232:
Brechtian theories. This might be too “in the weeds” for an introductory paragraph. Adding additional subheadings and expanding this information would help the reader navigate the article better. A section discussing the
History of Epic Theatre, Major Productions, and even subheadings that cover some of the primary techniques that are common in Epic theatre could be some possibilities. Additional visual elements could be added to enhance the article for example a picture of “non-realistic scenic design” to show the reader what scenic design of Epic Theatre might have looked like. The article is well written and understandable. It definitely provides a great start to build upon as you enhance the article. The article also does a great job utilizing internal links to provide the reader additional information within Knowledge (XXG) and the content is well cited. The External Links section is sparse and could be expanded with additional resources.
163:
231:
Great start Emma! Here are a few suggestions for improving the article. The article has a great introduction and provides a comprehensive overview of what Epic
Theatre is however about halfway into the second paragraph it begins to talk specifically about techniques associated with Epic Theatre and
205:
This is a dense page! After reading it it seems like there may be opportunities to add some different sections to break up all the text? For example, maybe one could be "elements of epic theatre" or maybe there could be a "key figures" section? I think the information on the page is relevant and
209:
Other than reformatting, I think in general, some more research and information in general would serve the page. I think the page has a lot of valuable information right now and that with some more edits, this will be a really helpful article!
34:
85:
135:
131:
116:
255:
78:
180:
I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to get feedback on my article and the ways in which I can improve it.
108:
59:
71:
17:
237:
188:
217:
53:
241:
221:
192:
233:
184:
124:
213:
170:
249:
101:
206:
important, but hard to digest in the way the page is set up now.
157:
150:
143:
112:
79:
8:
86:
72:
41:
44:
7:
24:
161:
1:
173:discussion has been closed.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
272:
242:03:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
222:05:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
193:02:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
256:July 2018 peer reviews
36:Previous peer review
178:
177:
151:Watch peer review
96:
95:
263:
198:Peer Review 2018
165:
164:
158:
148:
139:
120:
88:
81:
74:
56:
42:
271:
270:
266:
265:
264:
262:
261:
260:
246:
245:
229:
200:
162:
154:
129:
106:
100:
92:
60:Manual of Style
52:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
269:
267:
259:
258:
248:
247:
228:
225:
199:
196:
176:
175:
166:
156:
155:
153:
99:
94:
93:
91:
90:
83:
76:
68:
65:
64:
63:
62:
57:
47:
46:
40:
39:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
268:
257:
254:
253:
251:
244:
243:
239:
235:
234:Stories Alive
226:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
197:
195:
194:
190:
186:
185:Emmaosmundson
181:
174:
172:
167:
160:
159:
152:
147:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
105:
104:
98:
97:
89:
84:
82:
77:
75:
70:
69:
67:
66:
61:
58:
55:
54:Copying check
51:
50:
49:
48:
43:
38:
37:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
230:
212:
208:
204:
201:
182:
179:
168:
144:
140:
126:Article talk
125:
121:
102:
35:
28:Epic theatre
27:
227:Peer Review
214:Aoifemahood
171:peer review
113:visual edit
202:Hi Emma!
250:Category
183:Thanks,
136:history
117:history
103:Article
45:Toolbox
169:This
145:Watch
16:<
238:talk
218:talk
189:talk
132:edit
109:edit
252::
240:)
220:)
191:)
149:•
134:|
115:|
111:|
236:(
216:(
187:(
141:·
138:)
130:(
122:·
119:)
107:(
87:e
80:t
73:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.