1519:: "Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. Mere republications of a single source or news wire service do not always constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing articles in the same geographic region about an occurrence, does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Specifically, several journals publishing the same article within the same geographic region from a news wire service is not a multiplicity of works."
886:, routine news coverage of such things as announcements are not sufficient basis for an article. Planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it, is considered to be routine. Wedding announcements, sports scores, crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine. Routine events such as sports matches, film premieres, press conferences etc. may be better covered as part of another article, if at all.
775:, meaning that coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established, a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable. Events that are only covered in sources published during or immediately after an event, without further analysis or discussion, are likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article. However, this may be difficult or impossible to determine shortly after the event occurs, as editors
46:
1265:, it is recommended to delay the nomination for a few days to avoid the deletion debate dealing with a moving target and to allow time for a clearer picture of the notability of the event to emerge, which may make a deletion nomination unnecessary. Deletion discussions while events are still hot news items rarely result in consensus to delete. There may be
132:
1021:
Articles about criminal acts, particularly those that fall within the category of "breaking news", are frequently the subject of deletion discussions. As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those
890:
events—common, everyday, ordinary items that do not stand out—are probably not notable. This is especially true of the brief, often light and amusing (for example bear-in-a-tree or local-person-wins-award), stories that frequently appear in the back pages of newspapers or near the end of nightly news
1092:
until the event actually takes place, as even notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Such articles are not appropriate if nothing can be said about the
1029:
The disappearance of a person would fall under this guideline if law enforcement agencies deemed it likely to have been caused by criminal conduct, regardless of whether a perpetrator is identified or charged. If a matter is deemed notable, and to be a likely crime, the article should remain even if
433:, that differ from the criteria used by Knowledge (XXG) and encyclopedias. A violent crime, accidental death, or other media event may be interesting enough to reporters and news editors to justify coverage, but this will not always translate into sufficient notability for a Knowledge (XXG) article.
584:
An event affecting a local area and reported only by the media within the immediate region may not necessarily be notable. Coverage of an event nationally or internationally may make notability more likely, but such coverage should not be the sole basis for creating an article. However, events that
421:
events, but not every incident that gains media coverage will have or should have a
Knowledge (XXG) article. A rule of thumb for creating a Knowledge (XXG) article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance, and the scope of reporting (national or global reporting is preferred).
829:
Media channels under common control or influence are usually counted as one local or national outlet and a single instance of coverage when they report a matter, even if they have several regional or national outlets. Similarly, where a single story or press release is simply re-reported (often
537:
Events that have a noted and sourced permanent effect of historical significance are likely to be notable. This includes, for example, natural disasters that result in widespread destruction, since they lead to rebuilding, population shifts, and possible impact on elections. For example,
707:
Media sources sometimes report on events because of their similarity (or contrast, or comparison) to another widely reported incident. Editors should not rely on such sources to afford notability to the new event, since the main purpose of such articles is to highlight either the
815:
Significant national or international coverage is usually expected for an event to be notable. Wide-ranging reporting tends to show significance, but sources that simply mirror or tend to follow other sources, or are under common control with other sources, are usually
1088:, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are
140:
An event is presumed to be notable if it has lasting major consequences or affects a major geographical scope, or receives significant non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time. Coverage should be in multiple reliable sources with national or global
478:
In evaluating an event, editors should evaluate various aspects of the event and the coverage: the impact, depth, duration, geographical scope, diversity and reliability of the coverage, as well whether the coverage is routine. These factors are described below.
1481:
Jaeho Cho; Michael P. Boyle; Heejo Keum; Mark D. Shevy; Douglas M. Mcleod; Dhavan V. Shah; Zhongdang Pan (September 2003). "Media, Terrorism, and
Emotionality: Emotional Differences in Media Content and Public Reactions to the September 11th Terrorist Attacks".
368:(i.e. Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of news material). By attempting to clarify the application of these rules to articles about events, this guideline reflects the community consensus regarding the handling of similarly situated articles.
429:, the tendency for new and current matters to seem more important than they might seem in a few years time. Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. News organizations have criteria for content, i.e.
825:
recommends that multiple sources be provided to establish the notability of a topic, not just multiple references from a single source. A series of news reports by a single newspaper or news channel would not be sufficient basis for an article.
1330:
If the notability of an event is in question but it is primarily associated with a particular person, company or organization, or can be covered as part of a wider topic, it may preferable to describe the event within a preexisting article, by
355:
have featured a number of contentious debates about events, particularly breaking news events, that have received intense media coverage. This guideline was formed with the intention of guiding editors in interpreting the various pre-existing
1269:, such as merging or reworking the article so that it conforms with policy, for example, by rewriting an article about a person known only for one event to be about the event. Other alternatives to deletion while the story develops are
1198:. It is recommended that editors start a section about the event within an existing article on a related topic if possible, which may later be split into its own article if the coverage suggests that the event is independently notable.
657:
The general guideline is that coverage must be significant and not in passing. In-depth coverage includes analysis that puts events into context, such as is often found in books, feature length articles in major news magazines (like
1205:
of their notability. Anticipation is the creation of an article on a recent event with the expectation that it will meet inclusion guidelines, before the duration of coverage or any lasting effect is certain. For example,
1189:
It is wise to delay writing an article about a breaking news event until the significance of the event is clearer as early coverage may lack perspective and be subject to factual errors. Writing about breaking news may be
343:
reached through discussions and reinforced by established practice, and informs decisions on whether an article about past, current, and breaking news events should be written, merged, deleted or further developed.
838:). Derivative reports and reports under common control cannot be used to verify each other, nor does mere repetition necessarily show the kind of effort that is good evidence of a significant matter.
526:
Events are often considered to be notable if they act as a precedent or catalyst for something else. This may include effects on the views and behaviors of society and legislation. For example, the
1366:
1052:
People known only in connection with one event should generally not have an article written about them. If the event is notable, then an article usually should be written about the event instead.
1213:
Anticipation of notability may be mistaken. Many events portrayed by the media as major on the day they occur quickly become only a footnote. For example, it was reported in
January 2009 that
549:
It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable.
364:(i.e. "a topic is presumed to have met the criteria for notability if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") and its relationship to
1391:
466:
Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and
1580:
A "criminal act" includes a matter in which a crime has been established, or a matter has been deemed a likely crime by the relevant law enforcement agency or judicial authority.
1376:
224:
456:
if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards (as described below).
270:
275:
1210:
was started just 60 minutes after the crash occurred. The rescue operation was still ongoing, an investigation was yet to begin, and the final death toll was unknown.
585:
have a demonstrable long-term impact on a significant region of the world or a significant widespread societal group are presumed to be notable enough for an article.
877:
1079:
181:
1214:
205:
301:
1386:
1596:
53:
1207:
531:
1340:
1043:
970:, when assessing notability. Note that this guideline applies to articles about a wide range of subjects beyond just events including articles about
1427:
700:
in the UK). Reporting with little thematic connection or contextual information is often considered to be routine reporting. Some editors consider
1437:
1442:
69:
904:
402:
357:
405:, which means that there is no practical limit to the number of topics we can cover or the total amount of content. However, it is also
830:
word-for-word) by news publications, or when reporters base their information on repeating news coverage from elsewhere (for example, "
174:
352:
1558:
1448:
1166:
1094:
546:
are notable by these standards. A minor earthquake or storm with little or no impact on human populations is probably not notable.
217:
294:
1432:
1422:
1346:
If there is no suitable target for merging, a solution may be to rework the article to widen its context beyond a single event.
1047:
991:
236:
231:
1226:
779:
whether an event will receive further coverage or not. That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable.
212:
198:
188:
1468:
265:
35:
1131:
243:
61:
1222:
967:
543:
328:, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded".
1355:
1319:
887:
260:
1534:
287:
1371:
834:
reported that ..."), this should only be counted as a single source for the purpose of determining notability (see
726:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time
641:"WP:DEPTH" redirects here. For the figure of merit that indicates the quality of a collaborative encyclopedia, see
1396:
1307:
1217:. It was reported several days later that he had no such plans and this event was shown to be nothing more than a
1085:
1303:
1299:
786:
in multiple sources after the initial coverage has died down, this may be an indication of lasting significance.
771:
The duration of coverage is a strong indicator of whether an event has passing or lasting significance. Although
642:
1381:
883:
1230:
1417:
835:
701:
1363:, a category which may be a guide to the kind of articles about events considered acceptable by the community
934:
is usually considered a poor basis for an encyclopedia article, due to the lack of fact checking inherent in
1138:
520:
An event that is a precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance is likely to be notable.
1406:
943:
725:
316:
164:
157:
150:
1218:
1401:
1233:
will almost certainly gain consensus to be kept even when created on the same day as the event occurred.
1191:
975:
426:
340:
1151:
1142:
578:
Notable events usually have significant impact over a wide region, domain, or widespread societal group.
1411:
1325:
1286:
1262:
1244:
1172:
1106:
1061:
997:
910:
852:
795:
731:
617:
594:
558:
493:
377:
78:
65:
527:
1332:
1310:
from
Knowledge (XXG). Conversely, Wikinews content can be freely incorporated into Knowledge (XXG).
1195:
905:
Knowledge (XXG):What
Knowledge (XXG) is not § Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox or means of promotion
776:
1274:
1270:
979:
31:
1564:
1499:
1031:
947:
927:
1336:
772:
1221:. However, articles about widely reported major unexpected or unprecedented events such as the
1555:
939:
931:
539:
1535:"News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals"
1547:
1491:
831:
467:
1516:
1266:
971:
822:
442:
410:
406:
365:
361:
1360:
666:
1023:
1529:
935:
17:
1590:
1502:
946:, Knowledge (XXG) is not for scandal mongering or gossip. Even in respected media, a
678:
1044:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons § Subjects notable only for one event
959:
951:
690:
660:
332:
in the sense of being "famous", or "popular"—although not irrelevant—is secondary.
1306:, but the content could be reworked from the original sources for Wikinews with a
892:
320:
is a test used by editors to decide whether a topic can have its own article. The
1495:
1261:
Articles about breaking news events are often rapidly nominated for deletion. As
1298:
Moving a page to
Wikinews is not possible as this would re-license it under the
430:
1147:
If an event is still being widely covered in the press, editors may place the
963:
955:
783:
684:
765:
Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle.
696:
1367:
Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It's in the news
1292:
672:
414:
1215:
a man was planning to travel to
Washington to assassinate George W. Bush
1157:
template on it to inform readers of the changing nature of the article.
1567:
1048:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) § People notable for only one event
470:) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually
336:
651:
An event must receive significant or in-depth coverage to be notable.
474:
unless something further gives them additional enduring significance.
1551:
1130:"WP:BREAKING" redirects here. For reliability of breaking news, see
992:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) § Crime victims and perpetrators
950:
and other pressures inherent in the journalism industry can lead to
1407:
Don't create an article on a news story covered in 109 newspapers
958:
without proper fact checking, and they may engage in frivolous "
418:
463:; the descriptions below provide guidance to assess the event.
126:
40:
1030:
it is subsequently found that no crime occurred (e.g., the
441:
if they have enduring historical significance and meet the
30:"WP:EVENT" redirects here. For Knowledge (XXG) events, see
1445:, essay on articles on "International reactions" to events
1392:
Knowledge (XXG):News coverage does not decrease notability
1320:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy § Alternatives to deletion
962:" reporting. Some editors may take into account perceived
64:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
1377:
Knowledge (XXG):Big events make key participants notable
1252:
1180:
1121:
1114:
1069:
1012:
1005:
918:
867:
860:
803:
753:
746:
739:
632:
625:
602:
566:
508:
501:
392:
385:
114:
107:
100:
93:
86:
1080:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
1034:) since that would not make the matter less notable.
1335:
content. Care should be taken not to give the event
459:
Events having lesser coverage or more limited scope
1237:
878:
Knowledge (XXG):What is and is not routine coverage
1533:
1414:, a proposal for notability of aircraft disasters.
1387:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper
1291:Editors are welcome to write about news events in
417:offers a place where editors can document current
27:Knowledge (XXG) guideline for notability of events
1132:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources § Breaking news
407:not an indiscriminate collection of information
360:that apply to articles about events, including
52:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
1484:Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
1451:(Specific notability essay for weather events)
1084:All articles about anticipated events must be
823:Knowledge (XXG)'s general notability guideline
295:
8:
702:narrative news reports to be primary sources
1428:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (events)
60:Editors should generally follow it, though
1208:June 2009 Washington Metro train collision
532:Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act
302:
288:
146:
1443:Knowledge (XXG):Reactions to... articles
682:), and TV news specialty shows (such as
1461:
1236:
1201:Many articles on events are created in
1160:
252:
163:
156:
149:
1597:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
1196:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
7:
1449:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (weather)
1438:Knowledge (XXG):"Murder of" articles
1302:license, which is incompatible with
1167:Knowledge (XXG):There is no deadline
446:
1532:; Lester, Marilyn (February 1974).
1433:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
1423:Knowledge (XXG):Let the dust settle
643:meta:Knowledge (XXG) article depth
68:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
1093:event that is verifiable and not
1038:People notable for only one event
36:Knowledge (XXG):Event coordinator
534:, among other notable subjects.
445:, or if they have a significant
130:
44:
1356:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy
1295:as well as in Knowledge (XXG).
1227:Assassination of Benazir Bhutto
704:rather than secondary sources.
335:This notability guideline for
1:
1469:Encarta dictionary definition
1397:Knowledge (XXG):News articles
1341:biographies of living persons
1273:or incubating the article in
1238:Don't rush to delete articles
1161:Don't rush to create articles
1540:American Sociological Review
1496:10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_1
1382:Knowledge (XXG):Future event
1223:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
968:Missing white woman syndrome
544:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
443:general notability guideline
425:Editors should bear in mind
353:Article deletion discussions
158:General notability guideline
1418:Knowledge (XXG):In the news
876:For an opposing essay, see
836:Knowledge (XXG):Bombardment
773:notability is not temporary
276:Why was my article deleted?
225:Organizations and companies
165:Subject-specific guidelines
1613:
1372:User:Dlugar/WP:NOTANTINEWS
1323:
1317:
1284:
1242:
1170:
1164:
1136:
1129:
1104:
1077:
1059:
1041:
995:
989:
908:
902:
884:Per Knowledge (XXG) policy
875:
850:
793:
782:If an event is cited as a
729:
723:
640:
615:
592:
556:
491:
375:
76:
70:this guideline's talk page
34:. For the user-right, see
29:
1402:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism
1339:or violate our policy on
461:may or may not be notable
454:very likely to be notable
1412:Knowledge (XXG):AIRCRASH
1314:Alternatives to deletion
1287:Knowledge (XXG):Wikinews
1267:alternatives to deletion
1231:Death of Michael Jackson
712:or such types of events
403:not a paper encyclopedia
324:of an article should be
314:Within Knowledge (XXG),
271:Common deletion outcomes
138:This page in a nutshell:
1471:Retrieved 13 March 2008
1139:Category:Current events
358:policies and guidelines
18:Knowledge (XXG):ROUTINE
530:ultimately led to the
32:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup
1143:Portal:Current events
1263:there is no deadline
942:news reporting. Per
790:Diversity of sources
740:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE
720:Duration of coverage
528:murder of Adam Walsh
182:Astronomical objects
54:notability guideline
842:Other circumstances
401:Knowledge (XXG) is
237:Sports and athletes
206:Geographic features
1032:Runaway bride case
948:24-hour news cycle
553:Geographical scope
372:Inclusion criteria
331:
327:
1095:original research
940:scandal mongering
932:yellow journalism
612:Depth of coverage
540:Hurricane Katrina
329:
325:
312:
311:
266:Guide to deletion
261:Notability essays
145:
144:
125:
124:
16:(Redirected from
1604:
1581:
1578:
1572:
1571:
1537:
1526:
1520:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1478:
1472:
1466:
1255:
1239:
1183:
1156:
1150:
1124:
1117:
1072:
1024:reliable sources
1015:
1008:
921:
870:
863:
847:Routine coverage
806:
756:
749:
742:
635:
628:
605:
569:
511:
504:
452:Events are also
439:probably notable
395:
393:WP:EVENTCRITERIA
388:
304:
297:
290:
147:
134:
133:
127:
117:
110:
103:
96:
89:
48:
47:
41:
21:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1561:
1552:10.2307/2094279
1530:Molotch, Harvey
1528:
1527:
1523:
1514:
1510:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1467:
1463:
1458:
1361:Category:Events
1352:
1328:
1322:
1316:
1289:
1283:
1259:
1258:
1251:
1247:
1241:
1187:
1186:
1179:
1175:
1169:
1163:
1154:
1148:
1145:
1135:
1128:
1127:
1122:WP:ANTICIPATION
1120:
1113:
1109:
1103:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1050:
1040:
1019:
1018:
1011:
1004:
1000:
994:
988:
925:
924:
917:
913:
907:
901:
888:Run-of-the-mill
881:
874:
873:
866:
859:
855:
849:
844:
810:
809:
802:
798:
792:
760:
759:
752:
745:
738:
734:
728:
722:
646:
639:
638:
631:
624:
620:
614:
609:
608:
601:
597:
591:
573:
572:
565:
561:
555:
515:
514:
507:
500:
496:
490:
488:Lasting effects
485:
468:viral phenomena
399:
398:
391:
384:
380:
374:
350:
308:
248:
131:
121:
120:
113:
106:
99:
92:
85:
81:
73:
45:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1610:
1608:
1600:
1599:
1589:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1573:
1559:
1546:(1): 101–112.
1521:
1508:
1490:(3): 309–327.
1473:
1460:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1446:
1440:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1374:
1369:
1364:
1358:
1351:
1348:
1315:
1312:
1282:
1279:
1257:
1256:
1248:
1243:
1240:
1235:
1219:routine arrest
1185:
1184:
1176:
1171:
1162:
1159:
1126:
1125:
1118:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1074:
1073:
1070:WP:FUTUREEVENT
1065:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1039:
1036:
1017:
1016:
1009:
1001:
996:
987:
984:
936:sensationalist
923:
922:
919:WP:SENSATIONAL
914:
909:
900:
899:Sensationalism
897:
872:
871:
868:WP:DOGBITESMAN
864:
856:
851:
848:
845:
843:
840:
820:
819:
808:
807:
799:
794:
791:
788:
769:
768:
758:
757:
750:
747:WP:PERSISTENCE
743:
735:
730:
721:
718:
694:in the US, or
655:
654:
637:
636:
629:
621:
616:
613:
610:
607:
606:
598:
593:
590:
587:
582:
581:
571:
570:
562:
557:
554:
551:
524:
523:
513:
512:
505:
497:
492:
489:
486:
484:
481:
476:
475:
464:
457:
450:
447:lasting effect
397:
396:
389:
381:
376:
373:
370:
349:
346:
323:
310:
309:
307:
306:
299:
292:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
273:
268:
263:
255:
254:
250:
249:
247:
246:
240:
239:
234:
228:
227:
221:
220:
215:
209:
208:
202:
201:
196:
191:
185:
184:
178:
177:
171:
168:
167:
161:
160:
154:
153:
143:
142:
135:
123:
122:
119:
118:
111:
104:
97:
90:
82:
77:
74:
59:
58:
49:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1609:
1598:
1595:
1594:
1592:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1560:9780761900764
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1512:
1509:
1504:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1465:
1462:
1455:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1327:
1321:
1313:
1311:
1309:
1308:soft redirect
1305:
1301:
1296:
1294:
1288:
1280:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1234:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1211:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1168:
1158:
1153:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1123:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1108:
1101:Breaking news
1100:
1098:
1096:
1091:
1087:
1081:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1056:Future events
1055:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1037:
1035:
1033:
1027:
1025:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1003:
1002:
999:
993:
986:Criminal acts
985:
983:
981:
977:
973:
972:living people
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
920:
916:
915:
912:
906:
898:
896:
894:
891:broadcasts ("
889:
885:
879:
869:
865:
862:
858:
857:
854:
846:
841:
839:
837:
833:
827:
824:
818:
817:
812:
811:
805:
801:
800:
797:
789:
787:
785:
780:
778:
774:
767:
766:
762:
761:
755:
751:
748:
744:
741:
737:
736:
733:
727:
719:
717:
715:
711:
705:
703:
699:
698:
693:
692:
687:
686:
681:
680:
679:The Economist
675:
674:
669:
668:
663:
662:
653:
652:
648:
647:
644:
634:
630:
627:
623:
622:
619:
611:
604:
600:
599:
596:
588:
586:
580:
579:
575:
574:
568:
564:
563:
560:
552:
550:
547:
545:
541:
535:
533:
529:
522:
521:
517:
516:
510:
506:
503:
499:
498:
495:
487:
482:
480:
473:
469:
465:
462:
458:
455:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
432:
428:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
394:
390:
387:
383:
382:
379:
371:
369:
367:
366:WP:NOT § NEWS
363:
359:
354:
347:
345:
342:
338:
333:
321:
319:
318:
305:
300:
298:
293:
291:
286:
285:
283:
282:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
245:
242:
241:
238:
235:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
222:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
203:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
179:
176:
173:
172:
170:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
139:
136:
129:
128:
116:
112:
109:
105:
102:
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
83:
80:
75:
71:
67:
63:
57:
55:
50:
43:
42:
37:
33:
19:
1576:
1543:
1539:
1524:
1511:
1487:
1483:
1476:
1464:
1345:
1337:undue weight
1329:
1297:
1290:
1260:
1212:
1203:anticipation
1202:
1200:
1188:
1152:currentevent
1146:
1090:not definite
1089:
1083:
1051:
1042:Main pages:
1028:
1020:
980:fringe ideas
960:silly season
952:infotainment
926:
895:" stories).
882:
828:
821:
814:
813:
781:
770:
764:
763:
754:WP:CASESTUDY
713:
709:
706:
695:
691:CNN Presents
689:
683:
677:
671:
665:
661:The Guardian
659:
656:
650:
649:
589:The coverage
583:
577:
576:
548:
536:
525:
519:
518:
477:
471:
460:
453:
438:
424:
411:news service
400:
386:WP:EVENTCRIT
351:
334:
315:
313:
193:
137:
101:WP:NEWSEVENT
51:
1326:WP:PRESERVE
1318:Main page:
1285:Main page:
1115:WP:BREAKING
1078:Main page:
976:celebrities
893:And finally
816:discounted.
777:cannot know
603:WP:COVERAGE
567:WP:GEOSCOPE
472:not notable
437:Events are
431:news values
244:Web content
1324:See also:
1275:draftspace
1165:See also:
1137:See also:
1086:verifiable
1022:regarding
990:See also:
966:, such as
964:media bias
956:churnalism
903:See also:
861:WP:ROUTINE
804:WP:DIVERSE
784:case study
724:See also:
685:60 Minutes
626:WP:INDEPTH
502:WP:LASTING
348:Background
317:notability
151:Notability
115:WP:NEVENTS
62:exceptions
1503:143887217
1271:userfying
1192:recentism
1107:Shortcuts
1013:WP:NCRIME
998:Shortcuts
853:Shortcuts
732:Shortcuts
714:generally
710:old event
697:Newsnight
618:Shortcuts
509:WP:EFFECT
494:Shortcuts
483:The event
427:recentism
378:Shortcuts
341:consensus
339:reflects
175:Academics
79:Shortcuts
66:consensus
1591:Category
1350:See also
1304:CC-BY-SA
1293:Wikinews
1281:Wikinews
1253:WP:RAPID
1245:Shortcut
1181:WP:DELAY
1173:Shortcut
1062:Shortcut
911:Shortcut
796:Shortcut
673:Newsweek
633:WP:DEPTH
595:Shortcut
559:Shortcut
415:Wikinews
253:See also
108:WP:NNEWS
94:WP:EVENT
1568:2094279
1333:merging
1229:or the
1006:WP:N/CA
928:Tabloid
542:or the
330:Notable
326:notable
218:Numbers
87:WP:N(E)
1517:WP:GNG
1225:, the
1194:, and
1046:, and
978:, and
944:policy
362:WP:GNG
337:events
232:People
194:Events
141:scope.
1565:JSTOR
1515:From
1500:S2CID
1456:Notes
1300:CC-BY
676:, or
409:or a
322:topic
213:Music
199:Films
189:Books
1556:ISBN
1141:and
954:and
938:and
667:Time
419:news
1548:doi
1492:doi
930:or
688:or
1593::
1563:.
1554:.
1544:39
1542:.
1538:.
1498:.
1488:47
1486:.
1343:.
1277:.
1155:}}
1149:{{
1097:.
1026:.
982:.
974:,
832:AP
716:.
670:,
664:,
413:.
1570:.
1550::
1505:.
1494::
1134:.
880:.
645:.
449:.
303:e
296:t
289:v
72:.
56:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.