film is Linda Lee, though at the time point she is introduced in the film her name would have been Linda Emery. I feel like calling her Linda Lee would be anachronistic, and calling her Linda Emery would be confusing for the
481:"Conversely, Sheila Johnston from The Independent gave a negative review" - perhaps this can be stated as "While Sheila Johnston from The Independent praised Jason's performance, she was critical that the film "leaps about more wildly …" -- if that structure works for you. 249:
For this part, (haunting a young Bruce, and subsequently enrolls Bruce under the tutelage), I would change the second instance of "Bruce" to "him" as I think it would be understood from context, and it would cut down on the amount of times "Bruce" is said in the
435: 418:. Any point not replied to above has been addressed in the manner you suggested or very similarly. If you could review the responses and add anything further regarding them I would really appreciate it. Thanks so much. 205:
I am uncertain if the citations in the infobox are needed as the budget and box office should also be mentioned and sourced in the body of the article. I have seen it done for some featured articles, like
171:
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like feedback on what to improve before nominating it for FAC. I will happily return the favour by reviewing any nomination of your choice.
399:
Wonderful work with the article. This is what I have noticed from my first read-through. Let me know if any of comments require further clarification. Have a great rest of your week!
463:"Bruce works as a dishwasher at a Chinese restaurant, until getting in a violent brawl with four of the cooks." - perhaps it could be stated "until he gets in a violent brawl..." 126: 122: 107: 99: 76: 308:
I am a little confused by this part, (being shown and beaten against his own grave). Should it be (being shown beaten against his own grave) instead?
202:
it, but since I thought about it while reading this part, I thought I should still raise it to your attention even if the current wording is correct.
466:"but his Chinese peers demand he not train non-Chinese people" - perhaps maybe state this as "his Chinese peers demand he only train Chinese people" 246:
If the citations are kept in the infobox, I would add a citation for the running time, as I do not see it supported in the body of the article.
502:
Thanks for your comments, they are much appreciated. I've implemented all but the last one which I'd rather keep as is for the time being. :)
528: 438:, which is for an article about a very different film though both were released in the 1990s lol. Either way, I am glad I could help. 115: 434:
Thank you for addressing everything. This looks ready for a FAC to me. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback on
69: 511: 494: 485:
I hope these comments are helpful, few minor things as some may already have been addressed in the above comments by Aoba.
447: 427: 408: 389: 354: 285: 235: 183: 44: 321:
For this part, (saying he brought intelligence and charm to the role), I think the citations should be in numeric order.
92: 62: 198:
were published. I think it would be helpful to provide readers with a better sense of the timeline or chronology.
50: 365:
Since the historical accuracies have their own section, I think this topic should briefly addressed in the lead.
507: 423: 179: 298: 261:,), I would use Linda's full name since this is the first time she is mentioned in the body of the article. 311:
I would avoid repeating "film" twice in this sentence: (The film ends during a shot of the final scene of
17: 503: 419: 175: 490: 258: 472:
Under Filming, "thought the columns are exact replicas" - minor one, maybe you meant 'though'
338:
Yeah I think so. Let me know if you think the placement isn't OK or if it should be reworded.
302:, but in its Knowledge entry, it leaves out the "The" in the beginning. Which way is correct? 443: 404: 385: 350: 281: 231: 318:
The caption for the Jason Scott Lee image should have a period since it is a full sentence.
325: 226:
I think it should be fine, especially with the additional citation for the running time.
522: 486: 208: 161: 439: 415: 400: 381: 346: 277: 227: 328:
it has an approval rating of 71%), I would put a comma after "Rotten Tomatoes".
296:
This is more of a clarification question. In this article, the book is called
380:
Thank you for the clarification. I agree with your reasoning.
148: 276:
Thank you for bringing this up. I agree with your reasoning.
469:
Under Filming, "was set in San Fransisco" - very minor typo
331:
Is the video game notable enough for inclusion in the lead?
475:
Under Post-production, "in a bid bid to move" - repetition
305:
I think you can just say "film" instead of "feature film".
212:, but again, I just wanted to bring it to your attention. 194:
In the lead, I would add the year that the biography and
141: 134: 103: 315:, the film that would make Lee an international star.) 219:
I'll leave them in for now, but I'll keep it in mind.
70: 8: 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 24: 152: 257:For this part, (where he meets 414:Thanks so much for the review 1: 164:discussion has been closed. 28:Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story 545: 529:November 2018 peer reviews 512:07:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 495:22:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 448:23:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 428:14:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 409:03:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 390:22:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 355:23:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 286:22:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 236:22:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 184:01:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 196:Bruce Lee: The Biography 299:The Tao of Jeet Kune Do 458:Comments from Pseud14 18:Knowledge:Peer review 189:Comments from Aoba47 324:For this part, (On 345:Looks good to me. 169: 168: 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 536: 313:Enter the Dragon 156: 155: 149: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 544: 543: 539: 538: 537: 535: 534: 533: 519: 518: 460: 326:Rotten Tomatoes 191: 153: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 542: 540: 532: 531: 521: 520: 517: 516: 515: 514: 504:Damien Linnane 483: 482: 479: 476: 473: 470: 467: 464: 459: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 436:my current FAC 420:Damien Linnane 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 375: 374: 367: 366: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 340: 339: 333: 332: 329: 322: 319: 316: 309: 306: 303: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 271: 270: 263: 262: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 221: 220: 214: 213: 203: 199: 190: 187: 176:Damien Linnane 167: 166: 157: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 541: 530: 527: 526: 524: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 480: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 461: 457: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 410: 406: 402: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 371: 370: 369: 368: 364: 363: 356: 352: 348: 344: 343: 342: 341: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 327: 323: 320: 317: 314: 310: 307: 304: 301: 300: 295: 294: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 223: 222: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 210: 209:Kal Ho Naa Ho 204: 200: 197: 193: 192: 188: 186: 185: 181: 177: 172: 165: 163: 158: 151: 150: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 484: 398: 312: 297: 207: 195: 173: 170: 159: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 162:peer review 104:visual edit 254:sentence. 250:sentence. 523:Category 487:Pseud 14 373:biopics. 174:Thanks, 269:reader. 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 440:Aoba47 416:Aoba47 401:Aoba47 382:Aoba47 347:Aoba47 278:Aoba47 228:Aoba47 259:Linda 160:This 136:Watch 16:< 508:talk 491:talk 444:talk 424:talk 405:talk 386:talk 351:talk 282:talk 232:talk 180:talk 123:edit 100:edit 525:: 510:) 493:) 446:) 426:) 407:) 388:) 353:) 284:) 234:) 182:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 506:( 489:( 442:( 422:( 403:( 384:( 349:( 280:( 230:( 178:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
peer review
Damien Linnane
talk
01:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Kal Ho Naa Ho
Aoba47
talk
22:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Linda
Aoba47
talk
22:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
The Tao of Jeet Kune Do
Rotten Tomatoes

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.