297:
If you think so, but I think the list should be a bit more list-y and your mini-article should have its rightful place in the pantheon of articles. :) However, your points are well made - it is perhaps more a point of personal preference whether grouping all of the information together or separating
268:
article on its own, it really benefits most by its place in the list of works as does the list of works itself. It seems atm to be the ideal set-up, especially considering the audience is not huge for
Monahan's past works, and they are likely to get everything and more than they want to know by just
611:
is awarded in 1997, and it just avoids that confusion, as to whether you are being overly accurate when you say in 1997, or are simply referring to the year of the title of the pushcart prize. Simply put, the 1997 Pushcart Prize starts with a short story nominated in 1995 by a literary journal, and
317:
When I considered this, I realized I would have to copy a lot of sections into the Light House article, and then I just decided to settle with having it all in one list of works. The other sections that would have been copied over into a Light House: A Trifle article would have been the Old Crow
360:
You're right about this. Without a source I believe I am allowed to purely describe the article, but the qualifier innovative is OR and possibly the "electronic keychain game as a literary device" is OR although it really needs to be stated how odd "The
Virtual Career" is. You're basically sent
612:
then notification follows in 1996, and finally the volume containing all the pushcart prize winning stories is published in Dec 1996, although I'm sure the volume spends most of its time being read in 1997. Yes, that's way too much detail, but after I had gone there and couldn't turn back.-
211:
I fixed the punctuation based on whether it's a complete sentence or a fragment. I also fixed the inside quotations and made use of the   in appropriate situations. Also, attributed the criticism of his first novel to the authors, not just the papers they worked
252:
Then there is also the "Dining Late with Claude La
Badarian" section which gains a lot by its place in the list of works where you can make sense of all the inside-jokes and quirks in the serial narrative by just glancing about the list of
473:
At the conclusion of a successful run of his column, which initially "appeared at the back of the book" and eventually "migrated to the masthead" replacing the "Editor's Note", he requested the job of editor of the magazine for the next
354:
His last contribution to the Old Crow Review, titled "The
Virtual Career", was innovative in its use of an electronic keychain game as a literary device used to chronicle the tragic decision-making process of a career man in the media
226:
I have considered this. At the moment I think it would be best to keep everything in one list of works because there is a lot of referral by the works themselves and by the
Knowledge (XXG) list of works to the individual works.
53:, imitating its style where comparable. If you have any criticism of the prose (of which there is much in this list of works) please speak up; I am interested. I would like to give this list of works as much polish as possible.
318:
Review serialization list, and the Dining Late with Claude La
Badarian summary. It seems simpler to have everything in the list of works but that is my personal preference after all. I'm going to send this to
45:
before nominating it for the featured list status. Hopefully you will enjoy reading it, especially the
Reception sections. Although it is mainly a list of works, I have tried to annotate whenever possible.
548:
OK, let me just say this is stunningly comprehensive—you've certainly done your homework. I do have a few minor issues, though, mainly with the overall prose. I'll get to them in a while :)
141:
I further improved it. Those two timelines have excellent introductory paragraphs. Unfortunately there isn't as much to be said in my case. I will continue to see if I can improve the lede.-
21:
761:
I think you can remove the IPA pronunciation here. It may be fine in the main article, but I think it's overkill here; it's not as if "William
Monahan" is as hard to pronounce as, say, "
680:
Thanks for the review. I wonder if you have any opinions on how I should proceed after this peer review? Whether I should go to GA for an additional stamp of approval, before heading to
801:"However, in the following years his services as a screenwriter were in high demand "—that seems a bit too... laudatory, if not downright promotional, especially for the lead. Sorry :)
377:
His last contribution to the Old Crow Review, titled "The
Virtual Career", fictionalized an electronic keychain game in which a career man makes tragic decisions in New York City.
698:
Wait, there's more :) GA is not for lists; FLC is the only process for them, and, even if there was an equivalent, GA isn't really a requirement for an article to be featured.
659:
Note: Although this list of works has been meticulously compiled, it is based on amateur bibliographic research and should not be considered a professional bibliography.
957:
466:
At the conclusion of the successful run of his column, he requested the job of editor of the magazine for the next Summer; the publisher granted him the promotion.
633:
104:
has benefited substantially from this retrospective of his past journalism work. You're right about the lede and I've made some changes to it.-
726:
Okay, thanks. Take your time. I'm going to keep this LoW here for a while, and then once everything is polished I'll probably head to FLC.-
925:
897:
775:
708:
558:
277:
was put back in print, and a second novel appeared or something, then the list of works might be best broken up into separate articles.-
824:
Under "Literature published in
Massachusetts", I'm curious as to why you listed the numbers of pages rather than specific page ranges.
744:
now. If you do see any other problems with the prose let me know, but I think you already caught most of it. Thanks for all the help.-
361:
through a game of decisions, in which foolish decisions are made in lieu of other ones. It's one of my favorite pieces. Very funny.-
50:
969:
930:
902:
882:
864:
817:
794:
780:
753:
735:
713:
693:
673:
621:
578:
563:
537:
522:
500:
485:
450:
435:
403:
388:
370:
331:
308:
286:
183:
I think the infobox is unnecessary, as you are giving us the bibliographic information. It's intrusive - how about just the cover?
150:
132:
113:
67:
664:
I removed it. It was just a warning that if I didn't get everything, don't kill me. It's simply amateur bibliographic research.-
82:
270:
31:
204:- Blockquotes don't belong in call-outs and punctuation goes outside of the quotation mark for incomplete sentences.
878:
860:
813:
790:
749:
731:
689:
669:
617:
574:
533:
481:
431:
384:
366:
327:
282:
146:
109:
63:
17:
949:
921:
893:
771:
704:
554:
90:
223:
section seems like an article in and of itself - why not make it one and then summarize the article here?
197:
528:
Thank you for the review. If I missed something or you have any further comments please let me know.-
839:
I also just listed 3 pages. In that case I could list page numbers. Is that the correct thing to do?
874:
856:
809:
786:
745:
727:
685:
665:
613:
570:
529:
477:
427:
380:
362:
323:
278:
142:
105:
59:
916:
888:
766:
699:
549:
517:
512:
Overall, I thought this was excellent and I have no doubt that you can resolve the above issues.
495:
445:
398:
303:
127:
590:
245:
refers to the "Dining Late with Claude La Badarian" section, in which the work itself on the
201:
81:
Just who this William Monaham? :) Seriously, I think you need an introductory paragraph. See
953:
741:
681:
319:
38:
965:
600:
101:
343:
42:
238:
refers to the Publication section as well as to the Literature in Massachusetts section.
836:
608:
604:
599:
Thanks. I like the tweaks and I'm going to transfer them over the the main article on
762:
629:
513:
491:
441:
394:
299:
123:
638:
234:
The publication history criticism by Claude Dederer in the Reception section for
100:
Thanks. It has been a lot of work but definitely worthwhile. The main article on
249:
web site makes all sorts of references to the various works in the bibliography.
77:
I am so impressed! Wow! This is a list of works to match. Here are my comments:
440:
Again - this looks more descriptive - the quotations work well, in my opinion.
426:
I have revised the paragraph to be more pointed and hopefully removed any OR.-
961:
804:
I rewrote the sentence. I'm trying to illustrate the break, from publishing
37:
I've listed this article for peer review because I am hoping to send it to
342:
Sometimes I wondered if your narration of events doesn't tip over into
85:, for example, which starts out with a description of her, her time,
758:
You're welcome. Three more things, and a question for good measure:
421:
The letters from readers in the following weeks were more thoughtful
956:
style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
835:
there were no page numbers. You can see further down for the
952:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
393:
That seems more descriptive and less evaluative to me.
642:, his second produced screenplay."—could you change
569:
Sure. Any help with the prose would be appreciated.-
41:(Featured Lists) eventually. I may also send it to
593:done some tweaking here; tell me what you think.
49:Additionally, this list is based on the featured
808:to basically working heavily in screenwriting.-
650:? It would make things flow a little better.
8:
346:(good research!), but original nonetheless.
948:A script has been used to generate a semi-
164:In another part of the inn a fire foments
603:. I did revert one thing about the 1997
7:
173:I changed the phrase to fire starts.
28:
423:- what justifies this statement?
51:List of works by Joseph Priestley
661:Is such a disclaimer necessary?
271:List of works by William Monahan
32:List of works by William Monahan
22:List of works by William Monahan
264:So while I could duplicate the
83:Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft
1:
970:12:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
931:23:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
903:12:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
883:23:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
865:23:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
844:Is William Georgiades of the
818:00:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
795:23:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
781:23:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
754:23:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
736:03:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
714:21:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
694:21:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
674:21:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
622:21:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
579:21:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
564:20:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
538:05:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
523:08:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
501:05:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
486:00:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
451:05:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
436:23:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
404:05:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
389:00:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
371:18:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
332:23:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
309:05:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
287:18:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
151:23:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
133:05:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
114:05:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
68:19:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
241:The Publication section for
471:I changed this sentence to
375:I changed this sentence to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
986:
848:William Georgiades of the
740:I'm going to send this to
122:I think it is better now.
873:; it ran from 1990-1994.-
607:, just because the 1998
634:Best Adapted Screenplay
322:and see what they say.-
91:Timeline of Jane Austen
93:(new!) also does this.
628:"He was awarded an
468:- why "successful"?
73:Comments by Awadewit
855:Yep, the same one.-
915:Again, nice work.
166:- do fires foment?
929:
901:
779:
712:
562:
520:
498:
448:
401:
344:original research
306:
130:
977:
919:
891:
769:
702:
552:
518:
496:
446:
399:
304:
298:it out is best.
128:
985:
984:
980:
979:
978:
976:
975:
974:
968:
945:
850:Old Crow Review
829:Old Crow Review
785:Okay, will do.-
601:William Monahan
546:
269:consulting the
102:William Monahan
75:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
983:
981:
973:
972:
964:
944:
943:Semi-automated
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
875:BillDeanCarter
857:BillDeanCarter
846:New York Times
842:
841:
840:
837:Pushcart Prize
822:
821:
820:
810:BillDeanCarter
799:
798:
797:
787:BillDeanCarter
746:BillDeanCarter
738:
728:BillDeanCarter
719:
718:
717:
716:
686:BillDeanCarter
678:
677:
676:
666:BillDeanCarter
656:
655:
654:
626:
625:
624:
614:BillDeanCarter
609:Pushcart Prize
605:Pushcart Prize
587:
586:
582:
581:
571:BillDeanCarter
545:
542:
541:
540:
530:BillDeanCarter
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
478:BillDeanCarter
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
428:BillDeanCarter
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
381:BillDeanCarter
363:BillDeanCarter
348:
347:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
324:BillDeanCarter
312:
311:
292:
291:
290:
289:
279:BillDeanCarter
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
247:New York Press
239:
229:
228:
216:
215:
214:
213:
206:
205:
194:
193:
192:
191:
185:
184:
179:
177:
176:
175:
174:
168:
167:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
143:BillDeanCarter
136:
135:
117:
116:
106:BillDeanCarter
95:
94:
74:
71:
60:BillDeanCarter
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
982:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
942:
932:
927:
923:
918:
917:Fvasconcellos
914:
904:
899:
895:
890:
889:Fvasconcellos
886:
885:
884:
880:
876:
872:
871:Perkins Press
869:But you mean
868:
867:
866:
862:
858:
854:
853:
851:
847:
843:
838:
834:
833:Perkins Press
830:
827:For both the
826:
825:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
802:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
782:
777:
773:
768:
767:Fvasconcellos
764:
763:Geike Arnaert
760:
759:
757:
756:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
737:
733:
729:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
715:
710:
706:
701:
700:Fvasconcellos
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
662:
660:
657:
652:
651:
649:
645:
641:
640:
635:
631:
630:Academy Award
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
592:
584:
583:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
565:
560:
556:
551:
550:Fvasconcellos
544:Fvasconcellos
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
515:
502:
499:
493:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
470:
469:
467:
464:
463:
462:
461:
452:
449:
443:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
422:
419:
418:
417:
416:
405:
402:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
359:
358:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
340:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
307:
301:
296:
295:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
251:
248:
244:
240:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
225:
224:
222:
218:
217:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
196:
195:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
181:
180:
172:
171:
170:
169:
165:
162:
161:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
131:
125:
121:
120:
119:
118:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
78:
72:
70:
69:
65:
61:
57:
54:
52:
47:
44:
40:
33:
30:
23:
19:
887:Yes, sorry.
870:
849:
845:
832:
828:
805:
658:
647:
643:
639:The Departed
637:
588:
547:
511:
472:
465:
420:
376:
353:
274:
265:
246:
242:
235:
220:
178:
163:
86:
76:
58:
55:
48:
36:
806:Light House
275:Light House
273:. Maybe if
266:Light House
243:Light House
236:Light House
221:Light House
198:WP:MOSQUOTE
89:her works.
960:. Thanks,
644:screenplay
357:- source?
950:automated
227:Examples:
56:Thanks,
514:Awadewit
492:Awadewit
442:Awadewit
395:Awadewit
300:Awadewit
124:Awadewit
20: |
474:Summer;
202:WP:PUNC
742:WP:FLC
682:WP:FLC
648:script
591:boldly
490:Good.
355:world.
320:WP:FLC
253:works.
39:WP:FLC
954:house
765:" :)
653:Done.
589:I've
190:Done.
43:WP:GA
16:<
958:here
879:talk
861:talk
831:and
814:talk
791:talk
750:talk
732:talk
690:talk
670:talk
636:for
632:for
618:talk
585:Lead
575:talk
534:talk
519:talk
497:talk
482:talk
447:talk
432:talk
400:talk
385:talk
367:talk
328:talk
305:talk
283:talk
219:The
212:for.
200:and
147:talk
129:talk
110:talk
64:talk
962:APR
646:to
87:and
881:)
863:)
852:?
816:)
793:)
752:)
734:)
692:)
684:?-
672:)
620:)
577:)
536:)
516:|
494:|
484:)
444:|
434:)
397:|
387:)
369:)
330:)
302:|
285:)
149:)
126:|
112:)
66:)
966:t
928:)
926:c
924:·
922:t
920:(
900:)
898:c
896:·
894:t
892:(
877:(
859:(
812:(
789:(
778:)
776:c
774:·
772:t
770:(
748:(
730:(
711:)
709:c
707:·
705:t
703:(
688:(
668:(
616:(
573:(
561:)
559:c
557:·
555:t
553:(
532:(
480:(
476:-
430:(
383:(
379:-
365:(
326:(
281:(
145:(
108:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.