Knowledge (XXG)

:Peer review/Mandell Creighton/archive2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

227:
them into his diction. Otherwise, there is too much back and forth, and the article can begin to sound a bit like what Virginia Woolf had said about Captain Marryat's books, i.e. contain springy prose. But it is not a big deal. I have now reverted the article to your last edit. Please accept my heartfelt apology. Apologies also to
226:
I don't know who you are, so I have nothing against you. I do understand that the lead should be a balanced summary of the article, which the lead was not. All I had suggested was that you are better off making the suggestions here (i.e in the peer review section) and allowing Tim riley to transmute
198:
does not give an adequate overview of the content of the article. It says nothing about his early life, is vague in places and contains general statements that are tangential to Creighton and could be stated (as I tried to do) with more direct relevance to him, like "around the time that history was
203:
reverted them wholesale without discussion. I also made some minor edits to streamline notes in the next section, which were also reverted without comment by the same user. I am unwatching the article and this page, and I wish you good luck, but I think there is a lot of work to do on this article
255:
Thank you for reverting, which I did not notice until just now. I am sure that Tim is capable of editing the language of the Lead to effectuate his "diction" and the further suggestions about the section that I had sent him off-line. I'll leave you two to it. --
169:, as Mandell Creighton was an outstanding Bishop of London until his early death and also a leading and innovative historian. Comments are cordially invited on style, balance, prose, citations and anything else. 161:, has invited me to revise it, and, with his approval, I am now putting it up for a second peer review (the first was in 2011) with FAC in mind. I was unsure whether to list this under 148: 287: 76: 126: 122: 107: 282: 99: 69: 292: 50: 241: 62: 265: 246: 213: 184: 17: 44: 199:
emerging as an independent academic discipline in England." I made some preliminary edits to the Lead but
115: 236: 200: 158: 177: 261: 209: 92: 195: 230: 172: 276: 257: 221: 205: 194:
I was asked by Tim riley to look over this article. The
235:. I will now butt out for the duration of the review. 141: 134: 103: 157:This article has a long history. Its main author, 70: 8: 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 288:Philosophy and religion peer reviews 24: 204:to bring it up to FA quality. -- 266:02:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 247:23:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 214:20:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 185:14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1: 283:September 2024 peer reviews 18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review 309: 163:Religion and philosophy 201:user:Fowler&fowler 293:Current peer reviews 150:Previous peer review 238:Fowler&fowler 190:Ssilvers comments 159:Fowler&fowler 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 28:Mandell Creighton 300: 244: 239: 234: 225: 182: 180: 175: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 308: 307: 303: 302: 301: 299: 298: 297: 273: 272: 242: 237: 228: 219: 192: 178: 173: 171: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 306: 304: 296: 295: 290: 285: 275: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 250: 249: 191: 188: 155: 154: 153: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 305: 294: 291: 289: 286: 284: 281: 280: 278: 267: 263: 259: 254: 253: 252: 251: 248: 245: 240: 232: 223: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 202: 197: 189: 187: 186: 183: 181: 176: 168: 164: 160: 152: 151: 147: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 193: 170: 166: 162: 156: 149: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 104:visual edit 277:Categories 231:Tim riley 174:Tim riley 258:Ssilvers 222:Ssilvers 206:Ssilvers 196:WP:LEAD 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 243:«Talk» 136:Watch 16:< 262:talk 210:talk 179:talk 167:Arts 123:edit 100:edit 165:or 279:: 264:) 212:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 260:( 233:: 229:@ 224:: 220:@ 208:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
Mandell Creighton
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Previous peer review
Fowler&fowler
Tim riley
talk
14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
WP:LEAD
user:Fowler&fowler
Ssilvers
talk
20:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Ssilvers
Tim riley
Fowler&fowler
«Talk»

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.