282:
think this information is valuable and so possibly should be left as is, but it's a technical issue for FAC. Such are the trade-offs. "The thesis about the absence of antisemitism in Hong Kong is common" is awkward and should be rephrased. When entire sections rely on one source (I'm thinking particularly of
Antisemitism but there may be others) it would be better to attribute the analysis. Again, great job here, and thank you for your work.
201:, who can help provide feedback on the article, and post on various applicable Wikiprojects asking for help. I also suggest that you review FACs right now: this will allow you to get to know the FAC process and criteria, as well as build confidence among the FAC community that you understand the criteria. Many FAC reviewers, myself included, prioritize reviewing articles from nominators with high review-to-nomination ratios. Thanks.
154:
281:
Great job on this article. I'm concerned that some elements rely on your own interpretation or synthesis of sources, including the list of modern significant members of the Jewish community of Hong Kong and of 20th century most prominent representatives of the Jewish community in Hong Kong. I do
228:
this PR has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? If so, I suggest posting a request on
Wikiprojects attached to this article, asking for reviewers. If you are no longer requesting comments, can you close this PR? Thanks,
193:
to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that
262:
I'm afraid I won't have much time for
Knowledge for the next few months. Therefore, I believe it would be best if you close this peer review until I am able to be spare more time on this. Cheers. —
171:
I'm trying to get this article to FA and it's already failed FAC twice (due to low participation). I can't think of any other ways to improve it beyond what it is now.
76:
126:
122:
107:
99:
190:
69:
353:
62:
50:
336:
313:
291:
268:
250:
238:
210:
180:
44:
287:
115:
17:
325:
283:
92:
309:
234:
206:
330:
Thank you for the review! I'll address your concerns/recommendations as soon as I can. —
197:
Since you are still working towards your first successful FAC, I suggest that you seek a
347:
198:
161:
331:
299:
263:
245:
223:
175:
319:
305:
257:
230:
202:
244:
I'll try posting on relevant WPs to see if that gains any attention. —
148:
141:
134:
103:
70:
8:
77:
63:
32:
35:
7:
304:to ensure that they saw the above.
24:
318:I had not. Thanks for the ping,
191:Template:FAC peer review sidebar
152:
1:
189:I have added this PR to the
269:17:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
370:
337:09:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
314:23:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
292:14:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
277:Comments by GordonGlottal
251:15:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
239:15:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
211:14:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
181:07:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
354:May 2022 peer reviews
164:discussion is closed.
18:Knowledge:Peer review
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
28:Jews in Hong Kong
361:
334:
329:
303:
266:
261:
248:
227:
178:
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
369:
368:
364:
363:
362:
360:
359:
358:
344:
343:
332:
323:
297:
279:
264:
255:
246:
221:
219:
176:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
367:
365:
357:
356:
346:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
278:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
218:
217:Query by Z1720
215:
214:
213:
195:
187:STANDARD NOTE:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
366:
355:
352:
351:
349:
338:
335:
327:
326:GordonGlottal
321:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
301:
296:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
284:GordonGlottal
276:
270:
267:
259:
254:
253:
252:
249:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
225:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
172:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
280:
220:
186:
173:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
162:peer review
104:visual edit
174:Thanks, —
194:template.
348:Category
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
333:Golden
300:Golden
265:Golden
247:Golden
224:Golden
199:mentor
177:Golden
320:Z1720
306:Z1720
258:Z1720
231:Z1720
203:Z1720
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
310:talk
288:talk
235:talk
207:talk
123:edit
100:edit
350::
322:.
312:)
290:)
237:)
209:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
328::
324:@
308:(
302::
298:@
286:(
260::
256:@
233:(
226::
222:@
205:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.