154:
446:
and thank you for your input. I having trouble getting the sort key for certifications to work right. I'm trying to get it sort for Latin certifications by decimal value to represent the shipment figures, but it isn't working. I'm thinking putting back the old shipment values and sales (if provided
174:
I am considering further improving this list to possibly nominate it FLC. I created this list a few years ago when I looked at the RIAA's certifications for Latin albums. As the list mentions, the RIAA has a special certification for
Spanish-language which is why I compiled this list. I'd like to
561:
Ah right, I wondered why you had decimalised in the sort coding (Also, don't include the dagger code inside the sort code in the future, keep them separate). Yes I think you should include the numerical certification of shipments in another column, because that isn't clear at the moment.
421:. I was told that third party sources are needed, otherwise it fails part 3b of the FL criteria, and will most likely incur opposes for your nomination. So if you can find non-Billboard sources, that would help. Otherwise, I doubt this list will stand any chance of being promoted.
175:
know if this article makes complete sense to the reader and if there's anything in the prose that might fall under original research. I also liked suggestions for improving the grammar in the prose if necessary. I've based this list on the
126:
122:
107:
99:
179:
with permission by the editor who helped promote to FL. I'm also considering adding sales provided by
Nielsen SoundScan, but I'm not sure if I can find sales for every album listed in the article. Thank you,
483:
Right, I meant putting the shipment values with actual sales in parenthesis like I did before. I don't know how to get the sort key for shipments to work still. I'm open to any suggestion as well.
115:
547:
Sorted by shipment value. Like 14x Latin represents 1.4 million units shipped so it should be higher than 1x regular but lower than 2x regular. Same thing with the others like 16x, 35x, etc.
92:
386:
When I sort the Number of times certified platinum column, it doesn't sort in numerical order properly, going 11x, 12x, 14x, 16x, then multiple 1x and some 2x, then 35x at the end.
176:
217:
The first Latin albums chart were compiled → It's one chart, so it should be "was compiled", not "were compiled", unless there is more than one Latin album chart?
676:
665:
648:
637:
616:
604:
568:
556:
535:
524:
503:
492:
471:
460:
436:
189:
284:
Mi Tierra spent 25 → The album spent/ It spent. (You've just mentioned it as the subject, so you don't need to say it again so soon, as it sounds repetitive).
76:
610:¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? looks like it has one too many zeros? It doesn't many that it sorts descending, you can click it again to sort it ascending. —
656:
I want to thank you once more for taking the time to review this list. I'll go search for non-Billboard sources to ensure it becomes. Thanks again!
44:
383:
For The Best of the Gipsy Kings, it should sort under 'B', but still leave it in the same place, so just replace it with "{{sort|Best|]}}"
697:
430:
I hope my comments help you. It's a really good list. Please ping me or leave me a talkback if you have any questions or comments. —
515:
Hmm, it's still a problem because albums that have been certified 14x Latin should be higher than 1x regular but lower than 2x.
69:
350:
making Selena the first
Hispanic singer to debut at the top of this chart. → making her the first Hispanic singer to do so.
417:
A problem I faced with my own FLC the other day is that all the refs (bar three which are RIAA) in the article are
62:
50:
465:
A problem with that is that shipments and sales are not the same thing, and that says
Shipments (Sales). —
595:
Alright, I've added a column which contains the shipment values. Tell me what you think. Thank again, btw.
661:
633:
600:
552:
520:
488:
456:
185:
17:
201:
370:
You write 11× Platinum and then later 35 times. Keep it consistent with how you format/phrase it.
657:
629:
596:
548:
516:
484:
452:
181:
671:
653:
643:
623:
611:
590:
563:
542:
530:
510:
498:
478:
466:
443:
431:
497:
I've just fixed the last column for you. The certification 'x' now sorts in order. —
691:
529:
Oh, so you want it to sort with the highest number first? Descending numerically? —
294:
weeks at number one in 1993 → weeks atop in 1993 (Again, repetition of 'number one')
426:
I'll see if I can replace some of
Billboard's sources with a third party reference.
161:
254:
for Latin albums. → Remove, just because 'Latin albums' is being a bit repetitive.
240:
LP's from the US territory of Puerto Rico was included → Opposite situation. Album
380:
In the Key, I'd write (RIAA) after
Recording Industry Association of America.
228:
389:
In the table, which chart is the Chart peaks column representing? The
264:
On June 1985, → Unless you give the day, it would be "In June 1985"
148:
448:
141:
134:
103:
28:
List of best-selling Latin albums in the United States
177:List of best-selling albums in the United Kingdom
244:were included, so it would be "were included"
70:
8:
628:I've corrected the album's shipment units.
407:and PMG need link as it's the first usage.
304:33 weeks at this position in → 33 weeks in
77:
63:
32:
360:main influential for → main influence for
35:
7:
447:by Nielsens SoundScan) like I did
24:
642:Okay. I think it's fine now. —
152:
1:
314:1994 and was → 1994, becoming
274:into the chart → Not needed.
677:16:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
666:16:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
649:16:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
638:16:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
617:16:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
605:16:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
569:15:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
557:15:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
536:15:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
525:15:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
504:15:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
493:15:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
472:15:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
461:13:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
437:14:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
190:19:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
164:discussion has been closed.
714:
449:before I revamped the list
698:October 2015 peer reviews
195:Comments from Calvin999
207:which → by '']'' which
451:. What do you think?
18:Knowledge:Peer review
670:You're welcome. —
332:, → at number one
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
705:
627:
594:
546:
514:
482:
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
713:
712:
708:
707:
706:
704:
703:
702:
688:
687:
621:
588:
540:
508:
476:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
711:
709:
701:
700:
690:
689:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
668:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
428:
427:
423:
422:
414:
413:
409:
408:
400:
399:
395:
394:
387:
384:
381:
377:
376:
372:
371:
367:
366:
362:
361:
357:
356:
352:
351:
347:
346:
342:
341:
324:at number one
321:
320:
316:
315:
311:
310:
306:
305:
301:
300:
296:
295:
291:
290:
286:
285:
281:
280:
276:
275:
271:
270:
266:
265:
261:
260:
256:
255:
251:
250:
246:
245:
237:
236:
232:
231:
224:
223:
219:
218:
214:
213:
209:
208:
197:
196:
171:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
710:
699:
696:
695:
693:
678:
675:
674:
669:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
650:
647:
646:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
625:
620:
619:
618:
615:
614:
609:
608:
607:
606:
602:
598:
592:
570:
567:
566:
560:
559:
558:
554:
550:
544:
539:
538:
537:
534:
533:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
512:
507:
506:
505:
502:
501:
496:
495:
494:
490:
486:
480:
475:
474:
473:
470:
469:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
435:
434:
425:
424:
420:
416:
415:
411:
410:
406:
402:
401:
397:
396:
392:
391:Billboard 200
388:
385:
382:
379:
378:
374:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
359:
358:
354:
353:
349:
348:
344:
343:
339:
338:Billboard 200
335:
331:
330:Billboard 200
327:
323:
322:
318:
317:
313:
312:
308:
307:
303:
302:
298:
297:
293:
292:
288:
287:
283:
282:
278:
277:
273:
272:
268:
267:
263:
262:
258:
257:
253:
252:
248:
247:
243:
239:
238:
234:
233:
230:
226:
225:
221:
220:
216:
215:
211:
210:
206:
204:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
178:
172:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
672:
644:
612:
587:
564:
531:
499:
467:
432:
429:
418:
404:
390:
337:
333:
329:
325:
241:
202:
173:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
227:Link LP to
162:peer review
104:visual edit
403:In Ref 2,
673:Calvin999
654:Calvin999
645:Calvin999
624:Calvin999
613:Calvin999
591:Calvin999
565:Calvin999
543:Calvin999
532:Calvin999
511:Calvin999
500:Calvin999
479:Calvin999
468:Calvin999
444:Calvin999
433:Calvin999
419:Billboard
405:Billboard
229:LP record
203:Billboard
692:Category
205:magazine
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
442:Hello
658:Erick
630:Erick
597:Erick
549:Erick
517:Erick
485:Erick
453:Erick
412:Fixed
398:Fixed
375:Fixed
365:Fixed
355:Fixed
345:Fixed
319:Fixed
309:Fixed
299:Fixed
289:Fixed
279:Fixed
269:Fixed
259:Fixed
249:Fixed
235:Fixed
222:Fixed
212:Fixed
182:Erick
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
662:talk
634:talk
601:talk
553:talk
521:talk
489:talk
457:talk
336:the
328:the
186:talk
123:edit
100:edit
562:—
200:by
694::
664:)
636:)
603:)
555:)
523:)
491:)
459:)
334:on
326:in
188:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
660:(
632:(
626::
622:@
599:(
593::
589:@
551:(
545::
541:@
519:(
513::
509:@
487:(
481::
477:@
455:(
393:?
340:,
242:s
184:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.