162:
The biggest problem I see with the article is a near complete lack of references - the article needs inline citations as well as external refs. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a
70:
66:
51:
43:
235:
198:
Last sentence in lead has a plural subject and a singular verb (IIRC), try printing this out and reading it out loud slowly to see if there are other placves that need to be polished a bit.
59:
149:
I am pretty sure list articles no longer have to start with "This is a list..." (although they used to). A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow, see
189:
Since the format of the tables is the same (same columns) in almost all cases, the tables should be set to be the column same widths for a more uniform appearance.
103:
36:
221:
133:
154:
166:
There is one thing under references, but it needs more information. Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed.
118:, and see if it is anywhere near the criteria (and if so, make it conform more to it). Any and all constructive suggestions are welcome. —
240:
203:
159:
Per the MOS, the article should have at least one image - perhaps a cable car, a bus, and a Muni Metro light rail train?
141:: This is interesting and obviously has had a lot of work put into it, but I think it needs more work before it meets
195:
Avoid one sentence paragraphs (like the first one in the lead) by merging them with others or perhaps expanding them.
17:
192:
Any chance of a map of SF so those unfamiliar with the city have some idea of the major locations refered to?
95:
202:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at
211:
153:. While there do not seem to be any FLs of transit routes, there are several of stations, such as
142:
170:
177:
126:
99:
150:
115:
207:
181:
229:
121:
98:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
85:
78:
47:
236:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews
145:. Here are some suggestions for improvement.
176:and other cite templates may be helpful. See
28:List of San Francisco Municipal Railway lines
8:
206:(which is how I found this article). Yours,
111:This peer review discussion has been closed.
94:A script has been used to generate a semi-
186:Any reason why the list is not sortable?
155:List of Bay Area Rapid Transit stations
7:
204:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/backlog
114:I'm trying preparing the list for
24:
102:style; it can be found on the
1:
222:11:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
134:22:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
257:
241:February 2009 peer reviews
104:automated peer review page
139:Ruhrfisch comments
218:
106:for January 2009.
86:Watch peer review
248:
216:
175:
169:
131:
129:
124:
83:
74:
55:
256:
255:
251:
250:
249:
247:
246:
245:
226:
225:
215:
173:
167:
127:
122:
120:
89:
64:
41:
35:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
254:
252:
244:
243:
238:
228:
227:
212:
200:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
164:
160:
157:
113:
108:
107:
91:
90:
88:
34:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
253:
242:
239:
237:
234:
233:
231:
224:
223:
220:
219:
209:
205:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
183:
179:
172:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
144:
140:
136:
135:
132:
130:
125:
117:
112:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
82:
81:
77:
72:
68:
63:
62:
58:
53:
49:
45:
40:
39:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
210:
201:
138:
137:
119:
110:
109:
79:
75:
61:Article talk
60:
56:
37:
27:
48:visual edit
230:Categories
214:<: -->
208:Ruhrfisch
96:automated
171:cite web
143:WP:WIAFL
178:WP:CITE
71:history
52:history
38:Article
213:: -->
151:WP:FL
116:WP:FL
100:house
80:Watch
16:<
182:WP:V
180:and
163:ref.
67:edit
44:edit
128:ykh
123:kur
232::
174:}}
168:{{
84:•
69:|
50:|
46:|
217:°
76:·
73:)
65:(
57:·
54:)
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.