Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 28

3465:. This is a minor synonym of an extinct language, that's broadly documentable but very marginally "notable" by our usual meaning of the term, leading to a related lack of a decision as to whether it should be mentioned as such in the article. If the synonym had a sourced mention in the article, I think there'd be a comfortable consensus to keep it - similarly, if there was another language that could be demonstrated to be causing ambiguity or confusion with these redirects, I think we'd have developed a comfortable consensus to delete it. As it is, nobody seems to have a particularly strong opinion one way or the other, so the redirect will be kept by default as it's broadly reasonable and nobody's really articulated how it's hurting anything. It can be re-discussed if that changes. ~ 1664:. Unfortunately the article on Kemptville doesn't seem to cover any of the community's 150-year railway history aside from a single brief mention in the history timeline, and this is the main context Bedell would be mentioned in. I would like to improve this but don't have enough references yet to be comfortable making substantial additions to the article, and am also working to flesh out coverage of railway history in the area in general. Having a redirect pointing to the Kemptville article felt most appropriate as any content relating to Bedell station would be added there. In the future this would likely be a redirect to a section. 6230:. All of these options are much preferable to deletion. I believe that in searching up Momala readers could either be looking for Harris' article or information about the nickname. My preferred retarget contains easy (if not compherensive) access to both. Note that there is a Congo athlete named Chelly Ngoualetou Momala (mentioned twice in WP) but he doesn't seem to be very important – definitely not to an extent where searches for his last name are highly prevalent. 5552:

Knowledge (XXG). Many experts have explicitly argued why it's both appropriate, ethical and important to comment on Trump's personality and mental health, and why it's unethical and inappropriate to attempt to obstruct such discussion with bogus, dogmatic postulates about a "Goldwater rule" that fundamentally misunderstand both the purpose of that supposed rule (individual conduct within a particular profession) and its professionally and geographically

507:. There's a lack of consensus both on the typo and on the general appropriateness of such a general redirect, but the objections based on other protests are, at this time, theoretical. If more notable protests with articles are created over 2021 that make this genuinely confusing, rather than just possibly so, then it can be re-discussed, or the correctly punctuated redirect can be boldly turned into a disambiguation page or set index. ~ 6349:: Widely documented nickname with no other meanings. This isn't something just mentioned in passing once in an interview. It comes up in pretty much any coverage of the Harris-Emhoff family, which has already drawn much more attention than most past Second Families. It's entirely plausible that someone could see the term "Momala" out of context, not know what that refers to, and search Knowledge (XXG). 6385: 2359: 65: 5758:. Not as a matter of personal preference for how to handle the immense amount of material here on Trmp, bit on the simple basis just mentioned that there is sufficient published material to justify an article. I would not necessarily have said this before recently, when the press and public began talking so intensively on alternatives to impeachment) . 3972:

article should account for them, to ensure that readers actually do know they've arrived at the right page. That is, our goal of reader clarity is the same, but we are somehow not getting to the same answer. Also, "no notability sufficient to warrant a mention" is, as both you and Kwami should know, not actually a valid argument.

3811:

its former code for Chumash. MultiTree defines as the Chumashan language, so its identity as Ventureño is clear. The fact that you couldn't verify the name supports my opinion that it isn't notable enough to mention in the article. Also, the correspondence in names is obvious enough that it shouldn't cause any confusion.

1435:, but I can't tell if the stop is in service or not. There's enough available information that the station in Ontario could be included in a list somewhere (probably the Bala subdivision article) and I didn't look as thoroughly for the one in Quebec, but our coverage of Canadian heritage railways is pretty incomplete. 3814:

As for whether I'm certain that no other language has ever been called by one of these names, of course not. But if we come across such a source we can handle in with a dab page or a hat note, just as we would any other rd that we come to find is ambiguous. That's not an argument for deleting the rd.

3810:

MultiTree, one of the standard references used by ISO (ISO provides each code with links to Ethnologue, Glottolog, Multitree and now Knowledge (XXG) to clarify its denotation/scope), assigned the private-use ISO code to the "San Buenaventura"/ "Buenaventura" language back before Ethnologue broke up

3638:

The point of the redirects is that all language names in various references, including Ethnologue, ISO, Glottolog, Voegelin & Voegelin and LinguistList/MultiTree should take the reader to the appropriate article in WP. The name might not appear in the article if it isn't notable enough, or if the

5836:

about the various psychologists' and psychiatrists' opinions and the surrounding controversy, but the descriptions of those opinions communicate a predominantly negative view of Trump's health. I feel this is implicitly an issue both for NPOV and BLP. Adding a link in DT#Health to the Goldwater Rule

3956:

I would argue that it does not actually help the reader to land on a page with no mention of the search term and, apparently, no notability sufficient to warrant a mention. It's just confusing to end up there. If it's not notable enough for a mention, it's not notable enough for a redirect to exist.

3682:

The problem I have is that we'd end up with articles that would be stubs apart from a long list of alt names. And we'd need a long list of sources for those alt names. Not RS's for the language, its grammar, ethnography or literature, but just alt or often mistaken names or spellings in old sources.

2676:

as compilations of mistakes made for cast/crew Christmas parties, so it's highly plausible that these would be known as "Christmas reel", however this isn't mentioned anywhere on Knowledge (XXG) and I can't immediately find anything suitable to use as a reference to add it somewhere either. There is

2255:

all the others. The Miranda warning is so well known that people outside the only country where it applies can recite it from memory and/or expect it to have legal force in their own countries; it is clearly the primary topic for common variations of its opening lines, not a handful of musical works

5551:

who are members of that association, it has nothing at all to do with the coverage of the material in Knowledge (XXG) or the media in general. As long as a stream of experts are in fact both willing to offer their professional expertise on this matter and RS widely cover it, the material belongs in

681:

until there are other protests in Washington DC this year with articles/significant sections, then disambiguate or setindexify. This is a highly plausible search term and will remain so. A setindex or dab will be much more helpful to readers than search results (which may be several clicks away and

5374:

The third option - to create an article on this topic specifically - probably receives the most express support in this discussion, but as has been mentioned is rather hard to use as a closure. As the closing admin, I'm neither intending on doing so nor do I have any power to force anyone else to.

4454:

I think these two cricketers for which I suggested retargets are in a different position from the majority of these cricketer redirects because they've specifically judged to not be notable enough for a standalone article and unlinked in the list. Both of these cricketers played in only 1 game and

3971:

This seems to be simply a defect in the text; the fact that Ventura is presently called by that short name doesn't mean it's the only place-name form that has historical connection to this language. MultiTree's use of these as names for this language means some readers will encounter them, so the

3864:

something (though MultiTree apparently did use at least one of these that way); it can be for any sensible attempt to find the subject. If you know Buenaventura exists, and know they have their own language or wonder whether they do, your first guessing attempt to find info about this is probably

573:

Too broad, there have already been other protests this year and there are likely to be more. While the Jan 6 incident is definitely the most prominent so far, it is not guaranteed to stay that way, and it's also more likely to be known by words other than "protests". I think that deletion to allow

3781:

for Ventureño says it was spoken at San Buenaventura mission, but doesn't mention Buenaventura as an alternate name or give a language code qmc. (In fact, Google shows no relevant use of "qmc" from linguistlist.org.) I could certainly see that being enough to call the language Buenaventura, but

6287:), even if some source somewhere (interview, paparazzi junk, long biographical book, etc.) makes it sourceable. So, it should not be in the article, and we should not have a redirect that inspires people to keep injecting it into the article. (Indeed, they will argue that is is "required" per 5863:

per nom. There's no content about his mental health at the current section, unless you read between the lines and supply some editorializing (i.e., making assumptions about his mental health based on his "finite body energy" belief). Editors have made good points that this is more logically a

3660:

But it's confusing to land on a page without knowing why you're there (is that an alternative name? Or is it a mistake? Who says it's an alternative name?...). If these are legitimate alternative names there's no harm in listing them, in the infobox, for example. I'd go as far as saying it's

906:

The correctly punctuated version was created during this discussion, so the "move" part of "keep and move" is moot. Since only one vote acknowledges the other redirect (to be fair, most commented before it was created), I'm relisting in case that affects the opinions of any who have already

2081:. "The right to remain silent" is a generic topic, and "Right to silence" has links to Miranda for those specifically looking for its used in the United States. "You Have The Right To Remain Silent" is a possible proper name and is best disambiguated, as I don't consider there to be a 3599: 5673:. Until the article is created though, the current redirect to Donald Trump is better than to Goldwater rule. The scope of the Goldwater rule article doesn't even come close to covering all the material from the books that have been written on Donald Trump's mental health. 392:(indirectly overturning the previous decision), but explicitely stating "The page history will still be accessible so any useful content may be merged as appropriate". To delete the redirect now would overturn the outcome of two previous discussions and go against 5560:, an entire article that rightly completely ignores the "Goldwater rule". As the world's most powerful person during his presidency, whose behaviour and decisions greatly impacted the world, Trump must accept a greater degree of scrutiny than some B celebrity. -- 1651:

Bedell was primarily a railway operations point and a full article is likely not merited for the station itself. It was heavily connected to Kemptville which was just to the north of it, and Bedell and Kemptville stations are often referred to together. E.g.:

6291:, and thus be trying to pit one guideline against the other, which is not something we would entertain. If the rule to not have pet-name cruft is being followed, then the redirect will not exist and thus the BOLDSYN for it in the article will not exist.) 5526:. I strongly disagree, this should be restored as a separate article, or at least redirected to the appropriate coverage in the Trump article. Redirecting to the "Goldwater rule" would reflect an inappropriately narrow US bias that ignores that the topic 5640:— Although Trump's mental health is highly relevant to his presidency and thus world history, all the information we have about it is speculative. Unfortunately, that's not enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article (not even enough for a section in 3686:

I often get redirected to a biography from an alt spelling with no explanation in the article as to why. I've never found that confusing, and it would be weird to have a section on attested misspellings of the name. Would any reader care that

2158:, a reader who goes out of their way to actually capitalize the phrase is looking for a proper noun, and should be sent directly to the capitalized dab. That dab should remain the primary topic for capitalized titles without ellipses.— 431:

Currently, without a longer search which I don't want to commit to at this point, I don't know of more source than were originally discussed. So I don't want to rebuild the article overturning the original discussion at this point. I

323:

Not mentioned at target. This likely happened because this was redirected to a target that has since been removed. This has since been retargeted to nothing. Unlikely search term and unlikely to be expanded due to a lack of sources.

172:

1207:

I think that would be a good Idea, a google search for "Countires" shows the typo turning up in all sorts of places. The first pages of results in my search included webpages from the UN, EU, gov.uk, multiple universities etc.

4714: 4754: 4256:

Note that the same editor has created many other similar article-to-category redirects, which probably all should get the same treatment: redirect to a list if such a list exists, and deletion otherwise. See e.g.

3377:. It's not the only use of "Standard offer" but it is referred to as that, is the single most prominent result when I search, and the only one we have mention of on Knowledge (XXG) so it's probably best. Add a 5375:

Suffice it to say, this discussion certainly encourages that as an option, and the success of that option very much depends on the sourcing and quality of the article if someone does choose to take it on. ~

5707:

It has been discussed in reliable sources, Knowledge (XXG) is able to report these discussions and any conclusions (yes, no, not proven either way) in a neutral manner so the lack of proof is not relevant.

381: 699:

until something else becomes the "2021 Washington D.C. protests." Whatever the page redirects to on Dec. 31 should be the best known subject by that name. If it's not, this discussion should be had then.

2178:

each according to Bagumba. The first redirect should target the general concept, whereas the others likely refer to the Miranda warning but should be disambiguated from the music entries at the dab page.

1570:. If content is added to a section of one of the articles mentioned, this can be freely recreated, but the consensus here is that it is not a helpful redirect if there is no information to point at. ~ 718:

until/unless another notable event describable as "2021 Washington D.C. protests" occurs. For now, its target is pretty unambiguous, and implying that there will be other events is a clear case of

5623:

to Goldwater rule. Donald Trump's mental health is clearly a sub-topic of Donald Trump, not anything else. Either keep, delete or create an article. (Almost no one ever uses the redirect anyway.)

6219: 2681:

called "The Christmas Reel", which is the only use on Knowledge (XXG) of the phrase and the first hit for me on Google, so we could retarget it there but I'm certainly open to other suggestions.

1995: 1907: 5369:

seems to be a rational place to mention this in that context, but there's clearly a different local consensus preventing that at this time, as it's a very full and controversial article already.

2482:

Non notable location only included in one episode, not mentioned at current target. Already sent to AfD, where the consensus was to delete and redirect. If this is kept a better target would be

6085:

None of the sources cited imply "Momala" is used to refer to Harris outside of her family. This may be a well known fact, but I dont think anyone is going to go looking for Harris via Momala.

2196:

per Shhhnotsoloud. Upon further thought I do think making the general Right to silence page the primary topic will benefit the most searchers (with a hatnote to the dab page there of course).

5278: 2366: 1951: 6392: 72: 39: 34: 5361:

to change the current target, which seems to be the least-objected-to option in a very divided discussion. It's apparent that either location is reasonable in principle - the section at

3404:

as ambiguous. Any retarget is likely to be ambiguous and to cause confusion. In any case don't hatnote as it would be inappropriate clutter: not every WP policy needs a selfref hatnote.

5446: 2140:

If the consensus here is to target the nominated redirects starting with "You" to the general article (something I'm not opposed to) then yes absolutely this dab page should be moved.

2030:, the general concept article) as the phrases are not exclusive to the scripted warning used by US law enforcement. I'm not opposed to targetting the first listed redirect directly to 5803:

and if necessary provide a link/section hatnote to the nom's alternative target. "Create an article" is a particularly unhelpful !vote since no closer is likely to actually do that.

2106:

because "The right to remain silent" is synonymous with that title, and the other phrases derive from a fundamental part of law enforcement phrases used widely, not just in the US.

4909: 4218: 2119: 877:

the redirect for now. What happens, though, when there are other protests in Washington, D.C. during this year? It will require that the redirect be removed from this article.

5418: 5068: 4552: 550: 2784: 1863: 1147:

per the ip. We routinely keep redirects from misspellings and typos if they're plausible and the usage stats of this redirect demonstrate that it is indeed plausible.

3552: 3865:

going to be something like these redirects. Mainspace redirs primarily serve the readers' interest, not editors' sense of logic or informational organization.

4299:

Thanks. Feel free to add them to the nomination if you wish; I try to avoid TRAINWRECK closes and would probably prefer splitting this up over a couple days.

1740:

per nom. I'm sure neither of us are against adding content about this station, but in the meantime, the redirect will just mislead and disappoint readers. --

1068: 3602:. That's not worth mentioning in the article, but I created a rd for it for x-ref with MultiTree. Whether it's worth keeping an rd for that I don't know. — 389: 3508: 1989: 1901: 149: 5690:: I feel like there would be BLP issues if an article is created for the topic. The allegation or prediction for his mental health has never been proved. 4340: 4330: 5237: 2772: 538: 3984:. This name and the old code for it are clearly not indiscriminate, but things that should be mentioned in the article, even if shunted to a footnote. 3795:

would be "Are you certain this is a valid synonym for this language (and not others)"? I trust that you're more knowledgeable on languages than I am. --

611:. Too broad. Perhaps a different article (which discusses all of the protests which were and which are to be for this year) can be called by that name. 4593:

per nom. Same goes for the rest like this listed below. These are obviously just editor errors, and not something a reader would ever be looking for.

21: 4206: 4164: 4122: 4082: 1945: 5779:, but short of that, it should redir to appropriate section of Trump's own article. This has nothing in particular to do with the Goldwater rule. 359:: It is mentioned in the target now. This is a major fictional location in a major setting, with 10 (!) setting products about it, the last one, 2610:

Not mentioned at the target, I can't find any evidence of this being an alternative name online. Delete unless a justification can be provided.

4702: 4455:

both have sourced assertions that no biographical information is known about them, so there isn't really enough to write a standalone article.

3639:

article is just a stub and per WEIGHT you wouldn't want 20 alt names of the language, but at least it will get people where they need to be. —

2441: 5837:

topic would be adequate for now IMO, until someone practiced at BLP authorship can write a well-sourced and neutral article on the subject. –

4742: 4708: 940:

of the correctly punctuated version though so that when/if that gets retargetted or disambiguated this redirect can be updated accordingly.

17: 6020:

It's a nickname. I don't think it's going to be a frequent search term, but it's not a simple misspelling. Her stepkids call her "Momala".

5505: 4748: 4212: 3268: 2587: 1611: 1347: 2292:

per the nom. Although the Miranda Warning is the primary topic, there are many other uses for that phrase that could fit in the dab page.

776:. I would agree with the Keep arguments if the dot wasn't missing from (D.C.) The errant version of this search term should not be kept. 4456: 4349: 4241:

Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation.

4176: 3343: 3093: 2639: 2487: 2078: 2023: 1459: 1209: 1131: 300: 4697: 6226:

for easy access if that is the article readers are after when searching up Momala. Second choice keep as is, third choice retarget to

6202: 5748: 5461: 5412: 5391: 5111: 4737: 4134: 3367: 2678: 2663: 2631: 2548: 958: 418: 361: 343: 192: 2778: 722:. However, I would prefer a redirect with the correct punctuation (Washington D.C. or Washington, D.C.), in which case I would argue 6302: 5790: 5557: 4604: 4378: 4367:. That's probably the right approach to take for any more of these. And someone tell the user creating these XNRs to stop it. :-) 4094: 3995: 3917: 3876: 3320: 3031: 2262: 1441: 544: 369:

an unlikely search term! Even though it was decided in the past that there is not enough material to stand on its own, the redirect

5998:

I don't see how you can mistake a "K" sound for an "M" sound. Furthermore, the second letter is supposed to be an "a", not an "o".

1230: 749:

as unhelpful typo because the properly punctuated one has been created. My argument for keeping the newly created redirect stands.

6056: 3092:

and hatnote per Thryduulf. That would get both readers and editors who forgot the WP: namespace to the page they're looking for.

2483: 2118:

to assist readers to more readily navigate to that page). I think we also need to go further and move the disambiguation page to

1823:

on the others. Though most editors wanted the other three retargeted somewhere, there was too much disagreement for me to invoke

934: 2812: 2743: 6183: 6153: 5848: 5609: 1857: 1248: 6054: 6010: 3546: 2975: 2854:

as it is the current version that most editors will probably be looking for. There's a hatnote to the dab page there anyway.

2673: 6058: 1502: 1455: 1432: 1308: 5578: 5487: 4903: 1687:, which is the larger municipality that includes both Kemptville and Bedell, and it actually contains the name 'Bedell'. 860: 828: 773: 649: 629: 6249: 5728: 3832: 3708: 2309: 2214: 1712: 1476: 895: 6201:, which actually explains this nickname. We should not be pointing this nickname to a target which does not explain it. 5975: 5586: 4266: 2851: 2808: 5926: 5348: 5188: 5062: 5015: 4860: 4665: 4546: 4503: 4045: 3452: 3219: 2920: 2729: 2534: 2392: 1802: 1557: 1294: 1014: 494: 249: 98: 6360: 6339: 6324: 6307: 6269: 6240: 6210: 6189: 6157: 6132: 6115: 6094: 6077: 6043: 6029: 6014: 5948: 5887: 5855: 5812: 5795: 5769: 5717: 5702: 5682: 5657: 5632: 5613: 5597: 5569: 5516: 5493: 5309: 5291: 5287: 5212: 5149: 5135: 5100: 5096: 5043: 4976: 4959: 4941: 4937: 4884: 4821: 4804: 4786: 4782: 4689: 4626: 4609: 4584: 4580: 4527: 4464: 4438: 4434: 4417: 4397: 4393: 4383: 4357: 4308: 4304: 4294: 4250: 4246: 4069: 4000: 3966: 3940: 3922: 3899: 3881: 3850: 3824: 3804: 3754: 3728: 3700: 3674: 3648: 3629: 3611: 3584: 3481: 3413: 3396: 3351: 3325: 3300: 3296: 3243: 3180: 3163: 3146: 3124: 3101: 3084: 3063: 3036: 3011: 3007: 2948: 2881: 2864: 2842: 2824: 2820: 2757: 2690: 2647: 2621: 2560: 2495: 2473: 2416: 2334: 2300: 2284: 2267: 2232: 2205: 2188: 2167: 2149: 2135: 2094: 2065: 2043: 1836: 1763: 1749: 1730: 1703: 1673: 1645: 1586: 1518: 1494: 1467: 1446: 1407: 1381: 1320: 1255: 1217: 1198: 1174: 1156: 1139: 1122: 1118: 1100: 1062: 1041: 973: 949: 919: 886: 869: 851: 815: 791: 758: 739: 709: 691: 673: 669: 641: 620: 603: 585: 523: 453: 426: 405: 351: 333: 273: 200: 182: 122: 6060: 4892: 3256: 3976:

applies only to determining what may have its own stand-alone article; it has nothing at all to do with what may be

3691:

misspelled a tennis-player's name back in 1990? Would we want to clutter up the ref section with stuff like that? —

5838: 5605: 3767: 3502: 1238: 664:. As of right now these riots are the most notable covered topic when referring to this term. This should be kept. 440:

article (and possible expansion later), and the redirect link for Knowledge (XXG) users looking for this prominent

143: 5865: 5530:(i.e. Trump's mental health) is considered highly notable by the whole world. The so-called "Goldwater rule" is a 5051: 4535: 5365:

has more discussion on the actual topic of Trump's mental health, but in a very specific context. The section at

4348:

If someone manages to find a list entry for the first two players then consider my delete vote to be a retarget.

3617: 3591: 3080: 1420: 754: 735: 2155: 2082: 365:

listed among the bestsellers (in "Hardcover Nonfiction", mind you, not role-playgames only) of 2018. So this is

5511: 5231: 1634:

No mention of Bedell, or any other rail station, at the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided.

1056: 705: 6141: 661: 5107: 4258: 6320: 6227: 6198: 5808: 5678: 5305: 4955: 4800: 4622: 4460: 4353: 3962: 3750: 3670: 3625: 3580: 3409: 3374: 3347: 3159: 3097: 2643: 2491: 2131: 1463: 1213: 1135: 3973: 2435: 6206: 5283: 5220: 5092: 4933: 4778: 4576: 4449: 4430: 4389: 4300: 4242: 3665:

issue then why is there a redirect?). That is the case in other classes of articles, such as for species.

3292: 3003: 2816: 1130:. This redirect received 250 page views in the last year, which suggests this is a plausible misspelling. 1114: 840: 788: 665: 422: 347: 196: 6062: 5602: 5300:

as housekeeping as either an unrequired artefact of a move (or something) or an error in disambiguating.

4950:

as housekeeping as either an unrequired artefact of a move (or something) or an error in disambiguating.

4795:

as housekeeping as either an unrequired artefact of a move (or something) or an error in disambiguating.

4617:

as housekeeping as either an unrequired artefact of a move (or something) or an error in disambiguating.

3774: 3262: 1605: 701: 6299: 6039: 5922: 5787: 5344: 5264: 5184: 5119: 5011: 4972: 4856: 4817: 4661: 4601: 4499: 4375: 4041: 3992: 3914: 3873: 3820: 3742: 3696: 3644: 3607: 3448: 3317: 3215: 3028: 2916: 2725: 2530: 2429: 2388: 2280: 1798: 1553: 1290: 1010: 490: 245: 94: 6329:

Did you read the discussion above? If you did, then you should be able to make sense of this redirect.

5829: 5665:- This is my preferred solution since there are several whole books devoted to this subject, including 4128: 3738: 3540: 3496: 2110:

is essentially the primary topic for all these phrases. (I have added a further information hatnote to

393: 4088: 2424: 55:

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 28, 2021.

4897: 4282: 3575:

Neither the article nor the first cited reference indicate this language is known as "Buenaventura".

3120: 3076: 2833:

to the disambig, which will be kept up-to-date (I presume) so we don't have to keep revisiting this.

2469: 1335: 1096: 836: 750: 731: 5869: 3251: 1594: 832: 719: 6177: 6149: 6128: 5713: 5500: 5131: 3846: 3783: 3392: 3176: 3059: 2877: 2838: 2686: 2581: 2320:

While there's broad agreement that change is needed, editors have not settled on a single solution.

2145: 2039: 1669: 1424: 1389: 1341: 1152: 1037: 945: 882: 687: 616: 599: 4117: 3662: 1370:

No mention of Bolger or any station at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided.

6316: 6025: 6006: 5804: 5674: 5653: 5628: 5301: 5146: 4951: 4796: 4618: 4170: 4077: 3958: 3746: 3666: 3621: 3576: 3405: 3155: 2654: 2201: 2184: 2127: 637: 449: 401: 329: 294: 178: 6103: 3777:

to link the term to Ventureño or any other language, nor can I find anything on Ethnologue. The

3110: 1824: 1654: 660:

is kept when that can mean different things as well? And that rationale is a certain example of

417:, in fact if you can find sufficient additional sourcing the article could actually be rebuilt. 4388:

The user is retired, although only four days ago, so I don't think this is necessary just yet.

6111: 5697: 5565: 5481: 5456: 5056: 4540: 3109:

per SMcCandlish. ComplexRational's "no need" would be a consideration if redirects weren't so

2294: 2163: 2090: 2061: 1758: 1193: 845: 809: 777: 6222:, which explains the nickname the most of any Knowledge (XXG) article and contains a link to 5921:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5343:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5183:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5010:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4855:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4660:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4498:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4040:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

3447:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

3214:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2963: 2915:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2724:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2529:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2387:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1797:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1552:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1289:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1029: 1009:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

489:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

244:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

93:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6356: 6294: 6090: 6069: 6035: 5782: 5582: 5471: 4968: 4813: 4596: 4370: 3987: 3951: 3909: 3887: 3868: 3816: 3792: 3692: 3655: 3640: 3603: 3381: 3312: 3048: 3023: 2486:, the episode where the location was featured, but it's not mentioned by name there either. 2276: 2257: 2248: 2123: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2074: 2031: 2027: 1816: 1436: 208:: It appears at the target now. Fictional location in a major setting, so I think it is not 6284: 3981: 2053: 6220:

List of children of the Vice Presidents of the United States#Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff

4274: 3115: 2465: 2115: 1983: 1939: 1895: 1851: 1684: 1660: 1092: 927: 657: 5447:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 30#Mental health of Donald Trump

3136:

per SMcCandlish. I don't see a need for a hatnote here, but I don't mind if it is added.

1392:, where Bolger is listed as one of the communities. No prejudice against deletion either. 6169: 6145: 6124: 5709: 5645: 5442: 5362: 5127: 4290: 4278: 3842: 3388: 3360: 3335: 3172: 3055: 2873: 2834: 2682: 2141: 2035: 1665: 1514: 1403: 1148: 1033: 941: 878: 683: 612: 595: 5556:. We have extensive material on the health and personality of other politicians, e.g. 5260:

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links.

5091:

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links.

4932:

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links.

4777:

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links.

6262: 6223: 6021: 6002: 5963: 5944: 5883: 5765: 5741: 5649: 5624: 5272: 5205: 5039: 4877: 4682: 4520: 4262: 4062: 3936: 3895: 3800: 3721: 3236: 2969: 2941: 2750: 2614: 2556: 2409: 2327: 2228: 2197: 2180: 1832: 1745: 1726: 1694: 1638: 1490: 1416: 1374: 1316: 969: 915: 653: 633: 578: 445: 414: 397: 325: 266: 174: 115: 6123:: It is her nick name. Many sources have used this, in reference to her children. 6107: 5821: 5691: 5641: 5561: 5475: 5450: 5406: 5366: 3782:

wouldn't the same go for other languages spoken in places called Buenaventura (ex.

2159: 2086: 2057: 1187: 801: 1757:

per nom and BDD. Misleading redirect, station is not mentioned at target article.

628:– It's not even spelled correctly: there's no dot after 'C'. We don't have a page 73:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 5#Dragonspine Mountains

6393:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4#A Voyage to the Moon

6352: 6288: 6280: 6086: 6065: 5987: 5969: 5591: 5577:

Like it or not (I have some skepticism that it's a productive area of inquiry),

5430: 5249: 5080: 4921: 4766: 4726: 4564: 4270: 4230: 4188: 4146: 4106: 3564: 3520: 3280: 2987: 2796: 2599: 2453: 2007: 1963: 1919: 1875: 1623: 1359: 1080: 562: 312: 161: 5864:

subtopic of Trump himself rather than the Goldwater rule, but we must consider

4323:

F. W. James and A. F. Thomas, I couldn't find any mention of them in wikipedia.

5376: 5268: 5123: 4424: 3928: 3773:, but I don't know if that's the case here. I can't find anything relevant at 3466: 3338:, which is apparently known as a Standard Offer Contract in the US? otherwise 3075:

in all caps, so no need to keep an arbitrary, unhelpful redirect in all caps.

2670: 1599: 1571: 1458:, so if nothing else, it should redirect there, as it isn't anywhere else. -- 1234: 926:

My recommendation to keep stands, as this is a very plausible typo (e.g. note

508: 262:. A referenced mention has been added, making the nomination rationale moot. 6333: 6234: 5225: 4411: 4286: 3595: 3140: 2858: 2667: 2634:, as the first track on the album is called "The Christmas Reel", otherwise 1507: 1396: 1183: 1168: 1110: 388:, not delete it. Then it was decided to redirect, but not delete, Waterdeep 385: 111:. A reference mention has been added, making the nomination rationale moot. 4429:

You suggested deletion in a similar discussion; does this apply here, too?

437: 288: 5915:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5337:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5177:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5004:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4849:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4654:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4492:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4034:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

3441:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

3208:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

3071:. Not an appropriate XNR, and nothing unique or significant about writing 2909:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

2718:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

2523:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

2381:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1791:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1546:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1283:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1164:

per the IP. Why impede those readers' searches by deleting this redirect?

1003:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

483:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

238:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

87:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

6283:. Private-life pet names and endearments are not encyclopedic material ( 5940: 5879: 5760: 5035: 3932: 3891: 3796: 3133: 2999: 2934: 2552: 2224: 1828: 1741: 1722: 1689: 1486: 1428: 1312: 965: 911: 137: 436:

want to preserve what exists in the page history for improvement of the

6166: 2575: 864: 6372: