58:
21:
96:
true, no one knows how we got there. It makes it difficult for editors to check if a questionable claim may have some truth to it, and may cause contentious debate over inclusion of that claim, when a source cite could have solved the matter easily. It makes it difficult for those who may wish to do
185:
processes. Similarly, the fact that an article's sources are inadequate to verify all that it contains should not be addressed using this process. As long as a cited source is relevant to the article's subject, it prevents deletion by this means. This proposal does not prevent handling of articles
176:
The fact that a cited source is of questionable reliability does not allow deletion through this process. If an editor believes that an article should be deleted because the only sources available are questionable, that should be handled through the
130:
Before tagging an article for deletion using this method, an editor should make reasonable (though not necessarily heroic) efforts to look for usable source material. If a source is found, the editor should cite those sources rather than requesting
168:. Should the article remain unsourced for fourteen days, it may be deleted by any administrator. If and only if any editor cites a relevant source, (s)he may remove the template without discussion or debate, and it may not be added again.
39:
92:
and articles about existing organizations, the lack of sourcing causes several other significant issues. It impacts
Knowledge (XXG)'s credibility, as even if the information in an article
97:
further expansion of the article to expand the article using sources. It encourages editors to insert their own opinions or synthesis into articles in violation of our
66:
Lack of sourcing in
Knowledge (XXG) articles is a significant problem. Articles which are introduced without citing any sources whatsoever should be sourced or removed.
209:
Supports at least some of the article's content or, at minimum, verifies the existence of the article's subject. Other
Knowledge (XXG) articles are not sources.
194:
this proposal gains consensus may be deleted using this method, only those articles which are created after consensus to implement this policy is reached.
236:
121:. Like those, it is not a nicety before a featured article nomination, but a requirement from the very first edit that creates a new article.
43:
28:
133:
At the very least, Google searches with reasonable keywords should be performed, and any possible sources of verification examined. The
76:
states that unsourced material may be challenged or removed by any editor. It is a logical extension of this core policy that unsourced
165:
105:
material to be sourced. In order to change this "sourcing is optional" mindset and ensure that articles on
Knowledge (XXG) comply with
154:
which is relevant to the article's content. If a new article does not cite at least one such source, it should be tagged with the
88:
Unsourced articles are currently a significant problem on
Knowledge (XXG). In addition to raising legal concerns in areas such as
38:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
221:
To be developed if this proposal gains consensus or appears likely to do so, should be discussed as part of this proposal.
143:
template may be useful in this regard. Only if this step fails should an editor begin the deletion process.
158:
35:
137:
190:
process if an article meets any of the criteria for speedy deletion. No articles which were created
182:
114:
187:
178:
118:
98:
89:
151:
147:
106:
73:
230:
80:
may also be challenged and, if no sources whatsoever can be provided, removed.
146:
All new articles created on
Knowledge (XXG) must comply with the
52:
15:
101:
policy, as without cited sources it's not clear that we
109:, it is necessary that we make clear sourcing is a
166:Category:Unsourced articles proposed for deletion
8:
217:
215:
202:
164:template. This will add the article to
7:
150:policy by citing, at minimum, one
14:
237:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
56:
19:
1:
90:biographies of living persons
125:Handling unsourced articles
253:
64:This page in a nutshell:
42:or initiate a thread at
179:articles for deletion
99:no original research
183:proposed deletion
70:
69:
51:
50:
244:
222:
219:
210:
207:
163:
157:
142:
136:
60:
59:
53:
44:the village pump
23:
22:
16:
252:
251:
247:
246:
245:
243:
242:
241:
227:
226:
225:
220:
213:
208:
204:
200:
188:speedy deletion
174:
161:
155:
152:reliable source
140:
134:
127:
86:
57:
47:
20:
12:
11:
5:
250:
248:
240:
239:
229:
228:
224:
223:
211:
201:
199:
196:
173:
170:
126:
123:
85:
82:
72:
68:
67:
61:
49:
48:
34:
33:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
249:
238:
235:
234:
232:
218:
216:
212:
206:
203:
197:
195:
193:
189:
184:
180:
171:
169:
167:
160:
153:
149:
148:verifiability
144:
139:
132:
124:
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
83:
81:
79:
75:
65:
62:
55:
54:
45:
41:
40:the talk page
37:
32:
30:
25:
18:
17:
205:
191:
186:through the
175:
159:sourcedelete
145:
129:
128:
113:, just like
110:
102:
93:
87:
77:
71:
63:
26:
172:Limitations
138:findsources
111:requirement
27:This is a
198:Footnotes
131:deletion.
84:Rationale
36:Consensus
31:proposal.
231:Category
78:articles
115:WP:NPOV
192:before
119:WP:NOR
103:expect
29:failed
117:and
107:WP:V
74:WP:V
181:or
233::
214:^
162:}}
156:{{
141:}}
135:{{
94:is
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.