1097:
collecting and re-selling purposes. Those are often more commercial. With regard to images in particular, film and television archives often keep these as part of the production records for a particular television show. Television channels and news media organisations regularly contribute to those collections from their own archives (from my
Australian experience) and so a quid-pro-quot arrangement often exists to ensure that those channels (in turn) then have access to other materials kept by those archives. This gives them easier access to footage and images that they might not have themselves. Archives, and often the channels themselves, develop "packages" for older television, movie and music stars so that they have something prepared should that person pass away. This is especially the case where someone has a long-term or terminal illness. But when a personal passes away, those archives will often search their records, pull everything they have relating to that person and make those resources available to various news organisations. So items not previously in the public domain or not otherwise available in advance might suddenly become available. Hope that provides some further insight.
773:
stories feature adversaries (or individuals working at cross purposes) who never physically cross paths, whether that means they are unaware of one-another or utilize intermediaries or some other remote antagonism. In this case, even though Oldman's character, Zorg, never occupies the same room as Willis' (Korbin Dallas, AKA Space John McClane), Zorg nonetheless directs every element of conflict in the plot (though a pawn himself). In fact, the two nearly come face-to-face and only miss doing so by a mater of a few seconds after Oldman's character exits a hallway in one direction even as Bruce Willis enter the scene by exiting an elevator. And this immediately follows the scene, which you must have forgotten, in which Oldman's character shoots
Jovovich's half to death, so he did in fact interact directly with the other protagonist. The primary villain being the head of a vastly powerful and innately dangerous organization who works initially or entirely through lieutenants and other agents is so common to
142:, but historical events don't necessarily fit that structure, so they're altered until they do. Studios will also want there to be a clear hero the audience can identify with, whose motivation is personal and emotional, a villain, a romantic subplot, and a certain amount of suspense, action and excitement - all the things they know audiences respond to. If they can get an explosion or two in there, they will, no matter if it's set in the stone age. They don't want to depict historically accurate attitudes that conflict with modern attitudes - sexism, racism and so on - so they'll give the hero a black friend or add a female character who's as much of a fighter as any of the men, even if they have to invent such a character. Lastly, they'll want a big-name star to play the lead, and stars often demand scripts be changed to make their characters look better and give them more screen time. So the chances of ending up with a historically accurate screenplay at the end of all that are pretty slim. --
790:, so I'd start looking there for your best chance at finding a term and a listing of other examples; though it's by no means a certainty even there and any term found is unlikely to be in common use elsewhere, if you do find one, there will be a list of stories known to employ it. A fair warning, however -- if you have not visited TVtropes previously be prepared for the eventuality that you might end up spending an evening of feverish reading not all that dissimilar to what you might have experienced the first time you utilized Knowledge! At least, that was the similar experience for me. :)
213:?) features such a gunfight. The two people draw, one is shot dead immediately, and slumps over. Nobody does somersaults while dodging bullets and flying through a window, and, once shot, that person doesn't fly backwards 20 feet as if they had been hit by a truck. It's odd to watch it, because it's so different from what we've come to expect from Hollywood. (There are also many other oddities in that movie, from a lack of any close-ups to John Wayne's hat looking more like something the Pilgrims might have worn to the wagon train being dirty, not the spotless ones we see in later films.)
256:. During that they had voice actors read lots of soldiers' and wives' letters, complete with appropriate accents, and displayed photographs from the events. The lack of sound they fixed by adding period music and they created motion by cutting out the foreground of pics and moving it relative to the background. Note that while all this helps to some extent, it's still nowhere near as exciting as the typical Hollywood movie. Such is the price of realism.
663:. She did know both the Mesdames de Winter, of course, but we never see her communicating with the first one, because, as I say, Rebecca's a prehumous character. Then there's Max de Winter, who is more powerful than his second wife (something the early critics failed to pick up on), but was apparently under the thumb from his first. Such a fascinating interplay of character structures. --
621:, Gary Oldman and Bruce Willis' characters never meet or directly interact. Yet they are the antagonist and protagonist. And, if I remember correctly, Mila Jovovich's character never meets Oldman's either. Is there an industry term for this and can you name any other examples of this either in books or movies?
1037:
Also, when a news organization runs one of these photos, they don't need to get an original copy. They all have digital copies on file already (and probably have for decades); they have a license to reproduce them in their publications. That's what publicity photos are for and how they are intended
1011:
which were often mass produced and given to various press agencies to use for promotional purposes. The copyright on these would be owned by the original copyright holder. If you want to know who owns the actual prints; there were hundreds or thousands of these things made. You'll often find racks
880:
TV show? So, back in 1969 (when the show began), someone somewhere had – for example – audition tapes, publicity photographs, scripts, interview notes, props, sets, payroll records, cast lists, and all sorts of material of that nature. Who would "own" all that stuff? Who would "own" it back then?
935:
It would have been owned by the studio where the show was shot; it is unlikely that after nearly 40 years they still kept all that stuff in storage. Some of the stuff may have been since kept as mementos or given out as gifts to people who worked on the show; some may have been repurposed or reused
438:
I think part of their intent was to bring us close to the picture, to get a better sense of the person or place than you can get from seeing just the whole picture at once. Keep in mind that this was well before big-screen TVs were common. As regards the newsreels, you were supposed to say, "Movies
184:
A crucial thing about the real
Gunfight at the O.K. Corral is that the event itself is generally agreed to have lasted only about 30 seconds. That is how gunfights generally are - extremely brief. But that would make for a very poor climax to a film. Long action sequences are currently the fashion,
232:
Dialog is a problem though. It's quite rare that we have enough dialog recorded in diaries and such to make a full movie. So then, that means they either have a lack of dialog, maybe just a narrator explaining the known facts, or they make it up. Also, some words and expressions used then might
119:
Dear
WilliamThweatt. I am a historian and a practitioner of historical martial arts since twenty years. I have never seen a single movie in my entire life which was even a bit historically accurate (the portrayal of the medieval period for example is shockingly bad). I do not think that there is a
781:
at some point (or throughout the film) be completely dependent upon heroic and flashy rescue by the male lead, whether the rescued female lead is altogether helpless in general or outside that context is a "genetically perfect" fighting machine...but I digress. In any event, I expect if you are
591:
The affliction of the video-game age. Short attention span. Our generation was more into stories than non-stop action. The thing about the OK Corral story is not just the gunfight itself, but also the backstory of the characters and the moral ambiguity of most everyone involved. By contrast, it's
1096:
It's not unusual for some of those items to be donated, bequeathed or otherwise gifted to various (often public or non-profit) film and television archives. There are large "prop houses" and "costume houses" that have made a point, over the years, of purchasing props and costumes for archiving,
1016:
is a bunch for sale featuring the aforementioned Ms. Davis. Some of these (probably the cheap ones) are likely reproductions of questionable provenance and legality, but I'm sure some number of these are authentic publicity photos produced by the studio at the time of the show's original run.
580:
episode though). I'm hoping to share this passion with, or maybe even transmit it to, my children. But it seems they can't sit still long enough to read a book that doesn't have either a boy wizard, zombies or a crossbow-wielding teenager in it. I was thinking maybe a good film might spark some
108:
In all the movies I've seen, details are often wrong and some "facts", plot points and characters are complete fabrications. I assume this was to make the movie more interesting but the real-life events seem more than compelling enough to make a great movie. I'm left wondering if, aside from an
772:
I'm afraid I'm not aware of any such term, industry or otherwise, for this specific dramatic archetype, and I'd be surprised to learn one existed, given it's a rather specific scenario unlikely to necessitate a go-to shorthand. At the same time, it's not all that much of a rarity -- plenty of
474:
has the gunfight extraordinarily different from how the real thing went down. Regarding documentaries, several years ago on the
History Channel there was a micro-study of how the gunfight happened, or likely happened based on known facts. This included narration and re-enactors.
1255:(search for "Groucho") remembers the gag somewhat differently, specifying that Groucho's interlocutor was Margaret Dumont. Of course, the brothers may well have repeated the joke in more than one film/context, but I have to admit, it's not ringing any bells with me.
977:, etc. Where do people (TV stations, magazines, newspapers, internet sites, etc.) get these old photographs from? They go and contact the studio (that existed fifty years ago) that owns these photographs? That's what I am not understanding. Thanks.
120:
movie of the gunfight at the O.K. Corral that even comes close to a realistic representation (even most documentaries feature more myths than actual facts). The best thing would be if you could read books and documents that were written by eyewitnesses.--
222:
There are options to make a gunfight last longer on screen, without fictionalizing it. First, there's slow motion, then you can show the gunfight from multiple POV's, in turn. Also, if there's disagreement over the historical facts, you can show each
545:
Thanks for the responses everybody. Makes sense, especially
Nicknack's take on it. I'm a big U.S. history buff, especially the Civil War era and the (historically accurate events of the) Old West. I'm also, probably not coincidentally, a big fan of
301:
Not backlash exactly, but I saw a funny parody of it. I think it was a tampon commercial supposedly made by them, with the same slow panning pics and sad violin music playing as a woman read her letter (about tampons) in a thick
Southern accent.
968:
Thanks. OK, the physical props and sets and such are probably long gone. My main interest is photographs. Here is an example. Since Ann B. Davis died just recently, old photos of her are showing up all over the place. Old photographs from
1013:
419:
They did one of the things that they could. Another thing they could do is present still pictures in the way that we somehow tolerate in other media, rather than go out of their way to remind us with every damn shot that they
1328:
Late in the movie - 1hr 19m - Groucho moves to search Harpo's character, changes his mind, moves instead to search Ilona Massey's character, stops, turns to camera, and says... something dubbed into
Spanish... :)
1320:
After searching on YouTube with various combinations of: ilona massey, marx, groucho, love happy ; the only copy of the scene I've been able to find thus far is in a full copy of the movie, dubbed in
Spanish, at
646:
are. The title character
Rebecca (the first Mrs De Winter) never appears, having died before the book started, and consequently never meets the main active female character, the second Mrs De Winter (the
1311:
in 1950, in which Groucho plays a minor role, he is still making fun of the censors when he is about to search for the Romanoff diamonds in Mme. Egelichi's spectacular cleavage. His hands travel up to
896:
The studio or production company would have been the original owner, and may still be. That company may sell the entire program to a syndicator, but usually they sell just the distribution rights.
66:
45:
59:
55:
51:
1058:
And actually, now that I think about it more, I don't believe news agencies maintain their own photo libraries much anymore either. It's probably all outsourced to companies akin to
185:
but even when they're not, audiences need to be given time to see what's going on, rather than the smoke and confusion of everybody moving and shooting pretty much simultaneously.
921:
I am not really talking about the TV program itself (the 117 episodes). I am talking about all those physical items (props, photos, audition tapes, scripts, etc.). Thanks.
1012:
of them in antique stores, poster shops, used record stores, and places like that. Or you did before the Internet killed those businesses. Now you can find them on E-bay:
525:. At the time it was praised for their attempts at historical accuracy. Ongoing research can mean that "what was accurate then might not be now" so it may be out-of-date.
777:'s films that I honestly can't think of a single exception. The only other plot device that can be said to be more common to his films is that the female lead will
25:
277:
I almost never watch TV, preferring to wait for Netflix, so I don't know: has there been a backlash against the tic of panning/zooming on still photographs? —
1196:. I did some googling and didn't come up with anything. May be a good excuse to pull the DVD off the shelf but it will be a few days before I can get to it.
164:
There is no such thing as a historically accurate movie, period. If you want accuracy you need to read, and be critically selective about what you read too.
85:
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the
657:
character in the book - one of the most maleficent in all literature - is the housekeeper Mrs Danvers, but that doesn't necessarily make her the antagon
470:
was the most accurate portrayal they had seen, especially in terms of capturing the gunfight itself. By contrast, an otherwise really good film called
37:
121:
1356:
1331:
1219:
1150:
839:
737:
600:
479:
443:
390:
21:
936:
in other shows, some may have been sold off to collectors, museums, or the like, and a lot of it was probably just thrown away. --
752:
Depending on what you mean by "meet," IIRC (and as far as my dad can remember, too), Kirk and Khan are never in the same room in
109:
actual documentary, a movie has ever been made that accurately depicts the events surrounding the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral? --
529:
is a link to the OK Corral episode. I haven't seen it in more than 30 years but it may be available on the interwebs somewhere.
905:
753:
1364:
1348:
1339:
1264:
1246:
1223:
1204:
1185:
1158:
1124:
1109:
1077:
1053:
1032:
986:
951:
930:
912:
890:
866:
847:
812:
765:
745:
702:
671:
630:
604:
585:
537:
504:
483:
447:
433:
394:
368:
329:
311:
286:
265:
194:
173:
151:
129:
113:
819:
Another thought - is the original question about fiction only, or does it include productions based on historical events ?
713:
1252:
1120:
982:
926:
908:
886:
551:
526:
853:
Thank you for the responses. I hadn't considered war films/books but you raise a good point about them. And yes,
252:
825:
125:
86:
17:
1360:
1335:
1154:
843:
741:
1166:
1116:
978:
922:
882:
209:
190:
1234:
1192:
761:
560:
147:
1296:
Searching on groucho "If this were a French" returns among the results the following from Google Books:
724:
138:
The problem with historical films is that most mainstream screenplays are written to a formula, the
1243:
1201:
902:
809:
582:
534:
501:
139:
110:
1344:
He says "Si fuera una película francesa, lo haría" (If this were a French film, I would do it). --
550:. I've read much of the contemporary source material and history, including our own terribly long
1345:
1216:
1178:
1070:
1046:
1025:
944:
719:
695:
669:
597:
476:
440:
387:
169:
1228:
Hmm. Groucho isn't onscreen much in that one. I thought it might be the scene with Marilyn but
1062:
or the like who maintain all the photos for use, and the newspaper just gets it from them. --
617:
572:
429:
325:
282:
186:
1099:
864:
757:
628:
566:
466:
366:
356:
307:
261:
143:
520:
1008:
642:
547:
516:
1260:
1239:
1197:
899:
854:
791:
555:
530:
500:, although mostly fiction, was a great film. It ranks among my favorites of all time.--
857:, I've been to TVTropes and agree that it's harder to get out of than quicksand. :)
787:
1171:
1063:
1039:
1018:
937:
831:
688:
680:
664:
648:
439:
weren't invented yet!" and I was going to say "That's why they're hard to find." :) ←
165:
651:
character in the movie). Which of these women is the protagonist? The most antagon
1312:
1059:
425:
350:
321:
278:
1164:
It's been a while since I've last seen it, and I don't remember all the gags, but
233:
not make any sense now, so such dialog would need explaining to a modern audience.
1315:
capacious bosom then stop abruptly: "If this were a French picture I could do it"
1170:
involves the investigation of a theft. You might want to look into that one. --
859:
623:
361:
303:
257:
1322:
1308:
1229:
1211:
774:
204:
386:
They did what they could, as film footage of the Civil War is hard to find. ←
1256:
247:
243:
416:
Oh, did most of the Civil War newsreels rot or something? </sarcasm: -->
74:
835:, the opposing commanders never meet, as they never met in real history...
1300:
The Comic World of the Marx Brothers' Movies: "anything Further Father?"
104:
Gunfight at the O.K. Corral -- Is there an historically accurate movie?
684:
1209:
It doesn't sound familiar. Groucho is a detective in a movie called
1140:
A woman is suspected of... having stolen a secret document or such ?
876:
I don't know much about how the TV industry works. But who "owns"
1238:
is another possibility as it has some spy type shenanigans in it.
782:
going to find a name for this plot mechanism, you will find it at
1292:
I think I may have it... ( well don't give it to me... o_O )
734:, Bond also doesn't meet Kronsteen, the Russian chessmaster. )
79:
Welcome to the Knowledge Entertainment Reference Desk Archives
1130:
Groucho Marx - movie joke about searching a woman suspect....
1148:"You know, if this was a French movie, I'd be allowed to..."
1353:
I think we can safely say this question is solved then... ?
788:
here is their list of identified common themes for villains
1138:
Which Marx Brothers movie contains the following scene:
558:'s (mostly fictional) biography of Wyatt Earp and seen
783:
250:could make a realistic documentary, as they did in
359:. Just in case you needed a name to Google for.
1190:Much of the description also fits the plot of
464:Someone I knew who was a history buff thought
756:, though they do communicate by viewscreen.
8:
1215:which I have never seen. Could that be it? ←
1323:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiaAUeukKQ8
881:And who would "own" it today? Thanks!
1142:Someone suggests: "You should search her"
49:
36:
65:
43:
1146:Groucho turns to the camera and says:
496:is a close as I'll get. And I agree,
7:
576:, among others (wasn't aware of the
355:, that effect is referred to as the
592:hard to see any deeper meaning in
32:
1253:this Snopes message board thread
754:Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
872:Ownership of a television show
636:It's hard to say just exactly
1:
1134:A silly question perhaps. :)
33:
1302:by Maurice Charney - page 19
552:Gunfight at the O.K. Corral
1395:
1307:Even in a late movie like
1365:05:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
611:Pro/Antagonist never meet
519:produced a series titled
1349:17:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
1340:21:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1265:19:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1247:03:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1224:02:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1205:01:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1186:23:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
1159:22:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
1125:19:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
1110:00:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1078:00:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
1054:23:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
1033:23:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
987:21:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
952:21:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
931:21:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
913:20:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
891:20:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
867:07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
848:03:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
813:00:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
766:00:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
746:00:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
703:21:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
687:never actually meet. --
672:20:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
631:19:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
605:20:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
586:19:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
578:Appointment with Destiny
538:17:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
522:Appointment with Destiny
515:Back in the early 1970s
505:19:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
484:15:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
448:20:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
434:19:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
395:19:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
369:19:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
330:19:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
312:18:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
287:18:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
266:14:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
195:11:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
174:11:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
152:10:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
130:09:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
114:06:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Reference desk
1007:Many of these would be
973:, old photographs from
492:Thanks, Bugs. I guess
87:current reference desk
1235:A Night in Casablanca
1232:shows that it isn't.
1193:Duck Soup (1933 film)
975:The Bob Cummings Show
732:From Russia With Love
714:From Russia With Love
561:My Darling Clementine
498:My Darling Clementine
472:My Darling Clementine
725:Ernst Stavro Blofeld
424:move the pictures. —
723:, Bond never meets
140:three-act structure
823:In movies such as
730:( additionally in
38:Entertainment desk
1117:Joseph A. Spadaro
979:Joseph A. Spadaro
923:Joseph A. Spadaro
883:Joseph A. Spadaro
826:Battle Of Britain
727:, aka "Number 1".
640:the tagonists in
618:The Fifth Element
371:
332:
317:
314:
289:
93:
92:
73:
72:
1386:
1181:
1174:
1115:Thanks, all.
1106:
1104:
1073:
1066:
1049:
1042:
1028:
1021:
1009:publicity photos
947:
940:
911:
862:
832:Battle Of Midway
805:
802:
799:
796:
698:
691:
667:
626:
594:The Transformers
467:Tombstone (film)
415:<sarcasm: -->
364:
357:Ken Burns effect
354:
347:
319:
316:
300:
276:
166:Roger (Dodger67)
75:
34:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1179:
1172:
1167:Animal Crackers
1132:
1102:
1100:
1071:
1064:
1047:
1040:
1038:to be used. --
1026:
1019:
971:The Brady Bunch
945:
938:
897:
878:The Brady Bunch
874:
858:
803:
800:
797:
794:
696:
689:
665:
622:
613:
583:William Thweatt
517:David L. Wolper
502:William Thweatt
360:
348:
111:William Thweatt
106:
101:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
1392:
1390:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1354:
1329:
1326:
1318:
1317:
1313:Ilona Massey's
1304:
1303:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1278:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1141:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1113:
1112:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
916:
915:
873:
870:
851:
850:
837:
836:
821:
820:
816:
815:
769:
768:
749:
748:
735:
728:
711:In the movies
708:
707:
706:
705:
675:
674:
612:
609:
608:
607:
556:Stuart N. Lake
543:
542:
541:
540:
510:
509:
508:
507:
487:
486:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
417:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
293:
292:
291:
290:
271:
270:
269:
268:
237:
236:
235:
234:
227:
226:
225:
224:
217:
216:
215:
214:
198:
197:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
157:
156:
155:
154:
133:
132:
122:178.195.94.230
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
81:
71:
70:
64:
48:
41:
40:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1391:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1357:90.244.132.79
1355:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1346:NorwegianBlue
1343:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:90.244.129.56
1330:
1327:
1324:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1310:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1217:Baseball Bugs
1214:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1175:
1169:
1168:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:90.244.129.56
1144:
1136:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1095:
1094:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1067:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1043:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1015:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
953:
950:
949:
948:
941:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
920:
919:
918:
917:
914:
910:
907:
904:
901:
895:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
879:
871:
869:
868:
865:
861:
856:
849:
845:
841:
840:90.244.129.56
838:
834:
833:
828:
827:
822:
818:
817:
814:
811:
808:
807:
806:
789:
785:
780:
776:
771:
770:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
750:
747:
743:
739:
738:90.244.129.56
736:
733:
729:
726:
722:
721:
716:
715:
710:
709:
704:
701:
700:
699:
692:
686:
682:
681:Frodo Baggins
679:
678:
677:
676:
673:
670:
668:
662:
661:
656:
655:
650:
649:Joan Fontaine
645:
644:
639:
635:
634:
633:
632:
629:
625:
620:
619:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:Baseball Bugs
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
584:
579:
575:
574:
569:
568:
563:
562:
557:
554:, as well as
553:
549:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
481:
478:
477:Baseball Bugs
473:
469:
468:
463:
462:
449:
445:
442:
441:Baseball Bugs
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
423:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
396:
392:
389:
388:Baseball Bugs
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
370:
367:
363:
358:
352:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
331:
327:
323:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:The Civil War
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
231:
230:
229:
228:
221:
220:
219:
218:
212:
211:
206:
202:
201:
200:
199:
196:
192:
188:
183:
182:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
118:
117:
116:
115:
112:
103:
98:
96:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
76:
68:
61:
57:
53:
47:
42:
39:
35:
27:
26:Entertainment
23:
19:
1306:
1299:
1277:
1233:
1210:
1191:
1177:
1176:
1165:
1145:
1137:
1133:
1114:
1098:
1069:
1068:
1060:Getty Images
1045:
1044:
1024:
1023:
974:
970:
943:
942:
877:
875:
852:
830:
824:
793:
792:
784:TVTropes.org
778:
731:
718:
712:
694:
693:
659:
658:
653:
652:
641:
637:
616:
614:
593:
577:
571:
565:
559:
544:
521:
497:
493:
471:
465:
421:
251:
208:
187:AlexTiefling
107:
94:
78:
1251:Someone at
758:Ian.thomson
720:Thunderball
581:interest.--
144:Nicknack009
1309:Love Happy
1212:Love Happy
779:inevitably
775:Luc Besson
666:Jack of Oz
573:Wyatt Earp
210:Stagecoach
205:John Wayne
1240:MarnetteD
1198:MarnetteD
900:Michael J
855:Snow Rise
567:Tombstone
531:MarnetteD
494:Tombstone
320:Thanks! —
248:Ken Burns
244:Ric Burns
203:An early
50:<<
548:Westerns
223:version.
24: |
22:Archives
20: |
1220:carrots
643:Rebecca
601:carrots
480:carrots
444:carrots
426:Tamfang
391:carrots
351:Tamfang
322:Tamfang
279:Tamfang
207:movie (
89:pages.
1173:Jayron
1065:Jayron
1041:Jayron
1020:Jayron
939:Jayron
860:Dismas
690:Jayron
685:Sauron
624:Dismas
570:, and
362:Dismas
304:StuRat
258:StuRat
242:I bet
99:June 4
67:June 5
46:June 3
1105:lwart
654:istic
69:: -->
63:: -->
62:: -->
44:<
16:<
1361:talk
1336:talk
1261:talk
1257:Deor
1244:Talk
1230:this
1202:Talk
1155:talk
1121:talk
1014:here
983:talk
927:talk
887:talk
844:talk
829:and
810:talk
762:talk
742:talk
717:and
683:and
535:Talk
527:Here
430:talk
326:talk
308:talk
283:talk
262:talk
246:and
191:talk
170:talk
148:talk
126:talk
56:June
786:--
660:ist
638:who
615:In
596:. ←
422:can
60:Jul
52:May
1363:)
1338:)
1263:)
1242:|
1222:→
1200:|
1180:32
1157:)
1123:)
1101:St
1072:32
1048:32
1027:32
1017:--
985:)
946:32
929:)
898:→
889:)
846:)
764:)
744:)
697:32
603:→
564:,
533:|
482:→
446:→
432:)
393:→
328:)
310:)
285:)
264:)
193:)
172:)
150:)
128:)
58:|
54:|
1359:(
1334:(
1325:.
1259:(
1153:(
1119:(
1103:★
981:(
925:(
909:Ⓜ
906:Ⓒ
903:Ⓣ
885:(
863:|
842:(
804:w
801:o
798:n
795:S
760:(
740:(
627:|
475:←
428:(
365:|
353::
349:@
324:(
306:(
281:(
260:(
189:(
168:(
146:(
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.