Knowledge

:Peer review/Millennium '73/archive2 - Knowledge

Source 📝

123:
This article was peer reviewed back in October, and recently passed Good Article review. It was nominated for Featured Article, but did not pass. Many of the objections at FA concerned the quality of the prose. For that reason, copyediting suggestions are especially welcome.
158:
Ah looking into this further this appears to actually be a recommendation to add more wikilinks in the article's text itself - that might be a good idea to do a pass through the article and examine that. (Don't want to overdo it
255: 170:
Disagree with the automated recommendation that the article should be broken up into subpages, it is well-written and organized as an article about the event.
148: 110: 77: 73: 58: 50: 260: 167:
Cut down on the subsections/table of contents a bit, changed some subsection breaks to simply bolded formatting.
219: 190: 137: 240: 102: 131: 17: 66: 204:. Might be worth doing some quick research and creating an article on this individual if satisfying 155:
Not sure which other places to link to this article from, this seems more like a recommendation.
126: 43: 236: 215: 205: 186: 176:
The contractions appear in quotes and not in article syntax itself, so this checks out.
249: 106: 226: 201: 231: 210: 181: 173:
Could perhaps indeed do with a copyedit to watch for redundancies.
105:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
92: 85: 54: 164:
Don't know if there is an appropriate infobox to use.
256:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews 8: 118:This peer review discussion has been closed. 101:A script has been used to generate a semi- 200:One redlink in the article at present - 7: 24: 109:style; it can be found on the 1: 277: 241:17:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 220:07:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 191:07:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 149:automated peer review page 138:00:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 111:automated peer review page 225:I started an article on 261:April 2009 peer reviews 147:I took a look at the 18:Knowledge:Peer review 36:Previous peer review 196:Redlink potential 93:Watch peer review 268: 134: 129: 90: 81: 62: 26: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 267: 266: 265: 246: 245: 132: 127: 113:for March 2009. 96: 71: 48: 42: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 274: 272: 264: 263: 258: 248: 247: 244: 243: 198: 197: 178: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 161: 160: 145: 144: 120: 115: 114: 98: 97: 95: 41: 39: 30: 28:Millennium '73 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 273: 262: 259: 257: 254: 253: 251: 242: 238: 234: 233: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 212: 207: 203: 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 184: 183: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 157: 156: 154: 153: 152: 150: 142: 141: 140: 139: 136: 135: 130: 121: 119: 112: 108: 104: 100: 99: 94: 89: 88: 84: 79: 75: 70: 69: 65: 60: 56: 52: 47: 46: 40: 38: 37: 33: 32: 29: 19: 230: 227:Eric Mercury 209: 202:Eric Mercury 199: 180: 179: 146: 125: 122: 117: 116: 86: 82: 68:Article talk 67: 63: 44: 35: 34: 27: 128:Will Beback 55:visual edit 250:Categories 103:automated 159:though.) 206:WP:NOTE 143:Comment 78:history 59:history 45:Article 107:house 87:Watch 16:< 237:talk 232:Cirt 216:talk 211:Cirt 187:talk 182:Cirt 133:talk 74:edit 51:edit 151:: 252:: 239:) 229:. 218:) 208:. 189:) 91:• 76:| 57:| 53:| 235:( 214:( 185:( 83:· 80:) 72:( 64:· 61:) 49:(

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Millennium '73
Previous peer review
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
automated
house
automated peer review page
Will Beback
talk
00:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
automated peer review page
Cirt
talk
07:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Eric Mercury
WP:NOTE
Cirt
talk
07:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Eric Mercury
Cirt
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.