2073:"As per her contract with Big Machine, Swift released six studio albums under the label from 2006 to 2017. In late 2018, the contract with the label expired; she hence withdrew from Big Machine and signed a new recording deal with Republic Records" Why "hence"? As opposed to 'then' for example. Or why say anything? She didn't withdraw, her contract had ended; move on to say that a new one was signed. And is it known more precisely went her BM contract ended? This caught my eye while answering the "split off query", but if there is similar imprecise language it would probably be best to address it prior to FAC.
154:
1828:
2588:
1505:
Apologies for intruding on this discussion. DMT Biscuit is asking whether or not
Idolator would be considered a high-quality source that would be appropriate for a featured article. I have seen doubts about Idolator in particular being a high quality source. I would honestly recommend that you remove
1019:
From my understanding, it is encouraged to only use audio samples that are representative of the album as a whole or say something about the album. The captions for the "I Knew You Were
Trouble" and "All Too Well" samples clearly explain that, but I do not see a strong enough rationale for the "Begin
755:
I wasn't aware of this discussion here, but legacy and impact have different meanings despite the similarity. I recently added info on the album's impact on female country singers, hence I added the word "impact" to the subtitle to better cover the scope of the section. You can remove it if you want,
795:
I understand that the two words have different meanings, but I do not think they are distinct enough to the point that both are entirely necessary in a section title. I am in agreement with TheSandDoctor that the album's impact on other singers is part of the album's overall legacy. That is just my
527:
is mentioned in the prose for the "Lyrics and themes" subsection, but only the website is named in the prose and not
Gallucci. It seems odd to wait to identify Gallucci until the "Critical reception" section. This is quite common in the article. The author's name is first mentioned in the "Critical
1901:
I wish I knew the answer to that one and was considering it myself. I was admittedly surprised when it was merged, as I figured it could stand on its own two feet already (pre-merged form). I wonder if it should be treated differently or the same. Perhaps the FAC coordinators may know if we ping?
341:
I would look at recent album FAs to see how they write their audio samples. Whenever I have trouble with this stuff, I always go to recent FAs on similar subjects to see what other editors have done. I would go with recent FAs (i.e. within the last year) to insure that you are doing it in the way
1124:
The "Songs" subsection is quite lengthy. This is a very well-known album so I am not surprised that all the songs have received so much discussion from critics, but a part of me thinks that it is too lengthy and would benefit from being condensed down, especially for songs that have independent
402:
Here are some quick comments. I have only read through the lead so far so almost all of my comments are focused on that, except for the last point which is about one of the audio samples. I hope this is helpful and apologies in advance for doing this review with a more piecemeal approach.
2254:
applies here a bit, because nothing but the cover, the title and the release date has been revealed yet. I think that either keeping the section on this page or moving the section to its own page in draftspace would be a good idea until more is known about the album.
1055:
I am still not sure. It is a little better. I think it would actually be better to look to Perone's comment on the song (i.e. that while the album explores different genres, it closes with a country song). The current caption is rather vague. This part,
856:
but that's a big article already. The sources talk about Swift's country-to-pop transistion (which happened with RED) and how it affected female country artists after her. Hence, I included it in RED's article where it would be most appropriate.
528:
reception" section even though their articles are brought up in the prose in an early section with only the website name mentioned. I would think it would better to attribute the author when you first incorporate the citation into the prose.
939:
For citation 155, I do not think a majority of the quote is necessary. The parts about Lauren Alaina's opinion of Cole
Swindell's song "Break Up in the End" should be removed entirely as it does not relate to this article at all.
996:
Do you think that we can collapse some of these resolved points again? I am fine if that makes the bullets out of order as they are independent and don't really matter chronologically (plus timestamps in sigs would preserve it).
901:. Adding a sentence on this to Swift probably isn't a concern, but here it doesn't really fit per the above, especially in a wouldbe FA (if I can get these points ironed out, I could see it nominated within the week). --
318:
I’ve addressed one of the two issues here & just have the “respect for commercial” one left. I’ll have to look for other examples on how to fill that field out. If you have any ideas or examples, please do share.
1973:
If, at the moment, something is part of an article, it gets assessed for FAC just like any other part. If, hypothetically, we all know that next month it will be spun of into a separate article does not effect
1550:
states (for
Idolator) that "there is consensus that Idolator is generally reliable for popular music. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes due weight before citing it in an article."
681:
I have a question about the "Impact and legacy" section title. Is it necessary to include both impact and legacy? It seems a little overkill to me since both words can be used rather interchangeably.
2804:? Just a heads up, in the FA nomination, some editors may call for this section to feature less of "A said this", "B said this". Only speaking from experience as it has happened to me before.
234:
I think naming the album on the second instance would be somewhat awkward. This may be a case where the word just has to be repeated. I cannot think of a good fix for this right now either.
1060:, could really mean anything and it would better to use the caption to talk about something with the song's sound as that is the point of having an audio sample in the first place.
1977:
A debate as to whether something should be in an article right now - as opposed to a different article or a new one - is a different issue and not, I gather, what is being queried.
2685:
When listing the songs and genres, is there a reason the citations come after "Sad
Beautiful Tragic" and not "Begin Again"? Instead of "identical", could "reminiscent" be used?
1751:
I've already been sceptical of the "fall classic" note, moreso that I see it's cited to a student newspaper. A student newspaper is pushing it at GA, certainly not FA standard.
208:
The album's title refers to what Swift described as the tumultuous "red" emotions that were evoked from the unhealthy romance she was experiencing during the album's conception.
1322:"The first half of Red consists of back-and-forth country and pop songs sandwiched in-between each other" → The first half of Red consists of country and pop songs intertwined
1020:
Again" sample, as the audio sample is more so about the song and not about the album. I would either strengthen the caption to more clearly defend its inclusion or delete it.
1785:
I unfortunately don't own the album's iteration and was planning on waiting for the new one. We could reliably cite it regardless though probably. Do you have a copy? --
126:
1799:
No. A cursory glance on
Discogs' digital scans was far from forthcoming. But waiting for the new iteration is perhaps the best idea, in the long run. We'll see at FAC.
1583:
Thank you for the clarification. I have seen an editor who did not think
Idolator was a high-quality source so I would be ready to defend it in a FAC if necessary.
1506:
it since it is only used once in the article to reference the album's placement on year-end lists that already is well-supported supported by other publications.
122:
2717:
Could you add "previously written about" or specify that it was not a theme in her previously released music? It's possible she had privately written about it.
2203:
This section came on me out of the blue like an unlisted bonus track on a CD. Fearless (Taylor's
Version) has its own page, so maybe this should have one too?
2095:
that was indeed a weird wording. I’ve changed that whole “withdrew” bit to “she subsequently signed a new recording deal with
Republic Records”. Good catch. —
107:
312:
76:
1891:
Considering it's likely to be split off, following its release. How do you think this section should be handled in the context of GA/FA? Genuine inquiry.
281:
as a fall classic so I do not think this is notable enough to include in the lead and it actually gives undue weight to this critic. Also, both links in
1345:"all of which were produced by Swedish pop producers Max Martin and Shellback" - So close to its first mention seems redundant. Could be come a note.
99:
1712:
1931:
817:
I was just looking through the supporting refs for the new addition...none of them (exception: I can't vew thetimes) explicitly mention Red? --
2434:
I think the final sentence of the lead about the re-recording is a little too brief, however. Could it follow more of the description seen at
258:, I do not think "genre-blending" is necessary since later on in the same sentence, it already goes into more detail on how it blends genres.
2246:, in its current state, is not notable. It does not have significant coverage in reliable sources for it to have its own article, similar to
1095:
Thank you for your patience with this. It looks much better to me as it more clearly identifies how the sample is being used in the article.
1943:
Would one of the coordinators be willing to comment on this point? I agree that it is an interesting question and is one I have as well. --
2431:
Well done with the lead. Reading this article for the first time, I now have a clear understanding of the topics covered in the article.
2758:
Since there was no objection to it being cited to critics in the body beside the file, I copied the same convention over. Now reads
1452:
1911:
2807:
Those are pretty much all of my major comments. I'll be happy to pop in again once the article is nominated for a FA. Well done!
2831:
1041:
That's a good point. What are your thoughts on it now that I've expanded it a bit? Happy to work further on it or remove it. --
69:
2695:
Not every ref discusses every song. Only 23 (shows as 26 for me) actually talks about "Begin Again" at all. Identical-: -->
1257:
2435:
115:
2341:
I appreciate you taking the time to review this. Could you please clarify the point above about winning awards though? --
2187:
Resolved. It wasn't referenced as it was a merge from a standalone article and referenced in the following paragraphs. --
308:
2214:
44:
2816:
2775:
2753:
2729:
2705:
2678:
2655:
2628:
2601:
2574:
2552:
2527:
2506:
2450:
2396:
2378:
2350:
2326:
2307:
2282:
2261:
2226:
2196:
2173:
2147:
2104:
2082:
2047:
2018:
1989:
1952:
1925:
1859:
1841:
1808:
1794:
1763:
1742:
1728:
1669:
1651:
1626:
1592:
1578:
1560:
1533:
1515:
1492:
1456:
1432:
1395:
1376:
1357:
1338:
1304:
1290:
1269:
1232:
1213:
1194:
1175:
1134:
1104:
1090:
1069:
1050:
1029:
1006:
984:
970:
949:
910:
888:
866:
847:
826:
805:
790:
765:
743:
722:
708:
690:
669:
644:
622:
608:
594:
572:
558:
537:
512:
498:
484:
450:
434:
412:
390:
372:
351:
328:
300:
270:
243:
221:
183:
50:
2251:
2794:
Jon Dolan from Rolling Stone lauded Swift's autobiographical lyrics resulting in songs that linger on like "tattoos"
635:, so apologies in advance. I would avoid having "song" and "sings" in the same sentence as it is rather repetitive.
2131:"Critics are dubious about the genre that best describes the album" I don't think "dubious" is the right word here.
875:
or any of the album's songs, they do not belong in the article. The country-to-pop transition could be referencing
62:
2802:
lauded Swift's autobiographical lyrics which are depicted/represented/shown in songs that "linger on like tattoos"
2479:
could this "Background" be integrated into the next section as an introduction? Purely because it is quite small.
1824:
point is why I got confused above. It is typoed as "readability" instead of "reliability". Ah ha! I'm not insane
696:
1782:
Are you in possession of the liner notes? That's usually better than AllMusic, whose readability is contested.
472:
92:
2001:
That does answer it, thank you! That is what I figured it would boil down to, but figured I’d ask anyways. Cc
1711:
Insider is listed as no consensus in WP:RSP. I have no problem removing it from the article at this time, but
17:
2666:, "straight-up pop" is used ("straight-up" is an informal term). Could be changed to "pure pop" or similar?
2540:
1420:
657:
1440:
2078:
1985:
2143:
1921:
1855:
1804:
1738:
1665:
1574:
1529:
1448:
1300:
2065:
Ultimately, pretty good. Some tightening up and it should be FA ready. Ping me when it does go to FAC.
471:. These items should only be linked on the first instance in the article. If you want, you can use the
2641:
It will feature 30 of the songs that Swift originally wrote and expected to include on the 2012 album.
425:
Don’t worry about doing this piecemeal! I greatly appreciate you taking the time to give feedback. —-
2741:
585:, reads more like a positive review than an objective description of the song so I would remove it.
521:
I am a little confused on how citations are attributed in the prose. Michael Gallucci's article for
1383:"James E. Perone" - Since he is without further introduction, for the best, Perone should do fine.
1542:
I misread that as "readability" and got confused. Idolator is owned by the same company that owns
2767:
2721:
2697:
2670:
2647:
2620:
2593:
2544:
2513:
2498:
2442:
2388:
2373:
2342:
2321:
2299:
2274:
2233:
2218:
2188:
2165:
2096:
2039:
2010:
1944:
1903:
1833:
1786:
1755:
1720:
1643:
1618:
1552:
1484:
1424:
1387:
1368:
1349:
1330:
1282:
1261:
1224:
1205:
1186:
1167:
1082:
1042:
998:
962:
902:
839:
818:
782:
750:
735:
700:
661:
600:
550:
490:
426:
364:
320:
292:
262:
213:
175:
1733:
For what it's worth, if the consenus is render undecided I have no umbrage with it's inclusion.
1246:"'learn from them'" - I don't see why this is in quotes. It could be infered as editorializing.
206:
This is super nitpick-y, but would it be possible to avoid repeating "album" in this sentence:
2090:
2074:
1996:
1981:
1937:
1201:"and dubbed Red a fall classic" - This seems trivial, best reserved for the folly of forums.
212:
Would “Red’s conception” be acceptable? Otherwise will have to give this some more thought. —
2812:
2749:
2570:
2523:
2159:
2139:
2038:
That's a good catch. Was referenced in prose but missed in the note. I've corrected that. --
2004:
1939:
1917:
1896:
1851:
1815:
1800:
1734:
1706:
1661:
1637:
1604:
1588:
1570:
1525:
1511:
1478:
1444:
1414:
1296:
1276:
1251:
1130:
1100:
1065:
1025:
980:
945:
884:
862:
801:
761:
718:
686:
640:
618:
590:
568:
533:
508:
480:
446:
408:
386:
347:
239:
1547:
2257:
1601:
Makes sense. I'm glad that we were able to clear this up. Thank you for bringing this up,
161:
2475:. Is there any way to include a lead-in of sorts at the end to transition the sections?
2217:. I don't really think it has a place here and that it should be put back how it was. --
2825:
2384:
2368:
2336:
2316:
2266:
2237:
2208:
1935:
1163:"genre-blending" - A little bit fancruffy, its eclectic mix is expressed either way.
523:
463:
853:
2808:
2763:
2745:
2690:
2566:
2534:
2519:
2484:
1941:
1702:
1612:
1584:
1507:
1126:
1096:
1076:
1061:
1036:
1021:
991:
976:
956:
941:
898:
894:
880:
858:
833:
812:
797:
776:
772:
757:
729:
714:
682:
651:
636:
614:
586:
564:
544:
529:
504:
476:
442:
420:
404:
382:
358:
343:
235:
171:
I would like to take this article to FA and would like some peer review of it.
1617:. DMT -- do you think that we could collapse some of these resolved points? --
1220:"2010s decade" - 2010s, or decade? Either/or is fine but together is clunky.
781:
You could say that its impact on the artists is part of its legacy though. --
1847:
441:
Thank you for addressing everything so far! I am just glad that I can help.
2619:
We don't know if any of them were included as no track names are given. --
468:
285:
1125:
articles. I would be curious to hear other editors' opinions on this.
2637:
It will feature all 30 songs that were meant to be on the 2012 album.
2367:
received any awards, but I somehow overlooked the Accolades section.
282:
2242:
I performed the merger, so I can explain. The short version is that
2184:
The first paragraph of the Red (Taylor's Version) is unreferenced.
1182:"lyrical prowess" - Akin to above, maybe just change it to lyrics.
315:
sample is incomplete. There should not be any instances of "n.a.".
2789:
Thanks for making all of those adjustments, they are reading well.
148:
461:
There are a few duplicate links in the article. Examples are
756:
but I think the current title better covers it all. Thanks.
256:
The final product was a genre-blending album that combines
879:, which was Swift's first album marketed as a pop album.
2273:
This point is now moot as it has been spun off again. --
2156:
I agree. Changed to "conflicted". That was a good idea,
1058:
The track brings the album to a symbolic thematic close.
2616:? That would be very interesting to include, if known.
141:
134:
103:
2213:
Same here. It was merged after a brief discussion at
2612:, do we know if any of those songs were included on
2035:
Any reason as to why note 7 doesn't have citations?
1846:Ah, sorry. Partly muscle memory, partly talk page
1660:Sure; consider any resolved points null and void.
2715:Hints of sex, a theme Swift had not written about
2610:By October 2011, she had written around 25 songs.
381:Looks good to me. Thank you for addressing this.
277:From what I can see, only critic has described
1260:, those are her literal words from a quote. --
2250:when it first started out. I also think that
871:If the citations do not specifically mention
70:
8:
2115:Article looks in good shape. Some comments.
631:I have a very nitpick-y note for this part,
1825:
313:File:Taylor Swift - All Too Well sample.ogg
2418:
2118:
1878:
1715:a much narrower RfC with hopes of getting
1145:
193:
77:
63:
32:
656:Better or do you think more needs doing?
475:to identify duplicate links more easily.
2489:Good point. Borrowed some material from
1364:"erupting" → "dynamic", less fancruffy.
1409:"genre-spanning" - see first instance.
1081:Played with it a bit more. Thoughts? --
342:that is deemed the best for right now.
288:seem excessive so I would remove them.
35:
2797:
2793:
2759:
2737:
2714:
2640:
2636:
2609:
2310:; clarified 18:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
2215:Talk:Red (Taylor's Version)#Notability
1057:
632:
583:which builds up for a climactic finale
582:
255:
207:
2738:Swift's most radical sonic innovation
2383:Thank you for confirming/clarifying,
1916:It should certainly be brought up :)
7:
2585:
2582:is an excellent section, well done.
1473:High-quality realibity of Idolator?
2471:, but it feels quite detached from
1697:High-quality realibity of Insider?
1719:consensus for future reference. --
1642:Ping failed above so repinging. --
24:
2363:All I wanted to know was whether
961:Shortened. How does that look? --
2586:
1980:Does that address the question?
1826:
152:
2635:For the lead, could you change
2441:Modified slightly. Thoughts? --
2298:Which one? What do you mean? --
1820:That makes far more sense now.
261:Removed and reworked in lead. —
2295:Did the album win any awards?
2138:Perhaps conflicted is better.
1:
2436:Fearless (Taylor Swift album)
2497:. How does that look now? --
852:I wanted to include them in
2696:reminiscent switch made. --
2248:Fearless (Taylor's Version)
734:Why did you revert this? --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
2848:
2397:17:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
2379:18:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
2351:14:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
2283:14:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
2197:18:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1860:18:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1842:18:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1329:Good idea. Implemented. --
1105:17:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1091:17:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
911:02:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
889:22:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
2817:07:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
2776:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2760:Regarded by critics as...
2754:09:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2730:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2706:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2679:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2656:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2629:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2602:16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2575:06:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2553:03:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
2528:07:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2507:07:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2451:07:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2327:00:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
2308:00:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
2262:21:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
2227:00:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
2174:19:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
2148:19:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
2105:15:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
2083:14:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
2048:13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
2019:15:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1990:14:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1953:14:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1926:13:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1912:13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1809:13:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1795:13:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1764:02:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1743:19:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1729:14:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1670:19:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1652:19:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1627:19:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1593:17:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1579:14:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1561:14:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1534:09:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1516:04:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1493:02:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1457:13:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1433:13:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1396:13:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1377:13:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1358:13:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1339:13:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1305:19:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1291:19:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1270:13:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1233:02:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1214:02:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1195:02:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1176:02:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1135:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1070:19:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1051:19:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1030:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
1007:19:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
985:18:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
971:15:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
950:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
867:17:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
848:17:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
827:18:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
806:18:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
791:18:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
766:17:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
744:16:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
723:18:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
709:15:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
697:1989 (Taylor Swift album)
691:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
670:19:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
645:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
623:16:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
609:21:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
595:21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
573:18:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
559:16:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
538:05:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
513:16:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
499:21:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
485:05:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
473:duplinks-alt sidebar tool
451:21:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
435:21:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
413:21:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
391:02:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
373:01:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
352:21:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
329:21:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
301:21:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
271:21:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
244:21:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
222:21:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
184:01:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
2792:For Critical reception,
2580:Recording and production
2518:Both look a lot better!
1873:
1483:I don't quite follow? --
633:In the song, Swift sings
549:How does it look now? --
28:Red (Taylor Swift album)
1421:Special:Diff/1034370026
658:Special:Diff/1034951816
311:rationale" box for the
2832:July 2021 peer reviews
2762:. How does that look,
2463:is a great summary of
2244:Red (Taylor's Version)
1874:Red (Taylor's Version)
1524:I concur with Aoba47.
2740:sounds slightly like
893:I have to agree with
164:discussion is closed.
2414:Comments from SatDis
2111:Comments by Hawkeye7
1419:How does this look?
796:perspective though.
307:The "Media data and
2736:In the media file,
363:How's that look? --
2639:to something like
1404:Critical reception
975:Looks good to me.
695:Retitled to match
563:Looks good to me.
291:Removed in lead. —
198:Addressed comments
189:Comments by Aoba47
2785:
2784:
2410:
2409:
2270:
2252:WP:TENPOUNDHAMMER
2057:
2056:
1773:
1772:
1692:Impact and Legacy
1443:comment added by
1326:with each other.
1120:
1119:
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
2839:
2773:
2770:
2727:
2724:
2703:
2700:
2694:
2676:
2673:
2653:
2650:
2626:
2623:
2599:
2596:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2550:
2547:
2538:
2517:
2504:
2501:
2488:
2448:
2445:
2419:
2394:
2391:
2376:
2371:
2348:
2345:
2340:
2324:
2319:
2305:
2302:
2280:
2277:
2264:
2260:
2241:
2224:
2221:
2212:
2194:
2191:
2171:
2168:
2163:
2119:
2102:
2099:
2094:
2045:
2042:
2016:
2013:
2008:
2000:
1950:
1947:
1932:FAC coordinators
1909:
1906:
1900:
1879:
1839:
1836:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1819:
1792:
1789:
1761:
1758:
1726:
1723:
1710:
1649:
1646:
1641:
1624:
1621:
1616:
1608:
1558:
1555:
1490:
1487:
1482:
1459:
1430:
1427:
1418:
1393:
1390:
1374:
1371:
1355:
1352:
1336:
1333:
1288:
1285:
1280:
1267:
1264:
1255:
1230:
1227:
1211:
1208:
1192:
1189:
1173:
1170:
1146:
1088:
1085:
1080:
1048:
1045:
1040:
1004:
1001:
995:
968:
965:
960:
908:
905:
845:
842:
837:
824:
821:
816:
788:
785:
780:
754:
741:
738:
733:
706:
703:
667:
664:
655:
606:
603:
556:
553:
548:
496:
493:
432:
429:
424:
370:
367:
362:
326:
323:
298:
295:
268:
265:
219:
216:
194:
181:
178:
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
2847:
2846:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2822:
2821:
2798:Jon Dolan from
2786:
2771:
2768:
2725:
2722:
2701:
2698:
2688:
2674:
2671:
2651:
2648:
2624:
2621:
2597:
2594:
2587:
2548:
2545:
2532:
2511:
2502:
2499:
2482:
2446:
2443:
2424:
2416:
2411:
2392:
2389:
2374:
2369:
2346:
2343:
2334:
2322:
2317:
2303:
2300:
2278:
2275:
2256:
2231:
2222:
2219:
2206:
2192:
2189:
2169:
2166:
2157:
2124:
2113:
2100:
2097:
2088:
2071:
2063:
2058:
2043:
2040:
2014:
2011:
2002:
1994:
1948:
1945:
1907:
1904:
1894:
1884:
1883:Resolved points
1876:
1837:
1834:
1827:
1813:
1790:
1787:
1779:
1774:
1759:
1756:
1724:
1721:
1700:
1694:
1647:
1644:
1635:
1622:
1619:
1610:
1602:
1556:
1553:
1488:
1485:
1476:
1470:
1438:
1428:
1425:
1412:
1406:
1391:
1388:
1372:
1369:
1353:
1350:
1334:
1331:
1319:
1286:
1283:
1274:
1265:
1262:
1249:
1243:
1228:
1225:
1209:
1206:
1190:
1187:
1171:
1168:
1160:
1151:
1150:Resolved points
1143:
1121:
1086:
1083:
1074:
1046:
1043:
1034:
1002:
999:
989:
966:
963:
954:
906:
903:
843:
840:
831:
822:
819:
810:
786:
783:
770:
748:
739:
736:
727:
704:
701:
665:
662:
649:
604:
601:
554:
551:
542:
494:
491:
430:
427:
418:
368:
365:
356:
324:
321:
296:
293:
266:
263:
254:For this part,
217:
214:
199:
191:
179:
176:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2845:
2843:
2835:
2834:
2824:
2823:
2820:
2819:
2805:
2790:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2682:
2681:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2608:Where it says
2606:
2605:
2604:
2577:
2565:More to come.
2562:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2493:as it covered
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2426:
2425:
2422:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2151:
2150:
2133:
2132:
2126:
2125:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2070:
2069:Drive by query
2067:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
1978:
1975:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1886:
1885:
1882:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1778:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1655:
1654:
1630:
1629:
1596:
1595:
1581:
1564:
1563:
1537:
1536:
1519:
1518:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1469:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
677:
675:
674:
673:
672:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
376:
375:
354:
334:
333:
332:
331:
305:
304:
303:
275:
274:
273:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
227:
226:
225:
224:
201:
200:
197:
192:
190:
187:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2844:
2833:
2830:
2829:
2827:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2800:Rolling Stone
2795:
2791:
2788:
2787:
2777:
2774:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2728:
2719:
2718:
2716:
2713:
2707:
2704:
2692:
2687:
2686:
2684:
2683:
2680:
2677:
2668:
2667:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2654:
2645:
2644:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2627:
2618:
2617:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2600:
2584:
2583:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2563:
2554:
2551:
2542:
2536:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2515:
2514:TheSandDoctor
2510:
2509:
2508:
2505:
2496:
2492:
2486:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2452:
2449:
2440:
2439:
2437:
2433:
2432:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2421:
2420:
2413:
2398:
2395:
2386:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2377:
2372:
2366:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2352:
2349:
2338:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2320:
2309:
2306:
2297:
2296:
2294:
2293:
2284:
2281:
2272:
2271:
2268:
2263:
2259:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2239:
2235:
2234:TheSandDoctor
2230:
2229:
2228:
2225:
2216:
2210:
2205:
2204:
2202:
2198:
2195:
2186:
2185:
2183:
2182:
2175:
2172:
2161:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2121:
2120:
2116:
2110:
2106:
2103:
2092:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2068:
2066:
2060:
2049:
2046:
2037:
2036:
2034:
2033:
2020:
2017:
2006:
1998:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1954:
1951:
1942:
1940:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1910:
1898:
1893:
1892:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1880:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1840:
1823:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1793:
1784:
1783:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1765:
1762:
1753:
1752:
1750:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1727:
1718:
1714:
1708:
1704:
1699:
1698:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1639:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1628:
1625:
1614:
1606:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1569:Cool, great.
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1491:
1480:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1422:
1416:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1397:
1394:
1385:
1384:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1337:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1289:
1278:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1259:
1253:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1234:
1231:
1222:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1212:
1203:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1193:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1148:
1147:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1008:
1005:
993:
988:
987:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
972:
969:
958:
953:
952:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
912:
909:
900:
897:on this one,
896:
892:
891:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
864:
860:
855:
851:
850:
849:
846:
835:
830:
829:
828:
825:
814:
809:
808:
807:
803:
799:
794:
793:
792:
789:
778:
774:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
752:
751:TheSandDoctor
747:
746:
745:
742:
731:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
711:
710:
707:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:
678:
671:
668:
659:
653:
648:
647:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
624:
620:
616:
612:
611:
610:
607:
598:
597:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
560:
557:
546:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
526:
525:
524:The A.V. Club
520:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
500:
497:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:The A.V. Club
460:
459:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
371:
360:
355:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
330:
327:
317:
316:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
290:
289:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
260:
259:
257:
253:
252:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
223:
220:
211:
210:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
196:
195:
188:
186:
185:
182:
172:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
2799:
2663:
2613:
2579:
2494:
2490:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2364:
2315:
2247:
2243:
2114:
2091:Gog the Mild
2075:Gog the Mild
2072:
2064:
1997:Gog the Mild
1982:Gog the Mild
1821:
1716:
1713:have started
1543:
1439:— Preceding
1323:
876:
872:
854:Taylor Swift
676:
522:
462:
401:
309:Non-free use
278:
173:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
2664:Composition
2258:D🐶ggy54321
2160:DMT Biscuit
2140:DMT biscuit
2005:DMT biscuit
1918:DMT biscuit
1897:DMT Biscuit
1852:DMT Biscuit
1816:DMT Biscuit
1801:DMT biscuit
1754:Removed. --
1735:DMT biscuit
1707:DMT Biscuit
1662:DMT biscuit
1638:DMT Biscuit
1605:DMT biscuit
1571:DMT biscuit
1526:DMT biscuit
1479:DMT Biscuit
1445:DMT Biscuit
1437:Yep, fine.
1415:DMT Biscuit
1297:DMT biscuit
1295:Yep, cool.
1277:DMT Biscuit
1256:Looking at
1252:DMT Biscuit
1204:Removed. --
1141:DMT Biscuit
713:Thank you.
613:Thank you.
599:Removed. --
581:This part,
503:Thank you.
162:peer review
104:visual edit
2796:change to
2772:SandDoctor
2742:WP:PUFFERY
2726:SandDoctor
2702:SandDoctor
2675:SandDoctor
2652:SandDoctor
2625:SandDoctor
2598:SandDoctor
2549:SandDoctor
2503:SandDoctor
2461:Background
2447:SandDoctor
2393:SandDoctor
2347:SandDoctor
2304:SandDoctor
2279:SandDoctor
2223:SandDoctor
2193:SandDoctor
2170:SandDoctor
2101:SandDoctor
2061:Conclusion
2044:SandDoctor
2015:SandDoctor
1949:SandDoctor
1908:SandDoctor
1838:SandDoctor
1791:SandDoctor
1760:SandDoctor
1725:SandDoctor
1648:SandDoctor
1623:SandDoctor
1557:SandDoctor
1489:SandDoctor
1429:SandDoctor
1392:SandDoctor
1373:SandDoctor
1354:SandDoctor
1335:SandDoctor
1287:SandDoctor
1266:SandDoctor
1258:the source
1241:Background
1229:SandDoctor
1210:SandDoctor
1191:SandDoctor
1172:SandDoctor
1087:SandDoctor
1047:SandDoctor
1003:SandDoctor
967:SandDoctor
907:SandDoctor
844:SandDoctor
823:SandDoctor
787:SandDoctor
740:SandDoctor
705:SandDoctor
666:SandDoctor
605:SandDoctor
555:SandDoctor
495:SandDoctor
431:SandDoctor
369:SandDoctor
325:SandDoctor
297:SandDoctor
267:SandDoctor
218:SandDoctor
180:SandDoctor
2465:Speak Now
2375:(discuss)
2323:(discuss)
2269:on reply)
1848:solipsism
1777:Personnel
1468:Accolades
2826:Category
2720:Done. --
2669:Done. --
2646:Done. --
2541:reverted
2469:Fearless
2459:I think
2423:Resolved
2385:Hawkeye7
2370:Hawkeye7
2337:Hawkeye7
2318:Hawkeye7
2265:(please
2238:Hawkeye7
2209:Hawkeye7
2123:Resolved
1453:contribs
1441:unsigned
1386:Done. --
1367:Done. --
1348:Done. --
1223:Done. --
1185:Done. --
1166:Done. --
489:Done. --
469:AllMusic
174:Thanks,
1324:between
1317:M&L
286:classic
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
2809:SatDis
2764:SatDis
2746:SatDis
2691:SatDis
2567:SatDis
2535:SatDis
2520:SatDis
2485:SatDis
1703:Aoba47
1613:Aoba47
1585:Aoba47
1548:WP:RSP
1508:Aoba47
1127:Aoba47
1097:Aoba47
1077:Aoba47
1062:Aoba47
1037:Aoba47
1022:Aoba47
992:Aoba47
977:Aoba47
957:Aoba47
942:Aoba47
899:BawinV
895:Aoba47
881:Aoba47
859:BawinV
834:BawinV
813:BawinV
798:Aoba47
777:BawinV
773:Aoba47
758:BawinV
730:BawinV
715:Aoba47
683:Aoba47
652:Aoba47
637:Aoba47
615:Aoba47
587:Aoba47
565:Aoba47
545:Aoba47
530:Aoba47
505:Aoba47
477:Aoba47
443:Aoba47
421:Aoba47
405:Aoba47
383:Aoba47
359:Aoba47
344:Aoba47
236:Aoba47
2477:Or...
1974:this.
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
2813:talk
2766:? --
2750:talk
2571:talk
2543:. --
2539:Was
2524:talk
2491:1989
2467:and
2387:! --
2267:ping
2236:and
2164:! --
2144:talk
2079:talk
1986:talk
1922:talk
1856:talk
1822:This
1805:talk
1739:talk
1717:some
1705:and
1666:talk
1609:and
1589:talk
1575:talk
1544:Spin
1530:talk
1512:talk
1449:talk
1301:talk
1281:^ --
1158:Lead
1131:talk
1101:talk
1066:talk
1026:talk
981:talk
946:talk
885:talk
877:1989
863:talk
838:^ --
802:talk
775:and
762:talk
719:talk
687:talk
660:. --
641:talk
619:talk
591:talk
569:talk
534:talk
509:talk
481:talk
467:and
447:talk
409:talk
387:talk
348:talk
283:fall
240:talk
123:edit
100:edit
2769:The
2723:The
2699:The
2672:The
2662:In
2649:The
2622:The
2614:Red
2595:The
2546:The
2500:The
2495:Red
2473:Red
2444:The
2390:The
2365:Red
2344:The
2301:The
2276:The
2220:The
2190:The
2167:The
2098:The
2041:The
2012:The
1946:The
1905:The
1835:The
1788:The
1757:The
1722:The
1645:The
1620:The
1554:The
1486:The
1426:The
1389:The
1370:The
1351:The
1332:The
1284:The
1263:The
1226:The
1207:The
1188:The
1169:The
1084:The
1044:The
1000:The
964:The
904:The
873:Red
841:The
820:The
784:The
737:The
702:The
663:The
602:The
552:The
492:The
428:The
366:The
322:The
294:The
279:Red
264:The
215:The
177:The
2828::
2815:)
2752:)
2744:.
2643:?
2592:--
2573:)
2526:)
2438:?
2146:)
2081:)
1988:)
1934::
1924:)
1902:--
1858:)
1850:.
1832:--
1807:)
1741:)
1668:)
1591:)
1577:)
1551:--
1546:.
1532:)
1514:)
1455:)
1451:•
1423:--
1303:)
1133:)
1103:)
1068:)
1028:)
997:--
983:)
948:)
887:)
865:)
804:)
764:)
721:)
699:--
689:)
643:)
621:)
593:)
571:)
536:)
511:)
483:)
449:)
411:)
389:)
350:)
242:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
2811:(
2748:(
2693::
2689:@
2569:(
2537::
2533:@
2522:(
2516::
2512:@
2487::
2483:@
2339::
2335:@
2240::
2232:@
2211::
2207:@
2162::
2158:@
2142:(
2093::
2089:@
2077:(
2009:—
2007::
2003:@
1999::
1995:@
1984:(
1930:@
1920:(
1899::
1895:@
1854:(
1818::
1814:@
1803:(
1737:(
1709::
1701:@
1664:(
1640::
1636:@
1615::
1611:@
1607::
1603:@
1587:(
1573:(
1528:(
1510:(
1481::
1477:@
1447:(
1417::
1413:@
1299:(
1279::
1275:@
1254::
1250:@
1129:(
1099:(
1079::
1075:@
1064:(
1039::
1035:@
1024:(
994::
990:@
979:(
959::
955:@
944:(
883:(
861:(
836::
832:@
815::
811:@
800:(
779::
771:@
760:(
753::
749:@
732::
728:@
717:(
685:(
654::
650:@
639:(
617:(
589:(
567:(
547::
543:@
532:(
507:(
479:(
445:(
423::
419:@
407:(
385:(
361::
357:@
346:(
319:—
238:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.