505:
Indeed, addressing the potential underlying complexity, Marder suggests that "it's harder to describe it than it is to read it". He also calls it "an ecological romance ... a self-contained fairy tale about a group of beings who live in the center of their perfect world obsessed with maintaining its food chain", a self-described "really low concept!" Equally, he says, "the reader has to invest a certain amount of mental energy to follow the book", which includes "maps and a rather long glossary". Despite these potentially conflicting comments, Wiater and
Bissette reiterate that "there is no simpler or more iconographic comic book in existence".
175:, which can lead to examples like "Graphism is the study of ...". Extreme cases have seen fifteen or more footnotes after a single word, as an editor tries to strengthen their point or the overall notability of the subject with extra citations, in the hope that others will accept that reliable sources support it. Similar circumstances can also lead to overkill with legitimate sources, when existing sources have been repeatedly removed or disputed on spurious grounds or against consensus.
832:
492:, citations should be placed at the end of the passage that they support. If one source alone supports consecutive sentences in the same paragraph, one citation of it at the end of the final sentence is sufficient. It is not necessary to include a citation for each individual consecutive sentence, as this is overkill. This does not apply to lists or tables, nor does it apply when
149:
301:
42:
134:
333:
Example: A statement of where the person was born referenced to a source which only verifies that the named town exists; a statement about a charitable organization is sourced to a source that talks about the subject the organization is interested in, e.g., hunger or homelessness or art, but does not
859:
of sources. For example, if the six citations include two books, two journal articles, and two encyclopedia articles, the citations could be trimmed down to one citation from each type of source. Comprehensive works on a topic often include many of the same points. Not all such works on a topic need
308:
A common form of citation overkill is adding sources to an article without regard as to whether they support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic. This may boost the number of footnotes and create a superficial appearance of notability, which can obscure a lack of substantive, reliable,
911:
If there is a good reason to keep multiple citations, for example, to avoid perennial edit warring or because the sources offer a range of beneficial information, clutter may be avoided by merging the citations into a single footnote. This can be done by putting, inside the reference, bullet points
567:
tags at the end of each sentence. Doing so may benefit others adding material to that paragraph in the future. If that happens, they can uncomment the hidden citations and switch to citing references after every sentence. Having hidden citations could cause confusion, especially among inexperienced
867:
For many subjects, some sources are official or otherwise authoritative, while others are only interpretative, summarizing, or opinionated. If the authoritative sources are not controversial, they should generally be preferred. For example, a company's own website is probably authoritative for an
842:
Sometimes it may be possible to salvage sources from a citekill pileup by simply moving them to other places in the article. Sometimes, a source which has been stacked on top of another source may also support other content in the article that is presently unreferenced, or may support additional
587:
This type of overkill should be resolved by merging all of the citations into a single one and stripping unhelpful repetitions – when possible, the retained citation should be the originator of the content rather than a reprinter or aggregator, but if this is not possible (e.g. some wire service
382:
Some people might try to rest notability on a handful of sources that do not contribute, while other people might try to build the pile of sources up into the dozens or even hundreds instead – so this type of citation overkill may require special attention. Either way, the principle is the same:
504:
In the first collected volume, Marder explains that his work is "about the affinity of life", wherein the characters "understand that ultimately they depend on each other for survival". Wiater and
Bissette see this relationship as a wider metaphor for the interdependency of the comics industry.
386:
Overloading an article with bad citations can backfire if the article is nominated for deletion. Participators may not want to look at all one hundred citations, and they may instead choose to look at just a smaller sample. If they find only unreliable sources or sources that do not discuss the
851:
If there are six citations on a point of information, and the first three are highly reputable sources (e.g., books published by university presses), and the last three citations are less reputable or less widely circulated (e.g., local newsletters), then trim out those less-reputable sources.
716:
that independently describe the conflicting viewpoints or data, with additional, less independent sources cited only where pertinent, for verification of more nuanced claims made about the views or facts as represented by the conflicting sources. Sources that are opinional in nature – op-eds,
584:– as if they constituted distinct citations. Such duplicated citations may be piled up as multiple references for the same fact or they may be split up as distinct footnotes for different pieces of content, so watching out for this type of overkill may sometimes require special attention.
168:, making articles look untidy in read mode and difficult to navigate in markup edit mode. If a page features citations that are mirror pages of others, or which simply parrot the other sources, they contribute nothing to the article's reliability and are detrimental to its readability.
3541:
434:
Elephants are large land mammals ... Elephants' teeth are very different from those of most other mammals. Unlike most mammals, which grow baby teeth and then replace them with a permanent set of adult teeth, elephants have cycles of tooth rotation throughout their entire lives.
1581:
765:
This is usually a short-term issue, and is often better handled by discussing the evidence on the talk page, if the additional citation does not really increase verifiability (e.g., because the original citation, with which the added one would be redundant, is to a clearly
2742:
2146:
863:
In some cases, such as articles related to technology or computing or other fields that are changing very rapidly, it may be desirable to have the sources be as up-to-date as possible. In these cases, a few of the older citations could be removed.
1611:
383:
Sources support notability based on what they say about the topic, not just the number of footnotes present. An article with just four or five really good sources is considered better referenced than an article that cites 500 bad ones.
3428:
2877:
231:
of the sources. Ironically, this serves as a red flag to experienced editors that the article needs scrutiny and that each citation needs to be verified carefully to ensure that it was really used to contribute to the article.
178:
Another common cause of citation overkill is simply that people want the source they've seen to be included in the article too, so they just tack it onto the end of existing content without making an effort to actually add any
3308:
2480:
743:, and our readers know how to use online search engines. In most cases, if a source would be somewhat or entirely redundant to cite for a particular fact, but has important additional information, it is better to use it to
2837:
792:
weak sources with more reliable ones, or to add material outlining the nature of a disagreement between reliable sources. How to approach this is best settled on a case-by-case basis on the article's talk page, with an
2646:
2241:
3681:
1948:
531:
He also calls it "an ecological romance ... a self-contained fairy tale about a group of beings who live in the center of their perfect world obsessed with maintaining its food chain", a self-described "really low
3621:
3368:
2989:
1626:
3691:
3433:
1293:
3957:
3952:
3243:
3746:
607:
A similar case is redundant citation of an article that got its information from an article we have already cited. An exception, to many scientific and technical editors, is when we cite a peer-reviewed
2046:
3731:
427:
Material that is repeated multiple times in an article does not require an inline citation for every mention. If you say an elephant is a mammal more than once, provide one only at the first instance.
797:
if necessary, especially if the alleged fact, topic, or source is controversial. Adding competing stacks of citations is not how to address WP content disputes or real-world lack of expert consensus.
3481:
2021:
2076:
1773:
708:
If the matter is the subject of real-world dispute in reliable sources, our readers actually need to know the conflict exists and what its parameters are (unless one of the conflicting views is a
4049:
3751:
3158:
2344:
1798:
1721:
1303:
1923:
1353:
1343:
543:] and ] (ed.s) "Larry Marder Building Bridges" in ''Comic Book Rebels: Conversations with the Creators of the New Comics'' (Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1993) ISBN 1-55611-355-2 pp. 17–27</ref: -->
508:] and ] (eds.) "Larry Marder Building Bridges" in ''Comic Book Rebels: Conversations with the Creators of the New Comics'' (Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1993) ISBN 1-55611-355-2 pp. 17–27</ref: -->
3198:
3178:
2141:
2111:
738:
A cited source usually contains further relevant information than the particular bit(s) it was cited for, and its removal may be thought to "deprive" the reader of those additional resources.
612:
and also cite some of the original research papers the review covers. This is often felt to provide better utility for academic and university-student users of
Knowledge (XXG), and improved
1423:
2435:
2161:
1438:
1378:
1130:
1511:
3896:
1843:
519:
In the first collected volume, Marder explains that his work is "about the affinity of life", wherein the characters "understand that ultimately they depend on each other for survival".
3203:
3283:
3238:
3148:
3098:
2364:
2091:
2066:
4005:
3791:
2081:
1716:
1701:
1413:
693:), talk page discussion needs to proceed toward resolving the matter and balancing the article. If the dispute seems intractable among the regular editors of the article, try the
576:
Another common form of citation overkill is to cite multiple reprintings of the same content in different publications – such as several different newspapers reprinting the same
3118:
1681:
3273:
3188:
2304:
2156:
2061:
1676:
1636:
1491:
3901:
2994:
2907:
2505:
2246:
2071:
1996:
1731:
1706:
1631:
1243:
1202:
747:
these facts to the article. Or, if the additional material is not quite encyclopedically pertinent to the article but provides useful background information, add it to the "
330:– Citations which don't even namecheck the subject at all, but are present solely to verify a fact that's entirely tangential to the topic's own notability or lack thereof.
2882:
2827:
2812:
3328:
3278:
3133:
2425:
1763:
1646:
1526:
712:). Competing assertions with no context are not encyclopedic. Instead, the material should be rewritten to outline the nature of the controversy, ideally beginning with
2565:
1943:
3861:
2490:
2236:
1973:
1898:
1468:
2545:
3756:
3408:
3253:
3173:
2842:
2591:
2520:
2374:
1671:
624:
may sometimes result in "back-up" citations to original reportage of statements or allegations that are later repeated by secondary sources that provide an overview.
4044:
3801:
3358:
2056:
1933:
1823:
1726:
1711:
1151:
1938:
1313:
839:
Try to construct passages so that an entire sentence or more can be cited to a particular source, instead of having sentences that each require multiple sources.
788:
While this is often a legitimate rationale to add an additional source that some editors might consider not strictly necessary, it is sometimes more practical to
3343:
3313:
3123:
2872:
2867:
2404:
1853:
1808:
1738:
3881:
2560:
3656:
2101:
1476:
1190:
3741:
1458:
357:– Citations which are added only to make it seem that 'this topic was covered by X', rather than to actually support any substantive content about the topic.
3611:
3486:
1506:
3373:
3088:
2485:
2171:
1953:
1783:
1696:
1298:
244:(good article status) might add citations to basic facts such as "...the sky is blue...". While this might be a good thing in their eyes, the fact that the
2231:
1448:
3962:
3263:
3223:
2937:
2550:
2470:
1986:
1888:
1818:
1606:
1135:
650:
In controversial topics, sometimes editors will stack citations that do not add additional facts or really improve article reliability, in an attempt to "
3851:
3423:
2606:
551:
If consecutive sentences are supported by the same reference, and that reference's inline citation is placed at the end of the paragraph as described at
3103:
2540:
2286:
1778:
1318:
193:. It is also important for an article to be verifiable. Without citations, we cannot know that the material isn't just made up, unless it is a case of
2902:
2847:
2817:
1288:
540:
Despite these potentially conflicting comments, Wiater and
Bissette reiterate that "there is no simpler or more iconographic comic book in existence".
3571:
3491:
2354:
536:
Equally, he says, "the reader has to invest a certain amount of mental energy to follow the book", which includes "maps and a rather long glossary".
217:
3886:
3856:
3646:
3626:
3183:
2852:
2807:
2802:
2611:
2495:
2399:
2136:
1848:
1793:
1748:
1686:
1656:
1561:
1551:
1323:
3666:
3168:
1768:
1453:
3821:
3696:
3546:
3268:
2964:
2772:
2651:
2500:
2096:
1918:
1868:
1408:
394:(AfC) process, contributing to the backlog and resulting in a delay of several months before the draft is reviewed, usually only to be declined.
843:
content that isn't in the article at all yet, and can thus be saved by simply moving it to the other fact or adding new content to the article.
3836:
3776:
3701:
3193:
3163:
3083:
2912:
1883:
1873:
1838:
1651:
1556:
1278:
3876:
3846:
3711:
3686:
3566:
3338:
2797:
2706:
2666:
2570:
2226:
2211:
2086:
1691:
1541:
1496:
1428:
1388:
1238:
65:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3988:
3816:
3796:
3721:
3716:
3288:
2777:
2420:
2329:
2191:
2126:
2036:
2026:
2001:
1963:
1958:
1893:
1661:
1621:
1566:
1162:
66:
2274:
349:
Example: An article about an author sourced to works they have published; an article about an artist sourced to songs that they released.
2892:
2555:
2384:
1105:
945:– 83 citations for one sentence, part of 139 citations in a single paragraph. Notably, the rest of the article remained largely uncited.
319:– Citations which briefly namecheck the fact that the subject exists, but are not actually about the subject to any non-trivial degree.
4010:
3413:
2701:
2686:
2601:
2176:
1521:
1268:
1263:
748:
855:
If all of the citations are to highly reputable sources, another way to trim their number is to make sure that there is a good mix of
3806:
3616:
3586:
3551:
3378:
2857:
2767:
2681:
2324:
2294:
2166:
1348:
391:
1443:
3972:
3841:
3671:
3398:
3298:
3108:
2984:
2897:
2862:
2787:
2757:
2621:
2455:
2445:
2394:
2221:
2206:
2131:
1903:
1753:
1596:
1383:
1328:
1253:
1183:
872:'s specifications are, by definition, more authoritative about HTML and CSS standards than third-party Web development tutorials.
2887:
2782:
2747:
1576:
3947:
3761:
3676:
3438:
3383:
3303:
3258:
3213:
3208:
3093:
2927:
2722:
2430:
2251:
2031:
2006:
1913:
1908:
1788:
1418:
1333:
1248:
527:
Indeed, addressing the potential underlying complexity, Marder suggests that "it's harder to describe it than it is to read it".
322:
Example: A source which quotes the subject giving a brief soundbite to a reporter in an article about something or someone else.
3942:
3138:
2822:
654:" an opposing view when the article covers multiple sides of an issue or there are competing claims. This is something like a
3998:
3771:
3651:
3531:
3506:
3333:
2969:
2932:
2922:
2525:
2465:
2319:
1616:
1591:
1546:
1398:
1373:
1363:
1338:
1119:
3891:
3706:
3591:
3516:
3403:
3323:
3293:
3143:
2762:
2732:
2696:
2586:
2450:
2369:
2151:
2016:
1981:
1828:
1536:
1531:
1258:
2314:
1501:
142:
When citing material in an article, it is better to cite a couple of great sources than a stack of decent or sub-par ones.
3993:
3581:
3576:
3536:
3521:
3511:
3388:
3233:
2641:
2631:
2530:
2339:
2201:
1486:
1358:
161:
1096:
868:
uncontroversial fact like where its headquarters is located, so newspaper articles need not be cited on that point. The
4039:
3967:
3924:
3736:
3601:
3501:
3461:
3418:
3363:
3353:
3348:
3318:
3153:
3128:
3113:
3068:
2954:
2676:
2616:
2349:
2186:
2121:
2116:
2106:
1858:
1481:
1233:
1215:
1176:
1140:
782:
As alluded to above, an additional citation may allay concerns as to whether the other citation(s) are sufficient, for
421:
360:
Example: A citation to a source which is cited to support a statement in the
Knowledge (XXG) article that merely says "
3641:
3596:
2959:
2832:
2792:
2596:
2334:
1863:
1308:
906:
752:
58:
205:, or for direct quotations. Two or three may be preferred for more controversial material or as a way of preventing
1156:
3871:
3811:
3786:
3726:
3636:
3631:
3218:
3035:
2737:
2727:
2515:
2510:
1928:
1601:
1571:
1403:
756:
241:
157:
54:
928:
Each of these articles has been corrected. Links here are to previous versions where a citation problem existed.
869:
3831:
3781:
3561:
3556:
3526:
3015:
2979:
2974:
2671:
2475:
2309:
1833:
1666:
1641:
1516:
1145:
253:
194:
172:
3826:
3393:
3248:
2661:
2656:
2440:
2359:
2216:
1878:
1125:
698:
592:
reliable and widely distributed available reprinter (for example, if the same article has been linked to both
523:
Wiater and
Bissette see this relationship as a wider metaphor for the interdependency of the comics industry.
1283:
3766:
3228:
3025:
2949:
1813:
1758:
1743:
1273:
309:
and relevant information. This phenomenon is especially common in articles about people and organizations.
1084:– 14 citations for part of a claim, the other which wasn't even true or backed up by any of those sources.
913:
860:
be cited – choose the one or ones that seem to be the best combination of eminent, balanced, and current.
763:
An additional citation may allay concerns of some editors that the text constitutes a copyright violation.
209:
for online sources, but more than three should generally be avoided; if four or more are needed, consider
3866:
3476:
3045:
3020:
2999:
2379:
2011:
1803:
1368:
493:
202:
70:
28:
3040:
3030:
2944:
2917:
2181:
1433:
881:
807:
633:
552:
403:
269:
210:
80:
220:
by editors. A well-meaning editor may attempt to make a subject which does not meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s
201:). A good rule of thumb is to cite at least one inline citation for each section of text that may be
3496:
2460:
2299:
2196:
1393:
718:
659:
655:
257:
249:
206:
2636:
2626:
2535:
1199:
709:
556:
187:
50:
663:
662:
at once, happening inside the article's very content itself, and is an example of the fallacy of
2389:
722:
651:
617:
390:
Draft articles with excessive citations are likely to be ignored by volunteer reviewers in the
831:
609:
227:
to be notable through sheer quantity of sources, without actually paying any attention to the
3661:
3606:
2752:
2691:
1991:
771:
713:
682:
678:
489:
245:
198:
794:
775:
740:
694:
686:
621:
346:
their way through a rapid-fire list of content which doesn't help to establish notability.
221:
581:
783:
767:
702:
17:
920:. Within a simple text citation, semicolons can be used to separate multiple sources.
690:
613:
4033:
3542:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
73:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
937:– 275 citations for one section out of 580 in the article, citing 44 unique sources
577:
387:
subject in depth, they could recommend deletion. The good sources could be missed.
477:
6. Portant, I.M. (2015) "Analysis of Tooth
Presence during Elephant Lifespan".
1122:– An essay with a contrary viewpoint suggesting to cite every sentence/statement
343:
1165:– What should one do on finding a correct but uncited statement in an article.
755:" section instead of citing it inline in a way that does not actually improve
568:
editors, so the approach is strictly optional and should be used cautiously.
260:
and we do not need citations for the meanings of everyday words and phrases.
216:
Not only does citation overkill impact the readability of an article, it can
1018:
2743:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
191:– unreadable articles do not give our readers any material worth verifying
148:
961:– 54 citations to verify one statement (all but one from the same domain)
977:– 20 citations for one statement, after the phrase "advanced technology"
368:", instead of supporting any encyclopedic content about anything stated
364:
published an article about them" or "Chris
Celebrity was interviewed by
1168:
1159:, for Knowledge (XXG) articles that display a case of citation overkill
733:
Contrary views (and approaches to addressing their concerns) include:
2147:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
240:
It is possible that an editor who is trying to promote an article to
3429:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
300:
27:"WP:OVERCITE" redirects here. For the enhanced deletion policy, see
721:
sources – can usually simply be dropped unless necessary to verify
580:
article, or a newspaper or magazine article getting picked up by a
304:
Metaphorical ref bombs being deployed on a Knowledge (XXG) article.
830:
770:
source, and there are no disputes about its accuracy or about the
494:
multiple sources support different parts of a paragraph or passage
299:
156:
Knowledge (XXG) policy requires all content within articles to be
1612:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
725:
that are necessary for reader understanding of the controversy.
3922:
3459:
3066:
2272:
1213:
1172:
152:
These are probably too many sources to cite for a single point.
128:
36:
3309:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2481:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1949:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
1131:
Knowledge (XXG):You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
2838:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2647:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2242:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1582:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1294:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
430:
Avoid cluttering text with redundant citations like this:
1076:- 20 citations for a short paragraph about a new magazine
1052:– 77 citations for an article not even 70 words in length
555:, an editor may want to consider using Knowledge (XXG)'s
3682:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
1044:– 20 citations for one sentence, 3 of which were YouTube
3692:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1080:
1072:
1064:
1056:
1048:
1040:
1032:
1024:
1013:
1005:
997:
989:
981:
973:
965:
957:
949:
941:
933:
917:
896:
889:
822:
815:
641:
411:
291:
284:
277:
186:
The purpose of any article is first and foremost to be
116:
109:
102:
95:
88:
4050:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
3244:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2878:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1068:– 33 academic citations for lists of features and uses
2990:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1627:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
835:
This barber has the right idea: trim away the excess.
514:
This is also correct, but is an example of overkill:
340:
Citations to work that the article's subject produced
252:
require a citation. In all cases, editors should use
3434:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
1148:– extension to improve references into Harvard style
677:
If this is primarily an inter-editor dispute over a
312:
Examples of this type of citation overkill include:
3981:
3935:
3008:
2715:
2579:
2413:
2285:
2045:
1972:
1467:
1226:
907:
Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources § Bundling citations
670:. However, experts at The Other Camp suggest that
666:: "According to scholars in My School of Thought,
3953:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3732:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1354:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1152:Knowledge (XXG):Why most sentences should be cited
1924:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1216:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
918:all of the sources under a single footnote number
2077:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2022:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1774:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
218:call the notability of the subject into question
3752:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3482:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3159:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1799:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1304:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
3179:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2345:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2112:Counting and sorting are not original research
1136:Knowledge (XXG):Masking the lack of notability
4006:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3622:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2142:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1424:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1184:
8:
3672:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2436:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2162:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1439:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1414:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1379:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
958:Combatant Status Review Tribunal transcripts
376:said they were at high risk for bankruptcy".
3204:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
3932:
3919:
3897:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3469:
3456:
3284:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3239:News coverage does not decrease notability
3149:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3099:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3076:
3063:
2282:
2269:
2092:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2067:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1223:
1210:
1191:
1177:
1169:
604:should be retained as the citation link.)
4045:Knowledge (XXG) essays about verification
3792:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2082:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1702:Identifying and using independent sources
1081:Korean Association of Film Critics Awards
942:Customs and Excise Department (Hong Kong)
355:Citations that name-drop reliable sources
3958:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3119:Big events make key participants notable
2566:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1944:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1682:Formatting bilateral relations templates
1006:William Evans (Medal of Honor recipient)
697:process; the applicable NPOV, NOR or RS
203:challenged or is likely to be challenged
147:
67:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3369:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3274:Notability is not a level playing field
3189:How the presumption of notability works
2305:Contributing to complicated discussions
2157:How the presumption of notability works
1677:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1492:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
3902:You should not write meaningless lists
3199:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2506:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2247:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2072:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1637:Don't hope the house will build itself
1244:All Five Pillars are equally important
1163:Knowledge (XXG):Must I add a citation?
317:Citations lacking significant coverage
164:is helpful, adding too many can cause
3329:One sentence does not an article make
3279:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2995:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2908:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2426:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2365:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1997:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1939:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1764:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1527:An unfinished house is a real problem
1512:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1314:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
1065:Electrical Transient Analyzer Program
7:
3882:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3862:Things that should not be surprising
3557:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2883:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2828:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2813:Don't call people by their real name
2561:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2491:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1899:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
171:One cause of "citation overkill" is
3757:No one cares about your garage band
3742:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3409:What is and is not routine coverage
3254:No one cares about your garage band
3174:Existence does not prove notability
2592:Assume the assumption of good faith
2521:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2375:Relationships with academic editors
2237:Why was the page I created deleted?
2232:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1672:Featured articles may have problems
1459:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
985:– 65 citations in opening paragraph
258:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
3802:Please do not murder the newcomers
3359:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2843:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2057:Adjectives in your recommendations
1934:What an article should not include
1824:The problem with elegant variation
1632:Don't get hung up on minor details
1449:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
1120:Knowledge (XXG):Citation underkill
1017:– 18 citations for notable alumna
847:Deciding which citations to remove
741:Knowledge (XXG) is not a Web index
328:Citations that verify random facts
71:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
3852:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3424:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3124:Businesses with a single location
2405:You have a right to remain silent
1854:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1809:Potential, not just current state
1739:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
2873:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2868:Don't ignore community consensus
2102:Confusing arguments mean nothing
1001:– 14 citations for one statement
236:Misuse to prove an obvious point
132:
40:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
3374:Sources must be out-of-universe
3089:All high schools can be notable
2486:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2172:Identifying blatant advertising
1954:The world will not end tomorrow
1784:Not everything needs a template
1697:How to write a featured article
1299:Editors will sometimes be wrong
1141:Knowledge (XXG):Overlink crisis
1060:– 22 citations for one sentence
1036:– 29 citations for one sentence
1028:– 33 citations for one sentence
969:– 18 citations for one sentence
953:– 17 citations for one sentence
802:How to trim excessive citations
472:Yes, Elephants Still Have Teeth
372:that source, such as "In 2019,
256:. In particular, remember that
3963:Avoid writing redundant essays
3612:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3487:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3314:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
3264:Notability cannot be purchased
3224:Masking the lack of notability
1987:Copyediting reception sections
1889:Temporary versions of articles
1819:Principle of Some Astonishment
1607:Creating controversial content
1507:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1454:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1146:mw:Extension:HarvardReferences
717:advocacy materials, and other
465:All about the elephants' teeth
456:3. Christenson, Chris. (2010)
1:
3989:About policies and guidelines
3104:Articles with a single source
2728:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2551:Two wrongs don't make a right
2541:The rules of polite discourse
2471:It's not the end of the world
1779:Not everything needs a navbox
1647:Don't "teach the controversy"
1319:Here to build an encyclopedia
1014:New York Chiropractic College
974:China–United States trade war
620:. Similar concerns about the
458:An exhausting list of mammals
342:– A series of citations that
3877:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3572:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3492:Alternatives to edit warring
2355:Maintaining a friendly space
993:– many unnecessary citations
622:biographies of living people
538:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
534:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
529:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
525:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
521:<ref name="Rebels" /: -->
334:mention this charity at all.
3857:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3647:Editing under the influence
3184:Google searches and numbers
2903:Don't template the regulars
2818:Don't call the kettle black
2612:Be excellent to one another
2496:Revert notification opt-out
2400:We are all Wikipedians here
1849:Put a little effort into it
1794:Obtain peer review comments
1749:Introduction to structurism
1687:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1657:Editors are not mindreaders
1562:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1552:Beef up that first revision
1324:Leave it to the experienced
1289:Don't search for objections
1025:Carrfour Supportive Housing
4066:
3887:Why not create an account?
3822:Requirements for adminship
3697:How to vandalize correctly
3667:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3627:Don't delete the main page
3547:Avoid using preview button
3269:Notability comparison test
2853:Don't fight fire with fire
2848:Don't eat the troll's food
2808:Don't call a spade a spade
2803:Don't bludgeon the process
2652:Encourage full discussions
2501:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2137:Don't attack the nominator
2097:But there must be sources!
1919:Try not to leave it a stub
1869:Source your plot summaries
1157:Category:Citation overkill
1126:Knowledge (XXG):Wisps' Law
1106:Excessive citations inline
950:2004 Madrid train bombings
912:before each source, as in
904:
879:
805:
631:
588:articles) then retain the
542:<ref name="Rebels": -->
507:<ref name="Rebels": -->
470:5. Reporter, Rae. (2012)
453:, Chapter 2: The Elephant.
419:
401:
267:
78:
26:
3931:
3918:
3837:Sarcasm is really helpful
3777:Notability is not eternal
3702:How to win a citation war
3472:
3468:
3455:
3164:Every snowflake is unique
3084:Advanced source searching
3079:
3075:
3062:
2965:No, you can't have a pony
2913:Do not insult the vandals
2773:Don't be high-maintenance
2330:Encouraging the newcomers
2281:
2268:
1874:Specialized-style fallacy
1839:Pruning article revisions
1667:Endorsements (commercial)
1652:Editing on mobile devices
1557:Blind men and an elephant
1532:Articles have a half-life
1279:Dissent is not disloyalty
1249:Avoid vague introductions
1222:
1209:
870:World Wide Web Consortium
729:Other views and solutions
703:formal dispute resolution
442:1. Expert, Alice. (2010)
213:(merging) the citations.
29:Knowledge (XXG):Oversight
3847:The Night Before Wikimas
3712:Ignore every single rule
3687:How to get away with UPE
3567:Before they were notable
3339:Overreliance upon Google
3134:Common sourcing mistakes
2707:Settle the process first
2667:Imagine others complexly
2571:Writing for the opponent
2546:There is no common sense
2227:Unopposed AFD discussion
2212:Relisting can be abusive
2087:Avoid repeated arguments
1692:Give an article a chance
1542:Avoid mission statements
1502:Advanced text formatting
1497:Advanced article editing
1444:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1429:The rules are principles
1389:Product, process, policy
1239:Articles must be written
691:verifiability of a claim
463:4. Maizy, Daisy. (2009)
444:Size of elephants: large
140:This page in a nutshell:
59:Citing Sources guideline
18:Knowledge (XXG):REFFLOOD
3982:Policies and guidelines
3817:Requests for medication
3797:Please bite the newbies
3722:Mess with the templates
3289:Notability means impact
2823:Don't call things cruft
2798:Don't be the Fun Police
2607:Avoid the word "vandal"
2556:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2421:A thank you never hurts
2192:Liar liar pants on fire
2127:Deletion is not cleanup
2037:Writing better articles
2027:Write the article first
2002:Gender-neutral language
1974:Writing article content
1964:Writing better articles
1959:Write the article first
1894:Tertiary-source fallacy
1662:Encourage the newcomers
1622:Dictionaries as sources
1567:Build content to endure
616:of details, especially
598:The Palookaville Herald
420:For the guideline, see
4040:Knowledge (XXG) essays
4011:Policy writing is hard
3717:Is that even an essay?
3414:What notability is not
3169:Existence ≠Notability
2778:Don't be inconsiderate
2702:Read before commenting
2687:Mind your own business
2602:Avoid personal remarks
2177:Identifying test edits
1522:A navbox on every page
1477:100K featured articles
1274:Concede lost arguments
1269:Competence is required
1200:Knowledge (XXG) essays
982:Palestinian Christians
836:
549:
512:
486:
449:2. Smith, Bob. (2009)
305:
153:
3807:Pledge of Tranquility
3552:Avoid using wikilinks
3379:Subjective importance
2893:Don't spite your face
2682:Keep it down to earth
2446:Beware of the tigers!
2385:Too long; didn't read
2325:Edit at your own pace
2295:Accepting other users
2062:AfD is not a war zone
1409:There is no seniority
1349:Neutrality of sources
1033:Drifting (motorsport)
834:
695:requests for comments
687:source interpretation
516:
501:
432:
392:articles for creation
303:
222:notability guidelines
151:
69:, as it has not been
3973:Quote your own essay
3842:Sausages for tasting
3617:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3587:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3399:Vanispamcruftisement
3299:Notability sub-pages
3109:Avoid template creep
3069:Essays on notability
2985:There are no oracles
2768:Don't be a WikiBigot
2622:Call a spade a spade
2395:Unblock perspectives
2222:The Heymann Standard
2207:Overzealous deletion
2167:I just don't like it
1904:There is no deadline
1769:"Murder of" articles
1597:Common-style fallacy
1469:Article construction
1384:Process is important
1329:Levels of competence
1254:Be a reliable source
998:White power skinhead
488:In addition, as per
55:Verifiability policy
3762:No one really cares
3677:Go ahead, vandalize
3439:Two prongs of merit
3384:Third-party sources
3304:Notabilitymandering
3259:No one really cares
3214:Inherent notability
3209:Independent sources
3094:Alternative outlets
2928:Nationalist editing
2898:Don't take the bait
2863:Don't help too much
2788:Don't be prejudiced
2758:Don't be an ostrich
2723:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2456:Deletion as revenge
2431:Advice for hotheads
2252:No Encyclopedic Use
2132:Does deletion help?
2032:Writing about women
1914:The deadline is now
1909:There is a deadline
1789:Nothing is in stone
1419:Tendentious editing
1334:Levels of consensus
1097:Excessive citations
890:WP:Citation merging
679:core content policy
628:In-article conflict
398:Needless repetition
3772:No sorcery threats
3652:Embrace Stop Signs
3532:Assume good wraith
3507:Anti-Wikipedianism
3344:Perennial websites
3334:Other stuff exists
2970:Passive aggression
2933:No angry mastodons
2923:Hate is disruptive
2783:Don't be obnoxious
2748:Don't be a fanatic
2526:Most ideas are bad
2466:Forgive and forget
2275:Essays on civility
1884:Run an edit-a-thon
1617:Deprecated sources
1592:Citation underkill
1577:Chesterton's fence
1547:Be neutral in form
1399:Reasonability rule
1364:Oversimplification
1339:Most ideas are bad
837:
664:proof by assertion
602:The New York Times
594:The New York Times
451:Land-based animals
422:WP:CONSECUTIVECITE
306:
154:
4027:
4026:
4023:
4022:
4019:
4018:
3914:
3913:
3910:
3909:
3892:Yes legal threats
3707:Ignore all essays
3592:Complete bollocks
3517:Asshole John rule
3451:
3450:
3447:
3446:
3404:What BLP1E is not
3324:One hundred words
3294:Notability points
3058:
3057:
3054:
3053:
2858:Don't give a fuck
2733:Civil POV pushing
2697:Mutual withdrawal
2587:Assume good faith
2451:Civility warnings
2370:Please say please
2320:Editors' pronouns
2264:
2263:
2260:
2259:
2152:Follow the leader
2017:Use our own words
1982:Avoid thread mode
1829:Pro and con lists
1587:Citation overkill
1537:Autosizing images
1259:Civil POV pushing
916:, which produces
786:or other reasons.
714:secondary sources
618:in medical topics
610:literature review
499:This is correct:
146:
145:
127:
126:
16:(Redirected from
4057:
3968:Finding an essay
3933:
3920:
3582:Butterfly effect
3577:Boston Tea Party
3537:Assume stupidity
3522:Assume bad faith
3512:Articlecountitis
3470:
3457:
3389:Trivial mentions
3234:Minimum coverage
3077:
3064:
2763:Don't be ashamed
2642:Discussing cruft
2632:Deny recognition
2531:Nothing is clear
2340:Expect no thanks
2283:
2270:
2202:Nothing is clear
2049:deleting content
1732:Tertiary sources
1487:Acronym overkill
1359:The one question
1224:
1211:
1204:
1193:
1186:
1179:
1170:
1109:
1100:
1083:
1075:
1067:
1059:
1051:
1043:
1035:
1027:
1016:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
936:
899:
892:
876:Citation merging
825:
818:
710:fringe viewpoint
644:
563:to place hidden
562:
561:<!-- --: -->
545:
510:
414:
294:
287:
280:
166:citation clutter
162:inline citations
136:
135:
129:
119:
112:
105:
98:
91:
44:
43:
37:
21:
4065:
4064:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4056:
4055:
4054:
4030:
4029:
4028:
4015:
3977:
3948:Value of essays
3927:
3906:
3737:Legal vandalism
3602:Counting juntas
3502:Anti-Wikipedian
3464:
3462:Humorous essays
3443:
3419:What to include
3364:Run-of-the-mill
3354:Read the source
3319:Offline sources
3114:Bare notability
3071:
3050:
3004:
2955:No Confederates
2753:Don't be a jerk
2711:
2677:Keep it concise
2617:Beyond civility
2575:
2409:
2350:How to be civil
2315:Don't retaliate
2277:
2256:
2187:Keep it concise
2122:Delete the junk
2117:Delete or merge
2107:Content removal
2041:
2007:Myth vs fiction
1968:
1859:Robotic editing
1722:Science sources
1717:Primary sources
1707:History sources
1482:Abandoned stubs
1463:
1234:Article content
1218:
1205:
1197:
1116:
1103:
1094:
1091:
1079:
1071:
1063:
1055:
1047:
1039:
1031:
1023:
1012:
1004:
996:
988:
980:
972:
964:
956:
948:
940:
932:
926:
909:
903:
902:
895:
888:
884:
878:
849:
829:
828:
821:
814:
810:
804:
749:Further reading
731:
673:
669:
648:
647:
642:WP:CITECONFLICT
640:
636:
630:
582:news aggregator
574:
560:
518:
503:
485:
425:
418:
417:
410:
406:
400:
298:
297:
290:
283:
276:
272:
266:
264:Notability bomb
238:
160:. While adding
133:
123:
122:
115:
108:
101:
94:
87:
83:
75:
74:
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4063:
4061:
4053:
4052:
4047:
4042:
4032:
4031:
4025:
4024:
4021:
4020:
4017:
4016:
4014:
4013:
4008:
4003:
4002:
4001:
3996:
3985:
3983:
3979:
3978:
3976:
3975:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3955:
3950:
3945:
3939:
3937:
3929:
3928:
3923:
3916:
3915:
3912:
3911:
3908:
3907:
3905:
3904:
3899:
3894:
3889:
3884:
3879:
3874:
3869:
3864:
3859:
3854:
3849:
3844:
3839:
3834:
3829:
3824:
3819:
3814:
3809:
3804:
3799:
3794:
3789:
3784:
3779:
3774:
3769:
3764:
3759:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3734:
3729:
3724:
3719:
3714:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3642:Editsummarisis
3639:
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3609:
3604:
3599:
3597:Counting forks
3594:
3589:
3584:
3579:
3574:
3569:
3564:
3559:
3554:
3549:
3544:
3539:
3534:
3529:
3524:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3504:
3499:
3494:
3489:
3484:
3479:
3473:
3466:
3465:
3460:
3453:
3452:
3449:
3448:
3445:
3444:
3442:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3154:Don't cite GNG
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3129:But it's true!
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3080:
3073:
3072:
3067:
3060:
3059:
3056:
3055:
3052:
3051:
3049:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3026:WikiHarassment
3023:
3018:
3012:
3010:
3006:
3005:
3003:
3002:
2997:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2960:No queerphobia
2957:
2952:
2947:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2930:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2910:
2905:
2900:
2895:
2890:
2885:
2880:
2875:
2870:
2865:
2860:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2840:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2725:
2719:
2717:
2713:
2712:
2710:
2709:
2704:
2699:
2694:
2689:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2597:Assume no clue
2594:
2589:
2583:
2581:
2577:
2576:
2574:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2533:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2433:
2428:
2423:
2417:
2415:
2411:
2410:
2408:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2335:Enjoy yourself
2332:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2307:
2302:
2297:
2291:
2289:
2279:
2278:
2273:
2266:
2265:
2262:
2261:
2258:
2257:
2255:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2040:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1978:
1976:
1970:
1969:
1967:
1966:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1864:Sham consensus
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1473:
1471:
1465:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1309:Explanationism
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1230:
1228:
1220:
1219:
1214:
1207:
1206:
1198:
1196:
1195:
1188:
1181:
1173:
1167:
1166:
1160:
1154:
1149:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1101:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1077:
1069:
1061:
1053:
1045:
1037:
1029:
1021:
1010:
1009:– 16 citations
1002:
994:
990:Stewie Griffin
986:
978:
970:
962:
954:
946:
938:
925:
922:
901:
900:
893:
885:
880:
877:
874:
848:
845:
827:
826:
819:
811:
806:
803:
800:
799:
798:
791:
779:
760:
753:External links
746:
730:
727:
671:
667:
646:
645:
637:
632:
629:
626:
573:
570:
484:
483:
482:
481:
475:
468:
461:
454:
447:
437:
416:
415:
407:
402:
399:
396:
380:
379:
378:
377:
352:
351:
350:
337:
336:
335:
325:
324:
323:
296:
295:
292:WP:BOMBARDMENT
288:
281:
273:
268:
265:
262:
237:
234:
144:
143:
137:
125:
124:
121:
120:
113:
110:WP:TOOMANYREFS
106:
99:
92:
84:
79:
76:
64:
63:
47:
45:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4062:
4051:
4048:
4046:
4043:
4041:
4038:
4037:
4035:
4012:
4009:
4007:
4004:
4000:
3997:
3995:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3987:
3986:
3984:
3980:
3974:
3971:
3969:
3966:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3954:
3951:
3949:
3946:
3944:
3941:
3940:
3938:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3921:
3917:
3903:
3900:
3898:
3895:
3893:
3890:
3888:
3885:
3883:
3880:
3878:
3875:
3873:
3872:Watchlistitis
3870:
3868:
3867:The WikiBible
3865:
3863:
3860:
3858:
3855:
3853:
3850:
3848:
3845:
3843:
3840:
3838:
3835:
3833:
3830:
3828:
3825:
3823:
3820:
3818:
3815:
3813:
3812:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3810:
3808:
3805:
3803:
3800:
3798:
3795:
3793:
3790:
3788:
3787:Play the game
3785:
3783:
3780:
3778:
3775:
3773:
3770:
3768:
3765:
3763:
3760:
3758:
3755:
3753:
3750:
3748:
3745:
3743:
3740:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3727:My local pond
3725:
3723:
3720:
3718:
3715:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3637:Edits Per Day
3635:
3633:
3632:Editcountitis
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3588:
3585:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3573:
3570:
3568:
3565:
3563:
3560:
3558:
3555:
3553:
3550:
3548:
3545:
3543:
3540:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3523:
3520:
3518:
3515:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3493:
3490:
3488:
3485:
3483:
3480:
3478:
3475:
3474:
3471:
3467:
3463:
3458:
3454:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3219:Insignificant
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3081:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3065:
3061:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3036:WikiLawyering
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3013:
3011:
3009:WikiRelations
3007:
3001:
2998:
2996:
2993:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2939:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2931:
2929:
2926:
2924:
2921:
2919:
2916:
2914:
2911:
2909:
2906:
2904:
2901:
2899:
2896:
2894:
2891:
2889:
2886:
2884:
2881:
2879:
2876:
2874:
2871:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2856:
2854:
2851:
2849:
2846:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2833:Don't cry COI
2831:
2829:
2826:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2793:Don't be rude
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2738:Cyberbullying
2736:
2734:
2731:
2729:
2726:
2724:
2721:
2720:
2718:
2714:
2708:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2695:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2683:
2680:
2678:
2675:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2588:
2585:
2584:
2582:
2578:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2532:
2529:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2516:The last word
2514:
2512:
2511:The grey zone
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2432:
2429:
2427:
2424:
2422:
2419:
2418:
2416:
2412:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2292:
2290:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2267:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2052:
2050:
2044:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1979:
1977:
1975:
1971:
1965:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1929:Walled garden
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1754:Mine a source
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1602:Concept cloud
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1572:Cherrypicking
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1470:
1466:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1404:Systemic bias
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1201:
1194:
1189:
1187:
1182:
1180:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:If (magazine)
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:William Selig
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:Howard Cosell
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:Iris graminea
931:
930:
929:
923:
921:
919:
915:
908:
898:
894:
891:
887:
886:
883:
875:
873:
871:
865:
861:
858:
853:
846:
844:
840:
833:
824:
820:
817:
813:
812:
809:
801:
796:
789:
787:
785:
780:
777:
773:
769:
764:
761:
758:
757:verifiability
754:
750:
744:
742:
739:
736:
735:
734:
728:
726:
724:
720:
715:
711:
706:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:point of view
680:
675:
665:
661:
657:
653:
643:
639:
638:
635:
627:
625:
623:
619:
615:
614:verifiability
611:
605:
603:
599:
595:
591:
585:
583:
579:
571:
569:
566:
558:
554:
548:
546:
544:
539:
535:
530:
526:
522:
515:
511:
509:
500:
497:
495:
491:
480:
476:
473:
469:
466:
462:
459:
455:
452:
448:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
436:
431:
428:
423:
413:
409:
408:
405:
397:
395:
393:
388:
384:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
356:
353:
348:
347:
345:
341:
338:
332:
331:
329:
326:
321:
320:
318:
315:
314:
313:
310:
302:
293:
289:
286:
282:
279:
275:
274:
271:
263:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
235:
233:
230:
226:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
190:
184:
182:
176:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
150:
141:
138:
131:
130:
118:
117:WP:REFCLUTTER
114:
111:
107:
104:
100:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:
82:
77:
72:
68:
62:
60:
56:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
19:
3936:About essays
3925:About essays
3832:Rouge editor
3782:Oops Defense
3562:Barnstaritis
3527:Assume faith
3349:Pokémon test
3194:High Schools
3016:WikiBullying
2980:Superhatting
2975:POV railroad
2672:Just drop it
2476:Nobody cares
2310:Divisiveness
1834:Printability
1727:Style guides
1586:
1517:Amnesia test
1374:Paraphrasing
1049:Alvin Duskin
966:Generation Y
927:
914:this example
910:
897:WP:CITEMERGE
866:
862:
856:
854:
850:
841:
838:
781:
778:of its use).
762:
737:
732:
707:
676:
649:
606:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
578:wire service
575:
564:
550:
547:
541:
537:
533:
528:
524:
520:
517:
513:
506:
502:
498:
487:
478:
471:
464:
457:
450:
443:
433:
429:
426:
389:
385:
381:
373:
369:
365:
361:
354:
339:
327:
316:
311:
307:
254:common sense
239:
228:
224:
215:
195:common sense
188:
185:
180:
177:
173:edit warring
170:
165:
155:
139:
48:
3943:Essay guide
3827:Rouge admin
3394:Video links
3249:No big loss
2938:just madmen
2888:Don't shout
2662:How to lose
2657:Get over it
2441:Be the glue
2360:Negotiation
2217:Relist bias
2047:Removing or
1879:Stub Makers
1712:Law sources
1642:Don't panic
816:WP:CITETRIM
699:noticeboard
557:hidden text
553:WP:CITETYPE
344:Gish gallop
285:WP:NOTEBOMB
246:sky is blue
103:WP:OVERCITE
96:WP:OVERKILL
89:WP:CITEKILL
49:This is an
4034:Categories
3999:Guidelines
3767:No, really
3747:LTTAUTMAOK
3229:Make stubs
2950:No racists
2692:Say "MOBY"
2414:Philosophy
2287:The basics
1844:Publicists
1814:Presentism
1759:Merge Test
1744:Inaccuracy
1227:Philosophy
905:See also:
823:WP:CITEONE
772:neutrality
723:quotations
467:, p. 23–29
412:WP:REPCITE
278:WP:REFBOMB
158:verifiable
3477:Adminitis
3046:WikiPeace
3021:WikiCrime
3000:UPPERCASE
2380:Thank you
2012:Proseline
1804:Permastub
1369:Paradoxes
1284:Don't lie
1089:Templates
1019:Ora Golan
882:Shortcuts
808:Shortcuts
532:concept!"
374:The Times
362:The Times
270:Shortcuts
248:does not
183:content.
81:Shortcuts
3994:Policies
3144:Coatrack
3041:WikiLove
3031:WikiHate
2945:No Nazis
2918:Griefing
2182:Immunity
1434:Trifecta
1264:Cohesion
1114:See also
924:Examples
768:reliable
681:matter (
660:edit war
656:PoV fork
652:outweigh
634:Shortcut
572:Reprints
565:ref name
404:Shortcut
366:Big Show
242:GA-class
211:bundling
57:and the
3657:Emerson
3497:ANI flu
2461:Failure
2300:Apology
2197:Nothing
1394:Purpose
790:replace
719:primary
672:Claim 2
668:Claim 1
600:, then
559:syntax
490:WP:PAIC
479:J. Imp.
250:usually
229:quality
207:linkrot
199:WP:BLUE
53:on the
3139:Clones
2716:Don'ts
2637:Desist
2627:Candor
2536:Reader
776:nature
751:" or "
225:appear
2390:Truce
857:types
784:WP:RS
701:; or
689:, or
197:(see
51:essay
3662:Fart
3607:Crap
1992:Coup
1344:Need
658:and
596:and
590:most
189:read
2580:Dos
1203:(?)
795:RfC
774:or
745:add
674:."
181:new
4036::
1108:}}
1104:{{
1099:}}
1095:{{
705:.
685:,
496:.
370:in
1192:e
1185:t
1178:v
759:.
474:.
460:.
446:.
424:.
61:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
