Knowledge

:Peer review/Foot drop/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

187:, with attention to the section "How to format and place citations". Sources should be high-quality - the best available - and I doubt that Sweed-O would qualify. There are also prose issues, in particular the tendency to write material in very short paragraphs. I note that you have not contributed much to the article thus far; maybe your first step should be to contact other editors who are knowledgeable in the area and work with them on improving the article before bringing it back here. 183:, which stipulates that PR is "intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work". At present the article contains bare links to a few online sources; it needs to be properly referenced per the requirements of 153:
I've listed this article for peer review because… I need all sections especially the epidemiology to be reviewed because I want to know that this will be beneficial to the public in gaining and understanding the topic of drop foot.
179:: Your objective is praiseworthy. However, the article is not yet in a sufficiently prepared state to warrant a full-scale peer review - articles with major cleanup banners are specifically excluded by 76: 126: 237: 122: 69: 107: 99: 62: 50: 184: 219: 192: 17: 167: 159: 44: 223: 196: 171: 163: 155: 215: 188: 115: 231: 180: 211:
The link marked "Drop Foot Explanation" goes to a completely unrelated page.
92: 205:
The tool on the right indicates two links to disambiguation pages.
208:
One of your external links (in the "Features" section) is dead.
141: 134: 103: 70: 8: 150:This peer review discussion has been closed. 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 162:) 00:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks, 24: 1: 254: 224:20:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 197:20:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 172:00:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 185:Knowledge:Citing sources 238:July 2011 peer reviews 18:Knowledge:Peer review 201:Please note also: 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 245: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 253: 252: 248: 247: 246: 244: 243: 242: 228: 227: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 251: 249: 241: 240: 230: 229: 213: 212: 209: 206: 152: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 250: 239: 236: 235: 233: 226: 225: 221: 217: 210: 207: 204: 203: 202: 199: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 216:Brianboulton 214: 200: 189:Brianboulton 176: 175: 149: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 104:visual edit 28:Foot drop 232:Category 177:Comment 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 164:Bavill 156:Bavill 181:WP:PR 136:Watch 16:< 220:talk 193:talk 168:talk 160:talk 123:edit 100:edit 234:: 222:) 195:) 170:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 218:( 191:( 166:( 158:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Foot drop
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Bavill
talk
Bavill
talk
00:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
WP:PR
Knowledge:Citing sources
Brianboulton
talk
20:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton
talk
20:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Category

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.