Knowledge

:Peer review/Monstercat/archive2 - Knowledge

Source 📝

163: 180:
I've listed this article for peer review because I am working to get this article to GA status and am looking for steps to improve the article before nomination.
85: 242:
I think an "overview" section wouldn't be misplaced. It jumps straight into the history of the orginasation without saying what it is, what it does, etc.
34: 135: 251:
Whilst I know British Colombia is in Canada, the article doesn't mention this is Canadian outside of the lede sentence and infobox.
317: 131: 78: 116: 260:
The massive quote borders on copyright issues. Even if not, it's quite promotional to copy a press release like this.
108: 71: 59: 229:
Is the mascot really the most important part of the article? I'd move it down the lede, if not remove entirely.
290: 17: 53: 303: 257:
Today, the label signs artists on a single-track basis - seems out of place on a section on origins.
194: 220: 189: 281:
Are all the albums notable? There's some that have articles. If they are notable, they should be
275: 297: 282: 271:
There's some sentence structure issues, with paragraphs often being just one or two sentences.
124: 254:(born 1989) and Ari Paunonen (born 1989/90) - refs should go ideally after punctuation. 206: 184: 311: 295:
I hope some of the above is helpful to you to take the item towards GA. Best Wishes,
170: 101: 245:"Beginning" is a weird title, something like "founding" makes more sense. 226:
The refs in the lede aren't really neccesary. Should be cited in prose.
274:
Does the dynamic list for the current artist land a little close to
157: 150: 143: 112: 219:"independent electronic dance music record label" - 289:Also be aware Earwigs CV check comes up with this: 248:Is it normal to put DOBs for people not in BLPs? 223:, could do with rewording/removing some links. 79: 8: 86: 72: 41: 268:Article is very "In X month, Y year..." 44: 209:. Here's a few things I picked up on. 7: 24: 278:? Seems a little in depth for me. 161: 1: 304:21:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 195:06:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC) 173:discussion has been closed. 334: 318:March 2020 peer reviews 232:meme should be linked. 18:Knowledge:Peer review 36:Previous peer review 200:Thoughts from Lee V 263:This happens a lot 178: 177: 151:Watch peer review 96: 95: 325: 300: 192: 187: 165: 164: 158: 148: 139: 120: 88: 81: 74: 56: 42: 333: 332: 328: 327: 326: 324: 323: 322: 308: 307: 298: 190: 185: 162: 154: 129: 106: 100: 92: 60:Manual of Style 52: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 331: 329: 321: 320: 310: 309: 294: 287: 286: 279: 272: 269: 266: 265: 264: 258: 255: 252: 249: 246: 243: 239: 238: 234: 233: 230: 227: 224: 216: 215: 211: 210: 203: 201: 176: 175: 166: 156: 155: 153: 99: 94: 93: 91: 90: 83: 76: 68: 65: 64: 63: 62: 57: 47: 46: 40: 39: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 330: 319: 316: 315: 313: 306: 305: 302: 301: 292: 291: 284: 280: 277: 273: 270: 267: 262: 261: 259: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 240: 237:General prose 236: 235: 231: 228: 225: 222: 218: 217: 213: 212: 208: 204: 202: 199: 198: 197: 196: 193: 188: 181: 174: 172: 167: 160: 159: 152: 147: 146: 142: 137: 133: 128: 127: 123: 118: 114: 110: 105: 104: 98: 97: 89: 84: 82: 77: 75: 70: 69: 67: 66: 61: 58: 55: 54:Copying check 51: 50: 49: 48: 43: 38: 37: 33: 32: 29: 26: 19: 299:Lee Vilenski 296: 293: 288: 283:WP:REDLINKed 221:WP:SEAOFBLUE 182: 179: 168: 144: 140: 126:Article talk 125: 121: 102: 35: 27: 276:WP:FANCRUFT 171:peer review 113:visual edit 186:Jalen Folf 28:Monstercat 207:JalenFolf 312:Category 183:Thanks, 136:history 117:history 103:Article 45:Toolbox 191:(talk) 169:This 145:Watch 16:< 214:Lede 132:edit 109:edit 205:Hi 314:: 149:• 134:| 115:| 111:| 285:. 141:· 138:) 130:( 122:· 119:) 107:( 87:e 80:t 73:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Monstercat
Previous peer review
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
peer review
Jalen Folf
(talk)
06:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
JalenFolf
WP:SEAOFBLUE
WP:FANCRUFT
WP:REDLINKed

Lee Vilenski
21:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Category
March 2020 peer reviews

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.