505:
Indeed, addressing the potential underlying complexity, Marder suggests that "it's harder to describe it than it is to read it". He also calls it "an ecological romance ... a self-contained fairy tale about a group of beings who live in the center of their perfect world obsessed with maintaining its food chain", a self-described "really low concept!" Equally, he says, "the reader has to invest a certain amount of mental energy to follow the book", which includes "maps and a rather long glossary". Despite these potentially conflicting comments, Wiater and
Bissette reiterate that "there is no simpler or more iconographic comic book in existence".
175:, which can lead to examples like "Graphism is the study of ...". Extreme cases have seen fifteen or more footnotes after a single word, as an editor tries to strengthen their point or the overall notability of the subject with extra citations, in the hope that others will accept that reliable sources support it. Similar circumstances can also lead to overkill with legitimate sources, when existing sources have been repeatedly removed or disputed on spurious grounds or against consensus.
832:
492:, citations should be placed at the end of the passage that they support. If one source alone supports consecutive sentences in the same paragraph, one citation of it at the end of the final sentence is sufficient. It is not necessary to include a citation for each individual consecutive sentence, as this is overkill. This does not apply to lists or tables, nor does it apply when
149:
301:
42:
134:
866:
Sometimes it may also be possible to salvage sources from a citekill pileup by simply moving them to other places in the article. Sometimes, a source which has been stacked on top of another source may also support other content in the article that is presently unreferenced, or may support additional
333:
Example: A statement of where the person was born referenced to a source which only verifies that the named town exists; a statement about a charitable organization is sourced to a source that talks about the subject the organization is interested in, e.g., hunger or homelessness or art, but does not
847:
of sources. For example, if the six citations include two books, two journal articles, and two encyclopedia articles, the citations could be trimmed down to one citation from each type of source. Comprehensive works on a topic often include many of the same points. Not all such works on a topic need
308:
A common form of citation overkill is adding sources to an article without regard as to whether they support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic. This may boost the number of footnotes and create a superficial appearance of notability, which can obscure a lack of substantive, reliable,
906:
If there is a good reason to keep multiple citations, for example, to avoid perennial edit warring or because the sources offer a range of beneficial information, clutter may be avoided by merging the citations into a single footnote. This can be done by putting, inside the reference, bullet points
567:
tags at the end of each sentence. Doing so may benefit others adding material to that paragraph in the future. If that happens, they can uncomment the hidden citations and switch to citing references after every sentence. Having hidden citations could cause confusion, especially among inexperienced
855:
For many subjects, some sources are official or otherwise authoritative, while others are only interpretative, summarizing, or opinionated. If the authoritative sources are not controversial, they should generally be preferred. For example, a company's own website is probably authoritative for an
587:
This type of overkill should be resolved by merging all of the citations into a single one and stripping unhelpful repetitions – when possible, the retained citation should be the originator of the content rather than a reprinter or aggregator, but if this is not possible (e.g. some wire service
382:
Some people might try to rest notability on a handful of sources that do not contribute, while other people might try to build the pile of sources up into the dozens or even hundreds instead – so this type of citation overkill may require special attention. Either way, the principle is the same:
504:
In the first collected volume, Marder explains that his work is "about the affinity of life", wherein the characters "understand that ultimately they depend on each other for survival". Wiater and
Bissette see this relationship as a wider metaphor for the interdependency of the comics industry.
386:
Overloading an article with bad citations can backfire if the article is nominated for deletion. Participators may not want to look at all one hundred citations, and they may instead choose to look at just a smaller sample. If they find only unreliable sources or sources that do not discuss the
839:
If there are six citations on a point of information, and the first three are highly reputable sources (e.g., books published by university presses), and the last three citations are less reputable or less widely circulated (e.g., local newsletters), then trim out those less-reputable sources.
716:
that independently describe the conflicting viewpoints or data, with additional, less independent sources cited only where pertinent, for verification of more nuanced claims made about the views or facts as represented by the conflicting sources. Sources that are opinional in nature – op-eds,
584:– as if they constituted distinct citations. Such duplicated citations may be piled up as multiple references for the same fact or they may be split up as distinct footnotes for different pieces of content, so watching out for this type of overkill may sometimes require special attention.
168:, making articles look untidy in read mode and difficult to navigate in markup edit mode. If a page features citations that are mirror pages of others, or which simply parrot the other sources, they contribute nothing to the article's reliability and are detrimental to its readability.
3536:
434:
Elephants are large land mammals ... Elephants' teeth are very different from those of most other mammals. Unlike most mammals, which grow baby teeth and then replace them with a permanent set of adult teeth, elephants have cycles of tooth rotation throughout their entire lives.
1576:
765:
This is usually a short-term issue, and is often better handled by discussing the evidence on the talk page, if the additional citation does not really increase verifiability (e.g., because the original citation, with which the added one would be redundant, is to a clearly
2737:
2141:
851:
In some cases, such as articles related to technology or computing or other fields that are changing very rapidly, it may be desirable to have the sources be as up-to-date as possible. In these cases, a few of the older citations could be removed.
1606:
383:
Sources support notability based on what they say about the topic, not just the number of footnotes present. An article with just four or five really good sources is considered better referenced than an article that cites 500 bad ones.
3423:
2872:
231:
of the sources. Ironically, this serves as a red flag to experienced editors that the article needs scrutiny and that each citation needs to be verified carefully to ensure that it was really used to contribute to the article.
178:
Another common cause of citation overkill is simply that people want the source they've seen to be included in the article too, so they just tack it onto the end of existing content without making an effort to actually add any
3303:
2475:
743:, and our readers know how to use online search engines. In most cases, if a source would be somewhat or entirely redundant to cite for a particular fact, but has important additional information, it is better to use it to
2832:
792:
weak sources with more reliable ones, or to add material outlining the nature of a disagreement between reliable sources. How to approach this is best settled on a case-by-case basis on the article's talk page, with an
2641:
2236:
3676:
1943:
531:
He also calls it "an ecological romance ... a self-contained fairy tale about a group of beings who live in the center of their perfect world obsessed with maintaining its food chain", a self-described "really low
3616:
3363:
2984:
1621:
3686:
3428:
1288:
3952:
3947:
3238:
3741:
607:
A similar case is redundant citation of an article that got its information from an article we have already cited. An exception, to many scientific and technical editors, is when we cite a peer-reviewed
2041:
3726:
427:
Material that is repeated multiple times in an article does not require an inline citation for every mention. If you say an elephant is a mammal more than once, provide one only at the first instance.
797:
if necessary, especially if the alleged fact, topic, or source is controversial. Adding competing stacks of citations is not how to address WP content disputes or real-world lack of expert consensus.
3476:
2016:
2071:
1768:
708:
If the matter is the subject of real-world dispute in reliable sources, our readers actually need to know the conflict exists and what its parameters are (unless one of the conflicting views is a
4044:
3746:
3153:
2339:
1793:
1716:
1298:
1918:
1348:
1338:
543:] and ] (ed.s) "Larry Marder Building Bridges" in ''Comic Book Rebels: Conversations with the Creators of the New Comics'' (Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1993) ISBN 1-55611-355-2 pp. 17–27</ref: -->
508:] and ] (eds.) "Larry Marder Building Bridges" in ''Comic Book Rebels: Conversations with the Creators of the New Comics'' (Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1993) ISBN 1-55611-355-2 pp. 17–27</ref: -->
3193:
3173:
2136:
2106:
738:
A cited source usually contains further relevant information than the particular bit(s) it was cited for, and its removal may be thought to "deprive" the reader of those additional resources.
612:
and also cite some of the original research papers the review covers. This is often felt to provide better utility for academic and university-student users of
Knowledge (XXG), and improved
1418:
2430:
2156:
1433:
1373:
1125:
1506:
3891:
1838:
519:
In the first collected volume, Marder explains that his work is "about the affinity of life", wherein the characters "understand that ultimately they depend on each other for survival".
3198:
3278:
3233:
3143:
3093:
2359:
2086:
2061:
4000:
3786:
2076:
1711:
1696:
1408:
693:), talk page discussion needs to proceed toward resolving the matter and balancing the article. If the dispute seems intractable among the regular editors of the article, try the
576:
Another common form of citation overkill is to cite multiple reprintings of the same content in different publications – such as several different newspapers reprinting the same
3113:
1676:
3268:
3183:
2299:
2151:
2056:
1671:
1631:
1486:
3896:
2989:
2902:
2500:
2241:
2066:
1991:
1726:
1701:
1626:
1238:
1197:
747:
these facts to the article. Or, if the additional material is not quite encyclopedically pertinent to the article but provides useful background information, add it to the "
330:– Citations which don't even namecheck the subject at all, but are present solely to verify a fact that's entirely tangential to the topic's own notability or lack thereof.
2877:
2822:
2807:
3323:
3273:
3128:
2420:
1758:
1641:
1521:
712:). Competing assertions with no context are not encyclopedic. Instead, the material should be rewritten to outline the nature of the controversy, ideally beginning with
2560:
1938:
3856:
2485:
2231:
1968:
1893:
1463:
2540:
3751:
3403:
3248:
3168:
2837:
2586:
2515:
2369:
1666:
624:
may sometimes result in "back-up" citations to original reportage of statements or allegations that are later repeated by secondary sources that provide an overview.
4039:
3796:
3353:
2051:
1928:
1818:
1721:
1706:
1146:
1933:
1308:
863:
Try to construct passages so that an entire sentence or more can be cited to a particular source, instead of having sentences that each require multiple sources.
788:
While this is often a legitimate rationale to add an additional source that some editors might consider not strictly necessary, it is sometimes more practical to
3338:
3308:
3118:
2867:
2862:
2399:
1848:
1803:
1733:
3876:
2555:
3651:
2096:
1471:
1185:
3736:
1453:
357:– Citations which are added only to make it seem that 'this topic was covered by X', rather than to actually support any substantive content about the topic.
3606:
3481:
1501:
3368:
3083:
2480:
2166:
1948:
1778:
1691:
1293:
244:(good article status) might add citations to basic facts such as "...the sky is blue...". While this might be a good thing in their eyes, the fact that the
2226:
1443:
3957:
3258:
3218:
2932:
2545:
2465:
1981:
1883:
1813:
1601:
1130:
650:
In controversial topics, sometimes editors will stack citations that do not add additional facts or really improve article reliability, in an attempt to "
3846:
3418:
2601:
551:
If consecutive sentences are supported by the same reference, and that reference's inline citation is placed at the end of the paragraph as described at
3098:
2535:
2281:
1773:
1313:
193:. It is also important for an article to be verifiable. Without citations, we cannot know that the material isn't just made up, unless it is a case of
2897:
2842:
2812:
1283:
540:
Despite these potentially conflicting comments, Wiater and
Bissette reiterate that "there is no simpler or more iconographic comic book in existence".
3566:
3486:
2349:
536:
Equally, he says, "the reader has to invest a certain amount of mental energy to follow the book", which includes "maps and a rather long glossary".
217:
3881:
3851:
3641:
3621:
3178:
2847:
2802:
2797:
2606:
2490:
2394:
2131:
1843:
1788:
1743:
1681:
1651:
1556:
1546:
1318:
3661:
3163:
1763:
1448:
3816:
3691:
3541:
3263:
2959:
2767:
2646:
2495:
2091:
1913:
1863:
1403:
394:(AfC) process, contributing to the backlog and resulting in a delay of several months before the draft is reviewed, usually only to be declined.
867:
content that isn't in the article at all yet, and can thus be saved by simply moving it to the other fact or adding new content to the article.
3831:
3771:
3696:
3188:
3158:
3078:
2907:
1878:
1868:
1833:
1646:
1551:
1273:
3871:
3841:
3706:
3681:
3561:
3333:
2792:
2701:
2661:
2565:
2221:
2206:
2081:
1686:
1536:
1491:
1423:
1383:
1233:
65:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3983:
3811:
3791:
3716:
3711:
3283:
2772:
2415:
2324:
2186:
2121:
2031:
2021:
1996:
1958:
1953:
1888:
1656:
1616:
1561:
1157:
66:
2269:
349:
Example: An article about an author sourced to works they have published; an article about an artist sourced to songs that they released.
2887:
2550:
2379:
1100:
940:– 83 citations for one sentence, part of 139 citations in a single paragraph. Notably, the rest of the article remained largely uncited.
319:– Citations which briefly namecheck the fact that the subject exists, but are not actually about the subject to any non-trivial degree.
4005:
3408:
2696:
2681:
2596:
2171:
1516:
1263:
1258:
748:
843:
If all of the citations are to highly reputable sources, another way to trim their number is to make sure that there is a good mix of
3801:
3611:
3581:
3546:
3373:
2852:
2762:
2676:
2319:
2289:
2161:
1343:
391:
1438:
3967:
3836:
3666:
3393:
3293:
3103:
2979:
2892:
2857:
2782:
2752:
2616:
2450:
2440:
2389:
2216:
2201:
2126:
1898:
1748:
1591:
1378:
1323:
1248:
1178:
860:'s specifications are, by definition, more authoritative about HTML and CSS standards than third-party Web development tutorials.
2882:
2777:
2742:
1571:
3942:
3756:
3671:
3433:
3378:
3298:
3253:
3208:
3203:
3088:
2922:
2717:
2425:
2246:
2026:
2001:
1908:
1903:
1783:
1413:
1328:
1243:
527:
Indeed, addressing the potential underlying complexity, Marder suggests that "it's harder to describe it than it is to read it".
322:
Example: A source which quotes the subject giving a brief soundbite to a reporter in an article about something or someone else.
3937:
3133:
2817:
654:" an opposing view when the article covers multiple sides of an issue or there are competing claims. This is something like a
3993:
3766:
3646:
3526:
3501:
3328:
2964:
2927:
2917:
2520:
2460:
2314:
1611:
1586:
1541:
1393:
1368:
1358:
1333:
1114:
3886:
3701:
3586:
3511:
3398:
3318:
3288:
3138:
2757:
2727:
2691:
2581:
2445:
2364:
2146:
2011:
1976:
1823:
1531:
1526:
1253:
2309:
1496:
142:
When citing material in an article, it is better to cite a couple of great sources than a stack of decent or sub-par ones.
3988:
3576:
3571:
3531:
3516:
3506:
3383:
3228:
2636:
2626:
2525:
2334:
2196:
1481:
1353:
161:
1091:
856:
uncontroversial fact like where its headquarters is located, so newspaper articles need not be cited on that point. The
4034:
3962:
3919:
3731:
3596:
3496:
3456:
3413:
3358:
3348:
3343:
3313:
3148:
3123:
3108:
3063:
2949:
2671:
2611:
2344:
2181:
2116:
2111:
2101:
1853:
1476:
1228:
1210:
1171:
1135:
782:
As alluded to above, an additional citation may allay concerns as to whether the other citation(s) are sufficient, for
421:
360:
Example: A citation to a source which is cited to support a statement in the
Knowledge (XXG) article that merely says "
3636:
3591:
2954:
2827:
2787:
2591:
2329:
1858:
1303:
901:
752:
58:
205:, or for direct quotations. Two or three may be preferred for more controversial material or as a way of preventing
1151:
3866:
3806:
3781:
3721:
3631:
3626:
3213:
3030:
2732:
2722:
2510:
2505:
1923:
1596:
1566:
1398:
756:
241:
157:
54:
923:
Each of these articles has been corrected. Links here are to previous versions where a citation problem existed.
857:
3826:
3776:
3556:
3551:
3521:
3010:
2974:
2969:
2666:
2470:
2304:
1828:
1661:
1636:
1511:
1140:
253:
194:
172:
3821:
3388:
3243:
2656:
2651:
2435:
2354:
2211:
1873:
1120:
698:
592:
reliable and widely distributed available reprinter (for example, if the same article has been linked to both
523:
Wiater and
Bissette see this relationship as a wider metaphor for the interdependency of the comics industry.
1278:
3761:
3223:
3020:
2944:
1808:
1753:
1738:
1268:
309:
and relevant information. This phenomenon is especially common in articles about people and organizations.
1079:– 14 citations for part of a claim, the other which wasn't even true or backed up by any of those sources.
908:
848:
be cited – choose the one or ones that seem to be the best combination of eminent, balanced, and current.
763:
An additional citation may allay concerns of some editors that the text constitutes a copyright violation.
209:
for online sources, but more than three should generally be avoided; if four or more are needed, consider
3861:
3471:
3040:
3015:
2994:
2374:
2006:
1798:
1363:
493:
202:
70:
28:
3035:
3025:
2939:
2912:
2176:
1428:
876:
807:
633:
552:
403:
269:
210:
80:
220:
by editors. A well-meaning editor may attempt to make a subject which does not meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s
201:). A good rule of thumb is to cite at least one inline citation for each section of text that may be
3491:
2455:
2294:
2191:
1388:
718:
659:
655:
257:
249:
206:
2631:
2621:
2530:
1194:
709:
556:
187:
50:
663:
662:
at once, happening inside the article's very content itself, and is an example of the fallacy of
2384:
722:
651:
617:
390:
Draft articles with excessive citations are likely to be ignored by volunteer reviewers in the
831:
609:
227:
to be notable through sheer quantity of sources, without actually paying any attention to the
3656:
3601:
2747:
2686:
1986:
771:
713:
682:
678:
489:
245:
198:
794:
775:
740:
694:
686:
621:
346:
their way through a rapid-fire list of content which doesn't help to establish notability.
221:
581:
783:
767:
702:
17:
915:. Within a simple text citation, semicolons can be used to separate multiple sources.
690:
613:
4028:
3537:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
73:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
932:– 275 citations for one section out of 580 in the article, citing 44 unique sources
577:
387:
subject in depth, they could recommend deletion. The good sources could be missed.
477:
6. Portant, I.M. (2015) "Analysis of Tooth
Presence during Elephant Lifespan".
1117:– An essay with a contrary viewpoint suggesting to cite every sentence/statement
343:
1160:– What should one do on finding a correct but uncited statement in an article.
755:" section instead of citing it inline in a way that does not actually improve
568:
editors, so the approach is strictly optional and should be used cautiously.
260:
and we do not need citations for the meanings of everyday words and phrases.
216:
Not only does citation overkill impact the readability of an article, it can
1013:
2738:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
191:– unreadable articles do not give our readers any material worth verifying
148:
956:– 54 citations to verify one statement (all but one from the same domain)
972:– 20 citations for one statement, after the phrase "advanced technology"
368:", instead of supporting any encyclopedic content about anything stated
364:
published an article about them" or "Chris
Celebrity was interviewed by
1163:
1154:, for Knowledge (XXG) articles that display a case of citation overkill
733:
Contrary views (and approaches to addressing their concerns) include:
2142:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
240:
It is possible that an editor who is trying to promote an article to
3424:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
300:
27:"WP:OVERCITE" redirects here. For the enhanced deletion policy, see
721:
sources – can usually simply be dropped unless necessary to verify
580:
article, or a newspaper or magazine article getting picked up by a
304:
Metaphorical ref bombs being deployed on a Knowledge (XXG) article.
830:
770:
source, and there are no disputes about its accuracy or about the
494:
multiple sources support different parts of a paragraph or passage
299:
156:
Knowledge (XXG) policy requires all content within articles to be
1607:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
725:
that are necessary for reader understanding of the controversy.
3917:
3454:
3061:
2267:
1208:
1167:
152:
These are probably too many sources to cite for a single point.
128:
36:
3304:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2476:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1944:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
1126:
Knowledge (XXG):You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
2833:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2642:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2237:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1577:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1289:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
430:
Avoid cluttering text with redundant citations like this:
1071:- 20 citations for a short paragraph about a new magazine
1047:– 77 citations for an article not even 70 words in length
555:, an editor may want to consider using Knowledge (XXG)'s
3677:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
1039:– 20 citations for one sentence, 3 of which were YouTube
3687:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1075:
1067:
1059:
1051:
1043:
1035:
1027:
1019:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
936:
928:
912:
891:
884:
822:
815:
641:
411:
291:
284:
277:
186:
The purpose of any article is first and foremost to be
116:
109:
102:
95:
88:
4045:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
3239:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2873:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1063:– 33 academic citations for lists of features and uses
2985:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1622:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
835:
This barber has the right idea: trim away the excess.
514:
This is also correct, but is an example of overkill:
340:
Citations to work that the article's subject produced
252:
require a citation. In all cases, editors should use
3429:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
1143:– extension to improve references into Harvard style
677:
If this is primarily an inter-editor dispute over a
312:
Examples of this type of citation overkill include:
3976:
3930:
3003:
2710:
2574:
2408:
2280:
2040:
1967:
1462:
1221:
902:
Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources § Bundling citations
670:. However, experts at The Other Camp suggest that
666:: "According to scholars in My School of Thought,
3948:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3727:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1349:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1147:Knowledge (XXG):Why most sentences should be cited
1919:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1211:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
913:all of the sources under a single footnote number
2072:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2017:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1769:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
218:call the notability of the subject into question
3747:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3477:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3154:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1794:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1299:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
3174:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2340:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2107:Counting and sorting are not original research
1131:Knowledge (XXG):Masking the lack of notability
4001:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3617:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2137:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1419:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1179:
8:
3667:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2431:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2157:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1434:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1409:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1374:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
953:Combatant Status Review Tribunal transcripts
376:said they were at high risk for bankruptcy".
3199:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
3927:
3914:
3892:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3464:
3451:
3279:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3234:News coverage does not decrease notability
3144:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3094:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3071:
3058:
2277:
2264:
2087:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2062:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1218:
1205:
1186:
1172:
1164:
604:should be retained as the citation link.)
4040:Knowledge (XXG) essays about verification
3787:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2077:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1697:Identifying and using independent sources
1076:Korean Association of Film Critics Awards
937:Customs and Excise Department (Hong Kong)
355:Citations that name-drop reliable sources
3953:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3114:Big events make key participants notable
2561:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1939:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1677:Formatting bilateral relations templates
1001:William Evans (Medal of Honor recipient)
697:process; the applicable NPOV, NOR or RS
203:challenged or is likely to be challenged
147:
67:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3364:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3269:Notability is not a level playing field
3184:How the presumption of notability works
2300:Contributing to complicated discussions
2152:How the presumption of notability works
1672:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1487:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
3897:You should not write meaningless lists
3194:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2501:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2242:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2067:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1632:Don't hope the house will build itself
1239:All Five Pillars are equally important
1158:Knowledge (XXG):Must I add a citation?
317:Citations lacking significant coverage
164:is helpful, adding too many can cause
3324:One sentence does not an article make
3274:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2990:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2903:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2421:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2360:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1992:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1934:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1759:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1522:An unfinished house is a real problem
1507:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1309:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
1060:Electrical Transient Analyzer Program
7:
3877:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3857:Things that should not be surprising
3552:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2878:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2823:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2808:Don't call people by their real name
2556:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2486:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1894:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
171:One cause of "citation overkill" is
3752:No one cares about your garage band
3737:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3404:What is and is not routine coverage
3249:No one cares about your garage band
3169:Existence does not prove notability
2587:Assume the assumption of good faith
2516:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2370:Relationships with academic editors
2232:Why was the page I created deleted?
2227:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1667:Featured articles may have problems
1454:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
980:– 65 citations in opening paragraph
258:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
3797:Please do not murder the newcomers
3354:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2838:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2052:Adjectives in your recommendations
1929:What an article should not include
1819:The problem with elegant variation
1627:Don't get hung up on minor details
1444:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
1115:Knowledge (XXG):Citation underkill
1012:– 18 citations for notable alumna
741:Knowledge (XXG) is not a Web index
328:Citations that verify random facts
71:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
3847:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3419:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3119:Businesses with a single location
2400:You have a right to remain silent
1849:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1804:Potential, not just current state
1734:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
2868:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2863:Don't ignore community consensus
2097:Confusing arguments mean nothing
996:– 14 citations for one statement
236:Misuse to prove an obvious point
132:
40:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
3369:Sources must be out-of-universe
3084:All high schools can be notable
2481:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2167:Identifying blatant advertising
1949:The world will not end tomorrow
1779:Not everything needs a template
1692:How to write a featured article
1294:Editors will sometimes be wrong
1136:Knowledge (XXG):Overlink crisis
1055:– 22 citations for one sentence
1031:– 29 citations for one sentence
1023:– 33 citations for one sentence
964:– 18 citations for one sentence
948:– 17 citations for one sentence
802:How to trim excessive citations
472:Yes, Elephants Still Have Teeth
372:that source, such as "In 2019,
256:. In particular, remember that
3958:Avoid writing redundant essays
3607:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3482:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3309:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
3259:Notability cannot be purchased
3219:Masking the lack of notability
1982:Copyediting reception sections
1884:Temporary versions of articles
1814:Principle of Some Astonishment
1602:Creating controversial content
1502:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1449:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1141:mw:Extension:HarvardReferences
717:advocacy materials, and other
465:All about the elephants' teeth
456:3. Christenson, Chris. (2010)
1:
3984:About policies and guidelines
3099:Articles with a single source
2723:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2546:Two wrongs don't make a right
2536:The rules of polite discourse
2466:It's not the end of the world
1774:Not everything needs a navbox
1642:Don't "teach the controversy"
1314:Here to build an encyclopedia
1009:New York Chiropractic College
969:China–United States trade war
620:. Similar concerns about the
458:An exhausting list of mammals
342:– A series of citations that
3872:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3567:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3487:Alternatives to edit warring
2350:Maintaining a friendly space
988:– many unnecessary citations
622:biographies of living people
538:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
534:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
529:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
525:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
521:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
334:mention this charity at all.
3852:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3642:Editing under the influence
3179:Google searches and numbers
2898:Don't template the regulars
2813:Don't call the kettle black
2607:Be excellent to one another
2491:Revert notification opt-out
2395:We are all Wikipedians here
1844:Put a little effort into it
1789:Obtain peer review comments
1744:Introduction to structurism
1682:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1652:Editors are not mindreaders
1557:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1547:Beef up that first revision
1319:Leave it to the experienced
1284:Don't search for objections
1020:Carrfour Supportive Housing
4061:
3882:Why not create an account?
3817:Requirements for adminship
3692:How to vandalize correctly
3662:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3622:Don't delete the main page
3542:Avoid using preview button
3264:Notability comparison test
2848:Don't fight fire with fire
2843:Don't eat the troll's food
2803:Don't call a spade a spade
2798:Don't bludgeon the process
2647:Encourage full discussions
2496:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2132:Don't attack the nominator
2092:But there must be sources!
1914:Try not to leave it a stub
1864:Source your plot summaries
1152:Category:Citation overkill
1121:Knowledge (XXG):Wisps' Law
1101:Excessive citations inline
945:2004 Madrid train bombings
907:before each source, as in
899:
874:
805:
631:
588:articles) then retain the
542:<ref name="Rebels": -->
507:<ref name="Rebels": -->
470:5. Reporter, Rae. (2012)
453:, Chapter 2: The Elephant.
419:
401:
267:
78:
26:
3926:
3913:
3832:Sarcasm is really helpful
3772:Notability is not eternal
3697:How to win a citation war
3467:
3463:
3450:
3159:Every snowflake is unique
3079:Advanced source searching
3074:
3070:
3057:
2960:No, you can't have a pony
2908:Do not insult the vandals
2768:Don't be high-maintenance
2325:Encouraging the newcomers
2276:
2263:
1869:Specialized-style fallacy
1834:Pruning article revisions
1662:Endorsements (commercial)
1647:Editing on mobile devices
1552:Blind men and an elephant
1527:Articles have a half-life
1274:Dissent is not disloyalty
1244:Avoid vague introductions
1217:
1204:
858:World Wide Web Consortium
729:Other views and solutions
703:formal dispute resolution
442:1. Expert, Alice. (2010)
213:(merging) the citations.
29:Knowledge (XXG):Oversight
3842:The Night Before Wikimas
3707:Ignore every single rule
3682:How to get away with UPE
3562:Before they were notable
3334:Overreliance upon Google
3129:Common sourcing mistakes
2702:Settle the process first
2662:Imagine others complexly
2566:Writing for the opponent
2541:There is no common sense
2222:Unopposed AFD discussion
2207:Relisting can be abusive
2082:Avoid repeated arguments
1687:Give an article a chance
1537:Avoid mission statements
1497:Advanced text formatting
1492:Advanced article editing
1439:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1424:The rules are principles
1384:Product, process, policy
1234:Articles must be written
691:verifiability of a claim
463:4. Maizy, Daisy. (2009)
444:Size of elephants: large
140:This page in a nutshell:
59:Citing Sources guideline
18:Knowledge (XXG):REFBOMBS
3977:Policies and guidelines
3812:Requests for medication
3792:Please bite the newbies
3717:Mess with the templates
3284:Notability means impact
2818:Don't call things cruft
2793:Don't be the Fun Police
2602:Avoid the word "vandal"
2551:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2416:A thank you never hurts
2187:Liar liar pants on fire
2122:Deletion is not cleanup
2032:Writing better articles
2022:Write the article first
1997:Gender-neutral language
1969:Writing article content
1959:Writing better articles
1954:Write the article first
1889:Tertiary-source fallacy
1657:Encourage the newcomers
1617:Dictionaries as sources
1562:Build content to endure
616:of details, especially
598:The Palookaville Herald
420:For the guideline, see
4035:Knowledge (XXG) essays
4006:Policy writing is hard
3712:Is that even an essay?
3409:What notability is not
3164:Existence ≠Notability
2773:Don't be inconsiderate
2697:Read before commenting
2682:Mind your own business
2597:Avoid personal remarks
2172:Identifying test edits
1517:A navbox on every page
1472:100K featured articles
1269:Concede lost arguments
1264:Competence is required
1195:Knowledge (XXG) essays
977:Palestinian Christians
836:
549:
512:
486:
449:2. Smith, Bob. (2009)
305:
153:
3802:Pledge of Tranquility
3547:Avoid using wikilinks
3374:Subjective importance
2888:Don't spite your face
2677:Keep it down to earth
2441:Beware of the tigers!
2380:Too long; didn't read
2320:Edit at your own pace
2290:Accepting other users
2057:AfD is not a war zone
1404:There is no seniority
1344:Neutrality of sources
1028:Drifting (motorsport)
834:
695:requests for comments
687:source interpretation
516:
501:
432:
392:articles for creation
303:
222:notability guidelines
151:
69:, as it has not been
3968:Quote your own essay
3837:Sausages for tasting
3612:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3582:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3394:Vanispamcruftisement
3294:Notability sub-pages
3104:Avoid template creep
3064:Essays on notability
2980:There are no oracles
2763:Don't be a WikiBigot
2617:Call a spade a spade
2390:Unblock perspectives
2217:The Heymann Standard
2202:Overzealous deletion
2162:I just don't like it
1899:There is no deadline
1764:"Murder of" articles
1592:Common-style fallacy
1464:Article construction
1379:Process is important
1324:Levels of competence
1249:Be a reliable source
993:White power skinhead
488:In addition, as per
55:Verifiability policy
3757:No one really cares
3672:Go ahead, vandalize
3434:Two prongs of merit
3379:Third-party sources
3299:Notabilitymandering
3254:No one really cares
3209:Inherent notability
3204:Independent sources
3089:Alternative outlets
2923:Nationalist editing
2893:Don't take the bait
2858:Don't help too much
2783:Don't be prejudiced
2753:Don't be an ostrich
2718:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2451:Deletion as revenge
2426:Advice for hotheads
2247:No Encyclopedic Use
2127:Does deletion help?
2027:Writing about women
1909:The deadline is now
1904:There is a deadline
1784:Nothing is in stone
1414:Tendentious editing
1329:Levels of consensus
1092:Excessive citations
885:WP:Citation merging
679:core content policy
628:In-article conflict
398:Needless repetition
3767:No sorcery threats
3647:Embrace Stop Signs
3527:Assume good wraith
3502:Anti-Wikipedianism
3339:Perennial websites
3329:Other stuff exists
2965:Passive aggression
2928:No angry mastodons
2918:Hate is disruptive
2778:Don't be obnoxious
2743:Don't be a fanatic
2521:Most ideas are bad
2461:Forgive and forget
2270:Essays on civility
1879:Run an edit-a-thon
1612:Deprecated sources
1587:Citation underkill
1572:Chesterton's fence
1542:Be neutral in form
1394:Reasonability rule
1359:Oversimplification
1334:Most ideas are bad
837:
664:proof by assertion
602:The New York Times
594:The New York Times
451:Land-based animals
422:WP:CONSECUTIVECITE
306:
154:
4022:
4021:
4018:
4017:
4014:
4013:
3909:
3908:
3905:
3904:
3887:Yes legal threats
3702:Ignore all essays
3587:Complete bollocks
3512:Asshole John rule
3446:
3445:
3442:
3441:
3399:What BLP1E is not
3319:One hundred words
3289:Notability points
3053:
3052:
3049:
3048:
2853:Don't give a fuck
2728:Civil POV pushing
2692:Mutual withdrawal
2582:Assume good faith
2446:Civility warnings
2365:Please say please
2315:Editors' pronouns
2259:
2258:
2255:
2254:
2147:Follow the leader
2012:Use our own words
1977:Avoid thread mode
1824:Pro and con lists
1582:Citation overkill
1532:Autosizing images
1254:Civil POV pushing
911:, which produces
786:or other reasons.
714:secondary sources
618:in medical topics
610:literature review
499:This is correct:
146:
145:
127:
126:
16:(Redirected from
4052:
3963:Finding an essay
3928:
3915:
3577:Butterfly effect
3572:Boston Tea Party
3532:Assume stupidity
3517:Assume bad faith
3507:Articlecountitis
3465:
3452:
3384:Trivial mentions
3229:Minimum coverage
3072:
3059:
2758:Don't be ashamed
2637:Discussing cruft
2627:Deny recognition
2526:Nothing is clear
2335:Expect no thanks
2278:
2265:
2197:Nothing is clear
2044:deleting content
1727:Tertiary sources
1482:Acronym overkill
1354:The one question
1219:
1206:
1199:
1188:
1181:
1174:
1165:
1104:
1095:
1078:
1070:
1062:
1054:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1022:
1011:
1003:
995:
987:
979:
971:
963:
955:
947:
939:
931:
894:
887:
871:Citation merging
825:
818:
710:fringe viewpoint
644:
563:to place hidden
562:
561:<!-- --: -->
545:
510:
414:
294:
287:
280:
166:citation clutter
162:inline citations
136:
135:
129:
119:
112:
105:
98:
91:
44:
43:
37:
21:
4060:
4059:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4025:
4024:
4023:
4010:
3972:
3943:Value of essays
3922:
3901:
3732:Legal vandalism
3597:Counting juntas
3497:Anti-Wikipedian
3459:
3457:Humorous essays
3438:
3414:What to include
3359:Run-of-the-mill
3349:Read the source
3314:Offline sources
3109:Bare notability
3066:
3045:
2999:
2950:No Confederates
2748:Don't be a jerk
2706:
2672:Keep it concise
2612:Beyond civility
2570:
2404:
2345:How to be civil
2310:Don't retaliate
2272:
2251:
2182:Keep it concise
2117:Delete the junk
2112:Delete or merge
2102:Content removal
2036:
2002:Myth vs fiction
1963:
1854:Robotic editing
1717:Science sources
1712:Primary sources
1702:History sources
1477:Abandoned stubs
1458:
1229:Article content
1213:
1200:
1192:
1111:
1098:
1089:
1086:
1074:
1066:
1058:
1050:
1042:
1034:
1026:
1018:
1007:
999:
991:
983:
975:
967:
959:
951:
943:
935:
927:
921:
904:
898:
897:
890:
883:
879:
873:
829:
828:
821:
814:
810:
804:
749:Further reading
731:
673:
669:
648:
647:
642:WP:CITECONFLICT
640:
636:
630:
582:news aggregator
574:
560:
518:
503:
485:
425:
418:
417:
410:
406:
400:
298:
297:
290:
283:
276:
272:
266:
264:Notability bomb
238:
160:. While adding
133:
123:
122:
115:
108:
101:
94:
87:
83:
75:
74:
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4058:
4056:
4048:
4047:
4042:
4037:
4027:
4026:
4020:
4019:
4016:
4015:
4012:
4011:
4009:
4008:
4003:
3998:
3997:
3996:
3991:
3980:
3978:
3974:
3973:
3971:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3955:
3950:
3945:
3940:
3934:
3932:
3924:
3923:
3918:
3911:
3910:
3907:
3906:
3903:
3902:
3900:
3899:
3894:
3889:
3884:
3879:
3874:
3869:
3864:
3859:
3854:
3849:
3844:
3839:
3834:
3829:
3824:
3819:
3814:
3809:
3804:
3799:
3794:
3789:
3784:
3779:
3774:
3769:
3764:
3759:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3734:
3729:
3724:
3719:
3714:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3637:Editsummarisis
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3609:
3604:
3599:
3594:
3592:Counting forks
3589:
3584:
3579:
3574:
3569:
3564:
3559:
3554:
3549:
3544:
3539:
3534:
3529:
3524:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3504:
3499:
3494:
3489:
3484:
3479:
3474:
3468:
3461:
3460:
3455:
3448:
3447:
3444:
3443:
3440:
3439:
3437:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3149:Don't cite GNG
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3124:But it's true!
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3075:
3068:
3067:
3062:
3055:
3054:
3051:
3050:
3047:
3046:
3044:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3021:WikiHarassment
3018:
3013:
3007:
3005:
3001:
3000:
2998:
2997:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2955:No queerphobia
2952:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2936:
2935:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2910:
2905:
2900:
2895:
2890:
2885:
2880:
2875:
2870:
2865:
2860:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2840:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2725:
2720:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2707:
2705:
2704:
2699:
2694:
2689:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2594:
2592:Assume no clue
2589:
2584:
2578:
2576:
2572:
2571:
2569:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2533:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2433:
2428:
2423:
2418:
2412:
2410:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2330:Enjoy yourself
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2307:
2302:
2297:
2292:
2286:
2284:
2274:
2273:
2268:
2261:
2260:
2257:
2256:
2253:
2252:
2250:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2054:
2048:
2046:
2043:
2038:
2037:
2035:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1973:
1971:
1965:
1964:
1962:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1859:Sham consensus
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1468:
1466:
1460:
1459:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1304:Explanationism
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1225:
1223:
1215:
1214:
1209:
1202:
1201:
1193:
1191:
1190:
1183:
1176:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1155:
1149:
1144:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1096:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1072:
1064:
1056:
1048:
1040:
1032:
1024:
1016:
1005:
1004:– 16 citations
997:
989:
985:Stewie Griffin
981:
973:
965:
957:
949:
941:
933:
920:
917:
896:
895:
888:
880:
875:
872:
869:
827:
826:
819:
811:
806:
803:
800:
799:
798:
791:
779:
760:
753:External links
746:
730:
727:
671:
667:
646:
645:
637:
632:
629:
626:
573:
570:
484:
483:
482:
481:
475:
468:
461:
454:
447:
437:
416:
415:
407:
402:
399:
396:
380:
379:
378:
377:
352:
351:
350:
337:
336:
335:
325:
324:
323:
296:
295:
292:WP:BOMBARDMENT
288:
281:
273:
268:
265:
262:
237:
234:
144:
143:
137:
125:
124:
121:
120:
113:
110:WP:TOOMANYREFS
106:
99:
92:
84:
79:
76:
64:
63:
47:
45:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4057:
4046:
4043:
4041:
4038:
4036:
4033:
4032:
4030:
4007:
4004:
4002:
3999:
3995:
3992:
3990:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3982:
3981:
3979:
3975:
3969:
3966:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3954:
3951:
3949:
3946:
3944:
3941:
3939:
3936:
3935:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3921:
3916:
3912:
3898:
3895:
3893:
3890:
3888:
3885:
3883:
3880:
3878:
3875:
3873:
3870:
3868:
3867:Watchlistitis
3865:
3863:
3862:The WikiBible
3860:
3858:
3855:
3853:
3850:
3848:
3845:
3843:
3840:
3838:
3835:
3833:
3830:
3828:
3825:
3823:
3820:
3818:
3815:
3813:
3810:
3808:
3807:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3805:
3803:
3800:
3798:
3795:
3793:
3790:
3788:
3785:
3783:
3782:Play the game
3780:
3778:
3775:
3773:
3770:
3768:
3765:
3763:
3760:
3758:
3755:
3753:
3750:
3748:
3745:
3743:
3740:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3725:
3723:
3722:My local pond
3720:
3718:
3715:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3632:Edits Per Day
3630:
3628:
3627:Editcountitis
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3588:
3585:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3573:
3570:
3568:
3565:
3563:
3560:
3558:
3555:
3553:
3550:
3548:
3545:
3543:
3540:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3523:
3520:
3518:
3515:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3493:
3490:
3488:
3485:
3483:
3480:
3478:
3475:
3473:
3470:
3469:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3453:
3449:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3217:
3215:
3214:Insignificant
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3080:
3077:
3076:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3060:
3056:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3031:WikiLawyering
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3008:
3006:
3004:WikiRelations
3002:
2996:
2993:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2934:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2926:
2924:
2921:
2919:
2916:
2914:
2911:
2909:
2906:
2904:
2901:
2899:
2896:
2894:
2891:
2889:
2886:
2884:
2881:
2879:
2876:
2874:
2871:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2856:
2854:
2851:
2849:
2846:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2831:
2829:
2828:Don't cry COI
2826:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2788:Don't be rude
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2736:
2734:
2733:Cyberbullying
2731:
2729:
2726:
2724:
2721:
2719:
2716:
2715:
2713:
2709:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2695:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2683:
2680:
2678:
2675:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2579:
2577:
2573:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2532:
2529:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2511:The last word
2509:
2507:
2506:The grey zone
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2432:
2429:
2427:
2424:
2422:
2419:
2417:
2414:
2413:
2411:
2407:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2291:
2288:
2287:
2285:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2266:
2262:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2049:
2047:
2045:
2039:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1974:
1972:
1970:
1966:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1924:Walled garden
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1749:Mine a source
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1597:Concept cloud
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1567:Cherrypicking
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1467:
1465:
1461:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1399:Systemic bias
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1196:
1189:
1184:
1182:
1177:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:If (magazine)
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:William Selig
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:Howard Cosell
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1015:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:Iris graminea
926:
925:
924:
918:
916:
914:
910:
903:
893:
889:
886:
882:
881:
878:
870:
868:
864:
861:
859:
853:
849:
846:
841:
833:
824:
820:
817:
813:
812:
809:
801:
796:
789:
787:
785:
780:
777:
773:
769:
764:
761:
758:
757:verifiability
754:
750:
744:
742:
739:
736:
735:
734:
728:
726:
724:
720:
715:
711:
706:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:point of view
680:
675:
665:
661:
657:
653:
643:
639:
638:
635:
627:
625:
623:
619:
615:
614:verifiability
611:
605:
603:
599:
595:
591:
585:
583:
579:
571:
569:
566:
558:
554:
548:
546:
544:
539:
535:
530:
526:
522:
515:
511:
509:
500:
497:
495:
491:
480:
476:
473:
469:
466:
462:
459:
455:
452:
448:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
436:
431:
428:
423:
413:
409:
408:
405:
397:
395:
393:
388:
384:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
356:
353:
348:
347:
345:
341:
338:
332:
331:
329:
326:
321:
320:
318:
315:
314:
313:
310:
302:
293:
289:
286:
282:
279:
275:
274:
271:
263:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
235:
233:
230:
226:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
190:
184:
182:
176:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
150:
141:
138:
131:
130:
118:
117:WP:REFCLUTTER
114:
111:
107:
104:
100:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:
82:
77:
72:
68:
62:
60:
56:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
19:
3931:About essays
3920:About essays
3827:Rouge editor
3777:Oops Defense
3557:Barnstaritis
3522:Assume faith
3344:Pokémon test
3189:High Schools
3011:WikiBullying
2975:Superhatting
2970:POV railroad
2667:Just drop it
2471:Nobody cares
2305:Divisiveness
1829:Printability
1722:Style guides
1581:
1512:Amnesia test
1369:Paraphrasing
1044:Alvin Duskin
961:Generation Y
922:
909:this example
905:
892:WP:CITEMERGE
865:
862:
854:
850:
844:
842:
838:
781:
778:of its use).
762:
737:
732:
707:
676:
649:
606:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
578:wire service
575:
564:
550:
547:
541:
537:
533:
528:
524:
520:
517:
513:
506:
502:
498:
487:
478:
471:
464:
457:
450:
443:
433:
429:
426:
389:
385:
381:
373:
369:
365:
361:
354:
339:
327:
316:
311:
307:
254:common sense
239:
228:
224:
215:
195:common sense
188:
185:
180:
177:
173:edit warring
170:
165:
155:
139:
48:
3938:Essay guide
3822:Rouge admin
3389:Video links
3244:No big loss
2933:just madmen
2883:Don't shout
2657:How to lose
2652:Get over it
2436:Be the glue
2355:Negotiation
2212:Relist bias
2042:Removing or
1874:Stub Makers
1707:Law sources
1637:Don't panic
816:WP:CITETRIM
699:noticeboard
557:hidden text
553:WP:CITETYPE
344:Gish gallop
285:WP:NOTEBOMB
246:sky is blue
103:WP:OVERCITE
96:WP:OVERKILL
89:WP:CITEKILL
49:This is an
4029:Categories
3994:Guidelines
3762:No, really
3742:LTTAUTMAOK
3224:Make stubs
2945:No racists
2687:Say "MOBY"
2409:Philosophy
2282:The basics
1839:Publicists
1809:Presentism
1754:Merge Test
1739:Inaccuracy
1222:Philosophy
900:See also:
823:WP:CITEONE
772:neutrality
723:quotations
467:, p. 23–29
412:WP:REPCITE
278:WP:REFBOMB
158:verifiable
3472:Adminitis
3041:WikiPeace
3016:WikiCrime
2995:UPPERCASE
2375:Thank you
2007:Proseline
1799:Permastub
1364:Paradoxes
1279:Don't lie
1084:Templates
1014:Ora Golan
877:Shortcuts
808:Shortcuts
532:concept!"
374:The Times
362:The Times
270:Shortcuts
248:does not
183:content.
81:Shortcuts
3989:Policies
3139:Coatrack
3036:WikiLove
3026:WikiHate
2940:No Nazis
2913:Griefing
2177:Immunity
1429:Trifecta
1259:Cohesion
1109:See also
919:Examples
768:reliable
681:matter (
660:edit war
656:PoV fork
652:outweigh
634:Shortcut
572:Reprints
565:ref name
404:Shortcut
366:Big Show
242:GA-class
211:bundling
57:and the
3652:Emerson
3492:ANI flu
2456:Failure
2295:Apology
2192:Nothing
1389:Purpose
790:replace
719:primary
672:Claim 2
668:Claim 1
600:, then
559:syntax
490:WP:PAIC
479:J. Imp.
250:usually
229:quality
207:linkrot
199:WP:BLUE
53:on the
3134:Clones
2711:Don'ts
2632:Desist
2622:Candor
2531:Reader
776:nature
751:" or "
225:appear
2385:Truce
845:types
784:WP:RS
701:; or
689:, or
197:(see
51:essay
3657:Fart
3602:Crap
1987:Coup
1339:Need
658:and
596:and
590:most
189:read
2575:Dos
1198:(?)
795:RfC
774:or
745:add
674:."
181:new
4031::
1103:}}
1099:{{
1094:}}
1090:{{
705:.
685:,
496:.
370:in
1187:e
1180:t
1173:v
759:.
474:.
460:.
446:.
424:.
61:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
