167:
235:
After SR staged the 1975 contest in
Stockholm, left-wing groups argued that Sweden should not spend money to win and host Eurovision again. This led to mass demonstrations against commercial music and the organisation of an anti-commercial Alternativfestivalen. Therefore, Sweden decided not to send a
184:
The article was promoted in 2007 and since then has significantly updated. After giving a quick read, I have noticed some of the materials unsourced and therefore I believe it would be communities best interest to have a peer review and decide if the article is worth delisting. Thanks,
242:
There are certain elements of this type of writing that sounds a bit off to my ears. Also, I don't think "anti-commercial" is idiomatic
English. Better with 'non-profit', 'anti-consumerist', or something like
38:
222:
Also, the article relies rather heavily on a 13 year-old source, "Inbjudan till
Melodifestivalen 2007", which for obvious reasons can't cover statements like
247:
That's just a handful of comments from me – I haven't spent that much time reading the article, so I might revisit the page on a later stage, if you wish.
89:
139:
21:
229:
I'm also worried that the article hews to close to
Swedish syntax rules, rather than English grammar. For instance let's have a look at this para:
135:
120:
269:
112:
82:
217:
To be eligible, songwriters and performers must be at least sixteen years of age on the day of the first
Eurovision semi-final
63:
75:
193:
17:
255:
196:
57:
128:
186:
105:
208:
174:
248:
263:
212:
234:
223:
216:
224:
the 2012 contest marked the first time foreign songwriters could submit entries
213:
Medverkande artist måste ha fyllt 16 år före den 10:e maj 2007.
161:
211:, even when it's been translated from Swedish. For instance
219:, even if it's purely factual and straigthforward. YMMV.
154:
147:
116:
207:
You need to ensure that the article doesn't contain
236:song to Eurovision 1976 but returned in 1977.
83:
8:
90:
76:
45:
48:
7:
28:
165:
1:
177:discussion has been closed.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
286:
270:November 2018 peer reviews
256:06:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
197:23:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
202:Comments from Eisfbnore
239:
215:is a bit too close to
232:
40:Previous peer review
209:close paraphrasing
182:
181:
155:Watch peer review
100:
99:
277:
253:
237:
225:
218:
214:
169:
168:
162:
152:
143:
124:
92:
85:
78:
60:
46:
32:Melodifestivalen
22:Melodifestivalen
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
260:
259:
249:
166:
158:
133:
110:
104:
96:
64:Manual of Style
56:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
273:
272:
262:
261:
245:
244:
231:
230:
227:
220:
180:
179:
170:
160:
159:
157:
103:
98:
97:
95:
94:
87:
80:
72:
69:
68:
67:
66:
61:
51:
50:
44:
43:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
271:
268:
267:
265:
258:
257:
254:
252:
241:
240:
238:
228:
221:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
198:
195:
192:
191:
190:
178:
176:
171:
164:
163:
156:
151:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
131:
127:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
102:
101:
93:
88:
86:
81:
79:
74:
73:
71:
70:
65:
62:
59:
58:Copying check
55:
54:
53:
52:
47:
42:
41:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
250:
246:
233:
201:
200:
188:
187:
183:
172:
148:
144:
130:Article talk
129:
125:
106:
39:
31:
175:peer review
117:visual edit
251:Eisfbnore
264:Category
20: |
140:history
121:history
107:Article
49:Toolbox
194:(talk)
243:that.
173:This
149:Watch
16:<
136:edit
113:edit
189:IW.
266::
153:•
138:|
119:|
115:|
226:.
145:·
142:)
134:(
126:·
123:)
111:(
91:e
84:t
77:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.